South Dakota
Dakota Energy lawsuit continues against own members
SIOUX DROPS, S.D. (Dakota Information Currently) – The claims around Dakota Power’s intent to leave East River Electric aren’t done. The cooperative still has one suit in court versus a few of it’s very own participants, asserting they were aiming to weaken it’s suit versus East River Electric.
Dakota Power asserts the 17 offenders provided in the issue sought an illegal initiative to modify the cooperative’s laws, as well as to assemble an illegal unique conference. According to the suit, Dakota Power mentions that an application authorized by around 10 percent of it’s participants require an unique participants conference.
The application asked for a resolution as well as 3 modifications at the conference. The resolution asked for Dakota Power to reject it’s suit versus East River Electric, while the very first change would certainly transform the laws to call for that two-thirds of all participants favor altering wholesale power vendors. Dakota Power mentions that the various other 2 modifications were non-consequential in the suit.
In a declaration to Dakota Information Currently, Dakota Power stated the recommended resolution as well as very first change would certainly breach the powers as well as legal rights scheduled for Dakota Power’s Board participants, which the team of 17 offenders must invest even more time aiding it’s board locate services to reduced power prices.
We’ve asked East River to give us with the price to get of our existing, 60-year power agreement since it’s unreasonable to saddle our kids’s kids with this prejudiced contract. If Rub [Doak] as well as his team invested fifty percent as much time aiding our board locate services to reduce our power prices as they do benefiting the high paid execs at East River as well as Container [Electric], we’d all be a great deal much better off.
Nonetheless, the offenders stated the suit is just a device to avoid them from electing on the resolution as well as modifications as a participating. In a declaration to Dakota Information Currently, the offenders state that the participants wish to exercise their right to elect on law modifications for their participating, yet that Dakota Power’s Board of Supervisors is stopping the problems to find to a member-wide ballot.
“The Participants of Dakota Power merely wish to exercise their right to elect on law modifications for their electrical cooperative, yet the Board of Supervisors is doing whatever feasible to avoid participants from ballot- consisting of filing a claim against the Participants that asked for an Unique Participant Satisfying to permit them to elect.
Country electrical cooperatives are among South Dakota’s best success tales. When companies wouldn’t buy structure electric framework in country South Dakota, farmers as well as herdsmans brought up their bootstraps as well as did it by themselves by developing cooperatives. Those cooperatives developed the framework that has actually powered country South Dakota for generations as well as they are still going solid today.
Furthermore, South Dakota’s circulation, transmission as well as generation cooperatives are modern energies. The variety of centers, participants as well as landscape offered by electrical cooperatives in our state has actually motivated them to spend numerous millions in SCADA systems, automated metering framework, interactions framework, line building and construction as well as upkeep tools, along with modern-day as well as effective generation centers situated in our state as well as area.
Cages belong of our state’s abundant heritage, they remain in it for the long run, give a few of the most affordable prices in the country, as well as will certainly remain to give trusted as well as cost effective power. They deserve dealing with to maintain.”
Copyright 2022 Dakota Information Currently. All legal rights scheduled.
South Dakota
Judge dismisses a lawsuit over South Dakota abortion-rights measure that voters rejected
A South Dakota judge dismissed a lawsuit that an anti-abortion group filed in June targeting an abortion rights measure that voters rejected this month.
In an order dated Friday, Circuit Court Judge John Pekas granted Life Defense Fund’s motion to dismiss its lawsuit against Dakotans for Health, the measure group.
In a statement, Life Defense Fund co-chair Leslee Unruh said: “The people have decided, and South Dakotans overwhelmingly rejected this constitutional abortion measure. We have won in the court of public opinion, and South Dakotans clearly saw the abortion lobby’s deception.”
Dakotans for Health co-founder Rick Weiland said he had expected the lawsuit to be dismissed.
“The Life Defense Fund’s accusations were part of a broader, failed effort to keep Amendment G off the ballot and silence the voices of South Dakota voters,” Weiland said in a statement. “But make no mistake — this dismissal is just one battle in a much larger war over the future of direct democracy in South Dakota.”
Life Defense Fund’s lawsuit had challenged petitions that got the measure on the ballot, saying they contained invalid signatures and circulators committed fraud and various wrongdoing. The anti-abortion group sought to invalidate the ballot initiative and bar the measure group and its workers from doing ballot-measure work for four years.
The judge initially dismissed the lawsuit in July, but the state Supreme Court sent it back to him in August. In September, an apparent misunderstanding between attorneys and the court regarding scheduling of the trial pushed the case back until after the election.
Even before the measure made the ballot in May, South Dakota’s Republican-led Legislature cemented its formal opposition and passed a law allowing people to withdraw their petition signatures.
A South Dakota law that took effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 outlaws abortion and makes it a felony to perform one except to save the life of the mother.
South Dakota was one of three states where abortion rights measures failed this month. The others were Florida and Nebraska. Voters in six other states passed such measures.
___
Dura reported from Bismarck, North Dakota.
South Dakota
Cluff’s 14 help South Dakota State down Mount Marty 89-41
google-site-verification: google9919194f75dd62c5.html
South Dakota
‘Birdie or Better’ campaign raises $25k for Feeding South Dakota
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – SAM Nutrition is taking a swing at hunger and presented a $25,000 donation to Feeding South Dakota on Monday.
The generous contribution comes from SAM Nutrition’s Birdie or Better Campaign, which is a six-month initiative designed to raise funds through every birdie, eagle or albatross made by sponsored golfer Sam Bennett.
Around 400 birdies were recorded during this stretch.
“Yeah, it’s cool. SAM Nutrition has been a good sponsor for me, treating me well and supporting me on and off the course. And it’s just nice, you know, giving back to a charity when I am on the course making a birdie or eagle, being able to help out and feed families in South Dakota,” said Bennett.
Feeding South Dakota adds that this campaign is more than a charity; it’s a commitment to helping communities by promoting both nutrition and wellness.
Copyright 2024 Dakota News Now. All rights reserved.
-
News1 week ago
Herbert Smith Freehills to merge with US-based law firm Kramer Levin
-
Technology1 week ago
The next Nintendo Direct is all about Super Nintendo World’s Donkey Kong Country
-
Business6 days ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health6 days ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business3 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Politics1 week ago
Editorial: Abortion was on ballots across the country in this election. The results are encouraging
-
World7 days ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Politics2 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'