Connect with us

Minneapolis, MN

“Bigot Mobile” spotted in Minneapolis — Assigned

Published

on

“Bigot Mobile” spotted in Minneapolis — Assigned


by Arin Waller

In mid-November, an LED box truck was spotted outside Children’s Minnesota, a prominent pediatric hospital in Minneapolis, displaying a transphobic message targeting the hospital’s Gender Health Program. This non-profit facility is well known for its comprehensive healthcare services for children, including gender-affirming care. The message on the truck claimed that at least 54 children had 

been “harmed” by what it called “sex change interventions.” This incident underscores the increasing challenges faced by healthcare providers offering these essential services amidst a tide of misinformation and hostility. 

The group responsible for the transphobic message is The American Parents Coalition, a Parent rights organization founded in March of 2024 by Allison Leigh Marré. Marré previously served as a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services during the Trump-Pence administration. The Organization asserts that modern political dynamics, such as LGBT representation in children’s media, threaten their rights as parents. 

Advertisement

The attacks go beyond this single hospital. The website for this group’s campaign, titled Stop The Docs, lists Children’s Minnesota and 3 other children’s hospitals in Cincinnati, Philadelphia, And Washington D.C. as the worst offenders in offering “irreversible sex change interventions on kids”. They list statistics for all four clinics, detailing the number of patients, prescriptions for puberty blockers, and submitted charges which is assumedly the initial payment amount a healthcare provider submits to an insurance company. The figures are pulled from StopTheHarm, a medical database created by the anti-trans organization Do No Harm. Critics often tout the Database as misrepresenting data to purport a biased narrative. It’s odd that a medical database, keeping tabs on surgeries, wouldn’t list the exact procedures being performed, as many of these surgeries have purposes outside of gender reassignment. For instance, a study conducted by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found a majority of these procedures were breast reductions, a procedure that’s most commonly performed to alleviate back problems. 

Regardless of studies finding links between hormone blockers and improved quality of life for transgender teens, these groups continue to condemn their use. An advocacy group might be expected to explain their objection to certain practices, especially when backed findings contradict these notions. Still, it appears that most of these far-right groups tend to throw around buzzwords instead of providing any factual evidence for their claims. The APC is no different with a quick summary of their about section suggesting because an absurdly biased database reports questionable data we need to stop these “harmful gender interventions on children”. 

Despite no argument on why these interventions are harmful, The APC urges people to write to their local representatives and any hospitals in their area if it is listed in the Stop The Harm database, using a sample letter they have provided. 

The APC uses its stance as a group of parents to push anti-LGBTQ+ beliefs. Transforming Families, a peer-led group for families in support of their trans/gender non-conforming children in Minnesota, provides their input. Assigned Media met with Hannah Edwards, the Executive Director of Transforming Families, to ask a few questions.

When asked how she and her husband recognized their daughter might be transgender, Edwards explained: 

Advertisement

“As soon as she could start expressing herself… she likes sort of stereotypical girl things even though she was assigned male at birth… she would say things like, in my heart, I am a girl… We would say things like boys could have long hair… boys can have ear piercings or wear pink or any number of things, and finally, she was like, but I’m not a boy.” 

Reflecting on the impact of their child being transgender on their parenting style, Edwards remarked: 

“I feel like I always thought of myself as a very open person and parent… I have always wanted to be someone who didn’t shape my child into who I thought they should be but more so let them come through me and help guide them to who they truly are. And make healthy safe decisions about their lives and their future I think what it has done though was solidified that for me” 

Campaigns like this often incite violence, with some hospitals receiving bomb threats. When asked if any of the families she works with have felt threatened by the truck’s presence Edwards had this to say. 

“I don’t know specifically if any of our families have seen them or not, I do know we have talked about them in meetings, and being aware of them… just knowing that that truck was driving around the main clinic that our families use was hurtful in and of itself. It’s already scary to be supporting your child in this day and age. We’ve got people who are calling us, as parents, groomers or pedophiles.  And so to have a truck meant just to intimidate feels pretty icky and that it also makes me personally upset. I think that our children, our trans children our non-binary gender expansive children, are super brave when they shouldn’t have to be, and so to be going to do something that is taking care of yourself and making healthy choices for yourself is already brave enough, and to have to come across that, it makes me as a parent kind of angry that you would do that to my kid” 

Parents of trans children often face criticism by anti-trans groups. It is only fair for Edwards to provide her criticism toward the parenting choices of potential APC members. 

“I hope that their kids aren’t trans… because likely they would not be healthy and happy like the kids who are affirmed and supported are. I wish that instead of worrying about my parenting choices, they could reflect and look at their own parenting decisions and choices and work on their relationship with their children. So that their children are able to build healthier relationships with them. Because my relationship with my child is so healthy.”

It’s no coincidence that this campaign rolled out mere weeks before *The U.S. Vs. Skrmetti*. We are seeing so much transphobic propaganda that one may be reminded of a line from The Second Coming by William Butler Yeats, that reads “The best lack all conviction while the worse are full of passionate intensity”. Now, more than ever, it is crucial to amplify the voices of those who are bravelystanding against these injustices. We must remember that these opposing forces can only succeed if weallow them to drown us out.



Source link

Advertisement

Minneapolis, MN

Xcel gets partial rate increase approved, Minneapolis residents hit with added cost

Published

on

Xcel gets partial rate increase approved, Minneapolis residents hit with added cost


Xcel gets partial rate increase approved, Minneapolis residents hit with added cost

Energy users will see an increase in their Xcel Energy bills as the Public Utilities Commission has approved a rate hike.

The commission’s decision includes an interim rate increase for all Xcel Energy customers, raising bills by an average of $5.84. Additionally, the Minneapolis City Council approved an increase to its gas and electric franchise fee, adding about $1 a month to energy bills.

“I don’t think it’s sustainable, right? We’re going to have to figure out a solution,” said Seton McClellan, a Minneapolis homeowner, expressing concern over the rising costs of homeownership.

Advertisement

McClellan also mentioned that property taxes are one of the toughest financial burdens, and now energy bills are becoming more challenging. He worries about the payoff as the bills continue to rise.

“Here’s a tax that I’m paying, and I might not ever get a benefit for it,” McClellan said, referring to the franchise fees used to retrofit homes for energy efficiency.

Despite some opposition, the fee increase passed the council with a 10-3 vote and has significant community support.

Council member Katie Cashman emphasized the importance of addressing climate change. “The cost of not addressing climate change is much greater than the cost that we’re paying right now to try to get ourselves off fossil fuels,” she said.

Cashman also highlighted the benefits for those participating in city programs.

Advertisement

“For those who participate in our city programs and make these upgrades to their homes, their energy bills go way down,” she said.

Over the last two years, 700 homes have been retrofitted in Minneapolis, and the franchise fee is larger for industrial customers.

Ahead of the council vote, Linea Palmisano acknowledged the burden on residents: “Let’s be mindful that this is a significant burden for residents, especially those with lower or fixed incomes,” she said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis City Council approves plan for George Floyd Square that allows transit access

Published

on

Minneapolis City Council approves plan for George Floyd Square that allows transit access



The Minneapolis City Council on Thursday evening approved a redesign plan for George Floyd Square, capping off years of planning, public input and debate.

The council voted 9-4 to move forward with a plan that was backed by Mayor Jacob Frey and allows for transit access through 38th Street East and Chicago Avenue. 

Under the plan, Metro Transit service will be restored along Chicago Avenue, but no vehicle traffic will cross the location where George Floyd was murdered more than five years ago. The plan allows for the intersection to be closed for public gatherings and expands space for memorials and art.

Advertisement

“Thousands of voices shaped this plan, and today we turned years of work into real progress,” Frey said. “Approving the flexible open option means we are finally moving forward together.”

Earlier this year the City Council voted to explore a pedestrian-focused concept for the busy south Minneapolis intersection, a decision that was vetoed by Frey. Frey argued that nearby property owners opposed a pedestrian plan and would not approve it, which is required by state law. Still, the council voted in February to override his veto 9-4.

Months later, the council ultimately decided to approve the open street design plan, though some members expressed their frustration with the decision.

“This council has been put in a position where there is no will or ability for our mayor and our administration to move on any other plan,” said Ward 12 Councilmember Aurin Chowdhury at Thursday’s meeting. “There’s no will to do pedestrian mall from them.”

Council President Elliott Payne, Vice President Aisha Chughtai, along with councilmembers Jason Chavez and Robin Wonsley voted against the plan.

Advertisement

The council anticipates construction to begin in 2026. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis council’s costly encampment response plan passes, likely to be vetoed

Published

on

Minneapolis council’s costly encampment response plan passes, likely to be vetoed


Minneapolis City Council’s costly encampment response plan passes, likely to be vetoed

A controversial plan addressing homeless encampments, while getting enough votes for approval, may never see the light of day.

The Humane Encampment Response ordinance does and calls for many things, creating a heavy lift for the city of Minneapolis and needs a lot of public dollars — including providing portable bathrooms, hand washing station, needle disposal supplies, and more.

It also sets up a seven-day pre-closure notice and provides free storage, which city staff says alone would cost millions. The ordinance also includes ensuring people have access to services and shelter. 

Advertisement

RELATED: Minneapolis City Council passes housing crisis policies as mayor expedites encampment closures 

“We seek to address the public health and safety concerns,” Aisha Chughtai, one of the three council members, said during Thursday’s city council meeting. “It also ensures that unsheltered individuals are given the basic dignity of time to make plans before a closure.”

Her colleague, Linea Palmisano, was first to express opposition. 

“I don’t know how we could suggest that we keep people in a situation where addiction, violence, trafficking — drug and sex trafficking and child trafficking — how that can be a humane response to encampments,” Palmisano said. 

At the posting of this article, we did not receive a statement from council member Aurin Chughtai, who said she’s supplying one — we asked how she responds to those who feel the ordinance encourages encampments to form and why it does not include steps to address crime that unfolds in encampments.

Advertisement

The one who needs to sign off on the ordinance, Mayor Jacob Frey, is clear on his stance. 

“I intend to veto it,” Frey told 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS, which will be effective as there was not enough support from council members to override it. 

“I don’t know how anybody could argue with a straight face that that is safe, and that’s the right way to do this,” Frey said, adding, “I don’t want to turn back that progress on an ordinance that would essentially make homeless encampments much easier to start open and then much harder to close.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending