Minnesota
How ICE raids in Minnesota connect to a years-old fraud scandal
On Wednesday morning, the Department of Homeland Security posted on X, “GOOD MORNING MINNEAPOLIS!” Rep. Tom Emmer, a House Republican leader who represents Minneapolis suburbs, commented with encouragement: “Go out there and get ‘em.”
The Trump administration has surged thousands of immigration agents into the Twin Cities in what it has called the largest DHS operation ever. While the administration often frames its deportation operations as efforts to keep Americans safe, it has added another angle to its Minnesota campaign: eradicating fraud.
In 2022, during the Biden administration, federal prosecutors uncovered an enormous scheme to defraud a pandemic meals program in Minnesota’s Somali community, leading to charges against dozens of defendants and a growing number of convictions.
In the weeks leading up to the DHS deployment, conservative commentators had elevated that years-old scandal, suggesting that fraud was a reason to target East African migrants in the Minneapolis area. And within days of the story taking hold in conservative social media circles, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem posted on X that agents were “on the ground” in response.
More than 2,000 agents and officers from DHS have descended on the Twin Cities, and tensions are running high after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer fatally shot Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mom. DHS has said the incident was an act of self-defense, while some witnesses and Minneapolis’ mayor have challenged that explanation.
Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has attacked the Somali community as “garbage,” and right-wing influencers have filled X with videos purporting to investigate day cares connected to immigrants in an effort, they claim, to uncover ongoing fraud.
Here’s how a scandal prosecuted under both the Biden and Trump administrations went from a relatively local issue to one that has captured nationwide attention and been cited to bolster the White House’s immigration crackdown.
The crime
The scale of the fraud was massive. Prosecutors initially described a $250 million scheme but have since raised their estimate to $300 million — the largest fraud to come out of Covid-19 relief programs.
Federal prosecutors charged 78 defendants with connections to Feeding Our Future, the Minneapolis nonprofit organization at the center of the scandal. A jury convicted the accused ringleader in March, while other defendants have pleaded guilty and still more are awaiting trial. Most of them are of Somali descent, and the vast majority are American citizens, according to The New York Times, citing prosecutors.
The scam concerned government-subsidized meals for kids, prosecutors said: The nonprofit took grant money meant to feed thousands of children in minority communities, but its work was fictitious and it submitted fake records to keep the money flowing.
Prosecutors have widened their scope. Using the Feeding Our Future fraud as a jumping off point, they have since brought charges against other members of Minnesota’s Somali community alleging fraud against other government support programs.
How it started
The scandal began during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic. Government spending ramped up to try to alleviate the economic fallout, and agencies loosened some spending restrictions.
Prosecutors said that Aimee Bock, Feeding Our Future’s founder and executive director, worked with co-conspirators to create shell companies, fake attendance rosters and falsify documents to indicate thousands of children were being served meals.
Many of the children Bock was allegedly feeding — and many of her co-conspirators — were Somali Americans.
In November of last year, when conservative influencers started to take an interest in Minnesota fraud cases, they approached nonprofits and businesses with similar questions: asking whether they were providing the services they said they were.
Why it went on so long
There were early red flags, according to an autopsy of the failures conducted by the nonpartisan Office of the Legislative Auditor in Minnesota.
As far back as 2018, the Minnesota Department of Education received complaints about Feeding Our Future’s management. And in February 2020, the Internal Revenue Service revoked the organization’s nonprofit status, citing a failure to file documentation.
Then, in April 2020, with schools closed and safety net programs ramping up, Feeding Our Future sent a draft lawsuit to the Minnesota Department of Education, threatening to sue if the state did not approve its applications for meal programs. The state complied, according to the legislative auditor. A similar pattern continued for more than a year.
In November 2020, Feeding Our Future sued the Minnesota Department of Education, alleging that the state was slow-walking its grant applications.
The lawsuit put state officials on the defensive, according to the Office of the Legislative Auditor, and deterred them from taking action against the nonprofit.
Auditors faulted the state for not having the investigative chops to catch fraud. For example, the state conducted some of its oversight visits virtually — a practice that it later acknowledged did not work.
How they were caught
The FBI learned about the fraud through a tip, according to legislative auditors: In February 2021, the FBI notified the state of allegations it received that Bock was accepting kickbacks and not providing the meals she said she was. Two months later, the state education department told the FBI that the tip had some merit, and the FBI launched its investigation in May.
Consequences arrived in 2022. That January, the FBI raided the office of Feeding Our Future, and the Minnesota Department of Education cut off its funding. Later that year, federal prosecutors announced indictments against 47 defendants. U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland described it as “the largest pandemic relief fraud scheme charged to date,” at $250 million.
While the case made national and international headlines because of the scale, the indictments mostly played out in courtrooms and outside the spotlight. Three defendants pleaded guilty in October 2022, and prosecutors began preparing to take the other defendants to trial.
A jury convicted five defendants in a June 2024 trial, and prosecutors also charged additional people beyond those originally indicted.
The 2024 election
When Democrat Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her vice presidential running mate in August 2024, the fraud investigation was one of the first things Republicans used to attack him. That fall, House Republicans issued a subpoena to Walz for documents related to his oversight of Feeding our Future. But the fraud case fell from national discussion after Harris lost.
Federal prosecutors kept working on the case. Andrew Luger, the Biden-appointed U.S. attorney in Minnesota, said in December 2024 that he did not expect the election result to significantly alter how the government prosecuted fraud cases like the one involving Feeding Our Future.
“That’s bipartisan,” he told The Minnesota Star Tribune shortly before leaving office.
The investigation mushrooms
Bock, the Feeding Our Future founder whom prosecutors called the mastermind of the fraud, was found guilty in March 2025. She’s now awaiting sentencing and has been ordered to forfeit assets, including a 2013 Porsche and $3.5 million from Feeding Our Future’s bank account.
But federal prosecutors have not stopped their investigation into the meals program. In recent months, they have pursued what they said were similar fraud cases involving other safety-net programs.
In September 2025, the Department of Justice charged eight people, alleging they defrauded a Minnesota program meant to help seniors and people with disabilities find housing. The same month, it charged a man whom prosecutors accused of defrauding a Minnesota health care program designed to help people with autism.
“These massive fraud schemes form a web that has stolen billions of dollars in taxpayer money,” said Joseph H. Thompson, a career federal prosecutor who was serving as the acting U.S. attorney in Minnesota at the time.
Conservative media takes a new interest
On Sep. 18, Trump took aim at Minnesota’s Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar, who was born in Somalia, and Somali-Americans, telling reporters on Air Force One that Omar is “terrible” and saying “They come from a place with nothing, nothing, no, anything, and then they tell us how to run our country.” Trump’s criticism came after Republicans had tried unsuccessfully to censure her over a reposted video on her X account that Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) said “smeared Charlie Kirk and implied he was to blame for his own murder.”
On Nov. 19, City Journal, a magazine run by the Manhattan Institute, a right-leaning think tank, published a story summarizing the Minnesota fraud allegations. It largely drew on local media coverage, indictments and press releases from prosecutors, but it also cited anonymous sources to make the claim that some of the money was routed to al-Shabab, a Somalia-based militant group that the U.S. and other countries have designated as a terrorist organization. Fox News picked up the story. One of the article’s named sources later criticized the piece, and federal prosecutors have not claimed that any of the government funds went to militant groups. Christopher Rufo, one of the City Journal writers, has posted on X that he stands by the piece. City Journal did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Reuters reported that the claim about al-Shabab apparently made its way to Trump via several Republican lawmakers. Within two days, Trump said he would terminate temporary deportation protections for Somalis living in Minnesota, asserting on social media that the state had become “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity.”
Trump continued to attack Somali immigrants in December, as ICE agents launched a new deportation operation in the Twin Cities, which Reuters reported had put the Somali community there on edge.
Influencers focus on day cares
At the same time, Nick Shirley, a right-wing YouTube influencer from Utah, was on the ground in Minneapolis filming himself attempting to visit Somali child care centers. He had previously published a video about Muslims in Minnesota that insinuated an Islamic takeover was afoot, drawing little attention. But on Dec. 26, he released a 42-minute video claiming he uncovered over $100 million in fraud. It quickly went viral and now has more than 139 million views on X.
Other social media influencers and journalists have visited the same facilities identified in Shirley’s video in the two weeks since he posted it — some echoing Shirley’s claims they are fraudulent, and others demonstrating things he got wrong. The Minnesota Star Tribune reported on Jan. 1 that during its visits to the same day cares where Shirley had shown or insinuated no children were present, the newspaper observed children in four and wasn’t allowed inside six others.
Minnesota’s Department of Children, Youth, and Families said on Jan. 2 that its investigators checked nine of the child care facilities portrayed as fraudulent in viral social media clips and found they were operating normally, and one is now closed.
Unproven fraud claims expand beyond Minnesota
Over New Year’s week, Shirley’s video was the top story across conservative media. Right-wing political activists and influencers quickly picked up on his viral success and emulated his tactics with similar videos in which they visited day cares in other states including Ohio, Oregon and Washington. Prominent pro-Trump accounts on X amplified the videos and other posts from people who raised questions about day care business filings.
The vast majority of child care facilities spotlighted appeared to be connected to Somali immigrants. Some state lawmakers and congressional candidates called for state investigations into whether “Minnesota-style fraud” was occurring in their towns.
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, tried to tamp down speculation about rampant, unchecked fraud in the state, fact-checking viral but misleading claims on X about some specific day cares. In a subsequent press conference on Jan. 5, he further elaborated on how the state conducts oversight of its 5,200 child care facilities. DeWine said the public shouldn’t be surprised that day cares are telling people who show up while filming that they aren’t allowed to come inside; it’s for the protection of children.
“Hell no — no one should let them in,” he said.
But conservative content creators and activists have continued posting videos of themselves visiting day cares run by members of the Somali community in Ohio and other states. They’ve also drawn attention to business filings, raising questions about why some companies share mailing addresses or ownership.
Musse Olol, president of the Somali American Council of Oregon, told NBC News that businesses in the community have faced what appeared to be coordinated harassment, ranging from racial and religious insults online to people taking photos outside of their offices.
“This feels like an unprecedented and targeted campaign,” Olol said.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a nonprofit advocacy group, said Monday that Somali American-run day care centers and businesses need more law enforcement protection because they’ve received an onslaught of threats stemming from the firestorm on social media.
Trump administration freezes funds
The social media focus on day cares has prompted a multiagency response from the Trump administration.
The Department of Health and Human Services said last week it was withholding nearly $10 billion in federal funds that support child care, primarily through the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program, from five states run by Democrats: California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York. On Friday, a federal judge temporarily blocked the move.
Vice President JD Vance told reporters Thursday that the administration planned to create a new assistant attorney general position — run directly out of the White House — to investigate fraud allegations. He claimed there was misconduct in Ohio and California, though he did not provide examples.
The Trump administration has demanded California provide verified attendance information to get its child care funds back, according to a series of letters from the federal Administration for Children and Families cited in the New York Post that speculate that welfare funds have gone to ineligible noncitizens.
HHS also proposed a series of new rules this week to change how day care is subsidized by the government, including getting rid of a requirement to pay based on enrollment figures. Jim O’Neill, the department’s deputy secretary, said on social media that the Biden administration made it easier for fraud to occur in day care support programs through a regulation that based payment on enrollment rather than attendance. However, the Biden-era regulation still permitted states to require attendance records from child care providers and cut them off if they showed “excessive unexplained absences.”
Meanwhile, DHS posted several tweets in recent weeks announcing that its agents are going “DOOR TO DOOR” in Minnesota to investigate unnamed businesses for fraud, and the DOJ said it is sending additional federal prosecutors to help.
Congressional Republicans have also seized on the issue.
On Wednesday, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee held the first in a planned series of hearings on social services fraud in Minnesota. Three Minnesota GOP lawmakers appeared as witnesses, answering questions from Republicans on the committee that steered blame toward Walz. Congressional Democrats accused Republicans of inappropriately focusing on the Somali community.
The committee’s GOP leadership said it may subpoena Walz — who ended his bid for a third term as governor this week — and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison for a future hearing.
That same day — the last of Renee Nicole Good’s life — acting ICE Director Todd Lyons said the agency was surging agents into Minnesota as part of the “largest immigration operation ever.”
Minnesota
Medical services in limbo for thousands of providers amid Minnesota fraud crisis
The Minnesota Department of Human Services is reexamining over 5,000 Medicaid service providers across the state in an effort to combat fraud.
The federal government said it would pull $2 billion in annual Medicaid funding from Minnesota in January if the state didn’t make changes.
The Minnesota Department of Human Services set out to revalidate thousands of providers in programs deemed high risk for fraud by asking providers to submit verification paperwork and making unannounced site visits. The deadline passed on Sunday.
The latest data, published on May 27, shows 1,009 providers approved, 1,151 disenrolled and over 3,000 providers with pending applications.
Paige Berland and Camille Heyman run Minnesota Behavioral Specialists, providing autism care to children through two locations in the metro area. The women say that after submitting their paperwork, they received letters from DHS with determinations for both locations: the Bloomington center was terminated and the Eagan office was approved.
“It doesn’t make sense, everything is the same minus the location,” Berland said. “So why was one approved and one wasn’t approved?”
The termination letter said the Bloomington center was denied because they failed to disclose a managing employee during a site visit. Berland disputes that and said she already submitted an appeal.
“We were told to keep running, keep continuing as we are while we go through this process,” she said. “It just means that we don’t have the money coming in.”
Josh Berg with Accessible Space says they’re also in limbo. Berg said they offer integrated community supports, which means caretakers provide in-unit assistance for people with spinal cord injuries and disabilities.
“Most of the folks that we support are wheelchair-bound,” Berg said. “Helping with meals, helping with medications, helping them just live their lives.”
Berg said that of the seven locations where people are housed, the Department of Human Services terminated five and approved two. He believes the timeline to conduct this revalidation process was too aggressive. He said Accessible Space has also submitted an appeal.
“We’re not able to bill for services, we’re not able to start new services for anybody or change any of the supports that they receive,” he said.
Both Berg and Berland say they agree fraud needs to be dealt with, but they hope Minnesotans who truly need services aren’t left without the services they need.
“Not just the clients rely on services, but the families do too, so we can’t stop services; that’s not an option on our plate,” Berland said. “We want to continue to provide these services; they are medically necessary.”
The Minnesota Department of Human Services said a disenrollment letter could be sent for a few reasons, including failure to submit revalidation application after two notification attempts, failure to provide all requested documents within the required timeframe and failure to meet the criteria required during an on-site visit.
A spokesperson for the Department of Human Services said it’s currently in the process of compiling data from the thousands of applications, but didn’t say when the department would share those final numbers.
Minnesota
Minnesota GOP disavows Chauvin moment of silence at convention
Social media slams Netflix’s Kevin Hart roast
Some online users shared their reactions to jokes told about George Floyd and Charlie Kirk at Netflix’s “The Roast of Kevin Hart.”
The Minnesota Republican Party is distancing itself from a moment of silence held for Derek Chauvin during its state convention, saying the gesture was not part of leadership planning, not included in the official program, and should not be interpreted as a party position.
GOP officials said in a Monday, June 1 Facebook post that the recognition of the former Minneapolis police officer, who was convicted in the killing of George Floyd in 2020, emerged from a spontaneous delegate motion on the convention floor and was not initiated or endorsed by leadership.
The controversy quickly escalated after state leaders, civil rights attorneys and Democratic lawmakers condemned the action, describing it as deeply harmful to Floyd’s family and inconsistent with accountability under the law.
The moment of silence took place during the party’s annual gathering in Duluth on May 30 and comes just days after the sixth anniversary of Floyd’s murder in Minneapolis, an event that reshaped national debates over policing and racial justice.
Republican Party of Minnesota says gesture was not leadership action
In a statement, the Republican Party of Minnesota said the recognition of Derek Chauvin originated as a delegate request during floor proceedings at the convention in Duluth and was handled under standard rules of order.
Party officials emphasized that convention leadership, including chair Danny Nadeau, did not propose the motion. The statement said leadership’s role was procedural only, and that presiding over the motion did not reflect agreement with or endorsement of its subject matter.
Officials reiterated that the convention agenda itself did not include any planned recognition of Chauvin and said the episode should not be interpreted as a leadership-driven decision or policy stance.
Minnesota attorney general calls action ‘profound cruelty’
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who led the prosecution of Chauvin, sharply criticized the gesture, calling it an “act of profound cruelty” toward the Floyd family.
Ellison said the timing, so close to the anniversary of Floyd’s death, compounded the harm.
He said honoring Chauvin “dishonors the memory of George Floyd and wounds his loved ones all over again,” and called it “disturbing” to recognize someone convicted of violating his oath as a police officer.
Ellison also said the action was “disrespectful” to law enforcement officers who serve honorably, and reaffirmed that courts had already upheld Chauvin’s conviction through multiple appeals.
Broader backlash and political fallout
Democratic state Rep. Jamie Long called the moment of silence “disgusting,” arguing that Republicans chose to honor a convicted murderer rather than victims of violence or service members.
The gesture also drew criticism from civil rights attorneys Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, who represented George Floyd’s family in its civil case after his death. The attorneys called the moment of silence immoral and demanded a retraction and apology, saying it disrespected both the Floyd family and the broader public record of Chauvin’s conviction.
Floyd was killed on May 25, 2020, when Chauvin, a white former Minneapolis police officer, knelt on his neck for more than nine minutes. Chauvin was later convicted of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter, and sentenced to 22½ years in state prison.
The killing sparked global protests and became a defining moment in the Black Lives Matter movement and debates over policing in the United States.
Chauvin’s conviction has been upheld through multiple appeals, including a denial by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2023, and he is serving his sentence in federal custody.
Party officials say despite the controversy, their focus remains on candidate endorsements and upcoming elections, not the floor action that triggered the backlash.
Reporter Anthony Thompson can be reached at ajthompson@usatodayco.com, or on X @athompsonUSAT.
Minnesota
Where to watch Chicago White Sox vs Minnesota Twins: TV channel, start time, streaming for Jun. 02
What to know about MLB’s ABS robot umpire strike zone system
MLB launches ABS challenge system as players test robot umpire calls in a groundbreaking season.
The 2026 MLB season has surpassed the quarter mark, and after each team’s first 40 games, there’s plenty of reasons to tune in all summer long.
Chicago White Sox slugger Munetaka Murakami has already proven doubters wrong by launching 17 home runs, Pittsburgh’s Paul Skenes consistently looks like the best version of himself on the mound and Milwaukee ace Jacob Misiorowski is throwing harder than any starter in the majors.
The MLB action continues on Tuesday as the Chicago White Sox visit the Minnesota Twins.
Here’s everything you need to know to tune in for the first pitch.
See USA TODAY’s sortable MLB schedule to filter by team or division.
What time is Chicago White Sox vs Minnesota Twins?
First pitch between the Minnesota Twins and Chicago White Sox is scheduled for 7:40 p.m. (ET) on Tuesday, Jun. 02.
How to watch Chicago White Sox vs Minnesota Twins on Tuesday
All times Eastern and accurate as of Tuesday, June 2, 2026, at 6:33 a.m.
Watch MLB all season long with Fubo
MLB regional blackout restrictions apply
MLB scores, results
MLB scores for Jun. 02 games are available on usatoday.com . Here’s how to access today’s results:
See scores, results for all of today’s games.
-
West Virginia2 minutes agoTop Bike Adventures in West Virginia’s Mountain Playground
-
Wyoming9 minutes agoWyoming Town Rivalries – Feuds & Hate
-
Crypto12 minutes agoCryptocurrency is money, rules South African court – African Law & Business
-
Finance17 minutes agoHow can I illustrate our financial position to a spouse who shows little interest?
-
Fitness24 minutes agoFitness coach debunks 8 ‘crazy’ exercise myths women still believe: From periods and workouts to weightlifting
-
Movie Reviews32 minutes agoMovie Review: ‘Sacred Heart: His Reign Has No End’ – Catholic Review
-
World42 minutes agoVideo: A Death at the Epicenter of Ebola
-
News47 minutes agoMap: 5.1-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes off the Coast of California