North Dakota
Port: How is a wastewater lagoon political?
MINOT — Our nation is closing in on $37 trillion in debt, which represents almost 123% of our gross domestic product.
That’s a problem we have to fix, and spending cuts have to be part of the equation. Yet that immutable reality still doesn’t justify the approach President Donald Trump’s administration is taking to spending cuts.
Case in point, recently, the administration announced the cut of $20 million in grants that were headed to North Dakota infrastructure projects. Among the cuts was $7.1 million for a water intake project in Washburn, almost $8 million for a regional wastewater project in Lincoln, south of Bismarck, and nearly $2 million for a wastewater lagoon project in Fessenden.
These projects represent the boring but vital functions of government that most of us are oblivious to. We all want our waste to go away when we flush the toilet or rinse out the sink, and we take for granted that the waste is flowing through a system where it’s handled appropriately. But doing that takes planning and, perhaps most important, funding.
The sort of funding the Trump administration just cut for North Dakota projects.
What’s galling is that, when called on to defend these cuts, the Trump administration called the BRIC program, from which these funds derived, “wasteful” and “political.”
“The BRIC program was yet another example of a wasteful and ineffective FEMA program. It was more concerned with political agendas than helping Americans affected by natural disasters,”
read a statement from FEMA,
which is now under the control of Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem.
Political?
How in the world is a wastewater lagoon political?
We could have a debate about whether this sort of funding should come through FEMA, or the federal government at all. You could argue that the funding should be provided locally, except that the city of Fessenden has 425 citizens, and local officials estimate that raising the funds from local taxpayers would mean
a roughly $6,000 tax hike on every property owner in Wells County.
The state of North Dakota could step in and provide those funds, too, but there’s an upper limit on our capacity to do that. Like Wells County, the state of North Dakota has a relatively tiny tax base. Replacing the federal funding that flows into our state with state tax dollars would be fiscally devastating. Entering the current legislative session, roughly 30% of Gov. Kelly Armstrong’s executive budget was the appropriation of federal dollars.
Our liberal friends sometimes like to deride this state of affairs as evidence that North Dakota is a beggar state. The truth is more complicated. We have a lot of resources — energy, agriculture, etc. — that are vital to the rest of the country. Thus, it behooves federal taxpayers to fund infrastructure here, from roads to bridges to wastewater lagoons.
Without those federal dollars, North Dakota couldn’t function because we don’t have the tax base to support our infrastructure.
This is tough medicine for North Dakota’s pro-Trump electorate. The Trump administration is branding even valid infrastructure projects as “wasteful” and “political” and it’s left our congressional delegation scrambling to balance the stupidity of that with the unavoidable reality that this is precisely what North Dakota voters cast their ballots for.
Congresswoman Julie Fedorchak appeared
on a recent episode of the Plain Talk podcast,
and we asked her about the Trump administration’s approach to these cuts. Her answer was all over the map. She said she would “love” to talk about DOGE (special Trump adviser Elon Musk’s government efficiency initiative), but then said DOGE doesn’t work for her and that she won’t defend their approach, before circling back to say that it’s going to be a “really productive process.”
I think Fedorchak knows that DOGE is a mess, but can’t come out and say that because Republicans who register even modest criticisms of Trump are, as a practical political matter, walking out onto a dangerous limb.
It shouldn’t be that way, but it is.
Trump critics spend a lot of time wondering what it will take to break through the MAGA miasma and convince voters that they’ve made a mistake. My answer? It’s going to take some pain.
Voters will need to be impacted in some meaningful ways. The value of their retirement accounts will have to dwindle amid the trade war, or they’ll have to get slammed with massive property tax hikes as local officials try to fill in the gaps on infrastructure spending.
That’s what it will take, and DOGE may well be delivering.
New ballot measure guide to be mailed to North Dakota voters ahead of election
Kxnet.com
Welcome to the KXMB/KXMC YouTube channel, your home for all news, sports, and weather in western North Dakota. Subscribe to our channel for the latest information, breaking news, and weather updates.
Submit your photos, videos, and news tips to https://www.kxnet.com/report-it/. You can also message us on Facebook.
Visit KX News: https://www.kxnet.com/
Stream our shows here: https://www.kxnet.com/live-streaming/
Download our mobile app: https://www.kxnet.com/apps/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/KXNewsND?sub_confirmation
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kxnews
X: https://twitter.com/kxmb
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kx_news/
Get our new KXNews+ app on Roku, Apple TV, or Fire TV. Learn more here: https://www.kxnet.com/kx-news-plus/
BISMARCK (North Dakota Monitor) — A federal district court judge indicated he will nullify a nearly $28 million judgment against the federal government related to costs North Dakota incurred during the Dakota Access Pipeline protests so the parties can reach a settlement.
North Dakota is still set to receive a payment Attorney General Drew Wrigley described as satisfactory, but attorneys would not disclose the amount during a Friday hearing.
Attorneys for the United States and North Dakota said the settlement would allow the parties to avoid litigating the case in appeals court,putting the nearly seven-year-old lawsuit to rest.
“We’re hoping we really don’t need to fight any further,” Department of Justice attorney Jonathan Guynn said during the hearing.
The lawsuit, filed in 2019, concerns demonstrations against the construction of the crude oil pipeline, also known as DAPL, that took place in rural south-central North Dakota in 2016 and 2017.
North Dakota claims the federal government caused the protests to grow in size and intensity by unlawfully allowing demonstrators to camp on federal land. The state says it had to pay millions of dollars on policing and cleaning up the encampments as a result. The United States denies the state’s allegations.
North Dakota U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Traynor in April 2025 sided with the state and ordered the executive branch to pay North Dakota the $28 million sum, a decision the U.S. Department of Justice later appealed to the 8th Circuit.
If the settlement moves forward, North Dakota would receive a “substantial monetary payment” from the United States, attorneys said Friday. As a condition of the agreement, the Department of Justice wants Traynor’s judgment and three other orders in which he ruled against the United States to be voided. That includes the court’s 120-page ruling from April 2025.
Both parties said Friday that having the rulings nullified wouldn’t have a significant negative impact on the public, since the documents could still be cited even if they no longer hold the weight of court orders.
At the same time, Guynn said the Department of Justice wants the orders vacated because it doesn’t want the legal conclusions Traynor made to influence the outcome of future lawsuits.
“The downstream consequences of keeping these on the books is troublesome for the United States,” he said during the hearing. If Traynor does not agree to axe the rulings, the United States would likely no longer be willing to settle and move forward with its appeal instead, Guynn added.
Traynor’s orders make findings about the federal government’s responsibility under the Federal Tort Claims Act — the law North Dakota filed the suit under — which the state noted previously in court filings “could have utility holding the federal government to account” in the future.
Still, attorneys for the state said they believe this trade-off is outweighed by the time and money the public would save by not going through the appeals process. North Dakota would also avoid the risk of having Traynor’s judgment overturned by higher courts.
Wrigley said the settlement will be made public once it’s finalized.
The United States’ appeal of Traynor’s decision has been on hold since last summer, when the state and federal government informed the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals they had started settlement negotiations and wished to pause the case.
The 8th Circuit will have to first send the case back to Traynor before he could grant the parties’ requests.
The case went to trial in Bismarck in early 2024. During the four-week trial, the court heard from witnesses including former governors Doug Burgum and Jack Dalrymple, Native activists, federal officials and law enforcement.
The Dakota Access Pipeline carries crude oil from northwest North Dakota to Illinois. It crosses the Missouri River just north of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, which prompted the tribe to begin protesting the pipeline on the grounds that it poses a threat to its water supply and sovereignty.
North Dakota’s lawsuit originally requested $38 million in damages from the federal government. Traynor ordered the executive branch to pay $28 million since the U.S. Department of Justice previously gave the state $10 million as compensation for costs it spent related to the protests.
BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – North Dakota leaders unveiled an initiative aimed at getting more oil out of the Bakken, using enhanced oil recovery and CO₂.
Senator John Hoeven said the effort is getting a boost from $36 million from the Department of Energy for “Crack the Code 2.0,” a $157 million initiative with state and industry funding.
Hoeven said the goal is to use CO₂ for enhanced oil recovery, calling it “an important, usable, valuable commodity” and saying, “We’re linking our coal plants with our oil and gas producing companies to do it.”
Funding will be used to develop technology to make enhanced oil recovery profitable and viable, and then implement it in North Dakota oil fields in a number of pilot projects.
Hoeven said current recovery rates in the Bakken are limited.
“We’re only producing about 10 to 12% of the oil out of that shale,” he said, “But with EOR, advanced oil recovery techniques, we can double it. We can take it from 10 to 12% up to 25% or better.”
Hoeven said the effort is also tied to electricity demand, saying North Dakota will “produce more electricity for a company that wants to do AI, that wants to do data centers, needs more and more electricity,” and that “it isn’t just about oil and gas.”
North Dakota Petroleum Council President Ron Ness said the pilot projects are expected to start soon.
“We hope to see these pilots putting their technologies into the ground sometime late this year, first quarter of next year,” said Ness.
“So I would expect by this time next year, we’re going to maybe potentially begin to see what are some of the results early on,” Ness added. “And again, this is going to take multiple, multiple swings at this thing. It’s not going to just happen. If it was easy, we’d be doing it. Nobody’s done it anywhere in the world. This is where we’re going to crack the code.”
Copyright 2026 KFYR. All rights reserved.
-
New York9 minutes ago‘She Studied Us for a Moment With Theatrical Longing’
-
Detroit, MI39 minutes agoDetroit shines red for ALS kickoff & lighting ceremony
-
San Francisco, CA51 minutes agoWhere to watch Pittsburgh Pirates vs San Francisco Giants: TV channel, start time, streaming for May 10
-
Dallas, TX57 minutes agoDallas weather: Large hail, dangerous winds, and flash flooding possible
-
Boston, MA1 hour ago‘This is really just the start of it all’: Mojo Boston makes splashy debut at City Hall Plaza – The Boston Globe
-
Denver, CO1 hour agoPerson dies after being hit by plane at Denver airport
-
Seattle, WA1 hour ago‘Do you care more about the kids or the drug addicts?’: Jake calls out Seattle for potential homeless shelters near schools – MyNorthwest.com
-
San Diego, CA1 hour agoIt’s ‘trust, but verify’ for new AI spine surgery system