Connect with us

North Dakota

ND Legislature debates income tax reform; some argue why not property tax?

Published

on

ND Legislature debates income tax reform; some argue why not property tax?


BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – We’ve been speaking about it for months: Governor Doug Burgum desires to chop earnings taxes. And Wednesday, his invoice obtained its first listening to on the State Legislature.

Do you want the concept of tax-free earnings? Governor Burgum does. And so do a lot of highly effective lawmakers within the Legislature. However the questions surrounding this invoice are: how a lot wouldn’t it price, who wouldn’t it have an effect on, and why does the governor have his sights set on earnings tax somewhat than on property tax?

It’s not typically you see the governor at Legislative committee hearings, however earnings tax reform is on the heart of his plan to deal with the state’s workforce wants.

“That is particularly vital proper now once we’re in deep competitors for staff throughout the nation,” stated Governor Burgum.

Advertisement

The invoice would impose a flat tax fee of 1.5% for people making greater than about $45,000 or married filers making greater than about $75,000. As for many who make lower than $45,000 per 12 months: no state earnings tax.

“By doing this, three out of 5 taxpayers in North Dakota could have a zero-tax obligation to the state of North Dakota,” stated Consultant Craig Headland, R-Montpelier.

However regardless of assist from each tax committee chairmen, the governor, and the tax commissioner, opponents of the invoice have raised some considerations about who the invoice would profit.

“60% of tax filers in North Dakota, they get about $220 [per year], divide that out by 26 for people who find themselves getting paychecks each two weeks, it’s just some {dollars} additional within the paycheck. It offers $36,000 yearly for individuals making over $490,000,” stated Consultant Zac Ista, D-Grand Forks.

Democrats aren’t alone of their opposition to the invoice. Fellow Republicans are fearful this might negatively affect applications which can be boosted by tax credit.

Advertisement

“We affect plenty of issues, I imply, the endowment fund credit score. There’s a laundry record of credit the state does, automation credit score, the Renaissance Zone credit score, a workforce recruitment credit score, all of these issues turn into much less invaluable once we cut back the charges as a result of individuals simply aren’t paying the tax within the first place,” stated Rep. SuAnn Olson, R-Baldwin.

Moreover, they imagine earnings tax aid isn’t the first tax drawback for North Dakotans.

“The tax that retains households up at night time proper now could be the property tax. And sure, that’s not a tax that we levy on the state stage, however we’re kidding ourselves if we don’t assume our state insurance policies affect the quantity of property taxes our cities, counties, park districts are levying,” stated Rep. Ista.

Nonetheless, Governor Burgum says this laws, somewhat than property tax reform, is important to addressing the state’s workforce points.

“If you’re advertising to get individuals to maneuver to your state, the message is straightforward. We now have zero private earnings tax in our state, open your small business right here, rent your workers right here, versus different states like Minnesota, and hold ‘em right here,” stated Governor Burgum.

Advertisement

Governor Burgum sees this invoice as a primary step in direction of zero earnings tax for all North Dakotans.

Instantly following this listening to, the committee heard one other earnings tax reform invoice. That one would give people a tax credit score of $750 for particular person filers or $1,500 for married filers.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Township funding changes bill passes ND House

Published

on

Township funding changes bill passes ND House


BISMARCK, N.D. (KUMV) – The North Dakota House approved a bill to change Operation Prairie Dog funding for townships.

The bill impacts those in non-oil-producing counties.

Currently, every township receives an equal portion, but this bill would base it on road mileage.

With a 90 to 3 vote, it will move on to the Senate at a later time.

Advertisement

Previous Coverage and More Information: House bill seeks to change township funding for Operation Prairie Dog



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Concerns over local control pop up in hearing on North Dakota bill to restrict student cellphone use

Published

on

Concerns over local control pop up in hearing on North Dakota bill to restrict student cellphone use


BISMARCK — North Dakota lawmakers heard testimony for and against a bill to ban cellphone use by public school students during instructional time Wednesday, Jan. 15.

House Bill 1160,

sponsored by Rep. Jim Jonas, R-West Fargo,

would prohibit students from using cellphones during classes or any educational activity but allow such use during lunch, recess, between classes and open class periods.

Advertisement

Jonas said approximately 11 states have either total bans or restrictions on student cellphone use and another 10 are considering them.

“Let’s see if we can get better behavior, academic scores up, math, reading and better mental health,” Jonas told the House Education

C

ommittee on Wednesday.

A modified version of the bill makes exceptions for students who must use their cellphone to manage a medical condition or are on an individualized education program, plan or 504 plan who use their phone as an assistive device.

Advertisement

In addition, a school district or school may temporarily suspend the cellphone ban in the case of an emergency.

West Fargo High School Principal Rachel Bachmeier, who spoke in favor of the bill, said her school, along with others in the district, implemented a policy in the fall of 2022 to restrict cellphone use.

In effect, the cellphone policy is “out of sight, out of use from bell to bell,” she said, but students may use them during non-instructional time.

Consequences for violating the policy range from a classroom warning to surrender of the cellphone to the main office for a day or more to family meetings and behavior plans.

“We very, very rarely move beyond the first main office consequence. It is an incredibly effective policy in that way,” Bachmeier said.

Advertisement

Teachers have also noticed less “drama” in the classroom when students aren’t distracted by their phones, she added, and students themselves have reflected on how the policy improved their own behaviors.

Several school administrators and other stakeholders expressed concerns with aspects of the bill.

Steve Madler, principal of Bismarck Century High School, said they follow an “out of sight, out of mind during instruction” policy after attempting an all-out cellphone ban a few years back, which led to too many arguments from students and families.

However, he said, some students and teachers use cellphones in the classroom for research, surveys and language translation, adding that the Bismarck district distributes Google Chromebooks to students, which aren’t as efficient as Apple iPads for those tasks.

“It’s important for us to have policies, but I think it’s also important that we have pieces in the bill that allow us to use it for an educational purpose,” Madler said.

Advertisement

KrisAnn Norby-Jahner, in-house legal counsel for the North Dakota School Boards Association, expressed concern about a blanket ban on cellphone use. She said local control should be maintained, and a large majority of school districts already handle this issue.

Norby-Jahner suggested a change in the bill’s language simply requiring all school districts to come up with their own cellphone policies.

In 2024, the Minnesota Legislature passed a law requiring school districts and charter schools to adopt student cellphone policies by March 15, 2025.

Bachmeier said there is an argument for local control, but action is needed if lawmakers believe excessive cellphone use and social media access during classes is a public health crisis.

“If we do, what is our responsibility as a state to step in and take the first action in helping protect our kids?” she asked.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

School phone policies needed, but not a state ban, bill opponents say

Published

on

School phone policies needed, but not a state ban, bill opponents say


Mactrunk / Depositphotos.com

BISMARCK (North Dakota Monitor) – North Dakota public education groups said Wednesday they recognize the need for a policy on student use of cellphones but mostly resisted a call for a state-mandated ban.

Rep. Jim Jonas, R-West Fargo, introduced House Bill 1160 that would ban students from using cellphones during class time.

Advertisement

A proposed amendment to the bill would add some exemptions, like using a smartphone to monitor health conditions, such as diabetes, and in some cases where students are on a learning plan crafted for the student.

The House Education Committee did not act on the bill or the amendment but indicated that there would be more discussion next week.

KrisAnn Norby-Jahner, legal counsel for the North Dakota School Boards Association, testified that the cellphone use issue should be handled at the local level, but added she would not be opposed to a bill requiring that school districts have a cellphone policy.

Mike Heilman, executive director of the North Dakota Small Organized Schools, testified that the group’s board members did not support the bill.

He said some teachers have students use their phone during class and designate a spot on the desk where the phone should be when not being used.

Advertisement

He also said some schools may want to make exceptions for juniors and seniors to have more access to their phones

But he also said schools might like the state’s support on the need for a cellphone policy.

Cellphone use among students was described during testimony as a mental health issue in addition to being a distraction.

Rachel Bachmeier, principal at West Fargo High School, said there has been “less drama” since the school restricted phone use to breaks between classes.

She said parents generally support that policy, with little support for an overall ban during the school day.

Advertisement

Steve Madler, principal at Bismarck Century High School, said his experience with a ban during the school day turned out to be unworkable for many students and parents.

The U.S. Department of Education in December called on every state and school district to adopt a policy on phone use in schools.

Jonas, a former West Fargo teacher, said the goal of the bill is improved test scores and mental health. He said he received some calls from principals for an all-out ban during the school day.

When asked what the penalty would be for a school that did not enforce the state policy, he did not give specifics.

“The hope is that they would abide by the law,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending