Connect with us

Missouri

A Missouri police officer shot a blind and deaf dog. Now he's being sued.

Published

on

A Missouri police officer shot a blind and deaf dog. Now he's being sued.


A man has filed a lawsuit against the town of Sturgeon, Missouri, a little more than a week after a police officer shot and killed his small, blind, and deaf dog.

In a federal lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Nicholas Hunter alleges that Officer Myron Woodson and the city of Sturgeon violated his Fourth Amendment rights when Woodson killed Teddy, his 13-pound blind and deaf Shih Tzu, shortly after finding the dog wandering in a neighbor’s yard on May 19.

“Woodson’s warrantless seizure of Teddy was unnecessary, callous, and egregious as it was unwarranted by law and violative of Plaintiff Hunter’s most fundamental and guaranteed of constitutional rights,” Hunter’s lawsuit says. “At no time during the encounter between Teddy and Defendant Woodson did Teddy show any aggression towards Defendant Woodson. Teddy never barked, growled, or even moved towards Defendant Woodson. Instead, the small, blind and deaf dog simply kept trying to walk away, oblivious to the danger that Defendant Woodson posed to him.”

The shooting has outraged the town’s residents, especially after body camera footage obtained by a local news outlet contradicted the officer and city officials’ narrative of events. The mayor of Sturgeon resigned last Saturday evening after defending the shooting for several days, and Woodson has been placed on leave.

Advertisement

The shooting, though, is only an egregious example of a phenomenon that is so common that it has its own tag on Reason‘s website: “puppycide.” No one knows exactly how many dogs police shoot around the country, but every year there are more cases of wanton killings that, besides terrorizing owners, generate huge lawsuits, viral outrage, and in rare instances result in officers being fired, such as the case of an Arkansas officer who casually killed a nine-pound dog.

The incident in Sturgeon started when Teddy dug under Hunter’s backyard fence while Hunter was out at dinner and escaped, leaving its collar behind in the process. A neighbor called a county dispatch center to report that the dog had wandered into their yard and to get help finding its owner. According to Hunter’s lawsuit, the caller responded, “No, not at all,” when asked if the dog was aggressive.

The town of Sturgeon’s official Facebook page actually posted an alert on May 19 about the missing dog, along with photos of Teddy: “Do you know this doggie? Joint communications has been notified. The doggie seems in need of medical attention.”

Medical attention was not what the doggie received. Woodson arrived on the scene, and a few minutes later he shot Teddy twice.

In the meantime, Hunter had been called and told about the Facebook post. He was on his way to pick up Teddy, but arrived too late.

Advertisement

A day later, the city of Sturgeon posted on Facebook about the incident, defending Woodson’s decision: “Based on the behavior exhibited by the dog, believing the dog to be severely injured or infected with rabies, and as the officer feared being bitten and being infected with rabies, the SPD officer felt that his only option was to put the animal down,” Sturgeon wrote. “It was later learned that the animal’s behavior was because the animal was blind. Unfortunately, the animal’s lack of a collar or tags influenced the SPD Officer’s decision to put the animal down due to his belief that the animal was injured, sick and abandoned.”

Both Hunter and the neighbor filed complaints with the city. “I cannot stress enough that this animal was in no way a threat to others,” the neighbor, whose complaint was obtained by local news outlet ABC 17, wrote. “Woodson discharged his firearm multiple times in a residential area without a threat presenting itself, without warning.”

ABC 17 also obtained Woodson’s body camera footage, which showed that Teddy was never aggressive and didn’t bark or growl. Woodson tried to lasso Teddy with a catch pole—a common tool used in animal control—but the dog simply shook its head free of the rope and trotted away. After fumbling the catch pole several times, Woodson drew his gun and killed Teddy. ABC 17 reported that Woodson’s entire encounter with Teddy, from exiting his car to putting two bullets in the animal, lasted three minutes and six seconds.

After body camera footage was released, Sturgeon doubled down.

“The City believes that the officer acted within his authority based on the information available to him at the time to protect against possible injury to citizens from what appeared to be an injured, sick, and abandoned dog,” Sturgeon posted in a follow-up Facebook post.

Advertisement

Of course, it would have been embarrassing to admit the real reason that the officer resorted to using his gun: He was unable to snare a blind, deaf dog and was too poorly trained to come up with a solution besides shooting a harmless animal.

But police habitually lie about the behavior of dogs that they shoot. Dogs are almost always described in incident reports as snarling, aggressive, or lunging, and because department policies typically allow police to shoot dogs when they feel afraid for their safety, these shootings are almost always deemed justified.

For example, last year in Missouri a police officer shot a family’s dog and dumped it in a ditch. Similar to Hunter’s case, the dog had gotten loose during a storm, and a neighbor called to report it missing. In another case last year, Detroit cops killed a woman’s dog and dumped its body in a trash can. An Arkansas woman also filed a lawsuit after a cop accidentally shot her while trying to kill her Pomeranian—a toy breed that resembles a Koosh ball with legs.

This is the sort of behavior that’s flagged as sociopathic when committed by anyone who’s not represented by a police union.

And it’s the sort of behavior that can cost a small town like Sturgeon quite a lot of money, as city officials are surely fretting now. After Sturgeon’s mayor resigned last Friday, the acting mayor posted on Sturgeon’s Facebook account: “Like you we were just as appalled by what we saw. The actions of the Officer involved are not the values and beliefs of the residents of Sturgeon or the board of Alderman. Currently I have made calls to the Boone County Sheriff to meet and discuss an investigation.”

Advertisement

The city of Sturgeon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.



Source link

Missouri

Missouri Top High School Baseball Players For 2026

Published

on

Missouri Top High School Baseball Players For 2026


The 2026 MLB Draft is approaching, and Baseball America is providing a comprehensive, state-by-state look at the talent across the country with our rankings of the the top 2026 high school baseball players by state.

Our state lists collectively include rankings for more than 1,000 players from across the United States, Puerto Rico and Canada, offering an in-depth look at the 2026 high school class. Players are listed in the state where they attend high school, with the depth of each list varying depending on the level of talent in each state.

More MLB Draft Rankings

These rankings are based on Baseball America’s extensive scouting coverage, combining first-hand evaluations and industry feedback to line up players based on their projected future talent. The rankings reflect the full spectrum of talent in the 2026 class. The players who project to be the best major league players—and thus will likely end up being high draft picks—are at the top of our rankings.

In addition to elite draft prospects, these lists include high-end college recruits, many of whom project to be impact college players who could raise their MLB prospect profiles after getting to campus. They also include other players who have the potential to be quality Division I regulars.

Advertisement

The players at the top of the lists stand out right now with the highest long-term major league projection, but there are future major leaguers throughout these lists. Player further down the rankings have a greater chance of getting to college, where they have the potential to emerge after more development at that level.

These lists offer a resource for tracking the best 2026 high school baseball prospects who could shape the 2026 MLB Draft and make an impact on college baseball programs in the years ahead. For college programs, major league teams and fans, these lists provide a deeper look into the pipeline of talent that will shape the 2026 MLB Draft class, future draft classes and the next half decade of college baseball.

Missouri Class Of 2026 Baseball Rankings

RANK PLAYER POS SCHOOL COMMIT
1 Grayden Seuferling RHP Blue Springs South Wake Forest
2 Tyler Putnam RHP Battle Tennessee
3 Cooper Shrum RHP Belton Tennessee
4 Brody Crane RHP Neosho Arkansas
5 Dylan Curtis RHP Francis Howell Missouri
6 Haverly Cox RHP Home School Illinois
7 Troy Fisher SS Liberty North Arkansas
8 CJ Lake RHP Oaksville John. A Logan CC
9 Nolan Sissom SS Fort Zumwalt West Missouri
10 Brody Wilson RHP Kickapoo Missouri State
11 Brooks Zumwalt C/1B Summit Christian Academy Pittsburgh
12 GT Taylor OF Christian Brothers College Kansas
13 Brady Smith RHP East Carter Wichita State
14 Drew Messey SS Wesminster Christian Academy Louisville
15 Zach Van Hook LHP St. John Vianney Missouri
16 Henry Vedder RHP Washington Jacksonville State
17 Seaton Thompson SS Ladue Horton Watkins Missouri
18 Cameron Taylor RHP Kearney Uncommitted
19 Cooper Callahan SS Blue Springs South Southeast Missouri State
20 Jackson Smith LHP Festus Michigan
21 Luke Condrin LHP MICDS Notre Dame
22 Jake Brettschneider RHP Francis Howell Missouri
23 Brennan McLaughlin SS/RHP Platte County Oral Roberts
24 Colton Petersmith OF Rolla Nebraska
25 Jaxson Joggerst RHP Eureka Southeast Missouri State
26 Hunter Fryman C Marshfield Davidson
27 Logan Sutton SS Liberty St. Louis
28 Hayden Sharp OF Lee’s Summit West Uncommitted
29 Grant Mehroff LHP Christian Brothers College Jefferson CC



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri immigration enforcement triples; St. Louis families affected

Published

on

Missouri immigration enforcement triples; St. Louis families affected


ST. LOUIS – Missouri is experiencing one of the sharpest increases in immigration enforcement in the country, with activity nearly tripling compared to the end of the Biden administration.

More than 3,200 people have been taken into custody across the state since January 2025, according to new data from the Deportation Data Project.

Arrests in Missouri are approximately 2.7 times higher than they were just a year ago, leading local advocates in St. Louis to report that the impact is significantly affecting families.

Hundreds of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainees are held in facilities statewide on any given day.

Advertisement

Jessica Mayo, co-director and attorney for the M.I.C.A. Project, highlighted the widespread consequences of this intensified enforcement.

“Even though we don’t see ice on the streets, the way they were in Minneapolis or Chicago or LA. That same destruction of families is happening here and it is really impacting our neighbors, the people we go to school with, the people we work with,” Mayo said. “And we all need to stand up and let our government know that we don’t support that and to support the immigrants, uh, in our community to make it a more welcoming place.”

Local advocates in St. Louis are observing this impact directly. The ASHREI Foundation reports receiving nearly 6,000 hotline calls and has provided support for more than 650 families, many of whom are dealing with detained loved ones.

Mayo stated that local police departments are a significant source of these detentions. “More than 80% of the people that we see through the St. Louis rapid response hotline are being turned over to ice by local Police Department,” Mayo said. She added that this occurs even with departments that do not have 287(g) agreements.

She further explained various ways people are encountering ICE. “We see many municipalities cooperating with ice and calling them even when it’s just someone who’s been driving without a license,” Mayo said. She also noted that routine check-ins with immigration officials, which individuals have often attended for years to update their status, are now frequently leading to detention.

Advertisement

Federal officials with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security maintain that these enforcement efforts are focused on public safety, highlighting recent arrests of violent offenders and expanded operations. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement also points to initiatives like its VOICE office, which supports victims of crimes tied to immigration. However, advocates argue and data shows, that about 20% of those arrested in Missouri by ICE have no criminal charges or convictions. More than 60 local agencies are working with ICE statewide.

For individuals or families affected by detention, the St. Louis Rapid Response Hotline is available daily at (314) 370-7080. The hotline helps families locate loved ones and understand their legal options.

All facts in this report were gathered by journalists employed by KTVI. Artificial intelligence tools were used to reformat information into a news article for our website. This report was edited and fact-checked by KTVI staff before being published.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Safeguarding health care in rural Missouri demands a new approach

Published

on

Safeguarding health care in rural Missouri demands a new approach


Missouri lawmakers are right to treat the collapse of rural health care as an urgent crisis. Nearly half of the state’s remaining rural hospitals are at risk of closure, and many communities already know what it means to lose emergency rooms, labor and delivery services and timely stroke care. In this environment, legislation allowing MU […]



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending