In the only one-on-one debate of Missouri’s 2024 U.S. Senate campaign, Republican incumbent Josh Hawley sparred with Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce over abortion rights, border security and whether the 2020 presidential election was legitimate.
The abortion issue provoked some of the sharpest exchanges about 20 minutes into the debate. Hawley said he would not vote for Amendment 3, the reproductive rights proposal on Tuesday’s ballot. He co-sponsored a bill to create a national abortion ban at 15 weeks and has advocated outlawing abortion since he first sought office as Missouri attorney general in 2016, saying it is “not a right” and “should be barred by American law.”
Hawley said he supports exceptions for rape, incest or the life of the mother, but argued Amendment 3 is not limited to restoring legal abortion in Missouri.
“Amendment 3 would legalize sex change operations and transgender treatments for minors in Missouri without parental consent,” he said.
Advertisement
Legal experts dismiss attempt to link Missouri abortion amendment to transgender health care
Legal and medical experts interviewed by The Independent said the claim is a stretch at best — and at worst, an outright lie. Gender-affirming care, they say, would not be impacted by Amendment 3.
Kunce, who has made his support for Amendment 3 one of the key points in his message, said Hawley is obscuring his old positions to fool voters.
“He will literally lie, cheat, steal, do anything he can to confirm his life’s ambition, which is to make sure that there is no abortion, no contraception or anything else,” Kunce said.
The transgender treatments claims are a diversion, Kunce said.
Advertisement
“He sees sex-change surgeries around every corner,” he said.
Thursday’s debate was hosted by Missouri Nexstar stations and broadcast from the KTVI/KPLR-St. Louis studios. It was also carried by other stations throughout the state.
Hawley and Kunce debated once before, at the Missouri Press Association convention in September. In that debate, which was not televised, they shared the stage with Jared Young, who formed the Better Party by petition to get on the ballot, and Nathan Kline of the Green Party.
No third-party candidates were invited to Thursday’s debate.
Hawley is seeking a second term in the Senate. Kunce is making his second run for a Senate seat after narrowly losing the 2022 Democratic primary.
Advertisement
They also clashed face-to-face at the Missouri State Fair, where Hawley demanded an outdoor debate without a moderator and Kunce called on Hawley to agree to five televised debates.
Thursday night’s debate was less than 30 seconds old when Hawley injected a snarky reminder that a bullet fragment fired by Kunce struck a television reporter in the arm at a shooting range near Kansas City earlier this month.
Kunce provided first aid and the injury was not serious, but it has been the butt of snarky social media posts from Hawley and his campaign.
Hawley referred to it in his opening answer of the debate.
“It takes a little bit of courage to share a stage with Lucas Kunce after he shot a reporter last week,” Hawley said.
Advertisement
Sheriff concludes shooting-range injury of TV reporter at Lucas Kunce event was an accident
When his turn came to answer the first question, Kunce described the event and turned Hawley’s quip back on him with a reference to the Jan. 6, 2021, riots in the U.S. Capitol.
Hawley sells coffee mugs with a news photo that shows him raising his fist in solidarity with the groups that later stormed the Capitol hoping to violently stop the certification of the presidential election.
“It is crazy to see this guy over here clutching his pearls over this when he is completely cool with inciting a riot that led to the injuries of 174 police officers, God knows how many other civilians, and even led to several deaths,” Kunce said.
Asked later in the debate whether he felt responsible for the mob’s actions that day, Hawley didn’t reference the violence as he defended his lead role in raising objections to the electoral vote count. “What I feel responsibility for is defending our Constitution, which is what I was doing that day,” Hawley said.
Advertisement
On immigration, Hawley said he voted against a bipartisan border security bill this year because it allowed too many new immigrants in while funding attorneys for their amnesty cases.
“What we need to do is close the border,” Hawley said. “What we need to do is reinstate the remain in Mexico program.”
Hawley accused Kunce of backing unlimited immigration and providing undocumented immigrants access to Social Security and Medicare.
“He said he was for amnesty,” Hawley said, referring to Kunce’s 2022 campaign. “He said that he was for no border wall.”
Kunce said he would have supported the bill because it provided for 1,500 new border agents and funding for new equipment. He also said Hawley doesn’t understand the real issues at the southern border.
Advertisement
Kunce, a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corp, said he trained with border patrol units in Arizona.
“I know what’s going on there,” he said. “I have seen it. I haven’t just done a field trip like this guy.”
Trump ‘chose not to act’ as U.S. Capitol underwent attack, Jan. 6 panel says
The debate hit economic issues as well, ranging from whether Grain Belt Express should be able to use eminent domain to obtain a wind power electricity transmission line corridor to Hawley’s legislation to cap credit card interest rates nationally at 18%.
Hawley said he sees eminent domain as a threat to farmers, while Kunce said the national policy should be to expand energy created from renewable resources.
Advertisement
The credit card interest rate policy was one where there was some level of agreement between the candidates.
Kunce said the caps should also apply to payday lenders who charge rates in excess of 100% per year.
“We need to make sure these predatory financial institutions can’t come into these people’s lives and destroy them over and over and over again,” Kunce said.
Hawley said he doesn’t think his proposal would lead to fewer people having access to credit. Credit card companies would still offer credit cards to consumers even with a cap.
“They want the profit,” Hawley said. “They want the market.”
Advertisement
The last question of the debate was about how divisive politics have become, and where to draw the line on hate speech.
Kunce said there has been “a degradation” in politics and said Hawley is partially to blame.
“We have swamp creatures all throughout D.C.,” Kunce said. “Josh Hawley is a swamp creature.”
Hawley sought to turn that around to point to Kunce as part of the problem.
“If that’s my opponent’s attempt to unite the country, we’ve got a long way to go,” Hawley said.
Advertisement
Campaign activities
Kunce has been campaigning for the seat since late 2022, a few months after he narrowly lost a Democratic primary in the race for the seat eventually won by U.S. Sen. Eric Schmitt, a Republican.
He is the best-funded Democrat running statewide this year, raising almost $19 million since the start of 2023. Hawley has raised $26.4 million since taking office in 2019, but only $7.4 million since the start of 2023.
They are the only statewide candidates who have advertised continually on television and digital platforms.
Advertisement
Kunce has purchased $7.3 million in television time on broadcast and cable outlets, tracking by The Independent shows. He has also spent $2.7 million on digital platforms, with another $1.6 million devoted to direct mail, according to his campaign finance reports.
Hawley has spent $5.4 million on television and radio advertising and a PAC called Show Me Strong has spent another $2.7 million on his behalf. The campaign has not spent significantly on digital or mail promotion.
“He’s only run negative ads against me, nothing about his own record, because he hasn’t accomplished anything,” Kunce said.
In fundraising emails, Kunce is pleading for cash to beef up his final television buy. While independent polls indicate Hawley has a double-digit lead, Kunce touted one sponsored by his campaign that shows a margin of three percentage points.
Kunce’s campaign has not purchased any ads beyond Friday.
Advertisement
Hawley, meanwhile, is begging for more money to hold Kunce off. In an email sent Wednesday, he told supporters that “I’ve got BAD news. It’s Sen. Josh Hawley, and a new poll just confirmed my WORST fears.”
Hawley has repeatedly sought to draw out Kunce to say he will vote for Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday. Even when asked during the debate, Kunce refused to reveal how he would vote.
Hawley is counting on long coattails from former President Donald Trump to boost his chances on Tuesday.
“While my opponent will not tell you tonight who he’s going to vote for, I think we all know whose policies he supports, Kamala Harris,” Hawley said in his closing remarks.
Kunce has been criss-crossing the state this week, with stops in Smithville, Columbia and Cape Girardeau.
Advertisement
Hawley will be part of a statewide GOP get-out-the-vote tour on Monday, the Missouri Republican Party stated in a news release.
COLUMBIA — The mayors of the four largest cities in Missouri signed a letter addressed to Gov.-elect Mike Kehoe asking him to take a concrete step to protect minors against the dangers of firearms.
Advertisement
Kehoe won’t be sworn in until Jan. 13, 2025, but leaders from around the state are already speaking out about what could change in their communities.
The letter, dated Nov. 15, was signed by Springfield Mayor Ken McClure, with co-signatures from Columbia Mayor Barbara Buffaloe, Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas and St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones.
Buffaloe told KOMU 8 that she wants her signature to let “the governor-elect know the mayors of the four largest cities are ready to collaborate on some of his public safety initiatives.”
The current Missouri constitution does not set a minimum age to possess a firearm, and Buffaloe said she thinks in this case, Missouri’s law should match the federal law.
One advocacy group told KOMU 8 that it has made its mission to end gun violence. Kristin Bowen, a Columbia-based volunteer of Mom’s Demand Action, said she feels personally drawn to the issue because of her kids.
Advertisement
Success! An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup.
Error! There was an error processing your request.
Advertisement
“It’s personal for me,” Bowen said. “Our kids have been trained since kindergarten on how to handle themselves in an active shooter situation, it makes me angry that we put so much on our teachers and our kids and our schools to protect our kids.”
From 2023 to 2024, both victims and offenders of firearm related crimes from the ages of 10 to 17 years old increased, according to the Missouri State Highway Patrol.
The number of victims increased from 37 to 51, and the number of offenders increased from 44 to 54.
Bowen said her organization’s message gets lost at times, and is labeled with an “anti-gun” position. To her, Mom’s Demand Action is actually pro-gun ownership.
“We support the second amendment and the right for private citizens to keep and bear arms,” Bowen said. “It’s a misconception that we oppose the second amendment, that I think is a distraction from the real issue.”
Advertisement
Bowen wants to see real solutions and progress, and hopes that with a new administration, this issue will be less politicized.
“I wish that we could at this moment — where we’ve got new administrations coming in to office — step away from this as a political issue,” Bowen said. “And take seriously what works.”
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey announced his office will file a lawsuit against Jackson County over a gun ordinance recently passed by the county’s legislature.
The ordinance, introduced by Jackson County Legislator Manny Abarca, prevents 18- to 21-year-olds from buying pistols or semiautomatic rifles.
“I will be filing suit against Jackson County for their illegal attempt to violate Missourians’ right to keep and bear arms,” Bailey posted on his X (formerly Twitter) account.
Bailey’s office also ordered the county to preserve all records and communications from the legislature related to the measure.
Advertisement
The ordinance was opposed and even vetoed by County Executive Frank White, Jr., who warned the legislature it could open the county to legal battles like the one Bailey threatened.
Still, the legislature voted to overturn his White’s veto, a move he called “disappointing.”
White released a statement on Bailey’s intent to sue the county, saying he wasn’t surprised.
“This announcement comes as no surprise. From the start, I made it clear that this ordinance violated Missouri law,” White said in part in a statement. “While I strongly disagree with the state’s preemption of local gun regulations — because I believe communities should have the ability to protect themselves—ignoring the law doesn’t lead to progress. It leads to predictable legal challenges and wasted resources, and unfortunately, this ordinance will do more harm to gun safety advocacy than doing nothing at all.”
On Tuesday, White said his office was receiving concerns about the ordinance and called on the legislature to amend the measure to add protections for young hunters at a Wednesday meeting.
Advertisement
Abarca and other legislators subsequently skipped the meeting to protest an ongoing disagreement on how to allocate over $70 million in ARPA funding.
The not-for-profit group originally set up to pay for Gov. Mike Parson’s 2021 inauguration gave $150,000 this week to the political action committee that helped get him elected.
Parson is leaving office due to term limits and has said repeatedly that he does not intend to be a candidate for public office again.
The PAC, Uniting Missouri, received the donation on Monday from Moving Missouri Forward Inc., which also paid the expenses to write and publish a biography of Parson called “No Turnin’ Back” that the governor has promoted extensively since its publication in February.
The origin of the $150,000 is unclear, since Moving Missouri Forward is not required to disclose its donors. But none of the money donated Monday was generated by sales of the Parson book, attorney Marc Ellinger said in an interview with The Independent. A different not-for-profit called Moving Missouri Forward Foundation receives all proceeds from book sales, he said, and is headed by First Lady Teresa Parson as president and Claudia Kehoe, wife Gov.-elect Mike Kehoe, as vice president.
Advertisement
“It paid for the book and contributed the entire cost of it and everything to the foundation as a charitable contribution, so that the foundation would have an ability to raise money through the book,” Ellinger said.
Ellinger is the registered agent for both Moving Missouri Forward Inc. and Moving Missouri Forward Foundation.
Uniting Missouri PAC had about $93,000 on hand at the end of October. Reports filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission show it raised about $1.3 million since the start of 2023 and spent about $775,000 this year helping two officeholders Parson appointed, Kehoe and Attorney General Andrew Bailey, win hotly contested Republican primaries.
Uniting Missouri has also spent about $120,000 for Parson’s trips to watch the Kansas City Chiefs win the two most recent Super Bowls.
Tom Burcham — a former Republican state lawmaker from Farmington with close ties to Parson’s longtime friend and fundraiser, lobbyist Steve Tilley — is in charge of Uniting Missouri. It is unclear why the PAC needs to keep raising money to support a candidate who is no longer running for public office, and Burcham did not respond to a request for comment.
Advertisement
Burcham is also the registered agent for a not-for-profit created in September called 57 Foundation Inc., in reference to Parson’s position as the 57th governor of the state. The nonprofit held a fundraiser Nov. 14 in Kansas City where donors paid as much as $10,000 for a table and pre-event reception with the Parsons.
The purpose of 57 Foundation, according to its incorporation papers, includes “providing essential resources and support to needful and vulnerable Missourians who cannot adequately help themselves. The foundation’s activities are inspired by and aligned with the legacy of public service and contributions of Missouri’s 57th Governor, Michael L. Parson.”
The Moving Missouri Forward Inc. donation to Uniting Missouri is roughly equal to the remaining funds raised on behalf of Parson, Ellinger said.
It will now transition to become a vehicle for funding Kehoe’s inauguration, he said.
Soon after Parson’s 2021 inauguration, Moving Missouri Forward Inc. released a list of donors who contributed $500 or more to the $369,115 raised for the festivities. The list did not include the specific amounts donated.
Advertisement
As a not-for-profit 501(c)(4) entity, it is not required to reveal its donors. It is required to file a statement of revenues and expenses annually with the IRS. The most recent report, filed in November 2023 and covering 2022, shows $3,000 in contributions in 2022 and $40,563 in cash on hand at the end of the year.
The filing also showed a $25,000 contribution to the Moving Missouri Forward Foundation. The foundation is a 501(c)(3) entity and contributions are tax deductible.
The purpose of the Moving Missouri Forward Foundation, according to its creation filing, is to “aid, assist, or help Missouri’s children, including but not limited to Jobs for America’s Graduates-Missouri and children with autism and special needs.”
Mike and Teresa Parson have been co-chairs of Jobs for America’s Graduates-Missouri since 2016, when he was elected lieutenant governor.