South Dakota

Rhoden vetoes ‘misguided’ petition bill, signs off on tougher South Dakota residency law

Published

11 months ago

March 26, 2025

Rhoden vetoes ‘misguided’ petition bill, signs off on tougher South Dakota residency law

Gov. Larry Rhoden issued his second veto while making law a slew of legislation focused on South Dakota’s elections and its citizen-led petition process.

Rhoden on Tuesday signed 20 “election bills” largely aimed at tightening the state’s residency and voting requirements.

The most notorious includes House Bill 1208. According to the bill’s language, people who claim residency at a mail forwarding address or post office “without providing a description of the location of the individual’s habitation” are not considered residents of the state and can only vote in the federal election, if eligible. The bill works in tandem with the standing requirement that prospective voters must live in South Dakota for 30 consecutive days to be considered a resident and able to vote in state elections.

Opponents of the legislation have said the bill unfairly restricts the voting rights of full-time travelers from South Dakota and the state’s homeless population.

“South Dakota continues to be an example of free and fair elections. Our election system has integrity, and these bills improve our already strong system,” Rhoden stated in a Tuesday press release. “America is founded on the principle of freedom, and I am proud that we live in a nation and a state where we can choose our leaders.”

Other bills signed by Rhoden include laws prohibiting and penalizing the use of deepfakes in an election, requiring South Dakota driver’s licenses to indicate citizenship status, and banning people who aren’t registered as in-state voters from circulating petitions on ballot measures.

House Bill 1169, brought by State Rep. Rebecca Reimer, R-Rapid City, was the only one of the batch to receive the governor’s veto brand. The bill would have required groups circulating petitions for South Dakota Constitutional Amendments to obtain no less than 5% of signatures for all 35 legislative districts in the state, based on that district’s total votes in the last gubernatorial election, in order to placed on an election ballot.

The statute as it stands only requires circulators to receive a number of signatures equal to 5% of votes cast in the last gubernatorial election for the whole state.

Rhoden stated in a Tuesday press release that HB 1169 has a “worthy goal” in raising the bar for petitioning for constitutional amendments in the state but could prove a legal problem. He explained in a letter to the State House that if a court determines the proposed law infringes on the ability to engage in free speech, it would undergo “strict scrutiny,” or the highest standard of judicial review.

“I am concerned that this bill will not withstand scrutiny in the courts. This bill attempts to change the South Dakota Constitution in statute, and I believe that approach to be misguided,” Rhoden stated.

The governor’s veto was announced after Voter Defense Association of South Dakota, a group focused on the state’s ballot process, held a Friday press conference in which they and supporters threatened to put the bill through the referendum process.

Matthew Schweich, president of VDA, told the Argus Leader the bill would have hamstrung future citizen ballot initiatives in South Dakota by implementing “the most extreme geographic distribution requirement in the U.S.”

Former State Sen. Reynold Nesiba, a Sioux Falls Democrat, planned to sponsor the referendum petition to reject the legislation.

“It will effectively end the constitutional amendment process initiated by citizens in South Dakota,” Nesiba said. “We have to remember our state motto is, ‘Under God the People Rule.’”

Schweich also challenged the bill from a practicality standpoint by sharing concerns that petition gatherers would need to carry multiple versions of their petitions and clipboards for voters that may not live where they’re encountered. He also said the bill would make South Dakota’s petition process more vulnerable to outside influence, as smaller groups would be unable to financially support a statewide campaign that some out-of-state groups could still afford.

Rhoden echoed this in his letter to the State House.

“The additional burden of collecting signatures from each of the 35 senatorial districts, each on a separate petition sheet, risks creating a system where only those with substantial financial resources can effectively undertake a statewide petition drive. This undermines the bill’s intent by putting South Dakotans at a disadvantage to dark money out-of-state groups,” Rhoden wrote.

Other bills signed by Rhoden on Tuesday include:

SB 68: Requires an individual be a citizen of the United States before being eligible to vote and to provides a penalty therefor.
SB 73: Requires that an individual registering as a voter when applying for a driver’s license be a resident of the state for the purposes of voting.
SB 89: Repeals the requirement that judicial officers be listed on a separate nonpolitical ballot.
SB 91: Revises the requirements for a petition to initiate a measure or constitutional amendment or to refer a law.
SB 92: Requires that the director of the Legislative Research Council and the secretary of state review an initiated measure and determine if the measure embraces more than one subject.
SB 173: Revises the process by which a recount may be requested.
SB 185: Amends provisions pertaining to the process by which the qualifications of a registered voter are verified.
HB 1062: Amends provisions pertaining to the maintenance and publication of the statewide voter registration file.
HB 1066: Revises residency requirements for the purposes of voter registration.
HB 1126: Modifies provisions pertaining to the compensation of a recount board.
HB 1127: Requires that notice of a county’s canvass, post-election audit, and testing of automatic tabulating equipment be posted to the secretary of state’s website.
HB 1130: Provides permissible dates for municipal and school district elections.
HB 1164: Revises the process for nominating candidates for lieutenant governor.
HB 1184: Amends the deadline for filing a petition to initiate a measure or constitutional amendment.
HB 1256: Requires the inclusion of certain information on a candidate’s nominating petition or on a ballot question petition.
HB 1264: Requires the disclosure of an outstanding loan balance on a campaign finance disclosure report.

State House and Senate lawmakers will convene in Pierre on Monday. Both chambers will need a two-thirds majority of legislators to override Rhoden’s veto.

Source link

Click to comment

South Dakota

DOE selects nine school districts for 2026 South Dakota Perkins Reserve grant

Published

5 hours ago

March 5, 2026

Press Room

DOE selects nine school districts for 2026 South Dakota Perkins Reserve grant

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – Nine school districts have been selected as recipients of the 2026 Perkins Reserve Grant by the South Dakota Department of Education.

The grant provides major equipment upgrades for Career and Technical Education programs, helping to equip students with the skills and experiences needed for post-secondary education and the workforce.

“CTE programs are constantly evolving to match the pace of workforce needs,” said Secretary of Education Dr. Joseph Graves.

“The South Dakota Perkins Reserve Grant aids schools in equipping students with current technologies, resources, and tools, offering students a realistic, hands-on learning experience that will strengthen their marketability to colleges or employers once they leave the K-12 education system.”

The following school districts have been named as the 2026 recipients:

Aberdeen School District:
- Awarded $30,233 for new precision machine equipment for the manufacturing program.
De Smet School District:
- Awarded $15,898 for modernizing metal fabrication within agriculture programs.
Lake Preston School District:
- Awarded $43,160 for expansion of program offers in multiple career clusters to strengthen industrial alignment.
McLaughlin School District:
- Awarded $11,997 to purchase equipment to offer a new culinary arts program.
Menno School District:
- Awarded $32,844 to purchase small engines and attend professional development opportunities to enhance the agricultural mechanics program.
Mitchell School District:
- Awarded $38,663 for the modernization of the automotive technology lab.
Timber Lake School District:
- Awarded $42,400 for the expansion of agriculture course offerings to strengthen industry alignment.
Wakpala School District:
- Awarded $40,145 to purchase a skid steer simulator to enhance the agriculture and construction program.
Wolsey-Wessington School District:
- Awarded $26,201 to purchase industry-aligned equipment to enhance the agriculture and construction program.

You can learn more about the South Dakota Perkins Reserve Grant at doe.sd.gov.

Source link

South Dakota

SD Lottery Powerball, Lotto America winning numbers for March 4, 2026

Published

17 hours ago

March 5, 2026

Press Room

The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at March 4, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from March 4 drawing

07-14-42-47-56, Powerball: 06, Power Play: 4

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lotto America numbers from March 4 drawing

33-38-39-47-51, Star Ball: 07, ASB: 02

Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Dakota Cash numbers from March 4 drawing

02-18-22-30-32

Check Dakota Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from March 4 drawing

12-13-36-39-58, Bonus: 03

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize

Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.

When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?

Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.

Source link

South Dakota

South Dakota lawmakers push bill criminalizing deepfakes nearer to governor’s desk

Published

1 day ago

March 4, 2026

Press Room

South Dakota lawmakers push bill criminalizing deepfakes nearer to governor’s desk

John Hult
| South Dakota Searchlight

PIERRE — A bill from South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley to criminalize the creation or sharing of deepfakes was amended this week to more clearly define what constitutes nudity before it reaches Gov. Larry Rhoden’s desk.

The amendment, added on the floor of the House of Representatives, came in response to concerns about unintended consequences.

Senate Bill 41 creates a class of felony crime for the creation or distribution of images digitally altered to depict a person in a state of nudity or involved in a sexually explicit act, commonly referred to as deepfakes.

In testimony in the House Judiciary Committee on Monday in Pierre, Jackley pointed to the case of Mark Rathbun, a former Division of Motor Vehicles employee who is accused of taking images of women and girls from state databases and creating sexual images.“This is real, and it’s something that we unfortunately are seeing happen in our state,” Jackley said.

The judiciary committee voted 8-3 to send the bill to the House floor but not before a discussion on its potential to criminalize political memes.

The bill’s definition of nudity originally encompassed a partial state of nudity. Fort Pierre Republican Rep. Will Mortenson asked Jackley if that would include a fabricated topless photo. Jackley said yes. Then Mortenson asked if a fabricated image of Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker without a shirt, if shared by President Donald Trump on social media, would put the president in line for felony charges.

Jackley said a Pritzker image wouldn’t qualify because Pritzker is male, but Mortenson pushed back.

He noted that partially nude fabrications would be a felony if done with the intent to “self-gratify or alarm, annoy, embarrass, harass, invade the privacy of, threaten, or cause emotional, financial, physical, psychological, or reputational harm to that individual.”

Nothing in the bill specified that a person in a digitally fabricated topless image must be female.

“We just said that half-nude is a state of nudity, and so now he’s shirtless, and the point of this is to embarrass this guy,” Mortenson said of his topless Pritzker meme scenario.

Mortenson voted against the bill in committee but brought an amendment Tuesday to define nudity as inclusive of male or female genitalia, buttocks or the female nipple.

The amendment passed, but it did not address every concern about the bill.

Democratic Rep. Kadyn Wittman of Sioux Falls asked Jackley during the bill’s committee hearing why he didn’t use it to enhance penalties for people who film others in states of undress or participating in sexual activity against their will.

That behavior is a felony if it involves the recording of a minor, or if it happens repeatedly. The new penalties for deepfakes would be added to the same chapter of South Dakota law.

“Why is the first time hidden recording a misdemeanor generally, but a digitally fabricated image would automatically be a classified felony,” said Wittman.

Jackley said he feels that the creation of digitally manipulated sexual images, even if they aren’t shared, signals “significant criminal intent.” He told South Dakota Searchlight after the committee meeting that he’s open to addressing that issue, but that SB 41’s primary purpose was to target deepfakes.

On the House floor, Wittman was one of two representatives to say the bill’s felony penalties could be unnecessarily harsh in instances where young people make “a stupid decision” and create a deepfake.

“I feel like, in a lot of situations, this bill covers behavior that could be covered by a lower level of offense,” Wittman said.

Supporters countered that the creation of fake nudes can do real psychological damage to real people, and that the state needs to clearly signal that doing so is a serious crime.

“It’s only fun and games until it happens to you,” said Rep. Mary Fitzgerald, R-St. Onge.

The bill passed the House 60-6. It now moves to the state Senate, which passed the bill 32-0 on Jan. 16. The Senate would need to approve the amended version of the bill before it could be delivered to Gov. Larry Rhoden to sign or veto.

Source link