Connect with us

Nebraska

Nebraska tornadoes: Reality of rebuilding sinks in for those picking up the pieces

Published

on

Nebraska tornadoes: Reality of rebuilding sinks in for those picking up the pieces


OMAHA, Neb. (WOWT) – Reality is starting to sink in for those who will need to rebuild after Friday’s tornado outbreak.

Jeff Smedlund, an independent insurance agent, said it’s hard to predict what lies ahead for the hundreds of homeowners who will need to repair or rebuild from the ground up.

Smedlund said, “This is an unprecedented loss that we just don’t know what the solution is going to be.”

Smedlund recalls the tornado of 1975.

Advertisement

“For us that were alive in 1975 the tornado, we recall it took almost a year for the homes to get rebuilt,” he said.

However, Smedlund says back then, we didn’t face the obstacles we do now.

“There is a shortage of materials and there is a shortage of labor and then when you throw in a large loss like this, it exacerbates the problem.”

Smedlund says the problem took off during the COVID pandemic.

“The shortage we’ve seen started back in COVID, and that has just progressed itself along so we’re finding a hard time getting materials in place, so that might have to come from other areas, might have to wait for it, and as far as the labor goes, we’re going to have to find the labor that can do the job.”

Advertisement

Smedlund says many local contractors are already tied up. “The labor pool that we have in Omaha is strained already with a lot of the large commercial projects we have. You’re looking at Amazon and Google that take up a lot of resources, and then with things that are going at Crossroads and things like that may impact the ability to get your home rebuilt as quickly as you want to,” he said.

Or for what many are willing to pay, unlike large companies.

Smedlund said, “They’re building large warehouses, and they want to get things done quickly and they have the money to get the talent to work on it.”

Smedlund says homeowner’s insurance should cover temporary housing like apartments or hotels. However, he warns, finding a hotel may be difficult this weekend because of the annual Berkshire Hathaway shareholders’ meeting.

Advertisement



Source link

Nebraska

Nebraska Think-Tank Mimics ‘DOGE’ with ‘G.O.A.T. Initiative’ Bill Package

Published

on

Nebraska Think-Tank Mimics ‘DOGE’ with ‘G.O.A.T. Initiative’ Bill Package


A new package of bills introduced in the Nebraska Legislature, inspired by Elon Musk’s forthcoming Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), is set to continue a game of hack ‘n slash against red tape and regulations on industry in the state.

The “Regulatory Modernization Package” authored by The Platte Institute, a local libertarian/free-market-oriented think-tank, has chosen a different eponymous animal acronym for the initiative — G.O.A.T. (Government Oversight, Accountability, and Transparency).

The GOAT Initiative is comprised of six legislative bills, all seeking to rework the states regulatory landscape in different ways. Each bill has either a republican and democrat lawmakers sponsoring the legislation, presenting a bipartisan front in Nebraska’s technically non-partisan, one-house political body.

Those six lawmakers, plus Speaker of the Legislature John Arch, spoke on these bills during a Jan. 16 press conference in the Capitol Rotunda alongside officials with the Platte Institute, namely, former State Senators Dr. Laura Ebke and Nicole Fox.

Advertisement

“We believe that the time is right for rethinking how we regulate economic activity in our state,” Ebke began the conference, citing President Trump’s forthcoming DOGE department and Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds announcing plans to establish a similar agency during her Condition of the State address last week. “The senators introducing legislation in this package have decided not to wait on an advisory body to make recommendations and instead are taking the goat by the horns.”

The six proposals of the G.O.A.T. Initiative are:

(1) The REINS Act, introduced by Sen. Merv Riepe (R) of Omaha, would require legislative review and approval of any regulation with an annual economic impact exceeding $1 million over five years, or $200,000 per year. It will allow the Legislature to reconsider the authorization of legislation if an economic impact statement shows the impact to be significant.

(2) LB 29, introduced by Sen. Danielle Conrad (D) of Lincoln, would codify a 2017 Executive Order from then Governor Pete Ricketts which would mandate regular reviews (every 3 years) of existing regulations and submission of reports to the Legislature.

(3) Establish a Federal Fund Inventory, a bill to be introduced by freshman Sen. Bob Andersen (R) of Omaha, would mandate an audit of federal funds received by Nebraska, except those going to the University of Nebraska and state colleges. The bill would require auditors track how long the grant program lasts, if there are state matching requirements, or if there are maintenance requirements attached. It requires that an operating plan be in place should the federal receipts be reduced by 25% or more from the preceding fiscal year.

Advertisement

(4) A bill to allow for Venue Freedom, or in other words, allowing businesses to resolve disputes with state agencies in their local courts, not necessarily in Lincoln/Lancaster County as is now required by law. This bill is to be introduced by Sen. Tanya Storer (R) of Whitman.

(5) The creation of an Office of Regulatory Management in the executive branch, which would be tasked with conducting cost-benefit analyses of rules and regulations. A similar office established in Virginia was cited as a successful version of this program. This bill is to be introduced by Sen. Dan McKeon (R) of Sweetwater.

(6) Reform to Regulatory Advisories, a bill to be introduced by Sen. Dan Quick (D) of Grand Island, which would prevent regulatory advisories issued by agencies from being binding on businesses and others regulated by the agency unless required to remain in compliance with federal regulations, in which case the binding advisory cannot be stricter than that required by the federal rule.

While Speaker Arch isn’t sponsoring any of these bills, he spoke in support of the package and headlined a related bill he has introduced at the behest of Gov. Jim Pillen — LB 346 — which seeks to eliminate or consolidate the duties of over 40 of the state’s 225 boards, commissions, committees, councils, funds, panels, task forces, etc.

“These bills that are being brought, I think will improve the function of government, and that’s certainly been my passion,” said Arch, noting that certain regulations are established in reaction to a recent event or finding. He said the a periodic review of these regulations, through LB 29, will “make sure that the value that these regulations are providing are still there.”

Advertisement

Speaking on LB 29, Conrad said, “One of the most significant problems when it comes to regulatory reform and bureaucratic bloat is that it gets on autopilot and it evades review… We will ensure that there will be legislative eyes and ears on every rule and regulation that emanates from the bureaucracy on a periodic basis.”

When then Gov. Ricketts first issued this executive order in 2017, according to the Platte Institute, Nebraska had 100,627 rules and regulations on the books. Over several years, this order shrunk that number to 76,201 — a reduction of about 24.3%.

“That was an excellent first start, but we can’t rest on those laurels,” said Conrad.

Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue, Chair of the Government, Military, and Veterans Affairs Committee, the committee which all of these bills are likely to be referred to, said the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 reversal of the Chevron deference “generated a great deal of national interest of regulatory reform.”

The deference, set in 1984 in a case involving the oil giant, gave federal agencies wide powers to interpret laws and decide the best ways to apply them. In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court weakened the powers of federal agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency.

Advertisement

“Every Senator swore an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it’s our responsibility to honor that commitment by ensuring the legislative process remains the cornerstone of decision making in our state,” said Sanders. “I look forward to hearing [these bills in committee] and finding ways to advance as many of these measures as possible.”

Officials with the Platte Institute repeatedly thanked the Americans for Prosperity (AFP) Nebraska chapter and it’s director, John Gage, for helping author the package. Founded in 2004, AFP is a conservative political advocacy group affiliated with Charles Koch and the late David Koch, who have been prominent funders of think-tanks that lobby to oppose environmental regulation.

Asked for an estimate on the cost-saving potential of this package, Ebke cited a recent study done for the Platte Institute by Patrick McLaughlin, a Senior Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center, another free-market-oriented think-tank, also with ties to the Koch family.

McLaughlin’s study argues that regulatory “burdens” can hamper the growth rate of a state’s gross domestic product (GDP), or the total value of everything a state produces in goods and services. While a growing GDP is a useful sign of economic health, it’s not the whole story. Economists often look at other indicators — like income distribution, environmental health, and quality of life — to get a fuller picture. McLaughlin argues for a generic “one in, one out” or “net zero” approach to state regulations.

Leaning on studies produced by the Mercatus Center, McLaughlin also claims that government regulations on industry impose a disproportionate cost on low-income households. The data framework used to draw this conclusion does not account for any benefits to wellbeing reaped by regulatory safeguards.

Advertisement

According to Mercatus’ methodology, the state facing the “worst” federal regulatory burden is Louisiana. As is the case, Louisiana has a large presence of certain highly regulated sectors, such as “chemical products manufacturing” and “oil and gas extraction.” The Center for Progressive Reform, a left-of-center political research and advocacy group, sites the 2010 BP oil spill and Louisiana’s “Cancer Alley” — an 85-mile stretch in the River Parishes of Louisiana which is home to over 200 petrochemical plants and refineries — as reasons for increasing/maintaining regulations on industry. Regulations which have resulted from these occurrences are, albeit, lumped together pejoratively with all regulations in the Mercatus methodology.

“No one here is saying that we’re going to eliminate every single rule and regulation,” Conrad said to reporters when asked about striking the right balance. “What we are saying is that rules and regulations should only be utilized under clear legislative guidance to advance consumer safety, public health and welfare.”

“When we remove red-tape and require precision in lawmaking through [the legislature], we’re standing up for the people,” she continued. “There will still be rules and regulations for certain areas we cannot legislate to a certain level of precision. But they should only be there to protect the consumer’s health, welfare, and safety. They shouldn’t be there to expand the power of unelected bureaucrats.”

Critics of this package may cite the powerful influence of money in politics and partisan nature of the state legislature as reason not to trust the fate of each regulation, on a fluid basis, with an elected political body. But, as warped as it can seem, the will of the people of Nebraska is ideally reflected in it’s lawmakers who are held accountable by voters.

Lawmakers will begin to hold hearings on these bill this week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Sunday Standings: Nebraska Women’s Basketball Sits at 7th in Big Ten Conference

Published

on

Sunday Standings: Nebraska Women’s Basketball Sits at 7th in Big Ten Conference


In their only game of the week, the Nebraska women’s basketball team upended Iowa in overtime. That win helped the Big Red stay in the top half

Nebraska only had one game this week which they defeated the Iowa Hawkeyes. They defeated Iowa in overtime as they won by three points.

Elsewhere, Ohio State was upset by Penn State and Maryland won a close top-25 matchup against Minnesota early in the week.

Here are all of the scores from this week.

Advertisement

Tuesday, January 14

Wednesday, January 15

Thursday, January 16

Iowa Hawkeyes guard Lucy Olsen (33) attempts to steal the basketball from Nebraska Cornhuskers guard Britt Prince (23).

Iowa Hawkeyes guard Lucy Olsen (33) attempts to steal the basketball from Nebraska Cornhuskers guard Britt Prince (23) Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025 at Carver-Hawkeye Arena in Iowa City, Iowa. / Julia Hansen/Iowa City Press-Citizen / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Saturday, January 18

Sunday, January 19

One week after moving up to seventh in the league, the Huskers find themselves in that exact same position.

Below are the full rankings.

  1. #4 USC 7-0 (17-1)
  2. #1 UCLA 6-0 (17-0)
  3. #9 Ohio State 6-1 (17-1)
  4. #8 Maryland 6-1 (16-1)
  5. #24 Minnesota 5-2 (17-2)
  6. #22 Michigan State 5-2 (15-3)
  7. Nebraska 5-2 (14-4)
  8. Oregon 5-3 (14-5)
  9. Michigan 4-3 (13-5)
  10. Washington 4-3 (13-6)
  11. Indiana 4-3 (12-6)
  12. Illinois 3-4 (13-5)
  13. Iowa 2-6 (12-7)
  14. Wisconsin 1-6 (10-8)
  15. Penn State 1-7 (10-9)
  16. Northwestern 0-6 (7-10)
  17. Purdue 0-7 (7-11)
  18. Rutgers 0-8 (8-11)

MORE: Nebraska Men’s Basketball Falls to 13th in Big Ten Conference

MORE: Nick Handley Show: Nebrasketball’s Struggles & Will Notre Dame Pull the Upset?

MORE: How to Watch Nebraska Women’s Basketball vs. Wisconsin: Preview, Breakdown, TV Channel

MORE: Husker Doc Talk: Keyuo Craver, Book Author and Football All-American

MORE: After Nebrasketball: Huskers Fall Short in College Park

Stay up to date on all things Huskers by bookmarking Nebraska Cornhuskers On SI, subscribing to HuskerMax on YouTube, and visiting HuskerMax.com daily.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Takeaways from Maryland men’s basketball’s 69-66 win over Nebraska

Published

on

Takeaways from Maryland men’s basketball’s 69-66 win over Nebraska


Maryland men’s basketball narrowly escaped Nebraska, 69-66, Sunday at Xfinity Center.

The Terps led by nine points with less than four minutes remaining, but a 9-0 Nebraska run tied the score with a minute remaining.

Here are three takeaways from the game.

Queen’s up-and-down season continued

Less than a week ago, Derik Queen posted a season-high 27 points in a win over Minnesota, but followed it up with a nine-point, five-turnover performance against Northwestern Thursday. Instead of bouncing back, Queen’s stock continued to fall as he failed to make a single shot en route to a season-low three points.

Advertisement

His defensive play against Northwestern was heavily criticized, as he was consistently out of position and often did not keep up with his defensive assignment as they moved off-ball.

While his defensive effort marginally improved against the Cornhuskers, he was a nonfactor on offense. He did not command the ball on post-ups and lacked aggression when faced with a mismatch, resulting in his 0 for 4 shooting performance. And although he is a talented passer and recorded two assists Sunday, his turnover rate is far too high. He is occasionally careless with the ball and tries difficult moves that he has not perfected yet. He is averaging four turnovers per game over the last four games, including three Sunday.

Head coach Kevin Willard responded, benching Queen for eight of the final 10 minutes Sunday in favor of Jordan Geronimo, who played just two minutes against Northwestern.

Ja’Kobi Gillespie, Rodney Rice, Selton Miguel and Julian Reese picked up the slack, but Queen cannot put up duds if Maryland wants to consistently beat high-level opponents and win on the road.

Turnovers stalled the Terps’ offense

Maryland has protected the ball well throughout the season, committing 10.6 turnovers per game entering Sunday, fourth-fewest in the Big Ten. But the last three games have been a different story; the Terps committed 16 turnovers against then-No. 22 UCLA, 16 at Northwestern and 12 against Nebraska.

Advertisement

While Maryland started the game shooting 2-of-8 from the field, it took care of the ball — committing just two turnovers, both by Derik Queen — in the first 10 minutes, resulting in a five-point lead. But then the Terps got sloppy. They committed six turnovers in the following 10 minutes, which led to a near-five-minute scoring drought and allowed Nebraska to take a five-point advantage of its own. During the drought, Maryland was called for a 5-second violation fresh out of a timeout, highlighting coaching and execution lapses.

Luckily for Maryland, the Cornhuskers were not too sharp either. They committed nine turnovers in the first half — 13 total — multiple of which were just poor decisions rather than impressive defensive plays. Juwan Gary, Nebraska’s second-leading scorer, twice threw uncontested passes straight to Gillespie.

While Maryland cleaned up these issues in the second half and has overcome them at home, it’s been part of their road struggles and something it will need to address.

Maryland stumped Nebraska’s stars

The Terps struggled to contain Northwestern’s leading scorers Nick Martinelli and Brooks Barnhizer Thursday. Martinelli scored 22 points on 64.3% shooting, including the game-winner, while Brooks dropped 20 points and five assists.

But on Sunday, Nebraska’s top three leading scorers were all held below their season averages. Brice Williams, who averaged the fifth-most points per game in the conference with 18.9 entering the game, was subjected to more of a play-making role against the Terps, who assigned Rice to him for much of the game. Williams finished with 14 points on 6-of-14 shooting from the field and three assists.

Advertisement

Gary, coming off a 20-point game against Rutgers, posted one of his worst games of the season Sunday, recording just six points on 3-of-9 shooting from the field and two turnovers. He averaged 12.1 points per game prior to the contest.

Connor Essegian, Nebraska’s leading scorer off the bench, also totaled just six points, more than five points below his season average.

But the Cornhuskers saw production from a different source off the bench. Forward Andrew Morgan, who entered the game averaging 7.9 points per game, scored 12 of Nebraska’s first 24 points and finished with a team-high 17 points on 7-of-12 shooting from the field.

While Morgan kept the Cornhuskers in the game, struggles from their top players ultimately led to their demise.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending