Connect with us

Missouri

Missouri Senate hears bill on life imprisonment for people in U.S. without legal status

Published

on

Missouri Senate hears bill on life imprisonment for people in U.S. without legal status


Lee este reporte en Español.

A Missouri Senate committee heard hours of testimony Monday on illegal immigration legislation that includes life imprisonment for those found guilty and a bounty of $1,000 for reporting people without legal status in the U.S.

Through one of the pieces of legislation, someone who is in the country without legal status who enters Missouri and remains would be guilty of a new felony trespassing charge.

The penalty would be life imprisonment without parole, probation or conditional release except by action of the governor.

Advertisement

Those penalties would not apply if the federal government enters into a written agreement with the Missouri Department of Public Safety to take into custody and deport the person.

Sen. David Gregory, R-Chesterfield, sponsor of the legislation, said the bill’s goal is to create an equivalent of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“Much like ICE, we have to actually do an effective investigation and have enough probable cause to initiate a warrant for someone’s arrest before they can be tracked and arrested,” Gregory said.

Gregory said through his bill it would be illegal to conduct warrantless arrests, even though that is not specified in the measure.

“It is not allowed per constitutional law, which means we cannot change it here, nor can the federal government change it,” Gregory said.

Advertisement

Sen. Barbara Washington, D-Kansas City, asked Gregory for specifics on how this issue is affecting Missourians today.

“I am so sick of folks coming in here and telling me about what’s going on here, there and everywhere and not talking about the issues we have in our own state,” Washington said.

Gregory did not give specific examples in response to Washington’s question.

Gregory also referenced a substitute of his original bill that he’s building. That version has not been posted online.

A $1,000 bounty

The first version of the bill would require the state Department of Public Safety to create a system in which anyone can contact authorities and accuse someone of being here without legal documentation.

Advertisement

The system must include a telephone number, an email address and an online portal people can use.

People who would use it to report someone could remain anonymous. Within the bill language, there are no penalties if someone were to report on a person who has proper legal status.

If the accused person is in Missouri without legal status, the person who reported them would receive $1,000.

Sen. Stephen Webber, D-Columbia, asked Gregory if there were courses of action someone could take if they were incorrectly accused.

“If somebody tries to call in a tip and says, ‘I think my neighbor is undocumented’ and there’s an investigation, that person was not undocumented, do they have any kind of recourse for their troubles?” Webber said.

Advertisement

Gregory said it is currently against the law to harass or give false reports to hotlines.

The legislation also expands who can become a bounty hunter in the state in relation to the issue. It allows anyone with an unexpired valid license as a bail bond agent, general bond agent or surety recovery agent to apply to the program.

The bill also creates a fund that would provide money to implement the proposed act. The legislature would be responsible for coming up with the funding.

The committee briefly discussed a fiscal note on the cost of the bill, which amounts to roughly $4.5 million.

Only one person spoke in favor of the legislation, while over 30 spoke against it.

Advertisement

Tori Schafer with the ACLU of Missouri said the ACLU has already sued over similar laws in Iowa, Oklahoma and Texas.

“We’ve been successful in those cases because judges have agreed that we’re likely to succeed on the merits, because the federal government has an invested interest in carrying out federal law, which is exactly what we’re talking about,” Schaefer said.

Yazmin Bruno-Valdez, a recipient of the federal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, also spoke against the legislation. She said it would pit neighbors against one another.

“It would incentivize discrimination, foster xenophobia and perpetuate division by placing a price tag of a mere $1,000,” Bruno-Valdez said.

Hours earlier on Monday, senators heard similar legislation from Sen. Jill Carter, R-Granby.

Advertisement

The legislation makes it illegal for someone to enter Missouri if they do not have legal status in the United States.

They would be fined $10,000 and deported on the first offence. On subsequent offenses, the punishment would include prison time of one to seven years.

“It’s morally imperative to strike a balance between the unresponsive federal government and the plight of our communities and law enforcement,” Carter said.

Three people spoke in favor of the legislation, including David Parrish, a sheriff in Lewis County.

“We feel that this legislation will simply give law enforcement another tool in the tool box to help us assist any of our federal partners,” Parrish said.

Advertisement

Aura Velasquez was among the over 20 people who spoke against Carter’s legislation. Velasquez was born in Nicaragua and came to the U.S. when she was 5.

“My mom left Nicaragua to set out to find a place she was told was built by immigrants and welcomed them: the United States of America. And now, if this bill was to continue further than an idea, it would destroy the safety of anyone that looks different, my friends, my family and children could be labeled as not human enough to live in peace,” Velasquez said.

The hearings on these bills come a week into President Donald Trump’s second administration. Trump ran on a promise to enact mass deportations.

On Saturday, over 100 protesters gathered in Overland to decry the Trump administration’s immigration policy changes and deportations.

Advertisement





Source link

Missouri

Missouri Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 winning numbers for March 5, 2026

Published

on


The Missouri Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at March 5, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Pick 3 numbers from March 5 drawing

Midday: 5-5-1

Midday Wild: 7

Advertisement

Evening: 4-7-3

Evening Wild: 1

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from March 5 drawing

Midday: 9-4-6-3

Midday Wild: 1

Advertisement

Evening: 9-3-6-3

Evening Wild: 9

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Cash Pop numbers from March 5 drawing

Early Bird: 10

Morning: 14

Advertisement

Matinee: 14

Prime Time: 10

Night Owl: 09

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Show Me Cash numbers from March 5 drawing

10-17-22-24-30

Advertisement

Check Show Me Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Missouri Lottery retailers can redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes over $600, winners have the option to submit their claim by mail or in person at one of Missouri Lottery’s regional offices, by appointment only.

To claim by mail, complete a Missouri Lottery winner claim form, sign your winning ticket, and include a copy of your government-issued photo ID along with a completed IRS Form W-9. Ensure your name, address, telephone number and signature are on the back of your ticket. Claims should be mailed to:

Ticket Redemption

Advertisement

Missouri Lottery

P.O. Box 7777

Jefferson City, MO 65102-7777

For in-person claims, visit the Missouri Lottery Headquarters in Jefferson City or one of the regional offices in Kansas City, Springfield or St. Louis. Be sure to call ahead to verify hours and check if an appointment is required.

For additional instructions or to download the claim form, visit the Missouri Lottery prize claim page.

Advertisement

When are the Missouri Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Pick 4: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Cash4Life: 8 p.m. daily.
  • Cash Pop: 8 a.m. (Early Bird), 11 a.m. (Late Morning), 3 p.m. (Matinee), 7 p.m. (Prime Time) and 11 p.m. (Night Owl) daily.
  • Show Me Cash: 8:59 p.m. daily.
  • Lotto: 8:59 p.m. Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Powerball Double Play: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Missouri editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri Supreme Court reviews airport property tax deduction

Published

on

Missouri Supreme Court reviews airport property tax deduction


Summary:
  • Missouri Supreme Court heard arguments on constitutionality of airport property tax valuation statute.
  • Case involves valuation of Marriott hotel at Kansas City International Airport.
  • Platte County assessor argues statute creates special tax advantage for airport properties.
  • Missouri State Tax Commission reduced hotel’s valuation from $13.45 million to about $6.14 million.

The Missouri Supreme Court heard arguments Feb. 10 in a case challenging how a hotel at Kansas City International Airport was valued for property tax purposes and whether a state statute allowing deductions for airport property improvements is constitutional.

The dispute centers on the valuation of the Marriott Hotel located at Kansas City International Airport and whether a provision in Section 137.115.1 of state law improperly reduces the taxable value of certain airport properties.

At issue is a challenge by the Platte County assessor and the Park Hill School District to a decision by the Missouri State Tax Commission that resulted in a lower valuation for the 2016 tax year.

Advertisement

The assessor was represented during arguments by Stephen E. Magers, an attorney for Platte County in Platte City; Grady Hotel Investments was represented by Peter A. Corsale of McCarthy, Leonard & Kaemmerer in Town & Country.

Magers argued the statute effectively creates a special class of property that receives favorable tax treatment.

“This case concerns a truly novel item of the Missouri statutes,” he said. “It stands alone as the only statute within the entirety of the Missouri framework that gives a certain set of taxpayers a tax advantage of having real property located within an airport receive a deduction for new construction and improvements.”

The property at issue is a Marriott hotel located on land owned by Kansas City within the boundaries of Kansas City International Airport. The city leases the land to a private operator.

In 2015, Grady Hotel Investments purchased the prior operator’s interest in the property for about $8.5 million. As part of the transaction, Grady entered into an amended lease and concession agreement with the city and committed to making capital improvements to repair and renovate the property.

Advertisement

For the 2016 tax year, the Platte County assessor valued Grady’s interest in the hotel at approximately $13.45 million. After the county board of equalization upheld that valuation, Grady appealed to the Missouri State Tax Commission.

The commission initially set the hotel’s assessed value at zero using the “bonus value” methodology for leasehold interests, but the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District later reversed that ruling and remanded the case. On remand, the commission ultimately determined the hotel’s “true value in money” was about $6.14 million. The commission reached that figure after deducting the value of personal property included in the purchase and approximately $1.2 million in costs paid toward new construction and improvements made after 2008, as permitted under Section 137.115.1.

Magers argued that the statute operates as an unconstitutional tax break for properties located within airport boundaries.

“At its core, what the statute does is create a special kind of property that receives a reduction to its value based on new construction and improvements spent toward such possessory interests in real property,” said Magers.

He also said the provision treats airport properties differently from other commercial properties.

Advertisement

“A homeowner doesn’t get a reduction to their value when they get a new roof on their property,” he said. “But for property that is located within an airport boundary that undertakes new construction or improvements, there is a deduction to that value that the statute mandates.”

Corsale countered that the statute does not create a tax exemption but instead establishes a permissible method for valuing certain types of property.

“To me the answer is no. This is a method of valuation,” he said, arguing that the Missouri Constitution gives the legislature authority to determine how property is valued for tax purposes.

Judge Mary R. Russell questioned whether the deduction could potentially reduce a property’s value to zero if improvements continue over time.

“But couldn’t it be, at some point, a perpetual exemption,” she said, noting the statute allows deductions regardless of when improvement costs were incurred.

Advertisement

Corsale said the improvements ultimately revert to the city when the lease ends.

“What we are dealing with is a private company improving public land that eventually reverts back to the public,” he said. “At the conclusion of the lease, the public gets the benefit of whatever money they put into this property.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Fact Finders: Can tow trucks run red lights in Missouri?

Published

on

Fact Finders: Can tow trucks run red lights in Missouri?


SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (KY3) – A viewer named Donna asked KY3’s Fact Finders whether it is legal for tow trucks with emergency lights to run through a red light. The answer is yes, but with conditions.

Missouri law states that any wrecker or tow truck may proceed past a red stop signal or stop sign, but only after slowing down as necessary for safe operation.

What the law requires

Three conditions must be met for a tow truck driver to proceed through a red light legally: the driver must be responding to an emergency call, must slow down or stop to confirm the intersection can be crossed safely, and must have at least one lighted lamp displaying a red light visible from 500 feet to the front of the vehicle while also sounding an audible signal such as a siren or bell.

Terry Harden of Terry’s Towing said tow truck drivers can legally be treated the same as other emergency vehicles.

Advertisement

“You really could be treated just like a police car, fire truck, ambulance,” Harden said.

Not every call warrants running a red light

Harden said he uses judgment when deciding whether to exercise that legal right.

“If you call me for a jump start, don’t mean I’m going to run red lights and sirens to get to your jump start,” Harden said.

Dispatchers sometimes instruct drivers to respond quickly to emergency crash scenes, Harden said.

“They want you to be there faster than fast. It says, expedite, expedite. And that’s fine. I will expedite it,” Harden said.

Advertisement

Have a question for Fact Finders? Visit KY3.com, go to the menu, select Fact Finders, and click Contact Fact Finders.

To report a correction or typo, please email digitalnews@ky3.com. Please include the article info in the subject line of the email.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending