Connect with us

Nebraska

Nebraska lawmakers advance ‘absolute minimum’ property tax package after months of buildup • Nebraska Examiner

Published

on

Nebraska lawmakers advance ‘absolute minimum’ property tax package after months of buildup • Nebraska Examiner


LINCOLN — Months of buildup for a new property tax relief-driven package was heavily narrowed in the Nebraska Legislature on Tuesday before being advanced with the “absolute minimum” provisions.

Lawmakers voted 34-11 to end debate on Legislative Bill 34, accepting a “very skinnied-down,” “simple” version. Over the course of 24 hours, lawmakers pivoted through various tax packages before landing at a “consensus” that contained  just three components. 

That was a striking contrast from plans Gov. Jim Pillen, the Revenue Committee and others championed this summer. That included the results of a statewide tour that Pillen led to 26 communities, along with organizing a “task force” of select lawmakers.

In the end, state senators landed what could be the last train out of the special session:

Advertisement
  • “Front-loading” income tax credits for property taxes paid so they appear first on annual property tax statements. About 50% of such eligible credits were unclaimed.
  • Expanding school tax credits to a total of $750 million in the next fiscal year that would grow in future years.
  • Restricting annual increases in property tax-asking authority by municipal and county governments by the state and the local index of inflation, or 0% in times of deflation. Public safety services and the work of county attorneys and public defenders would be exceptions, as would voter approval and emergencies.
State Sen. Brad von Gillern of Elkhorn. Aug. 13, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

“This is an absolute minimum that I feel that we should do,” State Sen. Brad von Gillern of Elkhorn, Revenue Committee vice chair, said during debate. “I mean, I am disappointed that this is all that we’re talking about doing.”

‘Incremental positive movement’

State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha, another Revenue Committee member, said it was a start while calling it “the absolute least we can do.”

“It’s nowhere near what we really wanted, but incremental positive movement is still incremental positive movement,” Kauth said.

The Revenue Committee voted 6-1 just one day prior to advance an expansive, 122-page package that sought to lower local property taxes by about 30%, based on rough estimates. 

That effort included the final three items, but also more expansive credits for K-12 school districts and the state’s 23 natural resources districts. Funding the model would have come through existing property tax relief programs as well as new or increased taxes on various goods, services and “sin” items, such as candy, soft drinks, consumable hemp, tobacco and gambling.

Instead, State Sen. Lou Ann Linehan of Elkhorn, the Revenue Committee chair, acknowledging that the legislation lacked enough support, pivoted about halfway through the eight-hour debate Tuesday to a new amendment.

Advertisement

“If somebody votes ‘no’ on this, they can’t possibly stand up on the floor again and say they care about property taxpayers,” she said. “This literally puts money in people’s hands.”

Linehan and von Gillern, among others, said the change would help those who might not have an accountant to walk them through their tax filings and educate them about the program. Those already claiming the credit would have an easier process but smaller relief, Linehan said.

‘I hope we can do more’

State Sen. Justin Wayne of Omaha. Aug. 13, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

State Sen. Mike Jacobson of North Platte said that those revisions were a “no-brainer” and that it didn’t get easier, simpler or more fundamental.

“I’m truly flabbergasted that we’re debating whether we want to do the minimum,” Jacobson said. “I mean, it doesn’t get more minimal than this.”

Those who opposed the plan included State Sen. Justin Wayne of Omaha, who said out-of-state companies would benefit from the “front-loaded” property tax credits while residents of his district would be left out. 

Wayne criticized progressives and conservatives alike in the officially nonpartisan body for drawing lines in the sand and not working together. He said the “minimum” was bad policy.

Advertisement

“I hope we can do more than just this, because this is the bare ‘minimum,’ Senator Jacobson, and the bare minimum isn’t good enough for my district,” Wayne said.

Municipal, county tax asking caps

Linehan described the caps on local governments as “very soft” because a majority of some county or municipal budgets are related to public safety, which wouldn’t be capped.

However, that was the side of the narrowed bill that led to hesitation.

State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln. Aug. 13, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln said the public safety carveout might help with hiring jail guards, for example, but would not address the “upstream issues” to prevent incarceration, such as homelessness, substance use disorders and mental health.

“You can start to delineate certain exemptions of what you think is or is not public safety, but the reality is, if a political subdivision is financially unable to meet the needs of its citizens, it is failing the people that it’s there to represent,” he said.

State Sen. Terrell McKinney of North Omaha said the category needed to include other support, such as school programs or community centers, to ensure “kids aren’t going into the streets.”

Advertisement

State Sen. John Fredrickson of Omaha said in his conversations with constituents and officials statewide, many people are unwilling to sacrifice or compromise infrastructure, including roads, bridges and quality of life services, such as parks and libraries. 

The City of Omaha was among the loudest opponents to the caps, as were multiple municipal leaders statewide.

“I just don’t know that I’m comfortable kneecapping the possible economic development that’s going on in that city,” Fredrickson said of Omaha, “and I don’t know why anyone in the state would want to do that.”

‘Our spending lid is killing us’

State Sen. Anna Wishart of Lincoln attends a public listening forum on property taxes in Lincoln. July 22, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

Two Democratic lawmakers from Lincoln, State Sens. Eliot Bostar and Anna Wishart, supported the plan. They said it would be beneficial to their city, and to Lancaster County, because of existing budgetary restraints that Lincoln is up against but that would be removed.

“Our spending lid is killing us,” Wishart said.

Bostar said the city would benefit, “on net.”

Advertisement

The League of Nebraska Municipalities and Nebraska Association of County Officials have remained adamantly against the proposed hard caps, which could freeze tax asking in times of deflation even as some costs or salaries must be paid for.

Lynn Rex, executive director of the League, said the Legislature “basically disregarded” that cities and villages have obligations they must pay for. Jon Cannon, executive director of the county association, said the caps could make it “virtually impossible” for counties to maintain infrastructure, which law enforcement and the public rely upon.

“All the other things that are part of the fabric of our communities, now they’re subject to a cap,” Cannon said after the vote.

Cannon and Rex said taxpayers will see a decrease in quality of roads and bridges and fewer qualify of life services. 

Rex said she hopes lawmakers will consider bumping up the spending cap to 3% or inflation, as was negotiated between August 2023 and April 2024, when the previous tax package failed.

Advertisement

Pillen plan ‘down in flames’

In addition to Bostar and Wishart, three other lawmakers bucked the majority of ideological lines in either supporting or opposing the measure: Democratic State Sen. Tony Vargas of Omaha and Republican State Sens. Julie Slama of Dunbar and Merv Riepe of Ralston.

Vargas said in a tweet that he was proud to vote for an additional $180 million in property tax relief without increasing sales taxes, which Slama also celebrated.

State Sen. Julie Slama of Dunbar. Aug. 13, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

But Slama saw it more as a “huge indictment of Pillen’s failed leadership to watch his plan go down in flames,” which she added he and his family stood to financially benefit from.

“Big win for Nebraska taxpayers to have the largest tax increase in state history fail before the cloture vote,” Slama told the Nebraska Examiner.

Slama and Democratic State Sen. Jen Day in Sarpy County opposed the motion to end debate but ultimately voted to advance the bill.

Riepe, who joined members of the Revenue Committee and a handful of other senators in negotiating a tax plan this summer with Pillen, said it was hard enough to stay on top of the plan as it “changed almost by the hour.” He said it was more so for “citizens with skin in the game.”

Advertisement

He said the bill was an example of “biting off more than one can chew” and that the measure needed more thought and study, even though he wanted property tax relief.

“I’ve never lived by the theory of ‘jump and the net will appear,’ and I am afraid that that is where we’re at,” Riepe said. “I tell young people this all the time, it’s better to be single than to wish you were, and it’s better to have no legislation than to have bad legislation.”

Budget debate begins Wednesday

To fund the new plan, lawmakers will consider two bills advanced from the Appropriations Committee related to budget cuts, to the tune of about $139 million (LB 2), and increased fees (LB 3). 

If those measures advance as is from the committee, the state would be on the hook for about $46 million, according to State Sen. Rob Clements of Elmwood, chair of the Appropriations Committee. He said that would need to come out of state reserves.

That number could end up being higher, McKinney and Wishart previewed, as they and others are opposed to a broad, undisclosed $25 million administrative cut to the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services.

Advertisement

Debate on those two measures will begin at 9 a.m. Wednesday. LB 34 is expected to return for debate later this week.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Nebraska

In Nebraska special session on taxes, some ideas to raise millions in revenue get little attention

Published

on

In Nebraska special session on taxes, some ideas to raise millions in revenue get little attention


LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — Nebraska lawmakers began debate Tuesday on a special session bill to ease soaring property taxes, largely through mid-year budget cuts, caps on spending and shifts to sales and special taxes. But likely to be left on the cutting room floor are several bills designed to bring in millions of dollars a year in new revenue.

Among the new revenue measures are proposals to legalize marijuana and expand online gambling. Another would free up an estimated $25 million a year by allowing early parole for people who are incarcerated and meet certain criteria, as well as encouraging judges to offer alternatives to jail for some offenders — moves that would ease prison overcrowding and lower the state’s cost of feeding and caring for people in prison.

Republican Gov. Jim Pillen called the summer special session after the Legislature failed to pass his proposed plan to cut property taxes by an average of 40% during the regular session earlier this year.

Soaring housing and land prices in recent years have led to ballooning property tax bills for homeowners and farmers alike. Nearly all lawmakers in the officially nonpartisan Nebraska Legislature agree that ever-increasing property tax bills are forcing some people, including young and older people on fixed incomes, out of homeownership.

Advertisement

But they disagree on how to fix the problem. Democrats accuse Pillen and his allies of trying to ease property taxes on the backs of poor people, while some hardline conservatives object to any tax increase without significant cuts to spending.

Democratic Sen. Terrell McKinney introduced the bill intended to ease prison overcrowding and costs, which has not advanced from committee.

McKinney and fellow Democrat Justin Wayne have also proposed bills that would legalize marijuana use and regulate its production and distribution.

“That could bring in potentially $150 million,” McKinney said Tuesday. “Y’all don’t want to entertain that conversation, which is wild to me if we’re coming here and you guys are saying to put everything on the table.”

The question of legalizing marijuana could appear on the November ballot after a petition effort turned in nearly 115,000 signatures to state election officials in July — more than the 87,000 or so needed. The Nebraska Secretary of State’s Office is in the process of verifying the signatures.

Advertisement

A plan by Democratic Sen. Eliot Bostar would put on the November ballot a proposal to allow online sports gambling. The General Affairs Committee advanced for debate of the full Legislature but without a companion bill that would adjust ballot language deadlines to allow it to make the ballot. Bostar estimates the proposal could bring in more than $30 million a year in tax revenue.

Wayne, who supports the expanded gambling bill, said Nebraska is losing out on revenue that state residents already spend on online sports betting by simply crossing the border into neighboring states that allow it. That happened during the most recent College World Series held in Omaha, just west of Iowa, which allows online sports betting, he said.

“They literally drove over to Carter Lake, (Iowa), if they were in a car, and if they weren’t, they walked over to the Bob Kerrey bridge, got on their phone and made a bet,” Wayne said. “All that revenue is gone.”

The plan backed by Pillen, which remained in flux Tuesday, calls for dozens of goods and services currently exempt to be subject to the state’s 5.5% sales tax. That includes such things as pet grooming and veterinary care, real estate transactions, lawn mowing and landscaping, taxi and other transportation services, moving and storage. Many agriculture services and purchases — including machinery, chemicals, seeds, irrigation, and grooming and veterinary care for livestock — remain exempt.

Pillen’s plan would also issue several so-called sin taxes on purchases of candy, soda, cigarettes and vaping items, CBD products and alcohol. It would also cap the amount public schools and city and county governments could collect in property taxes.

Advertisement

Lawmakers expected to debate a version of the governor’s proposal throughout the week.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Nebraska baseball coach Will Bolt signs five-year contract extension

Published

on

Nebraska baseball coach Will Bolt signs five-year contract extension


Courtesy Nebraska Athletics

LINCOLN, Neb. (KLKN) – Nebraska baseball coach Will Bolt signed a five-year contract extension on Tuesday.

The deal runs through the 2029 season, Athletic Director Troy Dannen announced, and Bolt’s annual salary will be $500,000.

“We are pleased to have Will Bolt as the leader of our baseball program well into the future,” Dannen said in a press release. “Will has been a big part of the success of Nebraska Baseball over the past two decades, not only as the head coach, but also as an assistant coach and player. Through his past experiences, he knows what it takes to win at Nebraska and has a great vision to continue to elevate our program in the coming years.”

Bolt helped lead Nebraska to the program’s 19th 40-win season this year.

Advertisement

Nebraska then secured its first Big Ten Tournament title since joining the conference in 2012.  It was also the Huskers’ first conference tournament title since 2005.

“I would like to thank Athletic Director Troy Dannen and Deputy Athletic Director Dennis Leblanc for their confidence in our leadership and the direction of our program,” Bolt said in the release. “There is a lot of momentum with our program, and I am grateful for the dedication of our coaching staff, the hard work and commitment of our players, and the incredible support of our fan base.”

In five seasons with Nebraska, Bolt has 137 wins under his belt, the sixth most in program history.  The Huskers have also won two conference titles and made a pair of NCAA regional appearances with Bolt at the helm.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nebraska

Latest NE property tax plan would add sales tax to another 70-plus goods and services • Nebraska Examiner

Published

on

Latest NE property tax plan would add sales tax to another 70-plus goods and services • Nebraska Examiner


LINCOLN — Nebraska lawmakers are officially set to debate a tax relief package Tuesday that will include consideration of ending nearly 70 sales tax exemptions to provide funding for property tax cuts. 

One month ago, a draft property tax plan indicated lawmakers might begin taxing sales of 120 more goods or services. That number has been incrementally reduced in successive rewrites, and at this point has been cut nearly in half. 

The proposal

Some of the main components of the tax plan include:

  • Lowering the maximum school district tax rates for operational expenses to 40 cents per $100 of valuation for fiscal year 2025-26; 35 cents in 2026-27; and 30 cents in 2027-28 and beyond. The current maximum rate is $1.05.
  • Capping the annual increase in property tax collections by municipal and county governments at the rate of inflation or at 0% in times of deflation.
  • Crediting taxpayers for property taxes paid to their natural resources district (beginning at 50% in the next fiscal year).
  • Reimbursing county jail expenses (beginning at 25% in the next fiscal year).

Revenue Committee advances NE property tax relief package, with debate to start Tuesday

Advertisement

Most funding will come from retooling existing property tax reduction programs, such as tax credits and the portion of homestead exemptions no longer needed as school tax rates come down.

The other major area of financing will come from the newly taxed goods and services and increases to “sin” taxes, such as on spirits, cigarettes, oral nicotine pouches, vapes, cigarettes, keno and cash devices.

Legislative Bill 34, as originally introduced by State Sen. Tom Brewer of north-central Nebraska, would freeze property valuation increases over four years. He has described it as a “backup plan” or “fail-safe.”

‘They don’t fix the problems’

State Sen. Brad von Gillern of Elkhorn, vice chair of the Revenue Committee, said he is “cautiously optimistic” heading into Tuesday’s floor debate after he and the committee chair, State Sen Lou Ann Linehan, and others “listened to parties on all sides.” Von Gillern said committee members tried their best to build the bill around concerns raised.

State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln at a listening session on property taxes in Lincoln. July 22, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln, the lone “no” committee vote on LB 34, said the package remains “inherently regressive” and would hurt low-income residents. He said it would also not provide relief to renters, who live in about 50% of the housing units in Dungan’s district.

Advertisement

“I understand there are certain parts of it that are intended to help low-income individuals, but on the whole, when you balance those against the other portions of the bill, I simply think they don’t fix the problems,” Dungan said.

State Sen. Eliot Bostar of Lincoln, who was “present, not voting” on Monday’s committee vote, said afterward: “It’s just not there yet for me.”

The Legislature is officially nonpartisan, but votes sometimes split along ideological lines. On Monday, the six Republican committee members supported the package. Dungan and Bostar are Democrats.

Municipalities have raised concerns about the proposed sales tax changes on two fronts. One is with the state collecting an additional 12% in local sales tax revenue each year. The other involves how businesses can request future refunds for economic development and workforce incentive programs, such as the Nebraska Advantage and ImagiNE Nebraska Acts.

Those tax incentive programs utilize local sales taxes, but with the municipalities not collecting the full tax base, some have said it could further complicate planning for those future refunds.

Advertisement

Von Gillern pointed to a provision of LB 34 ensuring that cities or villages do not collect less sales tax revenue than they did in 2023-24, plus a 1% annual increase.

“There is a floor built into the bill, so they’re not going to get hurt on any of that,” he said.

‘We’ve got to get to 30’

State Sen. Brad von Gillern of Elkhorn. July 29, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

Von Gillern also pointed to an independent study from Ernie Goss, a regional economist and professor at Creighton University, contending that all taxes are regressive but that high property taxes are the most detrimental to economic growth.

“We’ve done as much as we can to take as much out that would have impacted the lowest income people, and I think we’ve done a good job of that,” von Gillern said. “We listened to the opponents, and we tried to modify as much as we could.”

He also pointed to internal legislative modeling, which was done on a previous tax package, where families with modest income would see a net benefit. He said that “seems to be forgotten in this discussion.”

Linehan said she thinks she has 31 votes but that getting to 33 votes on some bills to break a filibuster, particularly on proposals related to taxation, is “very, very partisan.”

Advertisement

“We’ve got to get to 30,” Linehan said. “I think we’re at about 31 right now.”

Many provisions of LB 34, if passed, would take effect Oct. 1. That would require 33 votes not only to end debate but also to pass the bill to take effect within three calendar months. Sales tax exemptions or repeals can only occur at the start of a calendar quarter.

First-round debate on the package will begin at 9 a.m. Tuesday and can last up to eight hours.

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending