Connect with us

South Dakota

Move into South Dakota bunker backfires on family seeking a new life

Published

on

Move into South Dakota bunker backfires on family seeking a new life


EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the second part of a series featuring the Black Hills Army Depot munitions storage facility developed in 2016 into the Vivos xPoint bunker complex that is now a residential community.

Read the first part here.

IGLOO, S.D. — David Streeter thought abandoning his traditional life to relocate into a survival bunker in South Dakota would allow his family to retreat from the stresses, expenses and restrictions of the modern world.

The family of three also wanted to be prepared in case an apocalypse of some kind altered the course of mankind and threatened their lives and way of life.

Advertisement

But 18 months after leasing a former Army munitions bunker in the Vivos xPoint residential complex south of Edgemont, the Streeters have had their dreams shattered. And they now find themselves embroiled in a situation that has brought on a level of upheaval, worry and danger they specifically sought to avoid.

“It’s been nothing but a nightmare,” Streeter, 51, said during an interview. “We just wanted to get away from the rat race and live peacefully, but obviously that hasn’t happened.”

In August, Streeter – an Army veteran who was injured while serving in Bosnia – shot a Vivos contract employee at close range. Streeter said the man had threatened his family and he was defending himself. No charges were filed in that case or another fatal shooting involving Streeter in Montana in 2010.

Streeter’s daughter witnessed and videotaped the shooting while his 12-year-old daughter was calling 9-1-1 for help. His younger daughter now sometimes cries in her sleep, Streeter said.

Streeter and his wife, Katja, a nurse who works in Hot Springs, were evicted from their bunker and are living in cramped quarters with nine other adults and children in a home with only one shower not far from the Vivos complex.

Advertisement

Streeter and his wife are the plaintiffs or defendants in a handful of lawsuits related to their eviction, the shooting, a protection order request against him and small claims cases.

For now, the Streeters have lost the money paid to lease and build out the Vivos bunker, a tab Streeter estimates is around $300,00. They’ve also spent about $15,000 in legal fees to file or fight several lawsuits.

Chris Yellow Thunder, left, stands with David Streeter outside Streeter’s bunker in the Vivos xPoint bunker complex, shown Oct. 4, 2024 near Igloo, S.D.

(Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

Advertisement

Streeter said that even after moving out of Vivos, the on-site subcontractor he shot – a convicted felon known to carry guns – frequently parks outside or drives by the house where they now live.

Streeter said he also has been interviewed twice by agents of the FBI, which former Vivos residents say has launched an investigation in the bunker complex and its owner.

The stress of protecting his family, battling for his legal rights, maintaining financial solvency and trying to retain a sense of normalcy has led Streeter to make late-night calls to a veterans’ mental health hotline on four occasions, he said.

“I find myself in a situation where I have to constantly defend my family, and it should never have been that way,” said Streeter, who carries a handgun at all times.

Bunker complex a source of resident unrest

Advertisement

Streeter is not alone in his stress and disappointment on how things have turned out at the bunker complex, but he has become a lightning rod in the effort to hold the owners accountable and push for positive change.

The Vivos xPoint survivalist community was developed in 2016 on the site of the former Black Hills Army Depot munitions storage facility. More than 500 above-ground concrete bunkers are marketed for lease to those who are worried about a potential national or global disaster or who want to live mostly off-the-grid. It’s located in a remote area 8 miles south of Edgemont in southwestern South Dakota.

The concrete bunkers, which look like earthen igloos, held military conventional and chemical munitions from 1942 to 1967. The town of Igloo grew up around the depot and was once home a young Tom Brokaw, a South Dakota native and former NBC anchor. The base and town are now abandoned.

A four-month

News Watch investigation

Advertisement

recently revealed that the Vivos complex has been the subject of at least 16 lawsuits or legal filings, five complaints to the South Dakota Attorney General’s Office, and is now part of an inquiry by the FBI.

Vivos is owned and managed by California businessman Robert K. Vicino, who told News Watch in an interview that the complex is largely peaceful, well-maintained and has been a financial success.

Vicino also denied allegations of financial impropriety, breaking of contractual obligations or retaliation against people who complained in legal or state documents. He said any unrest present at Vivos is being perpetuated by a small group of disgruntled residents and “bad apples,” including Streeter.

2024-10-4-Bunker-solar-wide-shot-1.JPG

A bunker being used as a residence, in foreground, is part of the Vivos xPoint bunker complex, shown Oct. 4, 2024, near Igloo, S.D.

Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch

Advertisement

In mid-2023, Streeter sold his home in Montana and leased a bunker at Vivos xPoint to get away from the modern world and test his mettle at building a home inside the bunker and successfully living off the grid.

The relatively low lease cost and monthly and annual fees, when compared to the cost of a traditional home and property taxes, would also allow Streeter and his family to travel internationally, he said.

After living for a time in a camper outside, he eventually moved himself, his wife and his daughter into the bunker. Later, he built out the bunker with a sub-floor, walls, and a kitchen, bathroom and TV rooms.

However, it wasn’t long after that problems arose and his expectation of a peaceful life on the South Dakota prairie was shattered.

Advertisement

Streeter’s complaints rejected by Vivos

Streeter began to contact Vivos management with complaints that his septic system at the bunker wasn’t functional and that the tires on his truck had been destroyed by nails and railroad spikes mixed within the road gravel.

In email communications with Vicino, Streeter asked to be compensated for the ruined tires and to have Vivos pay to get the septic system fixed. Streeter also made extensive allegations about how Vivos was being run, how resident money was being spent, and warned that he would file in small claims court to be paid if a financial arrangement could not be made.

In an email correspondence from March 30, reviewed by News Watch, Vicino rejected Streeter’s claims that Vivos was responsible for tire or septic system damages.

“So now you are threatening extortion and tort,” Vicino wrote, warning that “I think you are going down the rabbit hole.”

Advertisement

In April, Streeter filed two small claims cases against Vivos xPoint, both of which are pending.

A near-fatal shooting, but no charges filed

After that, Streeter said, Vivos’ on-site contract employees began to frequently drive by his home, sometimes fast and sometimes slowly, give him the middle finger or take pictures or videos of him, his bunker and his family.

Streeter said Vivos contract employee Shear “J.R.” Rodriguez ran him and his wife off the roadway several times within the Vivos complex. Even though Streeter complained to management and law enforcement, he said the dangerous behavior continued. Streeter said a Fall River Sheriff’s Office lieutenant told him that officers could not respond because the Vivos complex was on private property.

In August, Streeter said his concerns intensified when his adult daughter and young grandchildren moved onto his bunker property.

Advertisement

2024-10-4 David Streeter hugging dog.JPG

David Streeter kisses a puppy outside a friend’s bunker in the Vivos xPoint complex on Oct. 4, 2024 near Igloo, S.D.

(Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

On Aug. 23, Streeter said Rodriguez drove at high speeds past Streeter’s bunker. Streeter said he tracked down Rodriguez, pulled him over and reached into his truck and grabbed him by the shirt, warning him to stay away from his family.

A while later, Vivos contract employee Kelly Anderson drove up to Streeter’s bunker on a Caterpillar track loader, which the manufacturer indicates weighs up to 9,000 pounds and has a top speed of 7 mph.

Advertisement

Streeter said Anderson began to threaten Streeter, who pulled his handgun and pointed it at Anderson.

At one point, Streeter said Anderson lunged toward him, and Streeter filed a single shot, striking Anderson in the chest. A few moments later, Streeter, a former emergency medical technician, left his yard and began to provide aid to Anderson.

Streeter and another man who arrived on the scene, Chris Yellow Thunder, loaded Anderson into a truck and drove him off the bunker property, where they were met by an ambulance and authorities.

Prior to arriving at Streeter’s property, Anderson sent text messages to Yellow Thunder, who is an acquaintance of both Anderson and Streeter, that he was heading to Streeter’s bunker to confront him.

In the text message, viewed by News Watch, Anderson stated: “I’m about to f— his ass up” and “What he did isn’t right and I’m gonna educate this mother f———.”

Advertisement

Months later, according to Fall River State’s Attorney Lance Russell, a grand jury heard testimony and reviewed evidence in the case and decided not to charge Streeter with a crime related to the shooting. Streeter was charged with one count of simple assault for the earlier confrontation with Rodriguez, according to court documents.

Rodriguez could not be reached for comment. Anderson did not return a message left on his voicemail.

Streeter was evicted from his bunker and is being sued in civil court for damages by Anderson, who did not return a call seeking comment. A court overturned the eviction, but Streeter is still unable to legally enter Vivos due to a separate legal filing.

“Vivos promises to do all this vetting, but why do you then hire a known felon who carries guns to work down here?” Streeter said.

Vicino told News Watch that he hopes the state attorney general’s office, despite the grand jury ruling, will eventually charge Streeter with attempted murder.

Advertisement

“There’s no vendetta here, and we had no bone to pick with this guy,” Vicino said. “He has a temperament issue, and that was an egregious act.”

Streeter’s attorney, J. Scott James of Custer, said the relationship between Streeter and Vivos, and the on-site subcontractors, has left Streeter in an almost untenable situation.

“I think Mr. Streeter came here with a lot of hope about how his life would be when he got here, and I think that he’s been frustrated and disappointed by the way his interactions with Vivos have gone, and that he certainly didn’t expect to be in the middle of a shooting match with a (Vivos) employee,” James said. “He didn’t expect to be fearful for his safety and his life at all times, and has to basically guard himself 24 hours a day to keep everything from being taken from him.”

Streeter, by nature, is not one to back away from a fight. He grew up on a ranch in Montana, and his military service in Bosnia and his later work as a federal prison correctional officer, law enforcement officer and certified emergency medical technician are all roles that require some fortitude.

Streeter is also no stranger to using violence to protect his loved ones. In 2010, he was called to his mother’s home to break up a violent fight between her and Streeter’s stepfather. When his stepfather emerged with a loaded shotgun, Streeter shot and killed him. No charges were filed in that case, according to

Advertisement

local press accounts

.

When Streeter was evicted, his friend Yellow Thunder immediately opened his home to Streeter, his wife and daughter as well as Streeter’s adult daughter and her four children. The home is one of a handful in the former town of Igloo and sits a mile or so from the entrance to Vivos xPoint.

“I don’t trust easy, but Dave and I hit it off the second we met,” Yellow Thunder told News Watch. “So when they needed a place to stay, it was never a question that they would come in here, and in fact, I would have been offended if they had gone to a hotel or anywhere else to live.”

Streeter said he is angry over how he and other Vivos residents have been treated. But he is also disappointed that formal complaints made by him and other Vivos residents to the Fall River County Sheriff’s Office and the state attorney general’s office of consumer affairs have not led to substantive investigations or action.

Advertisement

“It’s like they think, ‘If we don’t see any problems, they’re not there,’” Streeter said. “All we need is for someone to take an interest and do something. All of this has happened down here, and I’ve reported it to every entity I can find, everybody that should have authority over it, and nothing has been done to help me or all these other people being hurt down here.”

Fall River County Sheriff Lyle Norton did not return calls seeking comment, and attorney general’s office spokesman Tony Mangan said there is no ongoing AG investigation into Vivos.

Meanwhile, Streeter said he is waiting for lawsuits he has filed or those filed against him to be resolved before making any plans for the future.

“I don’t like to run from things, and I’m tired of giving in to all this bulls—,” Streeter said. “My wife and my daughter have asked me not to go back down there to Vivos, but what do we do? I’ve got $300,000 into that (bunker), and we’re not a rich family. We put all of our savings into building a home there.”

— This story was first published on southdakotanewswatch.org.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South Dakota

South Dakota regulator back on Summit case

Published

on

South Dakota regulator back on Summit case


She cited conflict in 2022 but returns without explanation

South Dakota Public Utilities Commissioner Kristie Fiegen participates in an election forum on Sept. 19, 2024, at Dakota Wesleyan University in Mitchell. (Joshua Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight)

A trust controlled by a South Dakota regulator’s relatives still owns land along a proposed carbon dioxide pipeline route, but the regulator has not recused herself from the project’s second permit application in the state after recusing herself from the first one.

Advertisement

Two years ago, South Dakota Public Utilities Commissioner Kristie Fiegen disqualified herself from Iowa-based Summit Carbon Solutions’ first CO2 pipeline application. She cited state law prohibiting commissioners from participating in hearings or proceedings when they have a conflict of interest.

Fiegen wrote a recusal letter in February 2022 that said the pipeline “would cross land owned by my sister-in-law (my husband’s sister) and her husband.” South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem assigned State Treasurer Josh Haeder to fill in for Fiegen.

In September 2023, Haeder and the other two commissioners rejected Summit’s initial application in South Dakota, citing the route’s conflicts with several county ordinances that mandate minimum distances between pipelines and existing features.

Summit reapplied in November 2024 with an adjusted route. Fiegen has not filed a recusal letter in the new application docket, and she participated in a procedural hearing about the application Dec. 17.

Fiegen did not respond to questions from South Dakota Searchlight about her participation in the new docket.

Advertisement

Public Utilities Commission spokesperson Leah Mohr said “ex parte” rules bar Fiegen from discussing the matter. Those rules prohibit direct communication with commissioners about dockets they’re considering. Mohr also declined to discuss the matter, and declined to discuss how conflicts of interest are defined for commissioners.

The Attorney General’s Office declined to say whether Fiegen’s participation complies with state law, or whether she sought the office’s legal advice.

Defining a conflict of interest

The chapter of state law Fiegen cited in her 2022 recusal is specific to public utilities commissioners, and it leaves conflicts of interest undefined. It says “if a commissioner determines” the commissioner has a conflict, the commissioner should file a recusal letter.

A 2016 law required the South Dakota Board of Internal Control to create a conflict-of-interest policy for use by state agencies.

Advertisement

The policy says officials involved in quasi-judicial actions such as reviewing a permit application must be “disinterested and free from actual bias or an unacceptable risk of actual bias” and must abstain if “a reasonably-minded person could conclude” they are not impartial.

Land owned by Fiegen’s relatives

The $9 billion Summit pipeline would span five states — including Iowa — and transport some of the CO2 captured from the production processes at 57 ethanol plants to underground injection sites in North Dakota. The project would capitalize on federal tax credits that incentivize the prevention of heat-trapping carbon emissions.

The originally proposed pipeline route in South Dakota would have crossed three parcels of land in Minnehaha County owned by Fiegen’s sister-in-law, Jean Fiegen-Ordal, and Fiegen-Ordal’s husband, Jeffrey Ordal, plus another three parcels of land in McCook County owned by the Jeffrey A. Ordal Living Trust, for which the couple serves as trustees.

Summit said it paid $175,000 in total compensation for easements and future crop damages on the land owned by the Ordals or their trust. An easement is an agreement granting access to land.

Summit said $88,000 of the money went to the Ordals. The company did not disclose further details, but public records show the Ordals completed a sale of their Minnehaha County land several months after signing the easement documents in 2022.

Advertisement

The new pipeline route would cross the same parcels of land: the Minnehaha County land that Fiegen’s relatives no longer own, and the McCook County land that the Ordal trust still owns.

This article first appeared in the South Dakota Searchlight.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

State senator aims to prevent possibility of sanctuary cities in South Dakota

Published

on

State senator aims to prevent possibility of sanctuary cities in South Dakota


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – South Dakota’s legislative research council has posted over twenty bills filed for the 2025 legislative session.

One of these bills focuses on getting ahead on immigration policy in the state.

Senate Bill 7 aims to proactively snuff out any sanctuary city policies in the state of South Dakota.

Currently South Dakota does not have any cities that are considered sanctuary cities, nor has there been a notable attempt to establish one.

Advertisement

“South Dakota is not a sanctuary state, and we shouldn’t have sanctuary cities inside South Dakota when it comes to immigration policies,” Sen. Casey Crabtree (R) Madison said.

This means that South Dakota local law enforcement must comply with all federal immigration laws and cooperate with federal immigration authorities when requested.

Senator Casey Crabtree, the prime sponsor of this bill says it’s designed to fall in line with President Elect Donald Trump’s immigration policies

“This bill makes sure we are in line with what they are trying to do as we secure our southern borders and make our communities safe,” Crabtree said.

South Dakota would join over a dozen states, including neighboring states Montana and Iowa, that have banned sanctuary city policies from their state.

Advertisement

“It’s about making sure we are keeping our communities safe overall…and we want to make sure we don’t have issues with this as we go into the next four years,” Crabtree insisted.

Crabtree says he expects many of his republican colleagues to join him in his effort to pass this bill.

So far, the bill already has 11 other lawmakers that have attached their names as a sponsor.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

Rapid City Police investigating two new gunfire incidents

Published

on

Rapid City Police investigating two new gunfire incidents


RAPID CITY, S.D. — For the second time in less than a week, Rapid City Police detectives are investigating confirmed incidents of gunfire in the city with confirmed property damage, but no injuries. The two most recent incidents both happened during the predawn hours of New Year’s Day. Detectives are asking for help from residents in the area.
The first incident happened shortly before 2:00 a.m. Patrol officers in the 300 block of Curtis Street heard gunshots and tracked them to the area of Haines Avenue and Van Buren Street. They spoke to a witness who said two male subjects began firing a pistol before continuing on foot down Van Buren Street. Investigators found several shell casings in the area, as well as damage to the tire of a vehicle parked along the street.
The second incident happened about an hour and a half later near the same intersection. The person who called in the report told officers that they had been driving on Haines Avenue when they saw two males crossing the road. The witness said the two then turned, fired several shots at the vehicle, and ran eastbound on Van Buren Street. Officers noted several bullet holes in the vehicle. the witness described the two assailants as short, juvenile Native American males. One was described as wearing a black sweater and dark pants. The other was wearing a gray sweater.
Fortunately, no one was injured in either incident.
Detectives are investigating both incidents, identifying and interviewing witnesses and working to find video from the area. They ask that homeowners with security or door bell cameras review their video for any suspicious activities involving two youth matching the witness description. Because of the proximity in both time and location, detectives are also trying to determine if the two incidents are related.
The New Year’s Eve night incidents follow a

similar random gunfire incident

Friday night. RCPD Chief Don Hedrick

announced late Tuesday evening

Advertisement

that three suspects — two male adults and one male juvenile — had been taken into custody in that incident.
Rapid City Police say they are giving the two newest incidents their highest priority and are using “every appropriate investigative resource.”
Anyone with video or any other information about either incident is asked to contact police at (605) 394-4131, or send an anonymous tip by texting the letters “RCPD” and the information to 847411.

Our newsroom occasionally reports stories under a byline of “staff.” Often, the “staff” byline is used when rewriting basic news briefs that originate from official sources, such as a city press release about a road closure, and which require little or no reporting. At times, this byline is used when a news story includes numerous authors or when the story is formed by aggregating previously reported news from various sources. If outside sources are used, it is noted within the story.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending