Connect with us

Minnesota

Why are counties, GOP pushing against the Minnesota state flag and seal?

Published

on

Why are counties, GOP pushing against the Minnesota state flag and seal?


With Minnesota poised to officially adopt a new state flag and seal, some counties are passing resolutions opposing the new symbols and Republicans have pushed to make the change into a bigger political issue.

At least five counties across Minnesota have voted to formally complain about the new state symbols, raising issues about what they call unfunded mandates. And just a few weeks ago, the state Republican Party launched a website with a petition to reject the new flag, saying it erases state history.

The new state flag and seal come after decades of calls for change. Minnesota’s current flag includes the state seal against a blue background. The seal depicts a Native American riding off into the sunset while a white settler plows his field with his rifle leaning on a nearby stump.

The current version of Minnesota’s state seal was adopted in 1983, though it has its roots before statehood in 1858. (Courtesy of the State Emblems Redesign Commission)

Many found the imagery offensive because of its depiction of white settlers displacing the state’s original inhabitants, and to boot the design was seen as overcomplicated and unoriginal as it resembled many other state flags.

Advertisement

There is some political disagreement over whether the flag and seal are necessary, but counties also have had practical questions about when they’ll have to adopt the new symbols and how much it will cost.

Confusion among some counties

Flags are more or less an afterthought for counties when considering replacement expenses.

The biggest cost so far appears to come from law enforcement. Many sheriff’s departments incorporate the soon-to-be-gone state seal into their logos, meaning car decals, badges and letterheads will have to be replaced.

That’s the biggest question local governments have so far about the new flag and seal, though they’re under no requirement to make the changes immediately when the new symbols take effect, says Matt Hilgart, government relations manager with the Association of Minnesota Counties.

“Most of it that, what I’ve seen is just the concern about in the illusion that they’re under some kind of mandate to change everything that they have now, and that they’re very concerned with the costs,” he said, adding he hasn’t heard members say they are passing the resolutions purely to go against what’s coming out of the Capitol.

Advertisement

“I’m not hearing, you know, ‘I hate this flag and I’m gonna let St. Paul know I hate it,’” Hilgart said.

County opposition

In the past month, five counties outside the Twin Cities metro have passed resolutions against the flag. Though so far, none have said they’ll outright reject the flag and seal and hold on to the old one — though there isn’t anything in the law stopping them from doing so.

Crow Wing, Douglas, Houston, McLeod and Nobles counties approved measures criticizing the process that led to the new flag and the new expenses. Fillmore County sent a letter to state officials over their concerns with the new state symbols.

On Dec. 12, 2023, the State Emblems Redesign Commission voted to adopt design modifications to the official Great Seal of the State of Minnesota. Members of the commission picked their final designs from more than 2,600 public submissions in December, and barring intervention by the Legislature. Commission members who supported the measure say they think the whole state should have been brought into the process.

“That doesn’t seem fair to me … that should be voted on by their elected officials, or by the people,” said Eric Johnson, a Houston County commissioner.

Advertisement
A state seal featuring a loon.
On December 12, 2023, the State Emblems Redesign Commission voted to adopt design modifications to the official Great Seal of the State of Minnesota. The design is subject to further changes and final approval by the Commission. (Courtesy of the State Emblems Redesign Commission)

Expenses

In Houston County, the sheriff’s department expected it would cost about $32,000 to replace squad car decals and badges that incorporate the old state seal.

“That’s that’s the main reason why we’re pushing back on this — because this is this is going to be an unfunded mandate,” Johnson said.

Houston County has about 18,000 residents and an annual budget of about $14 million. In much bigger counties, officials have already estimated much higher costs for updating law enforcement equipment and other areas where state symbols appear. None have passed resolutions protesting the new state symbols.

Here’s a list of some counties with their cost estimates:

• Dakota County — Replacing state flags and seals in Dakota County will cost up to $170,000 when the new symbols go into effect, according to county spokesperson Mary Beth Schubert. Most of that cost is for the sheriff’s department, which expects to spend $140,000 to $150,000. Facilities officials expect to spend about $20,000.

• Hennepin County — Sheriff’s department symbols here incorporate the old state seal, and replacing uniforms will cost about $500,000, according to the sheriff’s office. That’s an initial estimate and does not include vehicles and other equipment. Replacing flags will cost about $300 per flag at seven different buildings, a county official said.

Advertisement

• St. Louis County — Officials here haven’t done a full tally of how much it’ll cost the county to replace its symbols. The St. Louis County Sheriff’s Office logo has the state seal at its center, and updating things like signage and badges would cost about $50,000 if it all had to happen at once, according to county spokesperson Dana Kazel.

• Ramsey County and Washington County didn’t have estimates as of late January.

Hilgart, with the county association, says his group has been telling members there is flexibility on adopting the new state symbols, and counties won’t be forced to do anything immediately.

Historic and cultural objections

Underlying budget concerns are some questions about the outgoing symbols’ significance to the state’s identity. Johnson, of Houston County, expressed a similar sentiment to what some GOP lawmakers and the Minnesota Republican Party have said.

“All those symbols on that flag are in honor of our heritage and our history of our state,” Johnson said.

Advertisement

In a statement launching a petition to keep the flag, Minnesota GOP Chairman David Hann and Deputy Chairwoman Donna Bergstrom had stronger words.

“The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War,” they wrote. “Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861, beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected.”

Asked about the new flag design, Johnson first said he didn’t have an opinion, but later added of the minimalist blue and white design: “It’s pretty plain to me; it doesn’t really stand for much.”

What can opponents do?

There has been plenty of noise the past month over the new design, but besides firing up conservatives, what exactly can Republicans and any other officials who oppose the new flag and seal actually do?

On the legislative side? Not much.

Advertisement

Following the adoption of the new state symbols, Sen. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, and Rep. Bjorn Olson, R-Fairmont, non-voting members of the redesign commission, said they wanted to put the new flag and seal up to a statewide vote, but Democratic-Farmer-Labor leaders in control of the Senate and House have no interest.

However, on the local government level, there may be more room for regional expression. The law that set the new flag and seal into motion only applies to the state of Minnesota and does not compel cities and counties to do the same.

But again, no counties have signaled they’d keep the old symbols. So far, their criticism has been about the process and cost.



Source link

Advertisement

Minnesota

Shorthanded Clippers can’t keep pace with Anthony Edwards and Minnesota

Published

on

Shorthanded Clippers can’t keep pace with Anthony Edwards and Minnesota


Anthony Edwards scored 31 points, Donte DiVincenzo added 18 and the surging Minnesota Timberwolves beat the Clippers 94-88 on Thursday night.

Jaden McDaniels and Ayo Dosunmu each scored 12 points and Rudy Gobert had 13 rebounds to help the Timberwolves improve to 5-1 since Feb. 9 and 3-1 since the All-Star break.

Edwards, returning to the site of the All-Star Game, where he was the MVP, was 12 for 24 from the floor and sealed the victory with a step-back three-pointer over two defenders for a 92-88 lead with 42.9 seconds left.

Advertisement

Minnesota improved to 2-0 on a three-game trip.

Derrick Jones Jr. scored 18 points and Bennedict Mathurin added 14 for the Clippers, who struggled from the outset with a season-low 38 points in the first half. Kris Dunn had 11 points for the Clippers (27-31), who have lost three consecutive games for the first time since December.

The Clippers struggled on offense without star Kawhi Leonard, out because of ankle soreness. The Clippers shot 40.5% from the floor, including 18.2% (four for 22) in the second quarter. Minnesota shot 43.4% in the game.

The Timberwolves (37-23) scored just 15 points in the second quarter and still topped the Clippers, who had 11. Minnesota led 44-38 at halftime behind 12 points from DiVincenzo and 11 from Edwards.

Advertisement

The Clippers led by six in the third quarter and were up 68-63 heading into the fourth. Edwards’ drive and reverse layup put the Timberwolves up for good at 76-74 with 7:40 remaining.

The Clippers pulled within one three times in the last 2½ minutes, but Edwards answered each time. He scored the Timberwolves’ last nine points.

Up next for Clippers: vs. New Orleans on Sunday night.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Church congregant filed lawsuit against alleged Minnesota church protesters

Published

on

Church congregant filed lawsuit against alleged Minnesota church protesters


A St. Paul church member has filed a federal lawsuit alleging that a group of individuals, including journalist Don Lemon and activist Nekima Levy Armstrong, unlawfully disrupted service last month as part of a coordinated political demonstration.

The complaint, filed by Ann Doucette in the U.S. District Court of Minnesota, alleges that a Jan. 18 demonstration at Cities Church interfered with her ability to worship and caused her to suffer damages, including emotional distress and trauma.

In addition to the former CNN anchor and Armstrong, the complaint names journalist Georgia Fort and activists Will Kelly, Jerome Richardson, Trahern Crews and Jamael Lundy. It also names St. Paul school board member Chauntyll Allen.

Doucette and seven of the defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Doucette filed the complaint without the representation of an attorney. In an emailed statement to NBC News, Crews denied the lawsuit’s allegations “with empathy and compassion.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit accuses the group of civil conspiracy, aiding and abetting, intentional infliction of emotional distress, interference with religious exercise and trespassing.

“As a result of Defendants’ actions, the worship service was disrupted, congregants experienced fear and distress, and Plaintiff’s ability to freely exercise her religion in a private place of worship was unlawfully interfered with,” the lawsuit states.

All eight defendants are also facing federal charges for conspiracy against the rights of religious freedom at a place of worship and for interfering with the exercise of the right of religious freedom. Lemon has pleaded not guilty to all charges, saying outside the court, “I wanted to say this isn’t just about me, this is about all journalists, especially in the United States.”

Fort, Crews and Lundy were released on bond and entered not guilty pleas, according to The Associated Press.

Don Lemon reporting from an anti-ICE demonstration at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minn.@TheDonLemonShow via YouTube

This is the latest legal action tied to protests in the Twin Cities, where tensions remain over the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown and the fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.

Advertisement

According to the lawsuit, the demonstrators engaged in “coordinated conduct” by organizing meetings ahead of the “Operation Pullup” protest and promoting it on social media.

The lawsuit alleges that on the morning of Jan. 18, a coordinated group of individuals entered Cities Church, halting the worship service, and chanting “‘ICE Out!’ and ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot!’” while obstructing aisles. Protesters could allegedly be seen “confronting the pastor and congregants in a menacing manner,” the lawsuit says, noting that their chanting and “aggressive gestures” caused “severe emotional distress, fear, anxiety, and trauma” and caused children “terror.”

Demonstrators gathered at the church because they said its pastor, David Easterwood, was the acting director of an ICE field office in the city, the lawsuit says.

Lemon was arrested in January in California and accused of violating federal civil rights law after covering the protest on Jan. 18. He was released on a personal recognizance bond before a federal grand jury in Minnesota returned the indictment against Lemon and eight co-defendants, all of whom are also named in Doucette’s lawsuit.

Nekima Levy Armstrong, Cities Church protest arraignment, St. Paul, Minn., February 2026
Nekima Levy Armstrong in St. Paul, Minn., on Feb. 13.Carlos Gonzalez / Star Tribune via Getty Images

In the lawsuit, Doucette alleges that Lemon specifically livestreamed the protest, “noting congregants’ fear and distress, and appeared to take satisfaction in the disruption.”

Levy Armstrong, a Minneapolis-based civil rights attorney and activist, was also arrested for her participation in the St. Paul protest. Her arrest drew national attention after the White House shared on social media doctored photos where she appeared to be crying.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Man arrested, charged with threatening to kill a state senator

Published

on

Man arrested, charged with threatening to kill a state senator



A Hubbard County man was arrested and charged after threatening to kill a Minnesota state senator on Facebook. 

Advertisement

Court documents filed on Wednesday state the Minnesota State Patrol were investigating a threat posted by John Tobias saying that he would “kill every one of you treasonous [expletive] immediately” if he did not get money back that he claims he lost during the 2020 COVID shutdown. 

Court documents go on to say that Tobias then called the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office asking for something to be done about “Minnesota Governor Tim Walz ‘unconstitutionally’ shutting down the state due to COVID-19. 

The Minnesota State Patrol contacted Hubbard County deputies regarding Tobias. Court documents state Hubbard County investigators were already familiar with Tobais after speaking with him regarding similar threats he made in Jan. 

The charging documents state that investigators searched Tobias’ residence on Tuesday and found an arsenal of guns and 45 boxes of ammunition. 

Tobias was taken into custody. During an interview with law enforcement, Tobias admitted to making the threat on Facebook. He also told investigators that “he did not have any intention of killing anyone, but admitted he was trying to get people’s attention,” according to court records. 

Advertisement

In late 2025, Lt. Col. Jeremy Geiger of the Minnesota State Patrol, who oversees Capitol security, told a panel of lawmakers that threats to lawmakers had doubled between 2024 and 2025. 

Tobias made his first court appearance Wednesday morning and is expected back in court early next month.  



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending