Nebraska
A guide to Nebraska’s property tax relief special session beginning Thursday • Nebraska Examiner
LINCOLN — Thursday is officially game day for Gov. Jim Pillen’s special session on property taxes: a high-risk, high-reward moment for the first-term governor who has vowed, if necessary, to keep lawmakers in Lincoln “ ‘til Christmas.”
State senators will convene at 10 a.m. Thursday for the first of three days of bill introductions, all related to property tax relief. When lawmakers adjourned April 18 without passing legislation to curb the property tax, Pillen declared they’d be back later in the year.
“Enjoy halftime. We’ll see you again here soon,” he said in his end-of-session speech, promising a special session.
For nearly one-third of state legislators, this session could be their final showing, most because they are term-limited after eight years of service.
Here’s what to watch for heading into the special session.
Will lawmakers debate, or go home?
First up on the docket is the question of whether lawmakers will stay in Lincoln, or if they will vote to adjourn “sine die.” That vote would send lawmakers home and put the ball back in Pillen’s court should he choose to call another session.
Led by State Sen. Justin Wayne of Omaha, lawmakers in a Tuesday night email thread summarized months of unease over the session and criticized Pillen for not calling the special session or clarifying its scope in a timely manner.
“We are not his slaves to be summoned at his whim,” Wayne wrote to his colleagues, detailing personal and career commitments he and other legislators needed to consider.
The governor officially issued that document Wednesday afternoon, less than 24 hours before the session is set to start. That’s the latest proclamation for any special session in 40 years.
Wayne suggested that lawmakers adjourn “sine die” and demand at least a week’s notice before any special session begins. Or, he suggested, the body should recess for one week, until Aug. 1, so senators would have more time to consider introducing legislation.
Usually, a “sine die” vote comes at the end of a legislative session and is a ceremonial formality to end the session. But Thursday morning could be a test vote.
At least 25 lawmakers must come to Lincoln for the session to begin, and if someone offers the “sine die” motion, it is not debatable. It requires a simple majority of those present.
A new record to introduced bills
Multiple lawmakers told the Nebraska Examiner that at least 80 bills were being prepared ahead of the special session. If all or most are introduced, it could set a record.
The previous record for a special session is 52 bills, which came in 2002 during a special session to address appropriations, cash funds, state aid to local governments and more.
Most lawmakers have not shared concrete details of what they might bring to the table, some out of concern that Pillen’s proclamation could have purposefully excluded their ideas.
Senators will determine what bills fall within the scope of the proclamation.
The 10-member Executive Board will determine which of 14 standing committees each bill or policy resolutions should be sent to.
After being assigned to a committee, all proposals must receive a hearing within five calendar days, per the Legislature’s rules. Speaker John Arch of La Vista said Wednesday he will better understand how many days of hearings will take after bill introductions, though he’s budgeted three days beginning next Monday.
Floor debate could in theory start next Thursday, Aug. 1, Arch said, though he stressed that scheduling depends on the number of bills introduced and the work of the various committees.
“Because it’s so focused, there’s probably going to be more committee work on the topic than in a general session,” Arch said. “I don’t anticipate bills being kicked out quickly.”
If a committee doesn’t take final action on a bill within two legislative days after its hearing, the rules allow lawmakers to seek a vote that could advance a proposal to the floor for future debate. That would require at least 25 votes.
What is Pillen proposing?
Once lawmakers get to floor debate, Arch said, “full and fair debate” will mirror his policy in the regular session last spring, allowing debate to go to a maximum of eight, four and two hours on three successive rounds of debate.
At those points after a “filibuster” to prolong debate, a cloture motion could be offered to end debate and vote on advancing or passing the bill.
Cloture requires at least 33 votes among the 49 members. Bills or resolutions that are not filibustered require at least 25 votes.
Pillen could run into problems with various lawmakers who have cast doubt on his ideas, which include:
- Placing hard caps on county and municipality property tax collections, either 0% (in times of deflation) or matching the consumer price index, unless 60% of voters agree to override the caps. There would be exemptions for growth and public safety needs.
- Funding more than 80% of local K-12 property tax burdens by the state, about $2.6 billion. School tax rates would be reduced from a maximum of about $1.05 per $100 of valuations to 15 cents, 7.5 cents and 0 cents in a three-year period.
- Retooling existing property tax relief programs, including homestead exemptions and property tax credits. A spokesperson for the governor said there would be no cuts to existing homestead exemptions.
- Removing more than 100 sales and use tax exemptions. Food, medicine and raw agricultural and manufacturing materials, along with more than 100 other goods and services, would remain exempt. Most new items would be taxed statewide at 5.5 cents per dollar purchase, plus local taxes between 0.5 and 2 cents; agricultural and manufacturing machinery and equipment would be taxed at 4 cents per dollar purchase, with personal property taxes on those items removed.
- Raising “sin” taxes on cigarettes, candy, pop, vaping, spirits, keno gambling, games of skill and consumable hemp.
Lawmakers to watch
Among the lawmakers to watch are the chairs of the three committees where legislation is likely to be referred: State Sens. Lou Ann Linehan of Elkhorn, who chairs Revenue; Rob Clements of Elmwood, who chairs Appropriations; and Dave Murman of Glenvil, who chairs Education.
Those three plus 14 other senators were part of a task force working with Pillen on his ideas this summer: State Sens. Joni Albrecht, Eliot Bostar, Wendy DeBoer, George Dungan, Steve Erdman, John Fredrickson, Ben Hansen, Teresa Ibach, Mike Jacobson, Kathleen Kauth, Mike McDonnell, Fred Meyer, Merv Riepe and Brad von Gillern.
Clements and Linehan joined Pillen in unveiling the outcome of that task force and 26 town halls across the state in May and June, which did not include the state’s largest cities of Omaha and Lincoln.
“Every senator, if you look at their campaign material, would say property tax relief is a high priority for them,” Clements told the Examiner last week. “I think it’s time for senators to step forward and do something about what they’ve been promising.”
However, not every task force member is in agreement on next steps, including Riepe and Dungan.
Riepe said last weekend he doesn’t “believe in the ‘jump and the net will appear’ philosophy.”
Multiple lawmakers have criticized Pillen, saying he and his family stand to gain financially as part of the plan, stating that lower-income Nebraskans could end up paying more in sales taxes:
- State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln: “This plan is indeed nothing more than a reverse Robin Hood scheme representing perhaps an unprecedented tax increase and massive tax shift.”
- State Sen. Julie Slama of Dunbar: “That’s corrupt, and we can’t have a tax plan that robs Peter to pay Pillen.”
Wayne has said a different proposal, relating to lawsuits alleging neglect on the part of political subdivisions in cases of child sexual assault or child abuse, needs to be part of the special session. Pillen vetoed that proposal in the spring, in part citing taxes, which could be the foot in the door to address the issue during the special session.
Erdman has promised that legislation similar to the ballot initiative to eliminate property, income and corporate taxes — the “EPIC Option” — will be introduced during the session.
Also something to watch is how lawmakers’ positions may shift from the 28-14 split from Legislative Bill 388, the previous Pillen-led proposal in the spring8. Five more lawmakers were “present, not voting” and two were “excused, not voting” when LB 388 was considered. The split wasn’t geographical or ideological.
Despite pushback, Pillen has remained confident that he will have enough bipartisan support to get something accomplished in the officially nonpartisan Legislature’s special session.
He says that’s because it’s not about what lawmakers say, it’s what they do.
“When it comes time to push that button [for the bill], it’s one heck of a responsibility to not push green,” Pillen said. “You push red, there’s going to be tough consequences.”
Special session costs, length
Of the 36 special sessions since the Unicameral formed in 1937, special sessions have ranged from six to 24 days. Twenty sessions lasted seven days and just one was six days.
Each day lawmakers are in session brings a cost to taxpayers. Pillen has said those expenses are “pennies compared to our property tax increases,” which went up $286 million in 2023.
During a special session, there is no specific end date, unlike in regular 90-day or 60-day sessions. That means lawmakers could theoretically remain in session until the next Legislature begins, or “ ‘til Christmas” as Pillen has threatened to ensure his relief goals are achieved.
The most recent cost estimates provided to the Examiner were in mid-May:
- Five days: $79,686 ($15,937.20 per session day).
- Seven days: $130,165 ($18,595 per session day).
- Ten days: $174,876 ($17,487.60 per session day).
“Special sessions aren’t 10-day sessions,” Pillen told school administrators Wednesday in Kearney. “This session will last as long as it takes to fix the problem.”
Nebraska
Insurance must now cover all parts of Nebraskans’ colorectal cancer screenings • Nebraska Examiner
LINCOLN — In the summer of 2002, Margaret Stamp returned home to Sarpy County from college four weeks after her 74-year-old grandmother, Phyllis Behm, had died from a short battle with colorectal cancer.
Stamp found her dad, Mark Behm, a former northeast Nebraska county attorney and private practice lawyer, wincing in pain on the living room floor. Stamp described him as in shape and thin. She said he looked healthy and didn’t drink or smoke.
But that weekend, Stamp’s father was doubled over, and he told his daughter, “Call your mom.”
“I’d never seen him like that,” Stamp recalled. “Never even remember him getting the flu or sick. Next thing we know, he’s in emergency surgery — it’s stage IV [colorectal] cancer, and there’s nothing they can do.”
Behm grew up in Olde Towne Bellevue and graduated from the University of Nebraska College of Law in 1976. He served as the Cedar County attorney from 1977 through 1993 and had a private practice in Wausa for many years, later a private practice with other attorneys in Randolph. Behm was also a 1980 delegate to the Republican National Convention for Ronald Reagan and was president of Out Front Properties, a local property management company where his daughter is now vice president.
Stamp said her father’s doctors did what they could to prolong his life and make conditions less painful, and he continued practicing law until about a week before he died in April 2004, at the age of 52.
Twenty years later, Stamp and others have successfully pushed for new state laws that expand insurance coverage for colorectal cancer screenings and associated procedures. The latest law took effect this week.
Stamp recalled losing her father as different from cancer deaths she had seen in some movies, where someone closes their eyes and goes to sleep. She said it was awful and that her father said over and over he couldn’t breathe, had muscle spasms and felt his body shutting down.
“To me, anything you can do to stop that is worth every penny,” Stamp said. “It’s worth going in, getting your colonoscopy, even though I know it can be literally a pain in the butt for some people, but you don’t want that message, ‘It’s too late,’ because then there’s nothing to do but plan the funeral.”
‘We can save lives’
Legislative Bill 829 from State Sen. Carol Blood of Bellevue took effect Jan. 1. It requires insurance companies to cover each “integral part” of performing a colorectal cancer screening, including:
- Removing polyps (abnormal cell growths in the underlining of the colon or rectum) found as part of a colonoscopy.
- Any pathology examination of a polyp biopsy.
- Required specialist consultation prior to the screening.
- Bowel preparation medications prescribed for the screening.
- Anesthesia services performed in connection with the preventive colonoscopy.
Its adoption followed passage of LB 92 in 2023, which included a provision from State Sen. Eliot Bostar of Lincoln that required insurance plans to cover screening colonoscopies, as well as an annual stool-based preventative screening test designed for patients with minimal to average risk of colorectal cancer.
Nebraska is ranked in the lower half of states for colorectal cancer screening rates, according to the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services.
Blood told the Nebraska Examiner she came up with the idea for her LB 829 when she was getting a colonoscopy and was handed a release before her procedure saying most insurance companies wouldn’t cover part of a colonoscopy should they find something, like a polyp, which can grow into cancer over time.
“Why would you want somebody to be put under anesthesia and look for something and just leave it there?” Blood said. “It made no sense whatsoever.”
Blood said her colonoscopy found something that her insurance didn’t cover, which left her on the hook for a procedure that cost $800 to $900.
Congress has closed this “loophole” for people on Medicare and Medicaid as part of the Affordable Care Act, Blood said, while others with private insurance were told they “could just go pound sand.”
“I thought, well, we can save lives with this one tweak,” Blood said of her Nebraska law, which passed 41-5 in the spring.
What is colorectal cancer?
Jungyoon Kim, Ph.D., who does colon cancer screening research at the University of Nebraska Medical Center’s College of Public Health, said colorectal cancer develops in the large intestine areas like the colon or rectum that are part of the digestive system.
Most colorectal cancers start with a polyp, Kim said, most of which are benign. However, some polyps can change into cancer over time, mostly over many years, like 10-15 years.
Symptoms can include blood in the stool or toilet after a bowel movement, constipation over a long period, abdominal pain or cramping, changes in the shape or size of stool and sudden or unexplained weight loss. If observed, Kim said a doctor should be consulted immediately.
One of the most common misconceptions, though, is that people think they must wait to see symptoms before getting screened, Kim said, which gives polyps time to grow.
“Sometimes, if you see the symptoms and go to the doctor, it might be too late,” Kim said. “That’s why the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommends to get screening when people become 45, even if they do not have any symptoms.”
People with a family history or who have previously had cancer should be screened earlier, Kim said, such as in their 20s or 30s.
Kim said that when a doctor can find and remove polyps, it stops the growth in its tracks and is “like you’re preventing cancer before it even becomes cancer cells.”
If colorectal cancer is detected early, Kim said, the chance of the cancer being cured is about 92%.
Some cancers can be prevented by regular screening, which includes breast cancer through mammograms at the age of 40 or other screenings for cervical or lung cancer.
Disparities include rural Nebraska
According to the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, early-age colorectal cancer diagnoses are on the rise. By 2030, the cancer is predicted to be the leading cause of death in people younger than 50, according to DHHS.
It is already the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in men and women combined.
Kim said disparities exist among racial minorities, people living in rural areas, people who are low-income or people with limited access to insurance or certain doctors, who can’t access screenings.
Blood noted those disparities as a reason for the bill, as every medical procedure comes with a certain amount of risk, but that for some patients, they had to “play Russian roulette with what’s in their body” and decide whether they could pay or come back later, if needed.
“That just seems wrong, especially when you look at how much higher colon cancer rates are in our rural areas,” Blood said.
Kim and Stamp said the new law made sense. Stamp added it will help avoid costlier cancer treatments and help save lives.
Importance of prevention
Stamp said her father had found some blood in his stool about two years prior to discovering he had cancer. His doctor had said it was probably hemorrhoids but gave him an at-home testing kit just in case, as at the time he didn’t have a family history of the disease.
The day after Stamp’s father found out he had cancer, Stamp said her mother found the at-home test in her father’s drawer at home. Stamp noted that around 2000, colon cancer wasn’t talked about as much as it is today. She said some people are still embarrassed to talk about it.
Stamp, a University of Nebraska-Lincoln alum who is now 44 and lives in Omaha with her husband and two teenage daughters, got her first colonoscopy at the age of 24.
She has had three more colonoscopies since, with a fifth planned in 2026, and encouraged others to get the procedure, which she described as a “walk in the park.”
“You are taken such good care of, and it is nothing compared to getting cancer and having to have surgery or chemotherapy or one of those colostomy bags,” Stamp said.
Stamp said her father missed her getting married about six months after his death and her two daughters being born, all for not realizing he had cancer.
“It was two quick deaths in the family that got me starting to try to advocate for colon cancer and having colonoscopies,” Stamp said. “… Anything people can do for prevention, it is so worth it, because it’s one of those things you don’t see coming.”
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
Nebraska
22-year-old woman accused of leading high-speed chase in central Nebraska
LINCOLN, Neb. (KLKN) — An Omaha woman was arrested Tuesday after a high-speed chase in central Nebraska.
The pursuit started about 10:30 p.m. on Highway 30 east of Central City, according to the Merrick County Sheriff’s Office.
A deputy saw a Chevrolet Impala driving recklessly near County Road 22, the sheriff’s office said, forcing other drivers to swerve out of the way.
The deputy tried to pull over the car, but authorities said the driver — 22-year-old McKenzie Hinderliter of Omaha — sped off.
Hinderliter topped 125 mph before getting off the highway and leading the deputy down county roads, according to the sheriff’s office.
She went off the road and rolled while trying to make a turn, deputies said.
Investigators found drugs in the car and discovered that Hinderliter had a revoked driver’s license, the sheriff’s office said.
They think alcohol and drugs contributed to the crash.
Hinderliter was taken to an area hospital, then transported to Bryan Medical Center in Lincoln with minor injuries.
Authorities are seeking a warrant for her arrest on two felony charges: possession of a controlled substance and operating a motor vehicle to avoid arrest.
She also faces several misdemeanors and infractions, including driving during revocation, obstructing a police officer and willful reckless driving.
Nebraska
Nebraska politicians react to deadly attack in New Orleans
LINCOLN, Neb. (KOLN) – Nebraska politicians are calling for action following the fatal attack in the early morning hours of New Year’s Day in New Orleans.
At least 10 people are dead and at least 30 more were injured after a man drove a pickup truck through barricades and into a crowd.
“Last night’s terror attack was evil and horrific. I’m praying for the families and loved ones of those killed and injured. The FBI must fully investigate how this happened,” Senator Pete Ricketts said.
Representative Mike Flood also sent a statement about the attack.
“Our prayers are with the people of New Orleans and the families and loved ones of those killed and injured in the horrific attack,” Flood said. “This was evil and seemed designed to perpetrate as much devastation as possible. I urge the FBI to investigate swiftly.”
Click here to subscribe to our 10/11 NOW daily digest and breaking news alerts delivered straight to your email inbox.
Copyright 2025 KOLN. All rights reserved.
-
Technology1 week ago
There’s a reason Metaphor: ReFantanzio’s battle music sounds as cool as it does
-
News1 week ago
France’s new premier selects Eric Lombard as finance minister
-
Business1 week ago
On a quest for global domination, Chinese EV makers are upending Thailand's auto industry
-
Health5 days ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology5 days ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
World1 week ago
Passenger plane crashes in Kazakhstan: Emergencies ministry
-
Politics1 week ago
It's official: Biden signs new law, designates bald eagle as 'national bird'
-
Politics6 days ago
'Politics is bad for business.' Why Disney's Bob Iger is trying to avoid hot buttons