Connect with us

Minnesota

Everything that P.J. Fleck said following Minnesota's win over Wisconsin

Published

on

Everything that P.J. Fleck said following Minnesota's win over Wisconsin


Thanks to everybody for making the trip out here. Happy Thanksgiving to everybody that’s out there. I know a lot of people — this is one of the best days and the best weekends of the year. One, because it’s Thanksgiving, and we all have a lot to be thankful and grateful for. We all do, no matter what your situation is. You can always find that. And obviously, there’s so much football being played.

At 11:00 AM, we’ll head back with the axe for the four-hour bus ride, and we’ll really enjoy that. I thought our players dominated the football game. I thought they did from start to finish. I think there are four or five plays we’d want back where it could have been even more lopsided. I thought we made a statement in the rivalry, winning three out of four here at Camp Randall. We take a lot of pride in that.

We knew we were going to have to play really well, and I thought our guys swarmed to the football on defense. We tackled really well. In a game where it’s 0°, those hits — both ways — are going to sting. We just wanted to be on the plus side of those things. The way we tackled and swarmed to the ball, I thought we did a great job. Limiting them to explosive plays was key.

Our team just played for each other, and I think that’s what’s really cool about this group. From day one, they’ve played for each other. I think other people are playing for other things, like streaks and all that other stuff, but we were able to play for each other and get the victory. That was really, really big for us — another step in the right direction. We wanted to be 1–0 today, and we did it for each other.

Advertisement

I think offensively, Max Brosmer played an outstanding game. I think our offensive line did as well. Aireontae goes out on the first play, first series. You know, Quinn Carroll and I had a talk about possibly moving him to left tackle if Aireontae decides to declare for the draft — which I’m sure he will. When you’re a first-rounder, I think that’s what you decide to do.

But we had that talk two weeks ago, and it’s kind of crazy how it came to fruition a little quicker than I wanted it to. I thought Quinn did an outstanding job. That whole line pushed together. He hasn’t played left tackle in practice, hasn’t done all of it, and for him to go over there says a lot about him and his commitment to this team.

The last thing we said was that we needed to be fully committed. We didn’t just need contributions from everyone; we needed full commitment. Coming off a short week, I thought our schedule was really, really good. I think we had four or five periods that were actually full-speed reps the entire week. Then we went all group tempo to make sure they felt as good as they could on game day.

Last but not least, special teams — I thought that was the difference for us in a lot of different areas. If you look at Dragan Kesich, it’s a great lesson for young Gopher fans out there. He misses against North Carolina, hits the upright from close at the beginning of the year, misses the game-winner — and now he seals the game here. It’s a great bookend to a great career.

Especially after the missed field goal and the kickoff out of bounds, to be able to get your mind right, come back, and make that kick is huge. It made it a three-score game and really ended the game at that point.

Advertisement

I’m really proud of our team. I’m proud of their resolve and resiliency all year. We had seven one-possession games this year in the regular season. We were 3–4 in those one-possession games. It could’ve gone a lot of different ways. I don’t live in the “coulda, shoulda” world, but this is a really good football team that fought, scratched, and clawed all year. They kept rowing the boat.

I’m really proud. It’s a great victory for us. Back-to-back wins here — is that right? Three? Back-to-back wins here for the first time since the early 80s. I was born in 1980, so that’s another huge development and shift in the rivalry. That’s our whole goal — to create streaks of our own, just like Wisconsin has had for a lot of years before we got here.

I’m just proud to coach this team. It’s a happy locker room right now, and a grateful locker room. With that, I’ll open it up for questions.

Yeah, I just saw the personality of the team, Andy. They’ve been that way all year. I mean, you saw their hearts, their mindset. They’re playing for each other, and you saw it today.

One score — OK, we’ve got a lead, then a head out of bounds. But they just kept responding. Everybody on the sideline was saying, “Respond, respond, respond.” We said we needed a full commitment from everybody — a full commitment from our sideline, a full commitment to encouraging everybody through the highs and the lows.

Advertisement

Just keep rowing the boat. Just keep going. Next play, one oar, next play. I thought they did a great job of that today.

Well, first of all, I think, you know, when you’re looking at him and a lot of people say, “Well, he was an FCS quarterback,” and I get that. But, I mean, this guy’s a Walter Payton finalist, and that’s the top three. That’s the FCS Heisman. He’s really, really good, and we knew if we could get him, we could make him even better and we could keep developing him.

But one thing, Chip, that made it easy for us was I’ve never heard of a college or university that was losing their quarterback to the portal promote their player more than ever to us. At one point, I looked at the staff and said, “Guys, are we sure? Like, they’re not overselling us, are they? Like, they’re selling us something, you know?” Because of that, you’re pretty paranoid. But it was his college coaches at New Hampshire. I don’t think I’ve ever seen that in the portal. Every single person was like, “You know, he needs to be there. That’s a perfect culture. It’s a perfect program.”

I think when he got with his mom and dad and, you know, those types of people, and you know exactly what Max was looking for—Max wasn’t going into the portal just to go in the portal. He was staying in New Hampshire unless he found the right opportunity with the right team. For us, we had to be right, Chip. I remember having a conversation like, “Man, you have to be who you say you are because I don’t have a backup. Like, I have to be all in on this, and you have to be all in on this.”

A lot of times, people think it’s one way. It’s just from the player’s perspective. But from the coaching perspective, you have to be right just as much as they have to be right. The next guy is a redshirt freshman, a true freshman who’s not ready to play yet. He’s going to be really good. But that’s what we talked to him about, and I think when he came on his visit, it’s real. It’s authentic.

Advertisement

It was a perfect marriage. He was looking for a life program, plus being able to play. I mean, his leadership and his confidence are unreal. People talk about the beginning of the year with him—maybe there were some ups and downs. Anything he does the first time is probably going to come with a little bit of a learning curve. Anything he does now, that’s not going to happen very long because he’s quickly going to get into the mastery phase, and he’s done that.

I’ve never seen a young man spend more time in the facility as a player — NFL or college — than I’ve ever been around. At every place I’ve been, nobody has spent more time than Max Brosmer.

QUESTION: You said it was both sides, is it fair to say you changed too?

II would say that’s probably really accurate. I had to change. And look, I’m not saying I had to change because I’ve done 11 years of the same thing prior to year 12. If you go back to Western Michigan, I mean, we had some of the most dynamic receivers in the country and threw the ball an awful lot. With the run game, you have Mohamed Ibrahim, Chip. I’m not… you’ve never coached, right? And I’ve never been a journalist. But you would have run the ball just as much as I did if you had Mohamed Ibrahim in that backfield.

We have different backs. It wasn’t just Max, but it was the ability to trust Max to throw, to run it—because you’ve got running the ball where everybody knows you’re going to run the ball—then you’ve got throwing to run it. And then he’s got throwing the ball. He can do all three. And if you saw tonight, we actually had a designed quarterback run for him. He didn’t get in, but it was a quarterback run for him, where they actually snapped it to him and ran the lead play, the follow play.

Advertisement

He is one of the most special people I’ve ever been around. Again, I can’t… it’s not because we won. I’ve said this all year: you can’t duplicate him. He’s an NFL quarterback, and he’s somebody that people fall in love with. The more you’re around him, the more you’re going to fall in love with him.

This guy is hard to come out of the game. He’s playing in the bowl game. His mental processing, his leadership, the connectivity… he started this all the way back in the spring by taking everybody to Georgia with him in the pass game, getting our O-line to those skill camps. I don’t know if anybody understands how difficult it is to come into a team from day one, lead the whole team, and you don’t know anybody’s name. It took him two days. He had everybody down.

He studied that. He said, “If I’m going to lead the team, I gotta know everybody—at least everybody’s name.” I mean, that’s what he does. When people say that you’ve got a coach on the field—I think that’s a corny saying—he truly is a coach on the field. He’ll be an NFL head coach, NFL coordinator, college head coach, or college coordinator—unless he decides to be a heart surgeon, which they’re about the same.QUESTION: What clicked for the Gophers defense today?

Well, I think it was just the small things. We tackled really well. I thought we tackled in open space really well. We swarmed tackled. I thought we created penetration in the backfield in the run game. I think they were never able to, even in the gap schemes, get to the patience. You know, you’ve got to be slow to in the gap schemes, fast through. Well, they were slow to, but we had already created pushback.

I thought on the outside that our guys stuck to them like glue. We had to. And the quarterback—you know, he’s a really good player, he can sling it—but he’s 6’1″, and we felt like there’s a lot of big people in front. Their offensive line’s big. We’re big. We felt that if we could get really big, he was going to have to be really precise in a lot of the man coverage stuff.

Advertisement

We felt like we liked our matchups. We had some great pass breakups with their down-the-field pass game, and then when they did hit it, we got it on the ground or we responded the next play. But I thought it was true team defense. Nobody was doing it for themselves—everybody was doing it for each other. They were sound, they were disciplined.

You know, there are some things you want back—the late hit out of bounds, I mean, those are the things that cost you. I mean, he doesn’t mean to do that. He’s a great kid, and he’ll learn from that. On the offensive side, we dropped the ball late. That could have sealed the game, too. But, I mean, the catches we made at the wide receiver position in these types of conditions, in this type of wind, the tackles we were making, the form… backline.

That’s just Minnesota. Go and go for it.

QUESTION: What went into Marcus Major’s 40-yard run and call

Yeah, we got a bunch of stuff out of that formation. You know, we do. I mean, we’ve proven that we’ve done a lot of different things, and I mean, it’s a true check. You know, we have a bunch of stuff, and we have seven or eight things we can do out of that, which is a lot of fun.

Advertisement

You know, I think it was a great check by Max, and you break one tackle, and that’s the type of play it is. You know, I think everybody in the stadium thinks you’re going to push, and that’s the point of it. You want everybody to think that because we do it a lot, and we’re good at it.

You know, we teach it on the other side of the ball—you’ve got to be ready for those types of things to defend against those things. But I think it’s a great play call by Greg Harbaugh. I think our coaches have just grown so much this year. When your team is teaching you so much—when the players are teaching the coaches—not just about football but about life and lessons, it’s just a fun group to be around.

It’s a fun team to be around, and you know you’ve got special kids when you’re learning so much from them instead of just teaching them. They’re teaching you a lot of things, too.

And you know Marcus Major—I mean, he’s not getting 35 carries a game, but when his number is called, he goes in there and executes it perfectly. That was a great, great play.

QUESTION: Does it being his birthday add anything to today’s celebration?

Advertisement

I’ll let you know later. I’m just excited for the bus ride, you know? I mean, we love and choose the blue-collar mentality with the bus ride here, and I think our players embrace that. We like to do that for rivalry games and, you know, the ones that are close enough to do that.

I think they take that mentality on the bus, and, you know, we stop halfway and get a little workout in. It’s just a team camaraderie thing that we do, and our administration allows us to do it, which I think is really cool.

So we’ve got a good four- or four-and-a-half-hour bus ride with that axe right there in the aisle. It’s going to be great. We’re passing it around, switching buses. We take it very seriously. We love that thing. We never take that thing for granted, and it’s good to have it back in the Twin Cities and at the University of Minnesota.

I can’t thank our fans enough for coming out to Camp Randall. I heard you, and we heard you the entire time. You were really loud.

Another thing I just want to note—what a play by design, play call, and catch by Jamison Geersin the back of the end zone. We needed our best players and our playmakers to make huge plays today, and I thought they all did. At all the crucial times, they did a great job of that.

Advertisement

QUESTION: Do you get anything out of ending Wisconsin’s bowl streak?

Yeah, I mean, that’s for them to worry about. We don’t really talk much about that. We talk about us, and we talk about us, and we talk about us. I guess people play for different things. This team is truly about playing for one another. The rivalries are great. The rewards for it are great. When you play really well, when you look at it… you know, besides Iowa, our three rivalry games, or three other rivalry games, came down to a one-point loss and a few-point loss against Michigan, and we needed one bad.

I just felt that with our team, I felt like they really needed that, and they came out and left no doubt. They weren’t going to have a one-possession game today, and I think that was in their mentality. But again, I can’t speak on their behalf of what they’re fighting for and what they’re doing. But if that’s the case, then I guess that’s what rivalries are all about.QUESTION: Was the cold a factor?

We’re at the University of Minnesota. You don’t let the cold get to you. You. You know you adapt and that’s the kind of weather we play in and we talk about our north and our players really, really embrace that when you get to November, our N is coming and our players love it. You should love it, I. Mean. I’m not sure how you can’t love it if you come to the University of Minnesota you just have to know that winter is there and we get all Four Seasons. I mean, three of the seasons are the most beautiful in the world, I think and the other ones just, you know, cover the white stuff on the ground, but it’s still really beautiful. You know, our Minnesotans embraced the winner and I think they embrace it, unlike. Any. Other and it’s so fun to be a member of that state and that. Community and we got so many people who, you know, the critics are here and how much they mean to us and what they’ve. Done. For our program and I’m not going to get into naming every single donor and people that are there, but like just they’re, you know, Mark and Deborah, just incredible people who support us through and through, and when you see the emotion on their faces who have been. Supporters of the program for so long. You know you’re doing all the right things because at the end of the day, as a head coach, you work for them. You work for the players, you work for your staff, you work for the administration, you work for the state, you work for the City of Minneapolis, the University and I take that really personal and I can’t thank you guys enough for the all that you’ve done and you know like go back to it. But I think our players just embrace that. Our N mentality and they love it. When we get that November, November, weather here in the north?



Source link

Advertisement

Minnesota

Why state charges for Minneapolis ICE shooting are possible but tricky

Published

on

Why state charges for Minneapolis ICE shooting are possible but tricky



To get a case to trial, state prosecutors may have to show federal immunity doesn’t apply.

play

Many in Minnesota and across the country were outraged by the killing of Renee Nicole Good by a federal immigration agent in a Minneapolis neighborhood, and called for the agent to face charges. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who oversees the city’s police department, said the Trump administration’s characterization of the shooting as self-defense is “spin.”

But even if Minnesota prosecutors conclude the shooting was a crime, can they charge a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent for something he did on the job? No, according to Vice President JD Vance, who asserted that the agent has “absolute immunity” from criminal charges.

The reality isn’t so simple. Minnesota state prosecutors may, in fact, be able to prosecute the federal immigration agent who shot and killed a Minneapolis woman, though the pathway forward would come with special challenges.

State officials announced Jan. 9 that they are collecting evidence surrounding Good’s Jan. 7 death, a signal they may consider bringing charges. The move comes after President Donald Trump and other White House officials suggested the shooting was justified, and state authorities said the FBI pulled out of a joint investigation.

Advertisement

Though the U.S. Department of Justice hasn’t announced whether it will bring charges, the hasty statements by White House officials opposing charges make a federal prosecution seem highly unlikely, especially at a time when the lines between the DOJ and White House are increasingly blurred.

“When you have the president, the vice president, the secretary of homeland security all saying that this was self-defense, there’s zero chance that Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice will move forward with a prosecution at the federal level,” Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, told USA TODAY.

At a Jan. 9 news conference, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and the top prosecutor for Minneapolis’ Hennepin County, Mary Moriarty, both said they haven’t yet made a charging decision when it comes to Good’s death, and will wait until evidence is evaluated.

Ellison led the state prosecution of Derek Chauvin, a Minneapolis cop convicted in 2021 of murdering a Black man who was under arrest, George Floyd. Moriarty was elected in 2022 on a platform of holding police accountable.

Advertisement

Rahmani said he wouldn’t be surprised by a decision to bring charges.

“I think they ultimately will choose to prosecute,” Rahmani said. “Attorney General Ellison’s office has been pretty aggressive in these types of cases, dating back to George Floyd,” he added.

As tensions have flared over the Minneapolis death, federal agents shot and wounded two people during a traffic stop in Portland, Oregon, on Jan. 8. As with the Minnesota case, federal officials said the driver “weaponized his vehicle,” while local officials called for an investigation. Similar questions of potential state charges could arise in that case.

Here’s why Minnesota authorities could pursue state charges, but could also face challenges:

Advertisement

Hurdles to Minnesota prosecuting federal agent

One challenge to Minnesota officials bringing charges is that they would likely have to prosecute the case outside of their home turf. There’s a federal law allowing officers of federal agencies to move their cases to a federal court when they are being prosecuted for something they did as part of their official responsibilities.

That’s a significant disadvantage for state prosecutors, according to Mark Bederow, a criminal defense lawyer in New York City and former Manhattan prosecutor. He noted that, in a federal court, state prosecutors would be dealing with a different pool of potential jurors, a different judge, and different legal processes.

“It’s a road game, instead of having home court advantage,” Bederow said.

In addition, state prosecutors would likely have to meet special legal standards to get the case to trial, because they would be prosecuting a federal agent. In that type of case, defendants often argue they can’t be prosecuted because of a constitutional provision – the Supremacy Clause – that puts federal law above state law.

Advertisement

Federal courts have sometimes blocked state prosecutions under that provision, out of concern that state authorities are using their prosecutorial power to frustrate the federal government from legitimately exercising its own powers, according to Bryna Godar, a staff attorney at the University of Wisconsin Law School’s State Democracy Research Initiative.

Godar wrote in the Lawfare legal publication that federal courts have repeatedly blocked state prosecutions when the federal official was reasonably carrying out lawful federal duties. But, outside those circumstances, courts have allowed the prosecutions to go forward.

“In many cases, the federal officer may ultimately walk away with immunity. But not always,” Godar wrote.

Another potential challenge is courts disagreeing on the exact contours of this type of immunity for federal officers, leaving the law in this area somewhat unsettled, according to Godar. The U.S. Supreme Court hasn’t weighed in on this type of immunity in more than a century.

Murder and manslaughter charges could be in play

Even if state officials do decide charges are warranted, they are unlikely to bring a first-degree murder charge, according to Rahmani. That crime generally requires premeditation.

Advertisement

He said state officials might consider a form of manslaughter or a lesser murder charge, which come with maximum penalties ranging from 10 to 40 years in prison. For example, a person can be guilty of second-degree manslaughter in Minnesota by unreasonably endangering a person’s life or of second-degree murder by intentionally killing someone without premeditation.

“It’s possible that there’s multiple charges and they don’t just land on one, to give jurors really the option,” Rahmani said.

‘Very tough job for prosecutors’

If the ICE agent ended up facing charges, he would likely argue he shot Good in self-defense, former prosecutors told USA TODAY.

Minnesota law allows officers to use deadly force if it’s reasonable for them to believe the force will protect them or another person from great bodily harm.

In this case, the agent may argue that Good appeared to be directing her SUV at him. Trump officials have highlighted video footage from the front of the SUV, saying it shows movement in the agent’s direction. Advocates for Good have pointed to footage from the rear, which shows the vehicle turning as if to pass the agent and get away.

Advertisement

Looking across multiple public videos, which show both Good’s handling of the wheel and the movement of the SUV’s tires, Good is driving simultaneously rightward and forward, as the agent stands towards the left, front side of her car. Then there are three brief sounds that may be bullet shots, one as the agent points his gun at the left side of the front windshield, and then two more as he is pointing at the side window as the car drives away.

Protests have mounted across the country, with many arguing the video shows the shots weren’t reasonable, and protesting what they see as ICE’s aggressive behavior — including towards U.S. citizens such as Good — more generally.

“They are already trying to spin this as an action of self-defense,” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said at his Jan. 7 press conference. “Having seen the video myself, I want to tell everybody directly – that is bull—-.”

But Bederow said, as emotional as the case is, there is much more to be parsed out in terms of witness interviews and video analysis that could illuminate key legal questions, such as whether it was reasonable for the ICE agent to believe he was in danger.

Advertisement

“Lawyers who do this for a living and have experience in self-defense or justification cases realize that there’s a lot more nuance to this than saying, ‘She didn’t mow the guy down, and he shot and killed her,’” Bederow said.

If he does face charges, the agent might argue that he was operating in a heated environment — he and Good’s wife were filming each other outside the SUV as she asked if he “wanted to come at” them, just seconds before the shooting — and that he didn’t have the luxury of analyzing the direction of the SUV’s movements in a frame-by-frame, slow motion video.

“It’s going to be a very, very tough job for prosecutors, notwithstanding the fact that there is very disturbing video and a woman lost her life,” he said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minnesota

Allegiant to acquire Sun Country Airlines in $1.5 billion deal

Published

on

Allegiant to acquire Sun Country Airlines in .5 billion deal



Minnesota-based Sun Country plans to merge with Allegiant in a $1.5 billion cash and stock deal, the two budget airlines announced on Sunday.

Under the definitive merger agreement, Allegiant will take over Sun Country to create a “leading leisure-focused U.S. airline,” a press release said.

“Today marks an exciting next step in our history as we join Allegiant to create one of the leading leisure travel companies in the U.S.,” Sun Country CEO and President Jude Bricker said. “We are two customer-centric organizations, deeply committed to delivering affordable travel experiences without compromising on quality. Importantly, we believe this transaction delivers significant value to Sun Country shareholders and an opportunity to continue to benefit from our growth plans as a combined company.”

Advertisement

The company will be headquartered in Las Vegas, but it will maintain “a significant presence” in the Twin Cities, where Sun Country is based.

The merger would expand service across the United States and internationally, with the combined airline expected to operate nearly 200 aircraft and provide more than 650 routes, according to the press release.

The transaction has been approved by each airline’s board of directors and is expected to close in the second half of 2026, subject to federal approvals.

Bricker will join Allegiant’s board of directors, along with two other Sun Country board members. Allegiant’s CEO, Gregory C. Anderson, will remain in his role in the combined company. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

How ICE raids in Minnesota connect to a years-old fraud scandal

Published

on

How ICE raids in Minnesota connect to a years-old fraud scandal


On Wednesday morning, the Department of Homeland Security posted on X, “GOOD MORNING MINNEAPOLIS!” Rep. Tom Emmer, a House Republican leader who represents Minneapolis suburbs, commented with encouragement: “Go out there and get ‘em.”

The Trump administration has surged thousands of immigration agents into the Twin Cities in what it has called the largest DHS operation ever. While the administration often frames its deportation operations as efforts to keep Americans safe, it has added another angle to its Minnesota campaign: eradicating fraud.

In 2022, during the Biden administration, federal prosecutors uncovered an enormous scheme to defraud a pandemic meals program in Minnesota’s Somali community, leading to charges against dozens of defendants and a growing number of convictions.

In the weeks leading up to the DHS deployment, conservative commentators had elevated that years-old scandal, suggesting that fraud was a reason to target East African migrants in the Minneapolis area. And within days of the story taking hold in conservative social media circles, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem posted on X that agents were “on the ground” in response.

Advertisement

More than 2,000 agents and officers from DHS have descended on the Twin Cities, and tensions are running high after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer fatally shot Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mom. DHS has said the incident was an act of self-defense, while some witnesses and Minneapolis’ mayor have challenged that explanation.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has attacked the Somali community as “garbage,” and right-wing influencers have filled X with videos purporting to investigate day cares connected to immigrants in an effort, they claim, to uncover ongoing fraud.

Here’s how a scandal prosecuted under both the Biden and Trump administrations went from a relatively local issue to one that has captured nationwide attention and been cited to bolster the White House’s immigration crackdown.

A memorial for Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on Wednesday.Scott Olson / Getty Images

The crime

The scale of the fraud was massive. Prosecutors initially described a $250 million scheme but have since raised their estimate to $300 million — the largest fraud to come out of Covid-19 relief programs.

Federal prosecutors charged 78 defendants with connections to Feeding Our Future, the Minneapolis nonprofit organization at the center of the scandal. A jury convicted the accused ringleader in March, while other defendants have pleaded guilty and still more are awaiting trial. Most of them are of Somali descent, and the vast majority are American citizens, according to The New York Times, citing prosecutors.

Advertisement

The scam concerned government-subsidized meals for kids, prosecutors said: The nonprofit took grant money meant to feed thousands of children in minority communities, but its work was fictitious and it submitted fake records to keep the money flowing.

Prosecutors have widened their scope. Using the Feeding Our Future fraud as a jumping off point, they have since brought charges against other members of Minnesota’s Somali community alleging fraud against other government support programs.

How it started

The scandal began during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic. Government spending ramped up to try to alleviate the economic fallout, and agencies loosened some spending restrictions.

Prosecutors said that Aimee Bock, Feeding Our Future’s founder and executive director, worked with co-conspirators to create shell companies, fake attendance rosters and falsify documents to indicate thousands of children were being served meals.

Many of the children Bock was allegedly feeding — and many of her co-conspirators — were Somali Americans.

Advertisement

In November of last year, when conservative influencers started to take an interest in Minnesota fraud cases, they approached nonprofits and businesses with similar questions: asking whether they were providing the services they said they were.

Why it went on so long

There were early red flags, according to an autopsy of the failures conducted by the nonpartisan Office of the Legislative Auditor in Minnesota.

As far back as 2018, the Minnesota Department of Education received complaints about Feeding Our Future’s management. And in February 2020, the Internal Revenue Service revoked the organization’s nonprofit status, citing a failure to file documentation.

Then, in April 2020, with schools closed and safety net programs ramping up, Feeding Our Future sent a draft lawsuit to the Minnesota Department of Education, threatening to sue if the state did not approve its applications for meal programs. The state complied, according to the legislative auditor. A similar pattern continued for more than a year.

In November 2020, Feeding Our Future sued the Minnesota Department of Education, alleging that the state was slow-walking its grant applications.

Advertisement

The lawsuit put state officials on the defensive, according to the Office of the Legislative Auditor, and deterred them from taking action against the nonprofit.

Auditors faulted the state for not having the investigative chops to catch fraud. For example, the state conducted some of its oversight visits virtually — a practice that it later acknowledged did not work.

How they were caught

The FBI learned about the fraud through a tip, according to legislative auditors: In February 2021, the FBI notified the state of allegations it received that Bock was accepting kickbacks and not providing the meals she said she was. Two months later, the state education department told the FBI that the tip had some merit, and the FBI launched its investigation in May.

Consequences arrived in 2022. That January, the FBI raided the office of Feeding Our Future, and the Minnesota Department of Education cut off its funding. Later that year, federal prosecutors announced indictments against 47 defendants. U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland described it as “the largest pandemic relief fraud scheme charged to date,” at $250 million.

While the case made national and international headlines because of the scale, the indictments mostly played out in courtrooms and outside the spotlight. Three defendants pleaded guilty in October 2022, and prosecutors began preparing to take the other defendants to trial.

Advertisement

A jury convicted five defendants in a June 2024 trial, and prosecutors also charged additional people beyond those originally indicted.

The 2024 election

When Democrat Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her vice presidential running mate in August 2024, the fraud investigation was one of the first things Republicans used to attack him. That fall, House Republicans issued a subpoena to Walz for documents related to his oversight of Feeding our Future. But the fraud case fell from national discussion after Harris lost.

Kamala Harris And Running Mate Tim Walz Make First Appearance Together In Philadelphia
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz speaks during a campaign rally with Kamala Harris on August 6, 2024 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Andrew Harnik / Getty Images file

Federal prosecutors kept working on the case. Andrew Luger, the Biden-appointed U.S. attorney in Minnesota, said in December 2024 that he did not expect the election result to significantly alter how the government prosecuted fraud cases like the one involving Feeding Our Future.

“That’s bipartisan,” he told The Minnesota Star Tribune shortly before leaving office.

The investigation mushrooms

Bock, the Feeding Our Future founder whom prosecutors called the mastermind of the fraud, was found guilty in March 2025. She’s now awaiting sentencing and has been ordered to forfeit assets, including a 2013 Porsche and $3.5 million from Feeding Our Future’s bank account.

But federal prosecutors have not stopped their investigation into the meals program. In recent months, they have pursued what they said were similar fraud cases involving other safety-net programs.

Advertisement

In September 2025, the Department of Justice charged eight people, alleging they defrauded a Minnesota program meant to help seniors and people with disabilities find housing. The same month, it charged a man whom prosecutors accused of defrauding a Minnesota health care program designed to help people with autism.

“These massive fraud schemes form a web that has stolen billions of dollars in taxpayer money,” said Joseph H. Thompson, a career federal prosecutor who was serving as the acting U.S. attorney in Minnesota at the time.

Conservative media takes a new interest

On Sep. 18, Trump took aim at Minnesota’s Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar, who was born in Somalia, and Somali-Americans, telling reporters on Air Force One that Omar is “terrible” and saying “They come from a place with nothing, nothing, no, anything, and then they tell us how to run our country.” Trump’s criticism came after Republicans had tried unsuccessfully to censure her over a reposted video on her X account that Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) said “smeared Charlie Kirk and implied he was to blame for his own murder.”

On Nov. 19, City Journal, a magazine run by the Manhattan Institute, a right-leaning think tank, published a story summarizing the Minnesota fraud allegations. It largely drew on local media coverage, indictments and press releases from prosecutors, but it also cited anonymous sources to make the claim that some of the money was routed to al-Shabab, a Somalia-based militant group that the U.S. and other countries have designated as a terrorist organization. Fox News picked up the story. One of the article’s named sources later criticized the piece, and federal prosecutors have not claimed that any of the government funds went to militant groups. Christopher Rufo, one of the City Journal writers, has posted on X that he stands by the piece. City Journal did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Reuters reported that the claim about al-Shabab apparently made its way to Trump via several Republican lawmakers. Within two days, Trump said he would terminate temporary deportation protections for Somalis living in Minnesota, asserting on social media that the state had become “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity.”

Advertisement

Trump continued to attack Somali immigrants in December, as ICE agents launched a new deportation operation in the Twin Cities, which Reuters reported had put the Somali community there on edge.

Influencers focus on day cares

At the same time, Nick Shirley, a right-wing YouTube influencer from Utah, was on the ground in Minneapolis filming himself attempting to visit Somali child care centers. He had previously published a video about Muslims in Minnesota that insinuated an Islamic takeover was afoot, drawing little attention. But on Dec. 26, he released a 42-minute video claiming he uncovered over $100 million in fraud. It quickly went viral and now has more than 139 million views on X.

Other social media influencers and journalists have visited the same facilities identified in Shirley’s video in the two weeks since he posted it — some echoing Shirley’s claims they are fraudulent, and others demonstrating things he got wrong. The Minnesota Star Tribune reported on Jan. 1 that during its visits to the same day cares where Shirley had shown or insinuated no children were present, the newspaper observed children in four and wasn’t allowed inside six others.

Minnesota’s Department of Children, Youth, and Families said on Jan. 2 that its investigators checked nine of the child care facilities portrayed as fraudulent in viral social media clips and found they were operating normally, and one is now closed.

Unproven fraud claims expand beyond Minnesota

Over New Year’s week, Shirley’s video was the top story across conservative media. Right-wing political activists and influencers quickly picked up on his viral success and emulated his tactics with similar videos in which they visited day cares in other states including Ohio, Oregon and Washington. Prominent pro-Trump accounts on X amplified the videos and other posts from people who raised questions about day care business filings.

Advertisement

The vast majority of child care facilities spotlighted appeared to be connected to Somali immigrants. Some state lawmakers and congressional candidates called for state investigations into whether “Minnesota-style fraud” was occurring in their towns.

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, tried to tamp down speculation about rampant, unchecked fraud in the state, fact-checking viral but misleading claims on X about some specific day cares. In a subsequent press conference on Jan. 5, he further elaborated on how the state conducts oversight of its 5,200 child care facilities. DeWine said the public shouldn’t be surprised that day cares are telling people who show up while filming that they aren’t allowed to come inside; it’s for the protection of children.

“Hell no — no one should let them in,” he said.

But conservative content creators and activists have continued posting videos of themselves visiting day cares run by members of the Somali community in Ohio and other states. They’ve also drawn attention to business filings, raising questions about why some companies share mailing addresses or ownership.

Musse Olol, president of the Somali American Council of Oregon, told NBC News that businesses in the community have faced what appeared to be coordinated harassment, ranging from racial and religious insults online to people taking photos outside of their offices.

Advertisement

“This feels like an unprecedented and targeted campaign,” Olol said.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a nonprofit advocacy group, said Monday that Somali American-run day care centers and businesses need more law enforcement protection because they’ve received an onslaught of threats stemming from the firestorm on social media.

Trump administration freezes funds

The social media focus on day cares has prompted a multiagency response from the Trump administration.

The Department of Health and Human Services said last week it was withholding nearly $10 billion in federal funds that support child care, primarily through the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program, from five states run by Democrats: California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York. On Friday, a federal judge temporarily blocked the move.

Vice President JD Vance told reporters Thursday that the administration planned to create a new assistant attorney general position — run directly out of the White House — to investigate fraud allegations. He claimed there was misconduct in Ohio and California, though he did not provide examples.

Advertisement

The Trump administration has demanded California provide verified attendance information to get its child care funds back, according to a series of letters from the federal Administration for Children and Families cited in the New York Post that speculate that welfare funds have gone to ineligible noncitizens.

HHS also proposed a series of new rules this week to change how day care is subsidized by the government, including getting rid of a requirement to pay based on enrollment figures. Jim O’Neill, the department’s deputy secretary, said on social media that the Biden administration made it easier for fraud to occur in day care support programs through a regulation that based payment on enrollment rather than attendance. However, the Biden-era regulation still permitted states to require attendance records from child care providers and cut them off if they showed “excessive unexplained absences.”

Clashes erupt outside ICE facility in Minneapolis
Law enforcement officers tackle a protester outside an ICE facility in Minneapolis on Thursday.Mostafa Bassim / Anadolu via Getty Images

Meanwhile, DHS posted several tweets in recent weeks announcing that its agents are going “DOOR TO DOOR” in Minnesota to investigate unnamed businesses for fraud, and the DOJ said it is sending additional federal prosecutors to help.

Congressional Republicans have also seized on the issue.

On Wednesday, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee held the first in a planned series of hearings on social services fraud in Minnesota. Three Minnesota GOP lawmakers appeared as witnesses, answering questions from Republicans on the committee that steered blame toward Walz. Congressional Democrats accused Republicans of inappropriately focusing on the Somali community.

The committee’s GOP leadership said it may subpoena Walz — who ended his bid for a third term as governor this week — and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison for a future hearing.

Advertisement

That same day — the last of Renee Nicole Good’s life — acting ICE Director Todd Lyons said the agency was surging agents into Minnesota as part of the “largest immigration operation ever.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending