Connect with us

Missouri

Two Missouri officers asked women for their phones at traffic stops – then stole nude images, authorities say | CNN

Published

on

Two Missouri officers asked women for their phones at traffic stops – then stole nude images, authorities say | CNN




CNN
 — 

A former Missouri police officer and a former Missouri State Highway Patrol trooper have been indicted separately on federal charges accusing them of taking nude images from women’s phones during traffic stops while on duty.

Julian Alcala, a 29-year-old former police officer in Florissant, was indicted Wednesday in federal court in St. Louis. David McKnight, a 39-year-old former state trooper, was indicted Tuesday in federal court in southeastern Missouri’s Cape Girardeau, court documents show.

A spokesperson for the FBI St. Louis office told CNN the two cases are not connected, describing the similarities as “a matter of coincidence.”

Advertisement

In both cases, federal prosecutors allege the officers asked women for their phones – ostensibly to check their insurance coverage, vehicle registration or identification – and then searched the women’s phones for nude images, the US attorney’s office for Missouri’s eastern district asserts in the indictments. In two cases, McKnight also took the phones of alleged victims after arresting them.

The officers then used their personal cell phones to take photos of nude images they found – often images of the women, but in a few cases images of other people, the indictments say. Images of the nude photos were found on the men’s phones and on Alcala’s iCloud account, according to the indictments.

While the indictments don’t specify how the men came under suspicion, the attorney for one of Alcala’s alleged victims has said she reported an incident to the FBI, and one of McKnight’s alleged victims has said she reported him to his supervisor.

Alcala is accused of searching and taking images from the cell phones of 20 women between February 6 and May 18. McKnight is accused of searching nine women’s cell phones – and taking images from at least seven – between September 2023 and August 2024, the indictments read.

Each man is charged with one count of destroying records in a federal investigation and multiple counts of deprivation of the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. Alcala pleaded not guilty in an arraignment on Friday and McKnight pleaded not guilty in a Thursday arraignment, court records show.

Advertisement

At least three lawsuits involving six plaintiffs have been filed in federal court against Alcala and the city of Florissant relating to the same allegations made in his indictment.

In one of the lawsuits against Alcala, a female plaintiff alleged that after he pulled her over in Florissant and took her phone, ostensibly to check her insurance in February, she noticed a deleted text message sent at the time of the traffic stop.

The lawsuit alleges Alcala found a video of the woman having sex and texted the video from her phone to his. That woman, having found the deleted message and realizing the video was sent from her phone to a number she didn’t recognize, contacted the FBI, her attorney, J.C. Pleban, told CNN affiliate KSDK.

The lawsuits also allege either that Alcala showed the nude images to other people, or that people have seen the images because of him.

CNN has sought comment from Pleban, other plaintiffs’ attorneys, the attorneys representing Florissant in the lawsuits against it, an attorney for McKnight, and the Missouri State Highway Patrol.

Advertisement

One of Alcala’s attorneys, Scott Rosenblum, told CNN Saturday he was reviewing evidence in the case.

The Florissant Police Department said in a Facebook post they learned about the allegations against Alcala in June, when the FBI in St. Louis informed them of the investigation into the officer. Alcala “immediately resigned” and the “department fully cooperated with the investigation,” the post says.

The department described itself as “disgusted at this behavior, which is a complete betrayal of the values we uphold and in no way reflects the professionalism and integrity of our dedicated officers.” They had “no knowledge of any illegal activity or improper behavior by Alcala” and had received no complaints about him during his employment, the post says. No other members of the police department were involved, according to the post.

One lawsuit filed against Alcala and Florissant on October 22 alleges that during two traffic stops for a broken taillight, he took pictures of nude photos of the unnamed plaintiff. The lawsuit claims he “observed those photos himself, and also distributed the photos to others.” The victim didn’t know about the photos until an FBI agent contacted her months later, the suit says.

In an email to CNN, W. Bevis Schock, an attorney representing the plaintiff in the October 22nd lawsuit, said of Alcala’s alleged actions: “The most important question is why? The answer, I think, is power.”

Advertisement

Another lawsuit was filed against Alcala and Florissant on October 28 on behalf of four anonymous victims, and another on behalf of an anonymous victim on November 14.

The October 28 lawsuit describes Alcala’s alleged actions as “a shocking degradation, an egregious humiliation and a flagrant breach of confidentiality.”

Alcala committed “a brutal abuse of official power that shocks the conscience,” the suit says. The suit also frames the incidents as sex-based discrimination, noting that Alcala only took photos and videos from women’s phones.

All three lawsuits also accuse Florissant. The October 28 lawsuit argues that the city “demonstrated deliberate indifference to or tacit authorization of the
Defendants’ misconduct after notice” and that it had failed to properly train or supervise officers “when they engaged in constitutional violations.”

McKnight, while working for the Missouri State Highway Patrol, searched through victims’ cell phones between September 1, 2023 and August 19, 2024, according to the indictment. Seven of the counts specify he took photographs of nude images he found on the victims’ phones, which were found on McKnight’s cell phone.

Advertisement

In two of the incidents, McKnight took the alleged victims’ phones after arresting them, the indictment says. In the other cases, he told the alleged victims he was checking their insurance coverage or identification before searching through their phones without a warrant or probable cause.

The destroying records count alleges that McKnight “deleted or attempted to delete those images from his cell phone.”

McKnight was arrested in August and charged with six counts of felony invasion of privacy in New Madrid and Scott counties, according to CNN affiliate KFVS. He pleaded not guilty to those charges, KFVS reported. CNN has reached out to the prosecuting attorneys in both counties for comment. He resigned from the Missouri State Highway Patrol on August 26, the patrol told CNN.

“Employees are required to safeguard the rights of everyone, obey all laws and are prohibited from performing any act that constitutes a violation of any law,” the patrol said in an email.

One of the former state trooper’s alleged victims described her experience as “really violating” in an interview with KFVS.

Advertisement

Emily Northern said McKnight pulled her over in late July for expired vehicle registration tags. When she showed him her insurance on her cell phone, he asked to take it back to his car, KFVS reported.

“I was uncomfortable with it, but I didn’t want to argue with him,” Northern told KFVS.

When he returned her phone, she looked at her screen time and could see that he had spent 5 minutes looking through her photos and was on her Snapchat account, she said.

She reported the encounter to his supervisor, she said.

“I was a mess. I was crying,” Northern said, according to KFVS. “It was such an awful feeling knowing he was going through my phone, like I’ve got private personal photos of me.”

Advertisement



Source link

Missouri

Missouri Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 winning numbers for March 5, 2026

Published

on


The Missouri Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at March 5, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Pick 3 numbers from March 5 drawing

Midday: 5-5-1

Midday Wild: 7

Advertisement

Evening: 4-7-3

Evening Wild: 1

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from March 5 drawing

Midday: 9-4-6-3

Midday Wild: 1

Advertisement

Evening: 9-3-6-3

Evening Wild: 9

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Cash Pop numbers from March 5 drawing

Early Bird: 10

Morning: 14

Advertisement

Matinee: 14

Prime Time: 10

Night Owl: 09

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Show Me Cash numbers from March 5 drawing

10-17-22-24-30

Advertisement

Check Show Me Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Missouri Lottery retailers can redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes over $600, winners have the option to submit their claim by mail or in person at one of Missouri Lottery’s regional offices, by appointment only.

To claim by mail, complete a Missouri Lottery winner claim form, sign your winning ticket, and include a copy of your government-issued photo ID along with a completed IRS Form W-9. Ensure your name, address, telephone number and signature are on the back of your ticket. Claims should be mailed to:

Ticket Redemption

Advertisement

Missouri Lottery

P.O. Box 7777

Jefferson City, MO 65102-7777

For in-person claims, visit the Missouri Lottery Headquarters in Jefferson City or one of the regional offices in Kansas City, Springfield or St. Louis. Be sure to call ahead to verify hours and check if an appointment is required.

For additional instructions or to download the claim form, visit the Missouri Lottery prize claim page.

Advertisement

When are the Missouri Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Pick 4: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Cash4Life: 8 p.m. daily.
  • Cash Pop: 8 a.m. (Early Bird), 11 a.m. (Late Morning), 3 p.m. (Matinee), 7 p.m. (Prime Time) and 11 p.m. (Night Owl) daily.
  • Show Me Cash: 8:59 p.m. daily.
  • Lotto: 8:59 p.m. Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Powerball Double Play: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Missouri editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri Supreme Court reviews airport property tax deduction

Published

on

Missouri Supreme Court reviews airport property tax deduction


Summary:
  • Missouri Supreme Court heard arguments on constitutionality of airport property tax valuation statute.
  • Case involves valuation of Marriott hotel at Kansas City International Airport.
  • Platte County assessor argues statute creates special tax advantage for airport properties.
  • Missouri State Tax Commission reduced hotel’s valuation from $13.45 million to about $6.14 million.

The Missouri Supreme Court heard arguments Feb. 10 in a case challenging how a hotel at Kansas City International Airport was valued for property tax purposes and whether a state statute allowing deductions for airport property improvements is constitutional.

The dispute centers on the valuation of the Marriott Hotel located at Kansas City International Airport and whether a provision in Section 137.115.1 of state law improperly reduces the taxable value of certain airport properties.

At issue is a challenge by the Platte County assessor and the Park Hill School District to a decision by the Missouri State Tax Commission that resulted in a lower valuation for the 2016 tax year.

Advertisement

The assessor was represented during arguments by Stephen E. Magers, an attorney for Platte County in Platte City; Grady Hotel Investments was represented by Peter A. Corsale of McCarthy, Leonard & Kaemmerer in Town & Country.

Magers argued the statute effectively creates a special class of property that receives favorable tax treatment.

“This case concerns a truly novel item of the Missouri statutes,” he said. “It stands alone as the only statute within the entirety of the Missouri framework that gives a certain set of taxpayers a tax advantage of having real property located within an airport receive a deduction for new construction and improvements.”

The property at issue is a Marriott hotel located on land owned by Kansas City within the boundaries of Kansas City International Airport. The city leases the land to a private operator.

In 2015, Grady Hotel Investments purchased the prior operator’s interest in the property for about $8.5 million. As part of the transaction, Grady entered into an amended lease and concession agreement with the city and committed to making capital improvements to repair and renovate the property.

Advertisement

For the 2016 tax year, the Platte County assessor valued Grady’s interest in the hotel at approximately $13.45 million. After the county board of equalization upheld that valuation, Grady appealed to the Missouri State Tax Commission.

The commission initially set the hotel’s assessed value at zero using the “bonus value” methodology for leasehold interests, but the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District later reversed that ruling and remanded the case. On remand, the commission ultimately determined the hotel’s “true value in money” was about $6.14 million. The commission reached that figure after deducting the value of personal property included in the purchase and approximately $1.2 million in costs paid toward new construction and improvements made after 2008, as permitted under Section 137.115.1.

Magers argued that the statute operates as an unconstitutional tax break for properties located within airport boundaries.

“At its core, what the statute does is create a special kind of property that receives a reduction to its value based on new construction and improvements spent toward such possessory interests in real property,” said Magers.

He also said the provision treats airport properties differently from other commercial properties.

Advertisement

“A homeowner doesn’t get a reduction to their value when they get a new roof on their property,” he said. “But for property that is located within an airport boundary that undertakes new construction or improvements, there is a deduction to that value that the statute mandates.”

Corsale countered that the statute does not create a tax exemption but instead establishes a permissible method for valuing certain types of property.

“To me the answer is no. This is a method of valuation,” he said, arguing that the Missouri Constitution gives the legislature authority to determine how property is valued for tax purposes.

Judge Mary R. Russell questioned whether the deduction could potentially reduce a property’s value to zero if improvements continue over time.

“But couldn’t it be, at some point, a perpetual exemption,” she said, noting the statute allows deductions regardless of when improvement costs were incurred.

Advertisement

Corsale said the improvements ultimately revert to the city when the lease ends.

“What we are dealing with is a private company improving public land that eventually reverts back to the public,” he said. “At the conclusion of the lease, the public gets the benefit of whatever money they put into this property.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Fact Finders: Can tow trucks run red lights in Missouri?

Published

on

Fact Finders: Can tow trucks run red lights in Missouri?


SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (KY3) – A viewer named Donna asked KY3’s Fact Finders whether it is legal for tow trucks with emergency lights to run through a red light. The answer is yes, but with conditions.

Missouri law states that any wrecker or tow truck may proceed past a red stop signal or stop sign, but only after slowing down as necessary for safe operation.

What the law requires

Three conditions must be met for a tow truck driver to proceed through a red light legally: the driver must be responding to an emergency call, must slow down or stop to confirm the intersection can be crossed safely, and must have at least one lighted lamp displaying a red light visible from 500 feet to the front of the vehicle while also sounding an audible signal such as a siren or bell.

Terry Harden of Terry’s Towing said tow truck drivers can legally be treated the same as other emergency vehicles.

Advertisement

“You really could be treated just like a police car, fire truck, ambulance,” Harden said.

Not every call warrants running a red light

Harden said he uses judgment when deciding whether to exercise that legal right.

“If you call me for a jump start, don’t mean I’m going to run red lights and sirens to get to your jump start,” Harden said.

Dispatchers sometimes instruct drivers to respond quickly to emergency crash scenes, Harden said.

“They want you to be there faster than fast. It says, expedite, expedite. And that’s fine. I will expedite it,” Harden said.

Advertisement

Have a question for Fact Finders? Visit KY3.com, go to the menu, select Fact Finders, and click Contact Fact Finders.

To report a correction or typo, please email digitalnews@ky3.com. Please include the article info in the subject line of the email.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending