Connect with us

North Dakota

What tax relief will North Dakotans get? Lawmakers weigh income, property tax cut bills

Published

on

What tax relief will North Dakotans get? Lawmakers weigh income, property tax cut bills


BISMARCK — Republicans in North Dakota’s Legislature agree with Gov. Doug Burgum that it’s time for tax aid. However there is not any consensus but on which taxes and the way a lot to chop.

Competing payments for earnings tax and property tax reductions are set to be main problems with the legislative session amid the state’s wholesome monetary state of affairs that policymakers say taxpayers ought to share in.

Burgum has urged the Legislature to prioritize earnings tax aid, seeing it as a lift to attracting workforce.

The plan would get rid of private earnings tax for single filers making $44,725 or much less and for married filers making $74,750 or much less. Larger earners would pay a flat tax of 1.5%. Burgum stated the tax lower would save North Dakotans $250 million yearly.

Advertisement

The Home Finance and Taxation Committee on Wednesday, Jan. 11, heard the invoice for the proposal:

Home Invoice 1158,

introduced by Rep. Craig Headland, R-Montpelier.

Headland stated three-fifths of taxpayers would haven’t any state earnings tax legal responsibility below the invoice, which he stated builds on the two-year earnings tax credit score the Legislature handed in its November 2021 particular session.

“That credit score itself worn out lots of people’s earnings tax legal responsibility. Let’s construct on that, so let’s design it in a means that makes certain that no one receives a tax enhance within the course of however we additionally develop coverage that may make it simpler for us to progressively begin decreasing to zero,” he stated.

Advertisement

The invoice would scale back basic fund income by over $566 million for the 2023-25 finances cycle. North Dakota’s basic fund revenues are working 23% over forecast for the 2021-23 finances cycle, or over $702 million.

The Republican governor testified on the invoice — a uncommon occasion — touting the state’s flush funds and wish to draw staff.

“When the state’s doing nicely, then, after all, our residents ought to share in that prosperity, and particularly these residents who’re working and incomes earnings in our state, and that is particularly vital proper now after we’re in deep competitors for staff throughout the nation,” Burgum advised the Home panel.

The governor has stated he desires the invoice to be the primary to cross his desk within the session. Headland concurred, however stated lawmakers need to “be certain that we get the coverage proper.”

Eight states, together with South Dakota, haven’t any earnings tax. 9 extra have a flat tax charge.

Advertisement

Democrats have criticized the proposal as taking away income that might be used for training, youngster care and workforce growth, and disproportionately benefiting the rich.

Different opponents have cited property tax aid as a larger concern amongst constituents. Rep. SuAnn Olson, R-Baldwin, a licensed public accountant, stated she doubts whether or not the earnings tax invoice’s discount from the highest tax charge of two.9% to a flat charge of 1.5%, as an alternative of zero, would actually appeal to staff.

Revenue tax aid “does not converse to what I feel our citizenry has been asking of us,” she stated. “I do not suppose they have been calling for earnings tax aid.”

The governor’s tax plan is competing this legislative session with a

proposed property tax lower

Advertisement

backed by Sen. Don Schaible, R-Mott, and several other different Republican lawmakers.

Schaible stated

Senate Invoice 2066

addresses a serious concern of his constituents by lowering property taxes by about 25% statewide.

Underneath the proposal, the state would assume the a part of property tax apportioned to Okay-12 training funding. The plan would additionally freeze the education-dedicated piece of property valuations for 2 years.

Advertisement

Meaning the state must pay

an estimated $327 million

in extra faculty funding for the two-year finances cycle beginning in summer season 2023. The plan attracts on earnings from the

$8.1 billion Legacy Fund

to cowl the prices, although Schaible stated he’s open to altering the funding supply. The voter-approved Legacy Fund receives 30% of the state’s oil and gasoline tax income.

Advertisement

Schaible stated reducing earnings taxes would “get rid of a income supply that we would want sooner or later.”

North Dakota Sen. Donald Schaible, R-Mott, proper, speaks subsequent to Rep. Mike Nathe, R-Bismarck, at a press convention a couple of proposed property tax lower on Monday, Sept. 26, 2022.

Jeremy Turley / Discussion board Information Service

Lawmakers “nonetheless should watch out” in figuring out tax aid regardless of the state’s rosy funds, stated Home Majority Chief Mike Lefor, R-Dickinson.

Advertisement

Increase-bust oil cycles, world politics and international international locations’ insurance policies can have an effect on North Dakota’s state tax revenues, and damaging impacts can have speedy results, he stated.

Lefor prefers a “mixture” of each property and earnings tax aid.

“On the finish of the day, it is the individuals’s cash, and we must always present aid to the residents as a result of we’re ready to take action, however we have to do it by way of what can also be in the very best long-term curiosity,” he stated.

Burgum has bristled at those that tout property tax aid because the larger problem.

“Our view is one is nice coverage, reduces tax revenues coming into the state, leaves cash in individuals’s pockets,” the governor stated final month, referring to earnings tax aid.

Advertisement

“The opposite one is a subsidy the place we would truly be taking tax {dollars} from somebody and transferring them to (native governments) … and you do not know if it ever goes to make it into the pocket of someone as a result of it is primarily based on the associated fee selections that they make,” he stated of property tax aid.

Rep. Pat Heinert, R-Bismarck, has introduced Home Invoice

1118

, which might primarily develop and prolong for an additional two years the earnings tax credit score handed in 2021.

The Home Finance and Tax Committee on Wednesday heard the invoice, which would scale back basic fund income by practically $363 million, offering a credit score of as much as $750 for single filers and as much as $1,500 for married {couples} submitting collectively.

Advertisement

“It permits individuals to have a piece of cash of their hand at one time limit,” Heinert advised the panel.

Home Payments 1158 and 1118 may be melded, in response to Headland and Heinert.

Legislators are also contemplating a number of payments that may change how info on property taxes is communicated with the general public.

Heinert is sponsoring

Home Invoice 1119,

Advertisement

which might require cities, counties and different taxing districts to specific details about property taxes in {dollars} and cents reasonably than mills, a little-understood unit that

represents a proportion of a property’s assessed worth.

Heinert stated the invoice would assist residents higher comprehend property tax levies. The proposal unanimously handed the Home on Tuesday.

Sen. Mark Weber, R-Casselton, has backed

Senate Invoice 2121,

Advertisement

which might require taxing districts to incorporate the greenback quantity of the earlier yr’s particular assessments on estimated property tax payments despatched to residents in September. The Senate Finance and Taxation Committee gave the invoice a “do move” suggestion.

Jack Dura is a reporter for The Bismarck Tribune. Jeremy Turley is a reporter for Discussion board Information Service.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Township funding changes bill passes ND House

Published

on

Township funding changes bill passes ND House


BISMARCK, N.D. (KUMV) – The North Dakota House approved a bill to change Operation Prairie Dog funding for townships.

The bill impacts those in non-oil-producing counties.

Currently, every township receives an equal portion, but this bill would base it on road mileage.

With a 90 to 3 vote, it will move on to the Senate at a later time.

Advertisement

Previous Coverage and More Information: House bill seeks to change township funding for Operation Prairie Dog



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Concerns over local control pop up in hearing on North Dakota bill to restrict student cellphone use

Published

on

Concerns over local control pop up in hearing on North Dakota bill to restrict student cellphone use


BISMARCK — North Dakota lawmakers heard testimony for and against a bill to ban cellphone use by public school students during instructional time Wednesday, Jan. 15.

House Bill 1160,

sponsored by Rep. Jim Jonas, R-West Fargo,

would prohibit students from using cellphones during classes or any educational activity but allow such use during lunch, recess, between classes and open class periods.

Advertisement

Jonas said approximately 11 states have either total bans or restrictions on student cellphone use and another 10 are considering them.

“Let’s see if we can get better behavior, academic scores up, math, reading and better mental health,” Jonas told the House Education

C

ommittee on Wednesday.

A modified version of the bill makes exceptions for students who must use their cellphone to manage a medical condition or are on an individualized education program, plan or 504 plan who use their phone as an assistive device.

Advertisement

In addition, a school district or school may temporarily suspend the cellphone ban in the case of an emergency.

West Fargo High School Principal Rachel Bachmeier, who spoke in favor of the bill, said her school, along with others in the district, implemented a policy in the fall of 2022 to restrict cellphone use.

In effect, the cellphone policy is “out of sight, out of use from bell to bell,” she said, but students may use them during non-instructional time.

Consequences for violating the policy range from a classroom warning to surrender of the cellphone to the main office for a day or more to family meetings and behavior plans.

“We very, very rarely move beyond the first main office consequence. It is an incredibly effective policy in that way,” Bachmeier said.

Advertisement

Teachers have also noticed less “drama” in the classroom when students aren’t distracted by their phones, she added, and students themselves have reflected on how the policy improved their own behaviors.

Several school administrators and other stakeholders expressed concerns with aspects of the bill.

Steve Madler, principal of Bismarck Century High School, said they follow an “out of sight, out of mind during instruction” policy after attempting an all-out cellphone ban a few years back, which led to too many arguments from students and families.

However, he said, some students and teachers use cellphones in the classroom for research, surveys and language translation, adding that the Bismarck district distributes Google Chromebooks to students, which aren’t as efficient as Apple iPads for those tasks.

“It’s important for us to have policies, but I think it’s also important that we have pieces in the bill that allow us to use it for an educational purpose,” Madler said.

Advertisement

KrisAnn Norby-Jahner, in-house legal counsel for the North Dakota School Boards Association, expressed concern about a blanket ban on cellphone use. She said local control should be maintained, and a large majority of school districts already handle this issue.

Norby-Jahner suggested a change in the bill’s language simply requiring all school districts to come up with their own cellphone policies.

In 2024, the Minnesota Legislature passed a law requiring school districts and charter schools to adopt student cellphone policies by March 15, 2025.

Bachmeier said there is an argument for local control, but action is needed if lawmakers believe excessive cellphone use and social media access during classes is a public health crisis.

“If we do, what is our responsibility as a state to step in and take the first action in helping protect our kids?” she asked.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

School phone policies needed, but not a state ban, bill opponents say

Published

on

School phone policies needed, but not a state ban, bill opponents say


Mactrunk / Depositphotos.com

BISMARCK (North Dakota Monitor) – North Dakota public education groups said Wednesday they recognize the need for a policy on student use of cellphones but mostly resisted a call for a state-mandated ban.

Rep. Jim Jonas, R-West Fargo, introduced House Bill 1160 that would ban students from using cellphones during class time.

Advertisement

A proposed amendment to the bill would add some exemptions, like using a smartphone to monitor health conditions, such as diabetes, and in some cases where students are on a learning plan crafted for the student.

The House Education Committee did not act on the bill or the amendment but indicated that there would be more discussion next week.

KrisAnn Norby-Jahner, legal counsel for the North Dakota School Boards Association, testified that the cellphone use issue should be handled at the local level, but added she would not be opposed to a bill requiring that school districts have a cellphone policy.

Mike Heilman, executive director of the North Dakota Small Organized Schools, testified that the group’s board members did not support the bill.

He said some teachers have students use their phone during class and designate a spot on the desk where the phone should be when not being used.

Advertisement

He also said some schools may want to make exceptions for juniors and seniors to have more access to their phones

But he also said schools might like the state’s support on the need for a cellphone policy.

Cellphone use among students was described during testimony as a mental health issue in addition to being a distraction.

Rachel Bachmeier, principal at West Fargo High School, said there has been “less drama” since the school restricted phone use to breaks between classes.

She said parents generally support that policy, with little support for an overall ban during the school day.

Advertisement

Steve Madler, principal at Bismarck Century High School, said his experience with a ban during the school day turned out to be unworkable for many students and parents.

The U.S. Department of Education in December called on every state and school district to adopt a policy on phone use in schools.

Jonas, a former West Fargo teacher, said the goal of the bill is improved test scores and mental health. He said he received some calls from principals for an all-out ban during the school day.

When asked what the penalty would be for a school that did not enforce the state policy, he did not give specifics.

“The hope is that they would abide by the law,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending