Connect with us

North Dakota

Port: Is it too much to ask that Doug Burgum do his job as governor?

Published

on

Port: Is it too much to ask that Doug Burgum do his job as governor?


MINOT — The most frustrating line from

the Bismarck Tribune report

about a group of North Dakota filmmakers upset about the troubling process around $700,000 in grants doled out by the state Commerce Department was this one: “[Gov. Doug] Burgum’s office previously declined comment to the Tribune.”

The filmmakers have been asking for answers from Burgum’s office since August, but neither the governor, nor anybody from his staff, could be bothered to oblige them?

Advertisement
Matt Fern with Prairieland Motion Pictures holds a press conference in the state Capitol in Bismarck on Tuesday representing North Dakota filmmakers in questioning the awarding of grants by the Commerce Department.

Tom Stromme / The Bismarck Tribune

As I reported back in August,

at issue are two grants given to Canticle Productions, a Bismarck-based filmmaker. One totaling $100,000 was issued to the company in 2021 but was apparently not advertised to other filmmakers. The other, for $600,000, was given to Canticle through a process that was seemingly designed to keep other filmmakers from applying.

Advertisement

On Friday, July 21, at almost 4:00 pm, the Commerce Department announced it

was taking applications for the grant money.

The due date for the applications was July 31, just 10 calendar days, or six business days, later.

If it seems like perhaps this competitive application process wasn’t intended to be all that competitive, you may be right. When the appropriation for the grant was discussed in the Legislature, it seemed lawmakers already knew where it was heading.

“There’s an added funding for a Motion Picture Production and Recruitment Grant to a production company for another motion picture that’s being made in North Dakota,” Sen. Brad Bekkedahl, a Republican from Williston, said earlier this year in his floor speech for

Advertisement

House Bill 1018,

the Commerce Department budget, which included the grant appropriation. “Many of the predictions…productions from this company have been North Dakota centrist productions, and this is another one they are bringing online.”

Why even bother with a competitive grant process if the money was always intended to go to Canticle?

One explanation may lay in

Article X, Section 18

Advertisement

of the North Dakota constitution, which states, “neither the state nor any political subdivision thereof shall otherwise loan or give its credit or make donations to or in aid of any individual, association or corporation except for reasonable support of the poor, nor subscribe to or become the owner of capital stock in any association or corporation.”

This, colloquially, is called the “gift clause,” a prohibition on the state making a direct appropriation to any specific person or company. Perhaps,exempli gratia, a $600,000 grant to a specific film production company.

A legislative appropriation to a competitive grant program for filmmakers passes constitutional muster. A legislative appropriation directly to a company would not.
It sure seems like the Commerce Department did an end-run around the state constitution to funnel money to a specific film company.

Other filmmakers are blowing the whistle on it, and they’re right to. It’s not a good situation. I have nothing bad to say about Canticle Productions. The films they’ve produced about North Dakota — I particularly enjoyed

“End of the Rope”

Advertisement

— are very good. It’s understandable why state officials would be enthusiastic about helping Canticle make more of those films.

But that’s not justification for putting a figurative finger on the scale of what was supposed to be an open, competitive process. Canticle Productions is not the problem. The process is.

Which brings us back to

Gov. Doug Burgum.

Why is he AWOL? Why can’t these filmmakers, who have a legitimate complaint to lodge, get the time of day from him? Or, at least, a member of his staff?

Advertisement

One answer is that Burgum is too busy with

his quixotic tilt at the White House

to attend to the picayune responsibilities of governing the State of North Dakota, even though that’s the duty of the office he currently holds.

  • Click to sign up for the Rob Port newsletter

Advertisement

The filmmakers are

now calling on Attorney General Drew Wrigley and Auditor Josh Gallion to get involved,

but they first went to Burgum in August.

They should have. The commerce commissioner, currently Josh Teigen, is a member of Burgum’s cabinet. The Commerce Department is a part of the executive branch he presides over. Burgum, or at least someone on his staff, owes these filmmakers and the public some explanations.

Maybe Burgum is too busy indulging the fantasy that a groundswell of

Advertisement

heretofore unidentified Republican primary voters

is going to emerge from the shadows to sweep him to victory in the GOP’s presidential primary.

Or maybe it’s time for him to come home and get back to work.

Rob Port

Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Port: Make families great again

Published

on

Port: Make families great again


MINOT — Gov.-elect Kelly Armstrong is roaring into office with some political capital to spend. I have some ideas for how to spend it during next year’s legislative session.

It’s a three-pronged plan focused on children. I’m calling it “Make Families Great Again.” I’m no marketing genius, but I have been a dad for 24 years. There are some things the state could do to help.

The first is school lunches. The state should pay for them. The Legislature had a rollicking debate about this during the 2023 session. The opponents, who liken this to a handout, largely won the debate. Armstrong could put some muscle behind a new initiative to have the state take over payments. The social media gadflies might not like it, but it would prove deeply popular with the general public, especially if we neutralize the “handout” argument by reframing the debate.

North Dakota families are obligated to send their children to school. The kids have to eat. The lunch bills add up. I have two kids in public school. In the 2023-2024 school year, I paid $1,501.65 for lunches. That’s more than I pay in income taxes.

Advertisement

How much would it cost? In the 2023 session,

House Bill 1491

would have appropriated $89.5 million to cover the cost. The price tag would likely be similar now, but don’t consider it an expense so much as putting nearly $90 million back in the pockets of families with school-age children. A demographic that, thanks to inflation and other factors, could use some help.

Speaking of helping, the second plank of this plan is child care. This burgeoning cost is not just a millstone around young families’ necks but also hurts our state’s economy. We have a chronic workforce shortage, yet many North Dakotans are held out of the workforce because they either cannot find child care or because the care available is prohibitively expensive.

State leaders haven’t exactly been sitting on their hands. During the 2023 session, Gov. Doug Burgum signed

Advertisement

a $66 million child care package

focusing on assistance and incentives. We should do something bolder.

Maybe a direct tax credit to cover at least some of the expenses?

The last plank is getting vaccination rates back on track.

According to data from the state Department of Health,

Advertisement

the kindergarten-age vaccination rate for chicken pox declined 3.76% from the 2019-2020 school year. The rate for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is down 3.72%, polio vaccines 3.54%, hepatitis B vaccines 2.27%, and the vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis 3.91%.

Meanwhile, personal and religious exemptions for kindergarten students have risen by nearly 69%.

This may be politically risky for Armstrong. Anti-vaxx crankery is on the rise among Republicans, but, again, Armstrong has some political capital to spend. This would be a helpful place for it. A campaign to turn vaccine rates around would help protect the kids from diseases that haven’t been a concern in generations. It would help address workforce needs as well.

When a sick kid can’t go to school or day care, parents can’t go to work.

These ideas are practical and bold and would do a great deal to help North Dakota families.

Advertisement
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN

Published

on

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN


LOS ANGELES — — Treysen Eaglestaff had 23 points in North Dakota’s 77-73 win over Loyola Marymount on Friday night.

Eaglestaff also contributed five rebounds for the Fightin’ Hawks (3-2). Mier Panoam scored 16 points and added seven rebounds. Dariyus Woodson had 12 points.

The Lions (1-3) were led in scoring by Caleb Stone-Carrawell with 17 points. Alex Merkviladze added 16 points, eight rebounds, four assists and two steals. Will Johnston had 15 points and four assists.

North Dakota went into the half ahead of Loyola Marymount 36-32. Eaglestaff led North Dakota with 12 second-half points.

Advertisement

——

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes' support

Published

on

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes' support


BISMARCK, N.D. — A coalition of conservation groups and Native American tribal citizens on Friday called on President Joe Biden to designate nearly 140,000 acres of rugged, scenic Badlands as North Dakota’s first national monument, a proposal several tribal nations say would preserve the area’s indigenous and cultural heritage.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would encompass 11 noncontiguous, newly designated units totaling 139,729 acres (56,546 hectares) in the Little Missouri National Grassland. The proposed units would hug the popular recreation trail of the same name and neighbor Theodore Roosevelt National Park, named for the 26th president who ranched and roamed in the Badlands as a young man in the 1880s.

“When you tell the story of landscape, you have to tell the story of people,” said Michael Barthelemy, an enrolled member of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and director of Native American studies at Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College. “You have to tell the story of the people that first inhabited those places and the symbiotic relationship between the people and the landscape, how the people worked to shape the land and how the land worked to shape the people.”

The National Park Service oversees national monuments, which are similar to national parks and usually designated by the president to protect the landscape’s features.

Advertisement

Supporters have traveled twice to Washington to meet with White House, Interior Department, Forest Service and Department of Agriculture officials. But the effort faces an uphill battle with less than two months remaining in Biden’s term and potential headwinds in President-elect Donald Trump ‘s incoming administration.

If unsuccessful, the group would turn to the Trump administration “because we believe this is a good idea regardless of who’s president,” Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said.

Dozens if not hundreds of oil and natural gas wells dot the landscape where the proposed monument would span, according to the supporters’ map. But the proposed units have no oil and gas leases, private inholdings or surface occupancy, and no grazing leases would be removed, said North Dakota Wildlife Federation Executive Director John Bradley.

This undated image provided by Jim Fuglie shows Bullion Butte in western North Dakota. Credit: AP/Jim Fuglie

The proposal is supported by the MHA Nation, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe through council resolutions.

Advertisement

If created, the monument would help tribal citizens stay connected to their identity, said Democratic state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, an MHA Nation enrolled member.

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service, including national monuments. In a written statement, Burgum said: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly develop our vast energy resources.”

North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven’s office said Friday was the first they had heard of the proposal, “but any effort that would make it harder for ranchers to operate and that could restrict multiple use, including energy development, is going to raise concerns with Senator Hoeven.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending