Connect with us

Milwaukee, WI

Updating the Milwaukee Brewers’ payroll projection for 2026

Published

on

Updating the Milwaukee Brewers’ payroll projection for 2026


At the start of the offseason, we looked at the initial payroll projection for 2026. While not much has changed to the roster since then, there have been some adjustments. As the end of January approaches, and pitchers and catchers are set to report in just 13 days, the starting payroll is getting closer to a set amount. Let’s take a look at what has changed since then. (If you want to review the original projection from the end of October, you can find that post here.)

Here are some reminders for the projection.

  • The majority of these numbers are from Spotrac, which has estimated payroll numbers for all MLB teams.
  • Per the CBA, the minimum salary for players in 2026 is $780,000. Any pre-arbitration player has this salary listed by default. These salaries can be slightly different for each player, but not by a significant amount.
  • This is not a roster projection for 2026. Some players on this list are currently in the organization but may be planned for a minor league role. This is just in place to show what a minimum commitment would be. Minimum salaries can be swapped out for any other minimum salary player that would be in the minors.
  • While I do not think the Brewers will break camp with 14 position players and 12 pitchers, that is how it is set up below due to current commitments. That will change before the season.
  • In the initial payroll for 2026, I included the declined options after the 2025 season. Spotrac has moved those numbers to the 2025 season, so I have also adjusted for that to keep the numbers consistent.
  • The final projected payroll for 2025 was $156,266,827, per Spotrac. That was 18th in MLB.

First, here are the projections for the initial roster.

Position Players

Bench Players

C – William Contreras $9,900,000* C – Jeferson Quero $780,000
1B – Andrew Vaughn $7,650,000 1B – Jake Bauers $2,700,000
2B – Brice Turang $4,150,000 UT – Andruw Monasterio $780,000
3B – Caleb Durbin $780,000 OF – Garrett Mitchell $950,000
SS – Joey Ortiz $780,000 OF – Akil Baddoo $1,250,000
LF – Jackson Chourio $7,000,000
CF – Blake Perkins $780,000
RF – Sal Frelick $780,000
DH – Christian Yelich $26,000,000
Total $57,820,000 Total $6,460,000

Starting Pitchers

Relief Pitchers

Brandon Woodruff $22,025,000 Aaron Ashby $5,700,000
Quinn Priester $780,000 Trevor Megill $4,700,000
Jacob Misiorowski $780,000 Angel Zerpa $1,095,000
Chad Patrick $780,000 Abner Uribe $780,000
Logan Henderson $780,000 Jared Koenig $780,000
Grant Anderson $780,000
DL Hall $780,000
Total $25,145,000 Total $14,615,000

Summary

Amount

Position Players $57,820,000
Bench Players $6,460,000
Starting Pitchers $25,145,000
Relief Pitchers $14,615,000
Initial Total for 2026 $104,040,000

Here’s a summary of what has changed since the original payroll:

  • Brandon Woodruff accepted his qualifying offer. That added his $22.025 million salary into the payroll. Even though Woodruff accepted the offer, he will also receive the buyout for his option being declined (that is factored into 2025 payroll).
  • William Contreras is the one player who still has a pending arbitration decision. Currently, he is estimated at $9.9 million, which is what he filed for. The Brewers filed for an $8.55 million salary. A deal could still happen before the hearing, but the salary will be somewhere between those two numbers.
  • Every other player that is in an arbitration year agreed to their salary. The contract amounts have been added above.
  • The following players have been removed: Freddy Peralta, Isaac Collins, Nick Mears
  • The following players have been added: Brandon Woodruff, Ángel Zerpa, Akil Baddoo

The total above is just the initial total based on the projected active roster. However, there’s still more money to factor in to the payroll. If you compare it to the active roster at the end of the season, the Brewers only had just over $84 million of their $156 million total on the active roster. Here’s where the rest of the payroll came from. (Some rounding is used in the table, so actual amounts will be slightly different.)

Source

Amount

Injured List (End of Season) $15,800,000
Traded/Released Players (Not on roster at end of season) $15,200,000
Declined Options $16,600,000
Deferred Salaries $2,800,000
Player Benefits $18,000,000
Pre-Arbitration Bonus Pool $1,666,666
Minor-League Contracts $2,700,000
Total $72,766,666

Some of those numbers will be in the 2026 payroll as well. Specifically, the last four numbers will be very similar to 2025. The first three will be different in 2026. For the moment, there will not be any options to consider after the 2026 season, so that number can be ignored.

Advertisement

As for the other two numbers, it’s difficult to include a solid projection. Those numbers can easily be inflated by circumstances during the season. For example, if we looked at the injured list at the end of 2024, that was highly inflated due to Yelich finishing the season on it. If we go back to 2022, the traded/release player number was significantly higher because Lorenzo Cain’s final year salary was included. That would also result in the active payroll having a lower figure due to the changes in players, but those numbers end up in the IL or traded/released categories instead.

There’s one other factor that Spotrac considers in their payroll estimate. Even though the initial projection factors in 26 players, Spotrac adds in the payroll for 12 additional pre-arbitration players. Considering the Brewers were paying for seven IL players and eight players not on the team anymore (not counting two who were paid under $10,000), adding in 12 more players is a reasonable estimate. Those 12 players would make $9.36 million total. (Spotrac uses a slightly higher $820,000 estimate for pre-arbitration players, but the CBA minimum is at $780,000.)

What we can expect for 2026 is similar to the 2025 payroll. In terms of cash payroll, the total will at most be around that $156 million mark. The Brewers have been in the $140-$156 million range in recent years and that likely will not change. With that in mind, here’s a comprehensive look at the estimated payroll for 2026.

Source

Amount

Initial Projected Roster $104,040,000
Additional Roster Players $9,360,000
Deferred Salaries $2,800,000
Player Benefits $18,000,000
Pre-Arbitration Bonus Pool $1,666,666
Minor-League Contracts $2,700,000
Initial Payroll Projection $138,566,666

That leaves $17.4 million in potential additional payroll space. That extra space would be needed for the team to make in-season moves. It gives them the ability to take on money in contracts for players acquired by trade. It would also factor in contracts for players who make the team that are on minor league contracts (such as the recently signed Reese McGuire). It also gives them the opportunity to bring in a low-cost contract in spring training if the team has a sudden need.

With the overall quiet offseason for the Brewers, the payroll appears to be heading to a similar point in 2026. Any space remaining will be needed for in-season flexibility. There is potential for a smaller signing, since the team gained $7 million in space after trading Peralta. However, the team may be content to just save that money for now. If that’s the case, what we’re looking at will be close to the current spending plan for next season.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Milwaukee, WI

Post From Community: Forward Scholars: Sips for Scholars invitation | Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service

Published

on

Post From Community: Forward Scholars: Sips for Scholars invitation | Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service


Editor’s note: Post From Community is the place for community announcements and event postings. If you have a community-oriented event you feel our readers would be interested in, please submit here.

By Bernard Rahming, Forward Scholars

Forward Scholars is a Milwaukee-based nonprofit providing one-on-one reading tutoring to K–3rd grade students who are not yet reading on grade level. With the support of more than 300 volunteers and a community of generous donors and partners, we empower students to build the skills and confidence to succeed.

Sips for Scholars is our summer fundraiser and celebration of student growth. Join us for an evening of connection, inspiration, and community as we celebrate the impact of literacy and invest in brighter futures for our students.

Advertisement

Date: June 30, 2026
Time: 5-7 p.m.
Location: Broken Bat Brewing (135 E Pittsburgh Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53204 )
Tickets: $50 Per Person (Advance tickets close June 23)

Get your tickets! 

Everyone is welcome. We’d love for you to join us!

Advertisement

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Despite early lead, Giants fall 16-2 to Brewers in embarrassing fashion

Published

on

Despite early lead, Giants fall 16-2 to Brewers in embarrassing fashion


MILWAUKEE — With their most effective starter on the mound and the wind at their sails from a 19-run, 25-hit outburst at Coors Field, the Giants jumped out to an early lead.

And, poof, like most of San Francisco’s hopes this season, it was gone.

About as soon as Matt Chapman’s two-run homer cleared the wall and the outstretched glove of Jackson Chourio in the top of the second, Landen Roupp began to give the lead right back.

The Brewers pounced on Roupp for seven runs in the bottom half of the inning and only added on from there while running away with the first game of their series, 16-2.

Advertisement
Matt Chapman’s two-run blast in the first inning was the lone Giants bright spot in an absolute drubbing by the Brewers Monday night Tannen Maury/UPI/Shutterstock

It was such a drubbing that it ended with a position player called up before the game, Buddy Kennedy, lobbing pitches while Daniel Susac, a catcher with no prior experience besides two minor-league games at first base, played third.

Roupp struck out Jake Bauers to bring a merciful end to the second inning, nine batters after the Brewers left fielder started with a leadoff walk. Sal Frelick and Chourio both jumped on first-pitch fastballs for explosive extra-base hits, Chapman wasn’t able to field a bunt from speedy No. 9 hitter David Hamilton, and Roupp issued another walk to Christian Yelich.

The biggest hit of the inning came off the bat of Bryce Turang and gave newly called up Jonah Cox his first opportunity to show off his defense that has been called the best in the organization. Cox gave chase but instead went crashing into the wall in left-center field as the ball careened away and Turang cruised into third for a bases-clearing triple.

Turang jogged home on a sacrifice fly from the next batter for the Brewers’ seventh run.

The Brewers added another run off Roupp the next inning and eight more against the Giants’ bullpen (plus Kennedy). But for all intents and purposes, they were already buried.

Advertisement
Jackson Chourio and the Brewers offense erupted for 16 runs on 18 hits Monday night. AP Photo/Aaron Gash

What it means

Whatever good feelings the Giants brought with them on the plane after their rout to end their series against the Rockies were gone by end of the second inning.

It has been hard enough for the Giants to pull ahead; staying in front has been just as much of a challenge.

The Giants have held a lead in only 48 of their 60 games, the fewest in the majors, and are one of only five teams to relinquish the advantage more often than not, falling to 23-25.

The culprit of late had been the bullpen, but in this one, there was nobody to blame but Roupp, who struggled to find the strike zone and was hit hard when he did.

Roupp exhausted 96 pitches to complete four innings, only half for strikes, and recorded season-highs in bases on balls (four) and earned runs (eight).

Advertisement

The outing raised his ERA almost a full run, to 4.22 from a rotation-leading 3.30.

Landen Roupp now sports a 4.22 ERA after giving up eight runs in 4.0 innings Monday night. Michael McLoone-Imagn Images

Who’s hot

Jung Hoo Lee recorded the most hits by a Giant in a single series since 2017 by going 11-for-15 over their three games in Colorado and picked up right where he left off.

Lee’s second-inning single extended his hitting streak to nine games and set the table for Chapman’s two-run shot that gave the Giants the briefest of 2-0 leads.

Bryce Eldridge, getting a rare start in the field, made a nice play to start a 3-6 double play, going to the ground to snag a hard hopper from Frelick, tagging first and getting back to his feet to make an accurate throw to Willy Adames at second base.

Eldridge also laced a double — his sixth in four games on the road trip — that left the bat at 107.7 mph, the Giants’ hardest-hit ball of the game.

Advertisement
Giants catcher Eric Haase could do nothing but look on after the Giants lost 16-2 Monday night. Michael McLoone-Imagn Images

Who’s not

After posting a 5.21 ERA in May that ranked as the fourth-worst in the majors, the Giants’ starting rotation didn’t start the month of June on any better note.

As a staff, San Francisco has surrendered at least six runs in six of its past seven games and all four to begin the road trip, albeit with the caveat that the first three were played at Coors Field.

Up next

Salt in the wound: As the Giants try to get back on track, they will be opposed by their former top prospect, Kyle Harrison, who has blossomed into an NL Cy Young contender since being dealt to the Red Sox for Rafael Devers and again this offseason to Milwaukee.

The Giants will have another homegrown arm, Trevor McDonald, on the mound.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

New book documents Violent Femmes’ rise to fame from Milwaukee roots

Published

on

New book documents Violent Femmes’ rise to fame from Milwaukee roots


Before the Violent Femmes became a world-famous band with a multi-platinum record, they started the same way any other group would in Milwaukee: playing wherever they could.

Local clubs weren’t interested in their unique musical style, so they took to playing on sidewalks and street corners until they were first discovered while performing outside of a Pretenders concert at the Oriental Theater in 1981.

They self-funded their first album, which went on to sell more than 7 million copies.

Understanding Wisconsin, Together.

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.

Advertisement

The story of the Violent Femmes’ Milwaukee origins and improbable rise to fame is the subject of a new book in the long-running music book series called “33⅓.” 

Author Nic Brown joined WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” to share the significance of the band’s self-titled debut album and what he learned from interviewing band members and producers.

The following was edited for clarity and brevity.

Advertisement

Rob Ferrett: For people who aren’t familiar with the Violent Femmes, how would you describe their music?

Nic Brown: They occupy this overlapping realm of folk, punk and jazz — which I’d call a Bermuda Triangle for anybody, but they pull it off because their songs are so great. Gordon Gano, the primary singer-songwriter, had this incredible collection of songs when the band formed, and they’re so well put together that they could have worked in any setting, really.

The Violent Femmes themselves had one of the most unique arrangements of instruments possible, and that’s the biggest surprise for people when they see them. A lot of what’s most unusual about them is often invisible on a recording, but they’re a one-of-a-kind band. Their debut record is a one-of-a-kind record. It didn’t sound like anything else then, and it still doesn’t sound like anything else today. 

RF: What were their early public performances like?

NB: They had a hard time getting gigs. They busked, and they had instrumentation that made it easy for them to do that, and that was by design, too. Victor DeLorenzo, the drummer, played standing up with brushes, with just a snare drum and then what he calls a tranceaphone, which is a metal bushel basket placed on top of another drum. Gordon (Gano) would play guitar on the street, usually an acoustic guitar. And then Brian Ritchie would play an acoustic bass guitar, which to most people sounds like stand-up bass, like what you’d see in a jazz trio. It looked more like a mariachi-style bass, and Brian’s point was, he couldn’t haul a stand-up bass around. He didn’t even have a driver’s license. 

Advertisement

They had instruments that were made to play on the street, and the fact that they spent so much time playing on the street is part of the reason the band works so well. There are few performance spaces less forgiving than a street corner in Milwaukee, or anywhere. They honed this act on the street corners so that they could make their songs work in that setting. And because of that, when they finally got into the studio to record their debut album, they were a really well-oiled machine, despite the fact they hadn’t spent much time on actual stages.

Gordon Gano (left), Brian Ritchie (right) and The Violent Femmes performs at The Sasquatch! Music Festival at the Gorge Amphitheatre on Saturday, May 24, 2014, in George, Washington. John Davisson/Invision/AP

RF: What was it like for them to try to get a record deal and record their first album?

NB: It was failure after failure, really. They tried to get a record deal before they went into the studio. They had one very small label out of New York that was interested, but that fell through, so that’s why they eventually recorded it themselves. They had a lot of pressure from some people who did recognize a spark there to do that ’80s rock ‘n’ roll production with the more processed sound and synthesizers, and they had a surprising amount of confidence at the age that they were at to stick with their sound.

Eventually, there was a label called Slash Records, a small punk label in California, and they turned the band down. But two employees at Slash loved this recording so much that they kept playing the cassette in the offices until the owner finally said, “OK, I can’t take it anymore. I’m going to sign this band, not because I want to, but because I’m so sick of hearing my employees playing it every day.” So that’s how they ended up getting their record deal with Slash Records.

They say it’s the worst record deal any band could ever have signed. But they did what they had to, the record came out, and the rest is history, right?

Advertisement

RF: It took four years before the album went gold and then another four years to go platinum. How did it pick up popularity and go viral in the pre-internet era?

NB: I describe it as going viral over eight years via cassette. Young people connected with the songs and shared dubbed cassette tapes. They say this album has sold 7 million copies, and I say you need to ask Maxwell how many blank tapes they sold between 1983 and 1991 and add in about 30 percent of that.

A lot of people don’t know what the album cover looks like. I had a guy recently tell me that the album cover is whatever guy’s handwriting wrote “Violent Femmes” on the blank tape, so it was a real organic word-of-mouth build-up over eight years. 

A young girl in a white dress peers through a weathered, partially open door of an old building. The words violent femmes appear in the top left corner.

RF: How unique was Brian Ritchie’s bass playing in what you described as a “lead bass” role in the band?

NB: This is probably the most bass-forward recording in popular music history. Brian Ritchie is an incredible musician, and so this thing happens on these songs where the melodic statements that aren’t happening with Gordon’s vocals are usually made on the bass guitar, and then Brian Ritchie takes long bass solos, unaccompanied by any other instrument.

They sound so natural and great that you actually don’t even think they’re bass solos. Often, if there’s a bass solo happening, that’s when we might skip the song. I’m sorry to say, but that doesn’t apply to Brian Ritchie’s work. He’s the lead.

Advertisement

RF: As a musician yourself, what drew you so enthusiastically into writing this book? 

NB: The book series that it’s part of, “33⅓,” is just a classic series, and guys like me were always dreaming about what record I would pitch to write about. This album had always been in my head as that record. I published a memoir about three years ago about my career as a musician, and in it I mentioned how important this album was. 

One of the members of the Femmes management read that memoir and actually reached out to me about maybe doing a project with them at some point. So this simmering dream of mine to pitch a “33⅓” book rose to the surface, and I thought, I’m gonna go for it. It was sort of a double-dream for me to have a book in the series and to be able to write it with the participation of all three members and the producer. It’s a fan’s dream come true.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending