Connect with us

South Dakota

From a South Dakota stage to a national platform: The winding road that got Tina Peters on the President’s radar

Published

on

From a South Dakota stage to a national platform: The winding road that got Tina Peters on the President’s radar


Mesa County’s former Clerk and Recorder has for months been a subject of national fascination, as well as a source of consternation for Colorado election officials. But it didn’t start out that way. 

Tina Peters first made national headlines in the summer of 2021, when the state started looking into the tampering of the county’s voting machines. Almost immediately, the county District Attorney’s office and the FBI began an investigation into the release of information from Mesa County’s Dominion voting election system and the role Peters played in it.

At the start of the investigation, Peters was attending a cybersecurity conference headlined by Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, and a leading purveyor nationally of false claims about election security. She quickly became a cause celebre on the right in President Donald Trump’s MAGA world, when people like Steve Bannon defended her right to investigate claims of election rigging. But for four years, Trump himself remained silent on Peters, even as his allies continued to claim she was innocent. 

“I’m not overly surprised that he didn’t have much to say during that time just because there was so much unknown, although that hasn’t stopped him in other ways,” said Republican Matt Crane, the executive director of the Colorado County Clerks Association, which has long pushed back against Peters’ efforts to try to prove election fraud. 

Advertisement

Peters was indicted by a grand jury from Mesa county and a Republican district attorney prosecuted the case. A jury of her peers later found her guilty on seven counts, including four felonies. 

“Ms. Peters has made this community a joke. She’s made respecting law enforcement a joke, made respecting court orders a joke. She’s not accepted any responsibility and considers this a badge of honor,” said Mesa County DA Dan Rubinstein during Peters’ sentencing hearing.

But even after her conviction and sentencing in the fall of 2024, still no word from Trump. 

“I had hoped that somebody smart was in his ear telling him that all of this was a facade,” said Crane. “She found no evidence of fraud. This is not a person worth getting behind or using calories on because she didn’t find any fraud, and she was a useful idiot for grifters and bad actors.”

Meanwhile, Peters’ supporters wanted Trump to speak out and take action. Scott Bottoms, a Republican representative in the Colorado Statehouse and now candidate for governor, said a team comprised of Peters’ attorneys, members of her inner circle and people like himself staged a campaign to alert the president to her cause. 

Advertisement

Bottoms thinks Trump didn’t initially weigh in because it was a state issue and also because he thinks the media was biased against Peters. 

“The media has been very quiet or very one-sided on the issue.” He said that contributed to Trump not being directly engaged. 

“I mean, how would he hear about a county clerk in Mesa County at the White House unless people had to just be beating on his door with it, and finally he opened his eyes and said, ‘Hey, this is a serious issue going on.’”

Peters’ conviction and sentence have stood out because other legal efforts related to 2020 election tampering have faltered. On Trump’s first day in office in his second term, he commuted the sentences of some of the people convicted of crimes stemming from the U.S. Capitol attack, and pardoned more than 1,200 people for crimes related to the January 6 riot. 

Then, in March, the administration turned some attention to Peters. The U.S Department of Justice decided to review her case, and in May of 2025, President Trump released his first social media post calling for her release. 

Advertisement

He referred to Peters as a hostage “being held in a Colorado prison by the Democrats, for political reasons. ” He asked the state to release her. 

“FREE TINA PETERS, NOW!” Trump wrote to punctuate his message. 

Trump has since ramped up efforts to secure her release, at one point telling state leaders to “rot in hell” and using Peters as a reason to punish the blue state, from efforts to cut federal funds to shutting down the National Center for Atmospheric Research and denying disaster emergency funding requests. Trump issued a symbolic federal pardon for her crimes, and Peters’ supporters are pushing for Democratic Gov. Jared Polis to commute her sentence. 

Crane is urging the governor to hold firm and resist pressure from Trump and said any special treatment for Peters would invite people to do nefarious things in the name of proving fraud or “stopping the steal.”

“It shows that you can try to undermine our election community, that you can commit these types of crimes, and that there’s no significant consequence to it … It becomes open season on our elections and our election personnel that you can have somebody now and go and listen to some disinformation, not know their jobs and say, hey, ‘we’re going to go and prove this.’”

Advertisement

But for Peters’ supporters, like Bottoms, Trump’s involvement has been welcome news. Though Bottoms said he is discouraged that federal funding for Colorado is being taken away, he said it’s because of the “leftists and the Marxists who control our state,” and is glad Trump is stepping in. 


Here is a timeline of Trump’s involvement in the Tina Peters case:

Aug. 12, 2024: A guilty verdict

After more than four hours of deliberation, a Mesa County jury finds Peters guilty on 7 charges, including four felony counts. 

Oct. 3, 2024: Prison time for ‘a charlatan’

21st Judicial District Judge Matthew Barrett sentences Peters to more than 8 years in prison. At sentencing, 21st Judicial District Attorney Dan Rubinstein argued for a strict sentence given Peters’ refusal to take accountability for her actions. 

Advertisement

“Ms. Peters has made this community a joke. She’s made respecting law enforcement a joke, made respecting court orders a joke. She’s not accepted any responsibility and considers this a badge of honor,” said Rubinstein.

Barrett lambasted Peters’ behaviour before handing down the prison time, noting that she was “as defiant a defendant as this court has ever seen.” 

“You are no hero,” Barrett told Peters. “You’re a charlatan who used, and is still using, your prior position in office to peddle a snake oil that’s been proven to be junk time and time again.” 

Mar. 3, 2025: Department of Justice gets involved

The federal government’s law enforcement arm wades into the Peters issue, announcing plans to review the state conviction. The Department of Justice submitted a statement of interest in district court. In it, the DOJ notes concerns about whether the case was political. 

Advertisement

Mar. 10, 2025: Colorado GOP leader calls for federal government to hold back funds

While campaigning to lead the Colorado GOP, Darcy Schoening tells 9News the federal government should pull funding from projects in Colorado, specifically citing Peters’ sentence as rationale.

May 5, 2025: The Truth (social) comes out

President Donald Trump pours fuel onto the Peters issue with a social media post calling for her release. In it, Trump describes Peters as a political prisoner and directs the Department of Justice to “take all necessary action to help secure” her release. 

Aug. 21, 2025: Trump takes aim at Colorado again, threatens harsh measures

Advertisement

Trump again calls for Peters’ release, this time while with a threat of consequences should she stay in prison. 

Sept. 2, 2025: Space command move announced, signs of a pressure campaign begin

Trump announces he is moving Space Command to Huntsville, Alabama. The President did not mention Peters in the announcement, but Colorado Democrats called the decision “political.” 

Nov. 12, 2025: Feds look to move Peters out of state custody

The Federal Bureau of Prisons sends a letter to the Colorado Department of Corrections requesting Peters’ be transferred to a federal facility. Such transfers from state to federal custody are rare and usually are reserved for cases involving long-term safety and security needs. 

Advertisement

Colorado’s Attorney General Phil Weiser and 21st Judicial District Attorney Dan Rubinstein would later co-author a letter to the governor asking Polis to reject the request, saying it was an attempt to circumvent the prison sentence Peters received. 

Dec. 8, 2025: Federal court rejects Peters’ habeas petition

A federal judge declines to consider Peters’ appeal, saying the state courts must settle the matter first. Peters’ legal team had been arguing that she should be eligible to post bond while the state appeal played out. 

Dec. 11, 2025: Peters pardoned, kind of

Trump claims on social media to have pardoned Peters. The action is met with skepticism as Peters was convicted on state charges, and the presidential pardon is commonly understood to be limited to federal crimes. 

Advertisement

Peters’ attorneys argue they have found a new read of the presidential pardon powers that could be read to apply to state charges as well. 

Dec. 16, 2025: Trump administration vows to dismantle NCAR, Dems think Peters issue to blame

In another blow to federal funding in Colorado, the Trump Administration announces plans to cut funding to the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder. Rep. Joe Neguse, a Democrat whose district includes Boulder, suggests it’s retaliation for Peters still being in prison. 

Dec. 24, 2025: Peters’ attorneys ask appeals court to review presidential pardon

Just ahead of scheduled oral arguments, Tina Peters’ attorneys ask the Colorado Court of Appeals to consider whether they still have jurisdiction over the clerk’s case in light of Trump’s pardon. 

Advertisement

Dec. 30, 2025: Trump vetoes Arkansas River Valley conduit

The bipartisan legislation would have helped finish a critical water project to benefit southeastern Colorado by giving local communities 100 years to pay back no-interest loans. 

Dec. 31, 2025: ‘May they rot in hell’

Trump takes to social media to call Gov. Jared Polis a “scumbag” and says Rubinstein, the district attorney in Mesa County, is “disgusting.” He concludes the post: ‘May they rot in Hell. FREE TINA PETERS!” 

Jan. 6, 2026: More cuts, more pressure from Trump Administration

Advertisement

The federal government freezes some childcare and food funding intended for Colorado. 

Jan. 8, 2026: Colorado AG ratchets up legal challenge

Weiser expands the scope of a lawsuit against the federal government, arguing that the cuts to Colorado funding amounted to a pattern of unlawful behavior. 

Jan. 8, 2026: Polis renews attention of his clemency powers with “harsh” comment

After publicly calling Peters’ prison sentence “harsh,” Polis kicks off a new wave of speculation that he might commute some of her sentence. 

Advertisement

Jan 9, 2025:

Tina Peters’ attorney, Peter Ticktin, tells CPR News that her legal team has applied for clemency.  The Governor’s office later told CPR that it could not confirm a request for clemency for Peters because and said under state law that clemency applications are not a public record. 

Jan. 14, 2026: Peters’ case heard by Colorado appellate court 

A panel of three Colorado Court of Appeals judges hears arguments as to whether Peters received a fair trial and sentence at the district court level. 

Jan. 18, 2026: Peters is involved in a prison scrap 

Advertisement

Peters is seen involved in a tussle with another inmate at the La Vista Correctional Facility in Pueblo.



Source link

South Dakota

Trading property tax for sales tax: Legislature moves forward with parts of homeowner relief package

Published

on

Trading property tax for sales tax: Legislature moves forward with parts of homeowner relief package


PIERRE — Two pieces of a property tax reduction package prepared by South Dakota’s legislative leadership and the executive branch are moving forward, but one bill failed during votes on Monday as lawmakers began the final week of the annual legislative session.

The House of Representatives voted

42-27

in support of

Advertisement

Senate Bill 245

, which would pull future revenue from a scheduled sales tax increase from 4.2% to 4.5% next year into a relief fund for homeowner property taxes, and use nearly $56 million in one-time money to seed the fund before the sales tax increase.

The Senate supported

House Bill 1323

, which would reduce the number of petition signatures needed to force an election on a local government’s decision to levy property taxes beyond limits set by the state. The Senate passed the bill 19-15.

Advertisement

Both bills have to return to the opposite chamber for consideration of amendments.

The Senate rejected

House Bill 1253

, which would cap annual assessment growth for owner-occupied homes and commercial properties at 5% annually and reset assessments back to market value every five years. The bill failed with a 9-24 vote.

The bills are part of a broader,

Advertisement

five-bill legislative package

targeted at property tax relief.

Another bill

in the package, which would allow counties to implement a half-percent sales tax with proceeds going to homeowner property tax credits, is awaiting the governor’s signature after he proposed it and it received both chambers’ approval.

The legislative budget committee is scheduled to consider a fifth piece of legislation in the package on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The bill

would reduce maximum property tax levies for school districts.

Sales tax bill overcomes concerns about future budget needs

SB 245 would capture revenue from the impending sales tax increase to deposit into a “homeowner property tax reduction fund” meant to reduce property taxes levied by school districts. The Legislature and then-Gov. Kristi Noem reduced the state sales tax rate three years ago but scheduled the reduction to sunset in 2027.

House Speaker Jon Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, told lawmakers on Monday that the bill would be an “investment in the people,” because it’ll give South Dakota homeowners more money to spend as they choose. Hansen, the bill’s sponsor and a candidate for governor, said that would lead to more spending and, therefore, more sales tax revenue. The state relies on sales taxes, while counties and schools rely on property taxes, and cities receive revenue from property taxes and sales taxes.

Advertisement

Some opponents said the legislation would favor wealthier, property-owning South Dakotans rather than lower-income renters.

Rep. Mike Weisgram, R-Fort Pierre, speaks on the House floor at the Capitol in Pierre on March 9, 2026.

(Photo by Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight)

Rep. Mike Weisgram, R-Fort Pierre, worried that automatically diverting future state revenue to reduce homeowner property taxes would come at the cost of other priorities, such as annual funding increases for state employees, Medicaid providers and public schools — which are known as the “big three” budget priorities. Lawmakers often

aim

Advertisement

to increase funding for the groups by 3% or inflation, whichever is less. An inflationary increase this legislative session would be 2.5%, according to the state Department of Education.

“We are just clawing to get 1.4% for the big three,” Weisgram said. “I don’t think any of us are proud of that.”

Hansen said the decision “is not an either-or” situation.

“We can help the property taxpayers in the state who desperately, desperately need it,” Hansen said, “and then I trust fully that this state is going to continue to grow and that we are going to be able to meet the needs of our core obligations of this state.”

The bill was introduced as an amendment to placeholder legislation last week, and it will head to the Senate for approval. The Senate narrowly rejected a

Advertisement

similar proposal

earlier this legislative session.

Senate approves lower signature threshold to force election on excess taxes

The version of House Bill 1323 that passed the Senate would set the number of petition signatures needed to force an election on an excess tax levy (often called an “opt-out”) for a local government at 2,500 or 5% of registered voters within its jurisdiction, whichever is less. The current threshold to refer decisions by a local government is 5% of registered voters in the district, without a 2,500 signature cap.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Taffy Howard, R-Rapid City, said it will still be difficult to refer decisions by a local government to voters.

Advertisement

“You’re talking dozens and dozens of volunteers, weeks of organized effort,” Howard said. “There’s not a lot of people that have been through that and can even organize that kind of effort. So it’s not a trivial bar.”

Because the bill was amended since it last appeared in the House, it’ll now go to the House for approval.

HB 1253 intended to provide South Dakota homeowners and commercial property owners predictable increases in their property assessments, which factor into property taxes they pay, over five year periods.

But opponents said the change would shift the property tax burden onto farmers and ranchers and surprise homeowners every five years when assessments would be re-based on market value, which could lead to double-digit increases in assessments.

This story was originally published on

Advertisement

SouthDakotaSearchlight.com.

______________________________________________________

This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

Political Pulse: South Dakota Senate Majority Leader Jim Mehlhaff on data centers, property taxes and more

Published

on

Political Pulse: South Dakota Senate Majority Leader Jim Mehlhaff on data centers, property taxes and more


RAPID CITY, S.D. (KOTA) – State Senate Majority Leader Jim Mehlhaff joined Political Pulse over the weekend.

Mehlhaff weighed in on property tax proposals, data centers, and effort to repeal the death penalty and speculation that Kristi Noem could run for Senate.

The interviewed was taped on Saturday.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Advertisement

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

These 15 South Dakota counties will see DUI checkpoints this month

Published

on

These 15 South Dakota counties will see DUI checkpoints this month



The monthly law enforcement effort helps to reduce alcohol-related deaths on the road.

play

The South Dakota Department of Public Safety is raising awareness this month on the dangers of drinking and driving.

Sobriety checkpoints take place statewide every month, usually hitting about 15 counties, in hopes of reminding motorists to “make responsible choices and avoid driving after drinking alcohol, whether or not a checkpoint is planned in their area,” says DPS communications director Brad Reiners.

DPS also announces ahead of time which counties will be monitored, most often Codington, Lincoln, Meade, Minnehaha and Pennington counties.

What is a sobriety checkpoint?

A sobriety checkpoint is a law enforcement effort that stops vehicles at pre-determined locations to identify and arrest impaired drivers as necessary.

Advertisement

These police stops are not based on unrelated violations of the law (ie., speeding, reckless driving, no seatbelt). Rather, officers are stopping any vehicle in a set pattern in a highly visible location that a driver will approach and must comply with.

Beyond arrests for driving under the influence (DUIs), including breathalyzer tests (PBTs) to determine blood alcohol level (BAC) as needed, the systematic effort is designed to “reduce impaired driving and improve roadway safety,” Reiners said.

South Dakota counties where checkpoints will take place in March include:

  • Beadle
  • Brookings
  • Brown
  • Clay
  • Codington
  • Day
  • Hughes
  • Hutchinson
  • Jones
  • Lawrence
  • Lincoln
  • Lyman
  • Meade
  • Minnehaha
  • Pennington

How many sobriety checkpoints took place in Minnehaha County in 2025?

Other than confirming counties ahead of time, Reiners says time, day and exact location of each checkpoint cannot be confirmed.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at totals from sobriety checkpoints in Minnehaha County in 2025.

Reiners says the number of vehicle stops is merely based on how many happen to drive through a checkpoint that day:

  • January: 30 vehicles stopped, 3 PBTs, no DUI arrests
  • February: 18 vehicles stopped, 1 PBT, no DUI arrests
  • March: 150 vehicles stopped, 9 PBTs, no DUI arrests
  • August: 49 vehicles stopped, 1 PBT, no DUI arrests
  • September: 105 vehicles stopped, 14 PBTs, no DUI arrests
  • November: 63 vehicles stopped, 2 PBTs, 2 DUI arrests

How many fatal, alcohol-related car accidents are there in South Dakota?

According to the South Dakota Department of Health, among 365 alcohol-related deaths in 2024, 19% were because of a transportation/machinery accident, the second-most common cause.

The leading cause of alcohol-related deaths in 2024 was poisoning/toxic effects, at 24%.

Counties that most often experience overall alcohol-related deaths include Buffalo, Mellette, Corson, Oglala Lakota and Dewey counties.

Overall, males make up 65% of alcohol-related deaths in South Dakota from 2015-2024, almost two times higher than the female rate, with ages 30-69 at the highest risk.

Advertisement

Operation: Prairie Thunder not involved in sobriety checkpoints

DPS officials say the S.D. Office of Highway Patrol, the South Dakota Highway Patrol (SDHP) and local law enforcement agencies support DUI checkpoints, which are funded by the South Dakota Office of Highway Safety (SDHS).

Although Operation: Prairie Thunder (OPT) recently completed its 11th saturation patrol in Watertown on Feb. 26-27 – missions that bring together the SDHP with the city, county and federal law enforcement partners – SDHS officials stated last week that “sobriety checkpoints are not conducted as part of Operation: Prairie Thunder.”

Rather, OPT consists of targeted saturation patrols focused on criminal activity in a variety of communities.

Since its inception in August of last year, here’s a look at where total numbers stand for OPT, provided by the DPS.

Advertisement

Ongoing Operation: Prairie Thunder running totals

  • 443 arrests
  • 281 individuals in custody with a drug charge
  • 162 in custody without a drug charge
  • 473 individuals with a drug charge
  • 192 charged and released

Operation: Prairie Thunder criminal drug apprehension totals

  • 1,109 drug charges
  • 318 felony drug charges
  • 791 misdemeanor drug charges
  • 81 felony warrants
  • 168 misdemeanor warrants

Operation: Prairie Thunder ICE contacts

  • 93 contacted
  • 95 interviewed
  • 71 in custody
  • 9 apprehended for cartel / gang
  • 10 identified for cartel / gang
  • No human trafficking arrests
  • No recoveries

Operation: Prairie Thunder traffic enforcement

  • 42 DUIs
  • 5 reckless driving
  • 2,244 citations
  • 2,725 warnings

The South Dakota governor’s office announced last December that operations will continue into 2026.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending