North Dakota
Our opinion: The time has come for free school meals for all in North Dakota
A poll by the North Dakota News Cooperative shows 82% of respondents in favor of providing free school meals to all children. Of those, 65% are “strongly in favor.”
With that kind of support, perhaps North Dakota’s Legislature will this year move forward with a plan to provide free lunches for all school children in the state, ensuring healthy and ample meals for all while ridding school lunchrooms of the terrible stigma that attaches itself to those children whose families struggle or refuse to make payments for the meals their children eat.
Minnesota has provided a roadmap. In 2023, Gov. Tim Walz signed a bill that calls for free breakfasts and lunches at schools across the state for all children, regardless of family income and ability to pay. It came as the state was seeing historically high demand at food shelves, according to a report by Minnesota Public Radio. The news agency quoted Leah Gardner, of Hunger Solutions Minnesota, who said “we are still seeing tremendous food insecurity across the state” as food prices continue to rise.
According to Forum News Service reporting last month, North Dakota food banks also are seeing high participation in food aid services. In 2023, for instance, more than 156,000 North Dakotans relied on the Great Plains Food Bank to supplement their nutrition.
Free meals improve the nutrition of all students. North Dakota United – which represents educators throughout the state – points to research that shows students who participate in free food programs have better attendance, behavior, academic performance and achievement.
A free-for-all-students program also changes how students view each other in the lunchroom. For instance, when free meals were offered in Minnesota during the COVID-19 pandemic, “it made it feel like an equal playing field,” Gardner told MPR. “It made all the stigma go away.”
In North Dakota, progress was made in 2023. Lawmakers approved legislation that pays for meals for students of low-income parents and guardians. The final bill was a skeleton of its original form, however. It had been introduced as a measure to provide free meals for all students.
Indeed, free lunches come with a cost. In North Dakota, the program to provide meals for low-income students is some $6 million per biennium. And in more densely populated Minnesota, the free-for-all-students approach is proving more costly than anticipated; it was budgeted at $400 million over two years, but it looks like it’ll be $80 million more than that.
For some lawmakers, the cost for the state is worth it, since it bolsters school learning and attendance while reducing costs for families. Sen. Zac Ista, D-Grand Forks, is among them.
“The top issue heading into the 2025 legislative session is lowering the cost of living. Across North Dakota, families continue to feel the pinch of high costs for essentials like food, child care and housing. As state policymakers, we must continue to make strategic investments and policy choices to bring down these costs,” Ista said. “To tackle food costs, one solution is to provide no-cost school meals for all K-12 students in the state, providing a substantial cost savings for families with schoolchildren and also leading to better educational and behavioral outcomes in classrooms.”
Ista isn’t alone, evidenced by the North Dakota News Cooperative poll and news that 30 organizations in the state are coming together to support a free-meal program. Called “Together for School Meals,” the coalition plans to recommend $140 million in state funding over the coming biennium to reimburse schools for the costs of free meals for all students.
North Dakota can afford this, and making the meals free for all is fair for everybody. Lawmakers should make it happen in 2025.
Herald editorials are written under the byline “Herald editorial board,” since they sometimes include the thoughts, opinions or written input of multiple authors. Editorials generally reflect the opinion of a newspaper’s publisher.
North Dakota
North Dakota approves certificate of site compatibility for 400MWh BESS from NextEra Energy Resources
Skip to content
North Dakota
Armstrong opens application period for Governor’s Band/Orchestra and Choral programs
BISMARCK, N.D. – Gov. Kelly Armstrong today announced the opening of the application period for school, community and church bands, orchestras and choirs across North Dakota to apply to serve as the Governor’s Official State Band/Orchestra Program and Choral Program for the 2026-2027 school year.
The Governor and First Lady will select the two groups from the applications received based on musical talent, achievement and community involvement. The governor may invite the groups to perform at official state functions held throughout the 2026-2027 school year, including the State of the State Address in January 2027 at the Capitol in Bismarck.
Interested groups should submit an application with a musical recording to the Governor’s Office by 5 p.m. Monday, May 4. The Governor’s Band/Orchestra Program and Governor’s Choral Program will be announced in May. Please complete the application and provide materials at https://www.governor.nd.gov/governors-chorus-and-bandorchestra-program-application.
North Dakota
Greenpeace seeks new trial, claiming jury pool biased in case over Dakota Access Pipeline
Greenpeace has asked for a second trial after a judge entered a $345 million judgment against the organization in a landmark case brought by the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline.
The case “threatens to result in one of the largest miscarriages of justice in North Dakota’s history,” attorneys for the environmental group wrote in a brief filed last week.
After a three-week trial roughly a year ago, a Morton County jury directed Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer about $667 million, finding the environmental group at fault for inciting illegal acts against the company during anti-pipeline protests in North Dakota in 2016 and 2017 and for publishing false statements that harmed Energy Transfer’s reputation.
Greenpeace denies Energy Transfer’s claims and maintains that it brought the lawsuit to hurt the environmental movement.
Southwest Judicial District Judge James Gion in October slashed the jury’s award to $345 million, though he didn’t finalize the award until late February.
Greenpeace is now taking steps to fight the judgment, which includes its motion for a new trial.
The environmental group’s reasons for the request include claims that the jury instructions and verdict form contained errors, and that Energy Transfer was allowed to present unfair and irrelevant evidence to jurors. The group also alleges the jury pool was biased.
Greenpeace says the jury’s award assumes that Greenpeace was entirely responsible for any injury Energy Transfer sustained related to the protests. Jurors were not given the opportunity to consider whether Greenpeace was only at fault for a portion of the damages, the organization wrote in its brief.
Attorneys for Greenpeace also referenced the mailers and other media circulated to Mandan and Bismarck residents before the trial that contained anti-Dakota Access Pipeline protest and pro-energy industry content.
The environmental group seeks a new trial in Cass County, arguing in part that the jury pool in the Fargo area would be more fair because its residents did not directly experience the Dakota Access Pipeline protests and because the local economy is less dependent on the energy industry.
If Greenpeace’s request for a new trial is denied, it plans to appeal the case to the North Dakota Supreme Court, the organization has said.
Greenpeace previously asked for the trial to be moved from Morton County to Cass County in early 2025, which Gion and the North Dakota Supreme Court denied.
The lawsuit is against three separate Greenpeace organizations — Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund.
Energy Transfer as of Wednesday morning had not submitted a response to Greenpeace’s motion for a new trial. Previously, the company has defended the jury’s verdict and disputed Greenpeace’s claims that the court proceedings were not fair.
Energy Transfer has indicated it may appeal Gion’s decision to reduce the award to $345 million.
Greenpeace will not have to pay any of the $345 million judgment for at least a couple of months, Gion ruled Tuesday.
Court documents indicate that the organization could have to pay a bond of up to $25 million while appeals proceed, though the environmental group has asked the judge to waive or reduce this amount. Gion has not decided on this motion.
He noted that obtaining such a large bond will be challenging.
“The magnitude of this matter defies simple decisions,” Gion wrote.
Energy Transfer in court filings urged the judge to require Greenpeace to post the full $25 million.
Any bond money Greenpeace provides would be held by a third party while the appeals proceed, according to Greenpeace USA.
Greenpeace International has filed a separate lawsuit in the Netherlands that accuses Energy Transfer of weaponizing the U.S. legal system against the environmental group. Energy Transfer asked Gion to order that the overseas suit be paused while the North Dakota case is still active, which Gion denied. The company appealed his ruling to the North Dakota Supreme Court, which has yet to make a decision on the matter.
-
Atlanta, GA3 days ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
South-Carolina1 week agoSouth Carolina vs TCU predictions for Elite Eight game in March Madness
-
Movie Reviews6 days agoVaazha 2 first half review: Hashir anchors a lively, chaos-filled teen tale
-
Vermont1 week ago
Skier dies after fall at Sugarbush Resort
-
Politics1 week agoTrump’s Ballroom Design Has Barely Been Scrutinized
-
Politics1 week agoJD Vance says he was ‘obsessed’ with UFOs, believes aliens are actually ‘demons’
-
Atlanta, GA1 week agoFetishist ‘No Kings’ protester in mask drags ‘Trump’ and ‘JD Vance’ behind her wheelchair
-
Entertainment6 days agoInside Ye’s first comeback show at SoFi Stadium