Connect with us

South Dakota

Noem’s proposed Social Services, Human Services cuts worry some lawmakers, health advocates • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

Noem’s proposed Social Services, Human Services cuts worry some lawmakers, health advocates • South Dakota Searchlight


Gov. Kristi Noem’s proposed cuts to the state’s Social Services and Human Services departments need scrutiny to make sure they don’t endanger the budget and don’t undermine Medicaid expansion or other programs for South Dakotans in need, some lawmakers and health advocates said.

Noem wants to adjust parts of the departments’ budgets downward by a combined $42 million for the current fiscal year, and also wants to reduce their combined budgets for the next fiscal year by $38 million compared to the budget adopted last winter.

“We’ll right-size funding for programs in the Department of Social Services and Department of Human Services to match utilization,” Noem said in her Dec. 3 budget address. “These programs had been reverting money at the end of the fiscal year over the last several years.”

Over the last two years, the Department of Social Services gave a combined $77 million back to state coffers, primarily due to less-than-anticipated caseloads and utilization of departmental programs, according to the state Bureau of Finance and Management year-end summaries. The state Department of Human Services gave back a combined $30.2 million, primarily within long-term services, which includes programs focused on home services, nursing homes and assisted living for older adults and adults with disabilities.

Advertisement

Economic volatility caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, federal protections during the pandemic that temporarily protected people from losing Medicaid coverage, and voter approval of Medicaid expansion made budget forecasts difficult and may have contributed to the large reversions during the last two years, said Rep. Tony Venhuizen, R-Sioux Falls, who serves on the Legislature’s budget committee.

Lawmakers will begin considering Noem’s budget proposals when they convene Tuesday for their annual legislative session at the Capitol in Pierre.

Medicaid expansion cuts scrutinized

Beyond the overall cuts, Noem is proposing additional, specific reductions in some of the two departments’ programs, including a combined $25 million reduction for current fiscal-year Medicaid enrollments. Medicaid is a joint federal-state health insurance program for low-income adults, children, pregnant women, elderly adults and people with disabilities.

South Dakota voters approved expanded income eligibility for Medicaid in 2022. The Department of Social Services planned and staffed for 57,000 expansion enrollees, but enrollment has been slower than projected. Noem’s budget for the next fiscal year predicts expansion enrollment to reach 32,296. She’s proposing the elimination of 27 state positions due to that slow pace.

Advertisement

That concerns Ben Hanson, North and South Dakota government relations director the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network

“I think it’d be shortsighted to make those cuts right now,” Hanson said. “I think they need to give it a little bit more time to continue.”

Less-than-anticipated enrollment so far could be due to “lack of awareness,” according to Hanson. He said the state has done little to no advertising about Medicaid expansion, instead relying on hospitals or advocacy organizations to connect patients. The state Department of Social Services has also received criticism from some lawmakers about a lack of outreach and advertising.

The Community HealthCare Association of the Dakotas works to guide potential enrollees through the process, in addition to its advocacy and policy work. Shelly Ten Napel, the association’s CEO, said “it would be a great thing” for the state to invest in an enrollment marketing campaign — especially targeted at young adults. One of the most uninsured demographics in South Dakota and the nation are adults aged 19-26. 

But Ten Napel is withholding judgment on Noem’s proposed cuts. With today’s technology, Medicaid departments may not need as many employees to enroll patients as they once did, Ten Napel said.

Advertisement

She’d like to see the Department of Social Services work toward proactive enrollment steps: simplifying the application, automatically enrolling eligible South Dakotans if they use other income-based programs, and using continuous eligibility for patients, which allows Medicaid recipients to stay enrolled for a set amount of time even if their income changes. 

“We want a larger conversation about how to make this process more efficient for the state and easier for consumers,” Ten Napel said.

The department has indicated it hopes to connect eligible patients when they seek other help from the department. Over two-thirds of South Dakotans eligible for expanded Medicaid are also eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. The department launched its online enrollment portal, meant to make it easier to apply for programs, last spring.

Legislators debate spending

Despite the slow expansion enrollment, the state’s share of Medicaid expenses is growing. That’s due to expiring federal bonus payments awarded for the eligibility expansion, and due to a federal formula that raises the state’s share of costs in accordance with increases in the state’s per capita income. Noem said her proposed budget includes about $60 million in mandatory ongoing spending increases for the state’s share of Medicaid.

Venhuizen wants to make sure Noem’s proposed cuts don’t underestimate Medicaid costs.

Advertisement
Rep. Tony Venhuizen, R-Sioux Falls, speaks on the state House floor on Feb. 7, 2024. (Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight)

The state typically estimates the costs “very conservatively,” leading to reversions and surpluses most years, he said. If Noem estimates too aggressively, it could land the departments in a deficit.

“You want to have a surplus. You want to have a reversion,” Venhuizen said. “In a perfect world, we would end right on the money. But that’s not possible, so the next best thing is to be conservative and end up in the black.”

Venhuizen also plans to propose a state constitutional amendment this year alongside Sen. Casey Crabtree, R-Madison, that would allow the Legislature to eliminate Medicaid expansion if the federal government ever reneges on its promise to cover 90% of the expansion costs. 

If the Legislature approves the amendment, it would go to voters in 2026. Voters already approved a Venhuizen-backed amendment last year that will allow legislators to consider imposing work requirements on Medicaid expansion enrollees. 

Sioux Falls Democratic Rep. Linda Duba, whose service will end this month because she did not seek reelection, said it’s “irresponsible” to cut funding for social and human services while proposing new spending in other areas. 

Advertisement

Noem’s new spending proposals include $4 million to create education savings accounts that would provide public funds for private school tuition or other alternative instruction costs, and $182 million to continue saving money for the replacement of the aging penitentiary in Sioux Falls with a new prison south of the city.

“You want to grow government over here but you want to cut it over here,” Duba said.

Venhuizen said the cuts proposed by Noem essentially reallocate money back into Medicaid to cover the state’s rising costs.

“Every dollar you spend, you have to find a dollar somewhere else,” he said.

Other notable social and human services cuts proposed

In addition to utilization and Medicaid cuts, Noem proposed other notable cuts to the state Social Services and Human Services departments, including:

Advertisement

TANF: Noem proposed cutting the state’s spending for Temporary Aid for Needy Families (TANF) by $5.3 million. The program in South Dakota is most commonly used to provide financial benefits to low-income families with the stipulation that they search or train for a job. 

Lawmakers allocated $12 million toward the program last fiscal year, which is more than the minimum federal match needed to continue the program. Duba suspects Noem plans to pull money from the state’s carryover TANF balance, which currently holds $23 million of unused TANF funds, while funding the program at the minimum of $8.54 million to receive a federal match. If money is taken from unused TANF funding, Duba hopes it could go toward other programs “in dire need,” such as assistance for victims of crime.

Indigent medication program: Noem proposed eliminating the indigent medication program, which financially supports South Dakotans to treat mental illness and substance use disorders who don’t have any means to pay for it. The program cost increased from about $500,000 in 2015 to $1 million in 2024, despite serving roughly the same number of people — about 1,360 a year, according to a records request from the Department of Social Services.

Pam VanMeeteren, a nurse practitioner with the Lewis and Clark Behavioral Health Services in Yankton, said the program provides up to two months of medication for an individual during which the patient works to establish another payment source, such as Medicaid. The clinic doesn’t use the program often, but its elimination could be a concern “in some cases,” she added.

“I think there’s always some immediacy to get someone back on their psychiatrist medication,” VanMeeteren said. “To wait two to three weeks to get an application in for another program to cover the cost or get something transferred over, we may miss our window.”

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement

South Dakota

Trading property tax for sales tax: Legislature moves forward with parts of homeowner relief package

Published

on

Trading property tax for sales tax: Legislature moves forward with parts of homeowner relief package


PIERRE — Two pieces of a property tax reduction package prepared by South Dakota’s legislative leadership and the executive branch are moving forward, but one bill failed during votes on Monday as lawmakers began the final week of the annual legislative session.

The House of Representatives voted

42-27

in support of

Advertisement

Senate Bill 245

, which would pull future revenue from a scheduled sales tax increase from 4.2% to 4.5% next year into a relief fund for homeowner property taxes, and use nearly $56 million in one-time money to seed the fund before the sales tax increase.

The Senate supported

House Bill 1323

, which would reduce the number of petition signatures needed to force an election on a local government’s decision to levy property taxes beyond limits set by the state. The Senate passed the bill 19-15.

Advertisement

Both bills have to return to the opposite chamber for consideration of amendments.

The Senate rejected

House Bill 1253

, which would cap annual assessment growth for owner-occupied homes and commercial properties at 5% annually and reset assessments back to market value every five years. The bill failed with a 9-24 vote.

The bills are part of a broader,

Advertisement

five-bill legislative package

targeted at property tax relief.

Another bill

in the package, which would allow counties to implement a half-percent sales tax with proceeds going to homeowner property tax credits, is awaiting the governor’s signature after he proposed it and it received both chambers’ approval.

The legislative budget committee is scheduled to consider a fifth piece of legislation in the package on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The bill

would reduce maximum property tax levies for school districts.

Sales tax bill overcomes concerns about future budget needs

SB 245 would capture revenue from the impending sales tax increase to deposit into a “homeowner property tax reduction fund” meant to reduce property taxes levied by school districts. The Legislature and then-Gov. Kristi Noem reduced the state sales tax rate three years ago but scheduled the reduction to sunset in 2027.

House Speaker Jon Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, told lawmakers on Monday that the bill would be an “investment in the people,” because it’ll give South Dakota homeowners more money to spend as they choose. Hansen, the bill’s sponsor and a candidate for governor, said that would lead to more spending and, therefore, more sales tax revenue. The state relies on sales taxes, while counties and schools rely on property taxes, and cities receive revenue from property taxes and sales taxes.

Advertisement

Some opponents said the legislation would favor wealthier, property-owning South Dakotans rather than lower-income renters.

Rep. Mike Weisgram, R-Fort Pierre, speaks on the House floor at the Capitol in Pierre on March 9, 2026.

(Photo by Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight)

Rep. Mike Weisgram, R-Fort Pierre, worried that automatically diverting future state revenue to reduce homeowner property taxes would come at the cost of other priorities, such as annual funding increases for state employees, Medicaid providers and public schools — which are known as the “big three” budget priorities. Lawmakers often

aim

Advertisement

to increase funding for the groups by 3% or inflation, whichever is less. An inflationary increase this legislative session would be 2.5%, according to the state Department of Education.

“We are just clawing to get 1.4% for the big three,” Weisgram said. “I don’t think any of us are proud of that.”

Hansen said the decision “is not an either-or” situation.

“We can help the property taxpayers in the state who desperately, desperately need it,” Hansen said, “and then I trust fully that this state is going to continue to grow and that we are going to be able to meet the needs of our core obligations of this state.”

The bill was introduced as an amendment to placeholder legislation last week, and it will head to the Senate for approval. The Senate narrowly rejected a

Advertisement

similar proposal

earlier this legislative session.

Senate approves lower signature threshold to force election on excess taxes

The version of House Bill 1323 that passed the Senate would set the number of petition signatures needed to force an election on an excess tax levy (often called an “opt-out”) for a local government at 2,500 or 5% of registered voters within its jurisdiction, whichever is less. The current threshold to refer decisions by a local government is 5% of registered voters in the district, without a 2,500 signature cap.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Taffy Howard, R-Rapid City, said it will still be difficult to refer decisions by a local government to voters.

Advertisement

“You’re talking dozens and dozens of volunteers, weeks of organized effort,” Howard said. “There’s not a lot of people that have been through that and can even organize that kind of effort. So it’s not a trivial bar.”

Because the bill was amended since it last appeared in the House, it’ll now go to the House for approval.

HB 1253 intended to provide South Dakota homeowners and commercial property owners predictable increases in their property assessments, which factor into property taxes they pay, over five year periods.

But opponents said the change would shift the property tax burden onto farmers and ranchers and surprise homeowners every five years when assessments would be re-based on market value, which could lead to double-digit increases in assessments.

This story was originally published on

Advertisement

SouthDakotaSearchlight.com.

______________________________________________________

This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

Political Pulse: South Dakota Senate Majority Leader Jim Mehlhaff on data centers, property taxes and more

Published

on

Political Pulse: South Dakota Senate Majority Leader Jim Mehlhaff on data centers, property taxes and more


RAPID CITY, S.D. (KOTA) – State Senate Majority Leader Jim Mehlhaff joined Political Pulse over the weekend.

Mehlhaff weighed in on property tax proposals, data centers, and effort to repeal the death penalty and speculation that Kristi Noem could run for Senate.

The interviewed was taped on Saturday.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Advertisement

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

These 15 South Dakota counties will see DUI checkpoints this month

Published

on

These 15 South Dakota counties will see DUI checkpoints this month



The monthly law enforcement effort helps to reduce alcohol-related deaths on the road.

play

The South Dakota Department of Public Safety is raising awareness this month on the dangers of drinking and driving.

Sobriety checkpoints take place statewide every month, usually hitting about 15 counties, in hopes of reminding motorists to “make responsible choices and avoid driving after drinking alcohol, whether or not a checkpoint is planned in their area,” says DPS communications director Brad Reiners.

DPS also announces ahead of time which counties will be monitored, most often Codington, Lincoln, Meade, Minnehaha and Pennington counties.

What is a sobriety checkpoint?

A sobriety checkpoint is a law enforcement effort that stops vehicles at pre-determined locations to identify and arrest impaired drivers as necessary.

Advertisement

These police stops are not based on unrelated violations of the law (ie., speeding, reckless driving, no seatbelt). Rather, officers are stopping any vehicle in a set pattern in a highly visible location that a driver will approach and must comply with.

Beyond arrests for driving under the influence (DUIs), including breathalyzer tests (PBTs) to determine blood alcohol level (BAC) as needed, the systematic effort is designed to “reduce impaired driving and improve roadway safety,” Reiners said.

South Dakota counties where checkpoints will take place in March include:

  • Beadle
  • Brookings
  • Brown
  • Clay
  • Codington
  • Day
  • Hughes
  • Hutchinson
  • Jones
  • Lawrence
  • Lincoln
  • Lyman
  • Meade
  • Minnehaha
  • Pennington

How many sobriety checkpoints took place in Minnehaha County in 2025?

Other than confirming counties ahead of time, Reiners says time, day and exact location of each checkpoint cannot be confirmed.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at totals from sobriety checkpoints in Minnehaha County in 2025.

Reiners says the number of vehicle stops is merely based on how many happen to drive through a checkpoint that day:

  • January: 30 vehicles stopped, 3 PBTs, no DUI arrests
  • February: 18 vehicles stopped, 1 PBT, no DUI arrests
  • March: 150 vehicles stopped, 9 PBTs, no DUI arrests
  • August: 49 vehicles stopped, 1 PBT, no DUI arrests
  • September: 105 vehicles stopped, 14 PBTs, no DUI arrests
  • November: 63 vehicles stopped, 2 PBTs, 2 DUI arrests

How many fatal, alcohol-related car accidents are there in South Dakota?

According to the South Dakota Department of Health, among 365 alcohol-related deaths in 2024, 19% were because of a transportation/machinery accident, the second-most common cause.

The leading cause of alcohol-related deaths in 2024 was poisoning/toxic effects, at 24%.

Counties that most often experience overall alcohol-related deaths include Buffalo, Mellette, Corson, Oglala Lakota and Dewey counties.

Overall, males make up 65% of alcohol-related deaths in South Dakota from 2015-2024, almost two times higher than the female rate, with ages 30-69 at the highest risk.

Advertisement

Operation: Prairie Thunder not involved in sobriety checkpoints

DPS officials say the S.D. Office of Highway Patrol, the South Dakota Highway Patrol (SDHP) and local law enforcement agencies support DUI checkpoints, which are funded by the South Dakota Office of Highway Safety (SDHS).

Although Operation: Prairie Thunder (OPT) recently completed its 11th saturation patrol in Watertown on Feb. 26-27 – missions that bring together the SDHP with the city, county and federal law enforcement partners – SDHS officials stated last week that “sobriety checkpoints are not conducted as part of Operation: Prairie Thunder.”

Rather, OPT consists of targeted saturation patrols focused on criminal activity in a variety of communities.

Since its inception in August of last year, here’s a look at where total numbers stand for OPT, provided by the DPS.

Advertisement

Ongoing Operation: Prairie Thunder running totals

  • 443 arrests
  • 281 individuals in custody with a drug charge
  • 162 in custody without a drug charge
  • 473 individuals with a drug charge
  • 192 charged and released

Operation: Prairie Thunder criminal drug apprehension totals

  • 1,109 drug charges
  • 318 felony drug charges
  • 791 misdemeanor drug charges
  • 81 felony warrants
  • 168 misdemeanor warrants

Operation: Prairie Thunder ICE contacts

  • 93 contacted
  • 95 interviewed
  • 71 in custody
  • 9 apprehended for cartel / gang
  • 10 identified for cartel / gang
  • No human trafficking arrests
  • No recoveries

Operation: Prairie Thunder traffic enforcement

  • 42 DUIs
  • 5 reckless driving
  • 2,244 citations
  • 2,725 warnings

The South Dakota governor’s office announced last December that operations will continue into 2026.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending