Connect with us

Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee Brewers 2026 preview by position: Starting Pitcher

Published

on

Milwaukee Brewers 2026 preview by position: Starting Pitcher


If there’s one thing we know about the Brewers and starting pitchers, it will be that they use a lot of them. Listen to any broadcast about the team and you will likely hear, at least once, a mention of how many starting pitchers the team has used over the past couple of seasons. (This is a true but somewhat misleading statement, as those counts tend to include “openers,” but the point stands.)

Already in mid-March, we’ve seen why the Brewers leaned into acquiring a lot of starting pitcher depth. They traded for highly regarded, about-major-league ready young pitchers in both of the Freddy Peralta and Caleb Durbin trades to go along with the several that were already in the organization.

The loss of Peralta will undoubtedly matter. Peralta was (and still is!) a very good pitcher, an excellent clubhouse presence, and one of the team’s longest-tenured players. But the Brewers have done just about as well as a team with their limited financial means can in terms of replacing him with multiple options that should be able to contribute this season and for many seasons beyond. Let’s take a look.

One thing that this pitching staff will not have in abundance is experience. By my count, there are 12 pitchers who are somewhat in contention for getting starts at the beginning of the season, though that includes three players I expect to be in the bullpen (but who the powers-that-be have murmured about as starters) and one who is currently injured. Of those 12 pitchers, there is one who is 33 years old. There are zero others who are within five years of that one player’s age.

Advertisement

The veteran, of course, is Brandon Woodruff. Woodruff, who turned 33 in February, is five years and three months older than the second-oldest player in this group, Aaron Ashby. Woodruff has started 127 career games; that’s 88 more than any other player on the roster. He’s thrown 745 career innings; the other 11 players in this group have that beat, if you combine them all, but if you narrow the field down to the seven pitchers most likely to grab spots in the rotation, they come up short, with just 717 innings between them.

Woodruff, at this point, isn’t really a known quantity. His health issues are well documented — he hasn’t thrown even 70 innings in a season since 2022. He finished last season hurt. He is obviously not getting any younger.

But last season Woodruff, even with somewhat diminished stuff over what he had at his best in the early 2020s, showed how valuable he can be. Despite lower velocity he managed the best K:BB ratio of his career at 5.93. He had career-best rates in walks per nine and strikeouts per nine. The underlying metrics suggest that those are probably unsustainable, and the losses on his stuff may have contributed to his career-worst rate in home runs per nine innings.

But he will certainly be able to provide leadership and he’s not going to make it easy for hitters. I wouldn’t put it past Woodruff turning into an impeccable control pitcher at this point in his career, either; he’s always had a good walk rate, and he’s a smart enough pitcher to realize that if he can’t throw in the mid-to-upper 90s anymore, he’s going to need to lean into different strengths.

The results could be mixed, and who would take the over if you asked over/under 75 innings this season? But Woodruff can still serve an important function to this team and this pitching staff.

Advertisement

There are a whole bunch of players in this category, a few who are new to the organization and a few who came up through the organization. The thing that they all have in common is a lack of time in the big leagues; Quinn Priester leads this group with 257 major league innings, and not one other player has reached 200.

Priester is, of course, injured. And while I’m optimistic, there are those who viewed his late-season (possibly injury-influenced) swoon as a major warning sign, especially when coupled with the fact that Priester outperformed his FIP by 0.69 runs. But Priester is an excellent example of the Brewers’ front office finding players whose particular talents — in this case, ground balls — are tailored to the team behind them.

The new-to-the-org guys include Brandon Sproat (acquired in the Peralta trade) and Kyle Harrison and Shane Drohan, acquired for Durbin. Sproat and Harrison are relatively recent top 100 prospects. Drohan is a late bloomer who was extremely good in Triple-A last year, but who hasn’t thrown an inning in the majors yet. Harrison hasn’t clicked in the big leagues, yet, but he doesn’t turn 25 until August. All three have intriguing arsenals that you’d expect the Brewers will be able to maximize.

The internal prospects include Jacob Misiorowski, Chad Patrick, Robert Gasser, and Logan Henderson. Gasser, who has made seven career starts dating back to May 2024, is the only one who pitched in the big leagues before last season. Patrick, who spent a good chunk of last season in the rotation, is the only one who has thrown more than 100 innings as a big leaguer.

Misiorowski, of course, could quickly become one of the league’s best pitchers if he’s able to consistently find his spots. Whether or not he can do that remains a question, but if he figures out his control, you’ve got a guy who throws 104 mph with massive extension and multiple devastating off-speed pitches (some of which still reach the plate faster than many other pitchers’ fastballs). Misiorowski walked 4.2 batters per nine innings last year, a number that would’ve tied for second in the league among qualified pitchers, and that mark was better than any of his three seasons in the minors (not including 2022, when he walked seven batters in 1 2/3 innings in his two-game professional debut).

Advertisement

Henderson, like Sproat, has only made a handful of appearances in the majors, but Henderson made such an impression in his five starts early in the 2025 season that it’s difficult not to be excited about him. In those five starts, Henderson allowed only five runs in 25 1/3 innings (a 1.78 ERA) and struck out 33 batters (11.7 per nine). While he won’t keep that pace, and there are questions about his velocity and a third viable pitch (in his five starts last year Henderson threw a fastball or a changeup 89% of the time), there’s a lot of intriguing talent.

Patrick had a great 2025. He made his major league debut in a relief outing on March 29 and was a staple of the rotation (and Rookie of the Year candidate) through the first week of July, when he was demoted not really because he was bad but because the Brewers were finally healthy again and he was the odd man out. Patrick worked on some new stuff in the minors and came back in late August, and down the stretch he served a valuable role as a reliever capable of going multiple innings. He served in that role in the postseason, where he allowed just two runs on three hits and a walk in nine innings while striking out 11. He, along with Misiorowski, was one of the most reliable players in the Brewers’ 11-game postseason run.

Gasser is the one in this group whose future might look murkiest. A fringe top 100 prospect prior to the 2024 season, he — like Henderson last year — made five good starts for the Brewers that season. But an elbow injury required Tommy John surgery, and Gasser didn’t get back to the big leagues until late last season, when he got in 5 2/3 innings in two shaky starts. He got beat up a little bit in the postseason, too, and he hasn’t looked very good in spring training. Gasser is still only 26 and you can’t give up on a guy after less than 35 career innings, but of all the guys in this preview, he’s the one who’s probably trending most downward.

But given the way the Brewers handle their starters, he’s likely to get a shot at some point this year, so we’ll hope he can get back to the promising form he showed before his arm injury.

The relievers who they keep telling us could start

Advertisement

Three players fit into this category, and they’re all left-handed: Aaron Ashby, DL Hall, and Ángel Zerpa. I’m going on the record now to say that I’m skeptical any of them will be any sort of traditional “starter” in the big leagues this year; they just have too many options, and while the bullpen is likely to be pretty heavy on lefties, I don’t necessarily think that’s a problem.

Ashby has proven capable of being one of the league’s top relievers, and the fact that he’ll be “stretched out” as a potential starter (he’s thrown 4 2/3 innings in two spring appearances) could just mean that he’s being prepped as an old-school “fireman,” an ace reliever capable of throwing two or three innings at a time. Ashby did this with regularity last season, when he threw 66 2/3 innings across 43 appearances, and he was excellent in doing so: a 2.16 ERA, 10.3 strikeouts per nine, and — qualitatively — stuff that, when he was on, looked impossible to hit.

I personally don’t believe it makes a ton of sense to move Ashby into a starting role when he’s proven this effective as a reliever. Yes, the Brewers tied some long-term money into Ashby that would make him somewhat expensive as a reliever, but if he’s one of the best relievers in the league he’s still a bargain at the $5.7 million he’ll make this year (and $7.7 million next year, with club options at $9 million and $13 million the next two). If the Brewers had more pressing needs in the starting rotation, I’d say sure, but as long as they’ve got options there, I believe Ashby is more valuable out of the pen.

Hall is similar to Ashby in terms of the starter/reliever dynamic, but he’s also got a lot to prove. Hall, like Garrett Mitchell, has intriguing talent but hasn’t been able to stay on the field, and in Hall’s case there have been some concerning trends in his pitch velocity. Hall has managed just 81 2/3 innings since coming to Milwaukee as one of the two major pieces in the Corbin Burnes trade, and while he’s shown flashes, the results have been largely inconsequential.

What we need to see from Hall is a healthy season so that the Brewers can get an actual assessment of where he fits. He’s still pre-arbitration, so it’s not like they’re taking any financial risk here; he likely starts the season in the bullpen, too, but he has started in the past and could conceivably do that again if there is need.

Advertisement

Zerpa, to my eyes, is just a reliever (a role he filled for the World Baseball Classic winners, Venezuela, over the last two weeks). Of his 148 big-league appearances, 140 are out of the bullpen, and while he did mostly start in the minor leagues, so did a lot of pitchers who end up as relievers. I see no indication that Zerpa (who hasn’t been pitching more than an inning at a time all spring) is being considered for any role other than as a typical reliever, despite what Matt Arnold and Pat Murphy would have us believe.

Beyond those nine players — Woodruff, Misiorowski, Priester, Patrick, Harrison, Sproat, Henderson, Gasser, and Drohan, in roughly that order, I would think — who is in the upper levels of the minors who could play a role this season if necessary?

The top two names here are Carlos Rodriguez, who has made seven appearances with the Brewers over the last two seasons, and Coleman Crow, who hasn’t debuted yet, because they are the two “starters” who are on the 40-man roster. Rodriguez is still young, but he’s got a 6.95 ERA across 22 major league innings and he’s sort of getting edged out of the prospect conversation.

Crow, who the Brewers got from the Mets in the December 2023 trade that sent Adrian Houser and Tyrone Taylor to Queens, had an excellent 2025 season at Double-A Biloxi, where he posted a 2.51 ERA in 10 starts and had a 6.5 strikeout-to-walk ratio. He finished the season at Triple-A Nashville, where he’ll start this year, and if enough players get injured, he could find his way to Milwaukee at some point this season.

Beyond those two, there’s not a whole lot else I’ve got my eye on for 2026, though the Brewers tend to surprise us in this regard.

Advertisement

Probably all of them? But I’ll take a stab at the Opening Day rotation.

We know that Quinn Priester will start the season on the IL with a hopeful return sometime in April or May. Brandon Woodruff is ramping up but probably won’t quite be ready, either. Based on Murphy’s comments, it seems that Misiorowski and Patrick will definitely start the season in the rotation. I’m going to say Harrison gets there, too.

I think the Brewers start Sproat in the minors, unless they want to use him for a start or two and then send him down when Woodruff is ready. I just think the service-time incentive is there for the Brewers to hold him in the minors for about six weeks this year.

I don’t have a good grasp on where the Brewers go with the last two spots to open the season, but just to make a guess, I’m going to say Gasser, as a lefty, gets one of them. For what it’s worth, Adam McCalvy thinks Aaron Ashby gets a spot in the rotation; I don’t really feel good about that as a long-term fix, but it might work in the short term. If we go along with that and say that Ashby starts the season in the rotation, I think it would be in a “piggyback” situation, where you might see Ashby and, for instance, Hall on the same day for three-ish innings each.

The Brewers certainly have enough pitchers to cover the innings they need to cover, but the combination in which they do so will remain mysterious for a while.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Milwaukee, WI

Post From Community: Forward Scholars: Sips for Scholars invitation | Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service

Published

on

Post From Community: Forward Scholars: Sips for Scholars invitation | Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service


Editor’s note: Post From Community is the place for community announcements and event postings. If you have a community-oriented event you feel our readers would be interested in, please submit here.

By Bernard Rahming, Forward Scholars

Forward Scholars is a Milwaukee-based nonprofit providing one-on-one reading tutoring to K–3rd grade students who are not yet reading on grade level. With the support of more than 300 volunteers and a community of generous donors and partners, we empower students to build the skills and confidence to succeed.

Sips for Scholars is our summer fundraiser and celebration of student growth. Join us for an evening of connection, inspiration, and community as we celebrate the impact of literacy and invest in brighter futures for our students.

Advertisement

Date: June 30, 2026
Time: 5-7 p.m.
Location: Broken Bat Brewing (135 E Pittsburgh Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53204 )
Tickets: $50 Per Person (Advance tickets close June 23)

Get your tickets! 

Everyone is welcome. We’d love for you to join us!

Advertisement

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Despite early lead, Giants fall 16-2 to Brewers in embarrassing fashion

Published

on

Despite early lead, Giants fall 16-2 to Brewers in embarrassing fashion


MILWAUKEE — With their most effective starter on the mound and the wind at their sails from a 19-run, 25-hit outburst at Coors Field, the Giants jumped out to an early lead.

And, poof, like most of San Francisco’s hopes this season, it was gone.

About as soon as Matt Chapman’s two-run homer cleared the wall and the outstretched glove of Jackson Chourio in the top of the second, Landen Roupp began to give the lead right back.

The Brewers pounced on Roupp for seven runs in the bottom half of the inning and only added on from there while running away with the first game of their series, 16-2.

Advertisement
Matt Chapman’s two-run blast in the first inning was the lone Giants bright spot in an absolute drubbing by the Brewers Monday night Tannen Maury/UPI/Shutterstock

It was such a drubbing that it ended with a position player called up before the game, Buddy Kennedy, lobbing pitches while Daniel Susac, a catcher with no prior experience besides two minor-league games at first base, played third.

Roupp struck out Jake Bauers to bring a merciful end to the second inning, nine batters after the Brewers left fielder started with a leadoff walk. Sal Frelick and Chourio both jumped on first-pitch fastballs for explosive extra-base hits, Chapman wasn’t able to field a bunt from speedy No. 9 hitter David Hamilton, and Roupp issued another walk to Christian Yelich.

The biggest hit of the inning came off the bat of Bryce Turang and gave newly called up Jonah Cox his first opportunity to show off his defense that has been called the best in the organization. Cox gave chase but instead went crashing into the wall in left-center field as the ball careened away and Turang cruised into third for a bases-clearing triple.

Turang jogged home on a sacrifice fly from the next batter for the Brewers’ seventh run.

The Brewers added another run off Roupp the next inning and eight more against the Giants’ bullpen (plus Kennedy). But for all intents and purposes, they were already buried.

Advertisement
Jackson Chourio and the Brewers offense erupted for 16 runs on 18 hits Monday night. AP Photo/Aaron Gash

What it means

Whatever good feelings the Giants brought with them on the plane after their rout to end their series against the Rockies were gone by end of the second inning.

It has been hard enough for the Giants to pull ahead; staying in front has been just as much of a challenge.

The Giants have held a lead in only 48 of their 60 games, the fewest in the majors, and are one of only five teams to relinquish the advantage more often than not, falling to 23-25.

The culprit of late had been the bullpen, but in this one, there was nobody to blame but Roupp, who struggled to find the strike zone and was hit hard when he did.

Roupp exhausted 96 pitches to complete four innings, only half for strikes, and recorded season-highs in bases on balls (four) and earned runs (eight).

Advertisement

The outing raised his ERA almost a full run, to 4.22 from a rotation-leading 3.30.

Landen Roupp now sports a 4.22 ERA after giving up eight runs in 4.0 innings Monday night. Michael McLoone-Imagn Images

Who’s hot

Jung Hoo Lee recorded the most hits by a Giant in a single series since 2017 by going 11-for-15 over their three games in Colorado and picked up right where he left off.

Lee’s second-inning single extended his hitting streak to nine games and set the table for Chapman’s two-run shot that gave the Giants the briefest of 2-0 leads.

Bryce Eldridge, getting a rare start in the field, made a nice play to start a 3-6 double play, going to the ground to snag a hard hopper from Frelick, tagging first and getting back to his feet to make an accurate throw to Willy Adames at second base.

Eldridge also laced a double — his sixth in four games on the road trip — that left the bat at 107.7 mph, the Giants’ hardest-hit ball of the game.

Advertisement
Giants catcher Eric Haase could do nothing but look on after the Giants lost 16-2 Monday night. Michael McLoone-Imagn Images

Who’s not

After posting a 5.21 ERA in May that ranked as the fourth-worst in the majors, the Giants’ starting rotation didn’t start the month of June on any better note.

As a staff, San Francisco has surrendered at least six runs in six of its past seven games and all four to begin the road trip, albeit with the caveat that the first three were played at Coors Field.

Up next

Salt in the wound: As the Giants try to get back on track, they will be opposed by their former top prospect, Kyle Harrison, who has blossomed into an NL Cy Young contender since being dealt to the Red Sox for Rafael Devers and again this offseason to Milwaukee.

The Giants will have another homegrown arm, Trevor McDonald, on the mound.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

New book documents Violent Femmes’ rise to fame from Milwaukee roots

Published

on

New book documents Violent Femmes’ rise to fame from Milwaukee roots


Before the Violent Femmes became a world-famous band with a multi-platinum record, they started the same way any other group would in Milwaukee: playing wherever they could.

Local clubs weren’t interested in their unique musical style, so they took to playing on sidewalks and street corners until they were first discovered while performing outside of a Pretenders concert at the Oriental Theater in 1981.

They self-funded their first album, which went on to sell more than 7 million copies.

Understanding Wisconsin, Together.

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.

Advertisement

The story of the Violent Femmes’ Milwaukee origins and improbable rise to fame is the subject of a new book in the long-running music book series called “33⅓.” 

Author Nic Brown joined WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” to share the significance of the band’s self-titled debut album and what he learned from interviewing band members and producers.

The following was edited for clarity and brevity.

Advertisement

Rob Ferrett: For people who aren’t familiar with the Violent Femmes, how would you describe their music?

Nic Brown: They occupy this overlapping realm of folk, punk and jazz — which I’d call a Bermuda Triangle for anybody, but they pull it off because their songs are so great. Gordon Gano, the primary singer-songwriter, had this incredible collection of songs when the band formed, and they’re so well put together that they could have worked in any setting, really.

The Violent Femmes themselves had one of the most unique arrangements of instruments possible, and that’s the biggest surprise for people when they see them. A lot of what’s most unusual about them is often invisible on a recording, but they’re a one-of-a-kind band. Their debut record is a one-of-a-kind record. It didn’t sound like anything else then, and it still doesn’t sound like anything else today. 

RF: What were their early public performances like?

NB: They had a hard time getting gigs. They busked, and they had instrumentation that made it easy for them to do that, and that was by design, too. Victor DeLorenzo, the drummer, played standing up with brushes, with just a snare drum and then what he calls a tranceaphone, which is a metal bushel basket placed on top of another drum. Gordon (Gano) would play guitar on the street, usually an acoustic guitar. And then Brian Ritchie would play an acoustic bass guitar, which to most people sounds like stand-up bass, like what you’d see in a jazz trio. It looked more like a mariachi-style bass, and Brian’s point was, he couldn’t haul a stand-up bass around. He didn’t even have a driver’s license. 

Advertisement

They had instruments that were made to play on the street, and the fact that they spent so much time playing on the street is part of the reason the band works so well. There are few performance spaces less forgiving than a street corner in Milwaukee, or anywhere. They honed this act on the street corners so that they could make their songs work in that setting. And because of that, when they finally got into the studio to record their debut album, they were a really well-oiled machine, despite the fact they hadn’t spent much time on actual stages.

Gordon Gano (left), Brian Ritchie (right) and The Violent Femmes performs at The Sasquatch! Music Festival at the Gorge Amphitheatre on Saturday, May 24, 2014, in George, Washington. John Davisson/Invision/AP

RF: What was it like for them to try to get a record deal and record their first album?

NB: It was failure after failure, really. They tried to get a record deal before they went into the studio. They had one very small label out of New York that was interested, but that fell through, so that’s why they eventually recorded it themselves. They had a lot of pressure from some people who did recognize a spark there to do that ’80s rock ‘n’ roll production with the more processed sound and synthesizers, and they had a surprising amount of confidence at the age that they were at to stick with their sound.

Eventually, there was a label called Slash Records, a small punk label in California, and they turned the band down. But two employees at Slash loved this recording so much that they kept playing the cassette in the offices until the owner finally said, “OK, I can’t take it anymore. I’m going to sign this band, not because I want to, but because I’m so sick of hearing my employees playing it every day.” So that’s how they ended up getting their record deal with Slash Records.

They say it’s the worst record deal any band could ever have signed. But they did what they had to, the record came out, and the rest is history, right?

Advertisement

RF: It took four years before the album went gold and then another four years to go platinum. How did it pick up popularity and go viral in the pre-internet era?

NB: I describe it as going viral over eight years via cassette. Young people connected with the songs and shared dubbed cassette tapes. They say this album has sold 7 million copies, and I say you need to ask Maxwell how many blank tapes they sold between 1983 and 1991 and add in about 30 percent of that.

A lot of people don’t know what the album cover looks like. I had a guy recently tell me that the album cover is whatever guy’s handwriting wrote “Violent Femmes” on the blank tape, so it was a real organic word-of-mouth build-up over eight years. 

A young girl in a white dress peers through a weathered, partially open door of an old building. The words violent femmes appear in the top left corner.

RF: How unique was Brian Ritchie’s bass playing in what you described as a “lead bass” role in the band?

NB: This is probably the most bass-forward recording in popular music history. Brian Ritchie is an incredible musician, and so this thing happens on these songs where the melodic statements that aren’t happening with Gordon’s vocals are usually made on the bass guitar, and then Brian Ritchie takes long bass solos, unaccompanied by any other instrument.

They sound so natural and great that you actually don’t even think they’re bass solos. Often, if there’s a bass solo happening, that’s when we might skip the song. I’m sorry to say, but that doesn’t apply to Brian Ritchie’s work. He’s the lead.

Advertisement

RF: As a musician yourself, what drew you so enthusiastically into writing this book? 

NB: The book series that it’s part of, “33⅓,” is just a classic series, and guys like me were always dreaming about what record I would pitch to write about. This album had always been in my head as that record. I published a memoir about three years ago about my career as a musician, and in it I mentioned how important this album was. 

One of the members of the Femmes management read that memoir and actually reached out to me about maybe doing a project with them at some point. So this simmering dream of mine to pitch a “33⅓” book rose to the surface, and I thought, I’m gonna go for it. It was sort of a double-dream for me to have a book in the series and to be able to write it with the participation of all three members and the producer. It’s a fan’s dream come true.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending