Connect with us

Nebraska

Lawmakers propose decade-long plan to reduce Nebraska K-12 property tax rates • Nebraska Examiner

Published

on

Lawmakers propose decade-long plan to reduce Nebraska K-12 property tax rates • Nebraska Examiner


LINCOLN — A new K-12 school funding proposal from a bipartisan segment of five urban and rural Nebraska lawmakers is being pitched as an alternative approach to provide tax relief.

State Sen. Jana Hughes of Seward. Jan. 4, 2023. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska News Service)

State Sen. Jana Hughes of Seward, a former school board member, introduced Legislative Bill 9 on Thursday. She has nicknamed the proposal “Lower the Levy Cap” because, over the course of 10 years, maximum general fund property tax rates for local K-12 school districts would fall to 25 cents per $100 of taxable valuation.

In the first year, maximum tax rates would fall from $1.05 per $100 of taxable valuation to 65 cents. The state would fill in the gap to cover the local portion of the school funding. Every two years after, lawmakers would have to find more state funding to lower the tax rate cap by an additional 10 cents, until the 2033-34 fiscal year when the cap would be reduced to 25 cents.

‘Lower the Levy Cap’ concept

“Lower the Levy Cap” would require about $444 million additional funds in its first year, according to estimates from Hughes and her office. She said her proposal is not “anti” the governor’s plan but is simply another approach to property tax relief.

Advertisement

“It’s just another way to do it, and I think it’s reasonable and can actually get accomplished because it’s just not quite so much money and we time it out over 10 years,” Hughes said.

Hughes began working on the concept this spring shortly after a prior proposal that she had backed didn’t pass.

Pillen, similarly, has suggested lowering the levy cap to 0 cents by the middle of 2027. That shift would require upwards of $2.6 billion, including nearly $1 million in current tax relief programs.

“We cannot go away with nothing,” Hughes told the Nebraska Examiner last week. “I’m worried we might be running into a buzz saw of nothing, and that’s not acceptable to me.”

State Sens. Tom Brandt of Plymouth, Myron Dorn of Adams, Danielle Conrad of Lincoln and Lynne Walz of Fremont were part of the bipartisan group working with Hughes.

Advertisement

An alternative option

State Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth. July 25, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

Brandt said the group set out to find a practical solution and offer an alternative for the state’s 49 lawmakers to consider. In anticipation of the session, the group decided to divide and conquer, Brandt said, with each of them reaching out to about 10 other senators to explain the impact. 

“Today, I could easily say 40 of them are absolutely aware of this, and like it,” Brandt said.

Hughes and the team shared the plan with local stakeholders and public school leaders, as well as Pillen and his staff, and asked for feedback.

According to estimates from Hughes’ staff, the proposal would lower property taxes for a home valued at $250,000 by an average of nearly $800. For a business property valued at $500,000, the savings would be more than $1,500. And for 80 acres of irrigated farmland, it would be more than $3,700 in savings, on average.

Conrad said that stood “in sharp contrast” to Pillen’s plan, which State Sen. Lou Ann Linehan of Elkhorn introduced on his behalf Thursday. Contrary to past statements that the governor’s plan would reduce property tax rates to 0 in three years, Linehan’s LB 1 included no direct reductions.

At a news conference announcing his ideas last week, Pillen said the state needed to act now and “couldn’t have a 10-year incremental plan.”

Advertisement

“My job as governor is to make sure we have a plan so we can grow the State of Nebraska, and we have to do it now,” Pillen said. “If we don’t do it now, the party’s over and this place shrinks. I don’t want to be any part of that.”

Hughes said she is in favor of removing some sales tax exemptions and has herself in the past proposed increasing the tax on e-cigarettes, or vapes, to 20% wholesale. The Pillen-led plan suggests a 30% tax on vaping products.

A second Hughes bill, LB 19, calls for a 2% excise tax on taxable personal property that is sold, given or furnished via mail, delivery service, online sales, telephone or other electronic method. If enacted, the change would take effect July 1, 2025.

That tax rate would add 2 cents to a statewide sales tax rate of 5.5 cents per dollar purchase, as well as any other local sales tax rates (those range from 0.5 to 2 cents).

‘Grandest challenge’ for lawmakers

State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln. July 25, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

Conrad, who along with Walz is a member of the Legislature’s Education Committee, said “Lower the Levy Cap” provides more resources and tax relief statewide. 

In the face of Pillen’s “misguided and radical plan,” Conrad said, their alternative is “gaining support at every moment.” She said it’s more fiscally sustainable and doesn’t rely upon huge tax increases.

Advertisement

“We are well positioned to use this measure as a centerpiece to move forward this session, which is thrilling,” Conrad said.

Brandt said he believes that the Legislature faces the “grandest challenge” that he’s seen in his six years in the Legislature, but he sees a chance to rise to the occasion.

“I’m not being facetious when I say that,” Brandt said. “We’ve talked about property tax, we’ve picked at the edges. We have an opportunity to focus on meaningful property tax relief for all the people in the state.”



Source link

Advertisement

Nebraska

Nebraska special session: Lawmakers adjourn Day 1 after less than an hour, filing 20 bills without debate

Published

on

Nebraska special session: Lawmakers adjourn Day 1 after less than an hour, filing 20 bills without debate


LINCOLN, Neb. (WOWT) – Day one of the Nebraska Legislature’s special session is over.

In less than an hour after the 10 a.m. start, senators introduced 20 bills and five legislative resolutions.

There was no debate.

State senators will have two more days to introduce additional bills. Reports have indicated there could be more than 90 of them in total.

Advertisement

Some lawmakers have told 6 News previously that they believe the governor’s plan is dead on arrival. On top of that, they said they were outraged that the Gov. Jim Pillen didn’t even give them 24 hours notice on what the parameters would be for the special session.

This is a developing story. Stay with 6 News for updates.

Get the latest breaking news delivered to your inbox. Sign up for 6 News email alerts.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Nebraska man accused of stealing fuel from Tampa gas station, striking intervening deputy's car

Published

on

Nebraska man accused of stealing fuel from Tampa gas station, striking intervening deputy's car


A Nebraska man faces a plethora of charges after authorities say he was caught stealing fuel from a Tampa gas station and then struck a deputy’s car as he attempted to intervene.

According to an affidavit, Kiusler Perez Ortiz was spotted at a Mobile gas station in Town ‘N Country on Saturday parked over the fuel intake lock. 

Advertisement

READ: Ashley Benefield trial: Prosecution expected to rest in murder murder trial for Florida mother

The deputy who spotted Perez Ortiz knew of a recent trend of diesel theft attributed to a car matching the same description as the one he drove – a white Chrysler. 

Advertisement

Authorities said the deputy then pulled behind the car with his scene lights on, and another deputy pulled around in front of the car to try to make contact with Perez Ortiz.

Perez Ortiz then sped off, striking one of the deputy’s patrol vehicles and causing the deputy to jump out of the way to avoid being struck, according to the affidavit. He caused about $1,500 in damage to the deputy’s vehicle in the process.

Advertisement

Deputies followed Perez Ortiz as he fled into Pinellas County jurisdiction, reaching speeds over 100 mph. During the pursuit, he ran a red light and drove over a raised median to avoid law enforcement before arriving at a cul-de-sac and climbing out of his car to run off. 

The pursuing deputy eventually tracked Perez Ortiz down and placed him under arrest. He faces several charges, including aggravated assault on a LEO, unlawful conveyance of fuel, resist officer without violence, and more. 

He is being held in the Orient Road Jail.

Advertisement

SIGN UP: Click here to sign up for the FOX 13 daily newsletter



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

A guide to Nebraska’s property tax relief special session beginning Thursday • Nebraska Examiner

Published

on

A guide to Nebraska’s property tax relief special session beginning Thursday • Nebraska Examiner


LINCOLN — Thursday is officially game day for Gov. Jim Pillen’s special session on property taxes: a high-risk, high-reward moment for the first-term governor who has vowed, if necessary, to keep lawmakers in Lincoln “ ‘til Christmas.”

State senators will convene at 10 a.m. Thursday for the first of three days of bill introductions, all related to property tax relief. When lawmakers adjourned April 18 without passing legislation to curb the property tax, Pillen declared they’d be back later in the year.

“Enjoy halftime. We’ll see you again here soon,” he said in his end-of-session speech, promising a special session.

For nearly one-third of state legislators, this session could be their final showing, most because they are term-limited after eight years of service.

Advertisement

Here’s what to watch for heading into the special session.

Will lawmakers debate, or go home?

First up on the docket is the question of whether lawmakers will stay in Lincoln, or if they will vote to adjourn “sine die.” That vote would send lawmakers home and put the ball back in Pillen’s court should he choose to call another session.

State Sen. Justin Wayne of Omaha. Feb. 2, 2023. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

Led by State Sen. Justin Wayne of Omaha, lawmakers in a Tuesday night email thread summarized months of unease over the session and criticized Pillen for not calling the special session or clarifying its scope in a timely manner. 

“We are not his slaves to be summoned at his whim,” Wayne wrote to his colleagues, detailing personal and career commitments he and other legislators needed to consider.

The governor officially issued that document Wednesday afternoon, less than 24 hours before the session is set to start. That’s the latest proclamation for any special session in 40 years.

Advertisement

Wayne suggested that lawmakers adjourn “sine die” and demand at least a week’s notice before any special session begins. Or, he suggested, the body should recess for one week, until Aug. 1, so senators would have more time to consider introducing legislation.

Usually, a “sine die” vote comes at the end of a legislative session and is a ceremonial formality to end the session. But Thursday morning could be a test vote.

At least 25 lawmakers must come to Lincoln for the session to begin, and if someone offers the “sine die” motion, it is not debatable. It requires a simple majority of those present.

A new record to introduced bills

Multiple lawmakers told the Nebraska Examiner that at least 80 bills were being prepared ahead of the special session. If all or most are introduced, it could set a record.

Speaker John Arch of La Vista addresses state lawmakers during a legislative retreat at Nebraska Innovation Campus on Dec. 7, 2023, in Lincoln. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

The previous record for a special session is 52 bills, which came in 2002 during a special session to address appropriations, cash funds, state aid to local governments and more.

Most lawmakers have not shared concrete details of what they might bring to the table, some out of concern that Pillen’s proclamation could have purposefully excluded their ideas.

Advertisement

Senators will determine what bills fall within the scope of the proclamation.

The 10-member Executive Board will determine which of 14 standing committees each bill or policy resolutions should be sent to.

After being assigned to a committee, all proposals must receive a hearing within five calendar days, per the Legislature’s rules. Speaker John Arch of La Vista said Wednesday he will better understand how many days of hearings will take after bill introductions, though he’s budgeted three days beginning next Monday.

Floor debate could in theory start next Thursday, Aug. 1, Arch said, though he stressed that scheduling depends on the number of bills introduced and the work of the various committees.

“Because it’s so focused, there’s probably going to be more committee work on the topic than in a general session,” Arch said. “I don’t anticipate bills being kicked out quickly.”

Advertisement

If a committee doesn’t take final action on a bill within two legislative days after its hearing, the rules allow lawmakers to seek a vote that could advance a proposal to the floor for future debate. That would require at least 25 votes.

What is Pillen proposing?

Once lawmakers get to floor debate, Arch said, “full and fair debate” will mirror his policy in the regular session last spring, allowing debate to go to a maximum of eight, four and two hours on three successive rounds of debate.

At those points after a “filibuster” to prolong debate, a cloture motion could be offered to end debate and vote on advancing or passing the bill.

Cloture requires at least 33 votes among the 49 members. Bills or resolutions that are not filibustered require at least 25 votes.

Pillen could run into problems with various lawmakers who have cast doubt on his ideas, which include:

Advertisement
  • Placing hard caps on county and municipality property tax collections, either 0% (in times of deflation) or matching the consumer price index, unless 60% of voters agree to override the caps. There would be exemptions for growth and public safety needs.
  • Funding more than 80% of local K-12 property tax burdens by the state, about $2.6 billion. School tax rates would be reduced from a maximum of about $1.05 per $100 of valuations to 15 cents, 7.5 cents and 0 cents in a three-year period.
  • Retooling existing property tax relief programs, including homestead exemptions and property tax credits. A spokesperson for the governor said there would be no cuts to existing homestead exemptions.
  • Removing more than 100 sales and use tax exemptions. Food, medicine and raw agricultural and manufacturing materials, along with more than 100 other goods and services, would remain exempt. Most new items would be taxed statewide at 5.5 cents per dollar purchase, plus local taxes between 0.5 and 2 cents; agricultural and manufacturing machinery and equipment would be taxed at 4 cents per dollar purchase, with personal property taxes on those items removed.
  • Raising “sin” taxes on cigarettes, candy, pop, vaping, spirits, keno gambling, games of skill and consumable hemp.

Lawmakers to watch

Among the lawmakers to watch are the chairs of the three committees where legislation is likely to be referred: State Sens. Lou Ann Linehan of Elkhorn, who chairs Revenue; Rob Clements of Elmwood, who chairs Appropriations; and Dave Murman of Glenvil, who chairs Education.

Gov. Jim Pillen is joined by State Sens. Lou Ann Linehan and Rob Clements in unveiling a proposal to reduce local property taxes in three years. July 18, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

Those three plus 14 other senators were part of a task force working with Pillen on his ideas this summer: State Sens. Joni Albrecht, Eliot Bostar, Wendy DeBoer, George Dungan, Steve Erdman, John Fredrickson, Ben Hansen, Teresa Ibach, Mike Jacobson, Kathleen Kauth, Mike McDonnell, Fred Meyer, Merv Riepe and Brad von Gillern.

Clements and Linehan joined Pillen in unveiling the outcome of that task force and 26 town halls across the state in May and June, which did not include the state’s largest cities of Omaha and Lincoln.

“Every senator, if you look at their campaign material, would say property tax relief is a high priority for them,” Clements told the Examiner last week. “I think it’s time for senators to step forward and do something about what they’ve been promising.”

However, not every task force member is in agreement on next steps, including Riepe and Dungan. 

Riepe said last weekend he doesn’t “believe in the ‘jump and the net will appear’ philosophy.”

Multiple lawmakers have criticized Pillen, saying he and his family stand to gain financially as part of the plan, stating that lower-income Nebraskans could end up paying more in sales taxes:

Advertisement
  • State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln: “This plan is indeed nothing more than a reverse Robin Hood scheme representing perhaps an unprecedented tax increase and massive tax shift.”
  • State Sen. Julie Slama of Dunbar: “That’s corrupt, and we can’t have a tax plan that robs Peter to pay Pillen.”
State Sen. Julie Slama of Dunbar. Feb. 22, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

Wayne has said a different proposal, relating to lawsuits alleging neglect on the part of political subdivisions in cases of child sexual assault or child abuse, needs to be part of the special session. Pillen vetoed that proposal in the spring, in part citing taxes, which could be the foot in the door to address the issue during the special session.

Erdman has promised that legislation similar to the ballot initiative to eliminate property, income and corporate taxes — the “EPIC Option” — will be introduced during the session.

Also something to watch is how lawmakers’ positions may shift from the 28-14 split from Legislative Bill 388, the previous Pillen-led proposal in the spring8. Five more lawmakers were “present, not voting” and two were “excused, not voting” when LB 388 was considered. The split wasn’t geographical or ideological.

Despite pushback, Pillen has remained confident that he will have enough bipartisan support to get something accomplished in the officially nonpartisan Legislature’s special session. 

He says that’s because it’s not about what lawmakers say, it’s what they do.

“When it comes time to push that button [for the bill], it’s one heck of a responsibility to not push green,” Pillen said. “You push red, there’s going to be tough consequences.”

Advertisement

Special session costs, length

Of the 36 special sessions since the Unicameral formed in 1937, special sessions have ranged from six to 24 days. Twenty sessions lasted seven days and just one was six days.

Each day lawmakers are in session brings a cost to taxpayers. Pillen has said those expenses are “pennies compared to our property tax increases,” which went up $286 million in 2023.

During a special session, there is no specific end date, unlike in regular 90-day or 60-day sessions. That means lawmakers could theoretically remain in session until the next Legislature begins, or “ ‘til Christmas” as Pillen has threatened to ensure his relief goals are achieved.

The most recent cost estimates provided to the Examiner were in mid-May:

  • Five days: $79,686 ($15,937.20 per session day).
  • Seven days: $130,165 ($18,595 per session day).
  • Ten days: $174,876 ($17,487.60 per session day).

“Special sessions aren’t 10-day sessions,” Pillen told school administrators Wednesday in Kearney. “This session will last as long as it takes to fix the problem.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending