Michigan
Michigan’s top Democrats are all in Chicago. Who’s the ‘acting’ governor?
Chicago — None of the six state officials able to serve as Michigan’s governor or acting governor are physically in the state this week, prompting allegations from some Republicans that the lack of a chief executive within the state’s boundaries is unconstitutional.
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in an interview Wednesday night from the sidelines of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago said she remains the governor and that she would return to Michigan should anything occur that requires her attention.
“I am the governor. I’m always the governor of Michigan. It’s 24/7,” Whitmer said. “Obviously, if there is something official that needs to be done I can get back over the state line in about an hour.”
The Michigan constitution requires that, should a governor be absent from the state, his or her powers and duties be transferred down in order of succession to one of the state’s five highest elected officials: Lieutenant Governor Garlin Gilchrist II, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Attorney General Dana Nessel, Speaker Pro Tempore in the Senate Jeremy Moss and House Speaker Joe Tate.
Gilchrist, Benson and Nessel have signed bills in the past under the title of “acting governor” while Whitmer was out of state.
But each of those five successors and Whitmer have been present at Michigan Democratic delegation breakfasts at the Hilton Chicago, with the delegation at the United Center and at other events throughout the Windy City this week.
Whitmer in 2019 also appointed five individuals to succeed her in the event of an emergency in which no one in the line of elected officials is able to perform the duties of the office. But those individuals are meant to be called on in the event of a disaster. Those individuals are State Treasurer Rachel Eubanks, former Lt. Gov. John D. Cherry, Wayne County Executive Warren Evans, businessman Gary Torgow and U.S. Debbie Stabenow.
Evans and Stabenow also are in Chicago.
Whitmer, when asked if Eubanks was intended to be acting governor during the Democratic National Convention, said she was not.
State Rep. Bryan Posthumus, R-Cannon Township, called the governor and her successors’ absence a “constitutional crisis” and reflective of the Democratic legislative majorities’ infrequent session days this year. The Senate and House — which has struggled to pass legislation with its slim 56-54 majority — have met sparingly throughout 2024 and are not scheduled to come back into session until September.
“There are really critical things at stake now in Michigan,” Posthumus said. “The Supreme Court just put down a ruling that could decimate the entire service industry.”
Posthumus was referring to a recent Michigan Supreme Court decision that overturned a Republican-led effort to curb minimum wage and paid sick leave laws. The decision has left restaurants and businesses in a panic amid the threat of sudden increase to minimum wage, the elimination of the tipped wage and the implementation of mandatory paid sick leave rules.
More: Whitmer supports independent review of police, emergency response to Oxford shooting
More: Michigan’s importance in presidential race in focus at Democratic convention
Attorney Steven Liedel, who served as chief legal counsel for former Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm and the Whitmer transition team, rejected the idea that the situation was unconstitutional. The constitutional language governing the line of succession activates those individuals if or when there is a power or duty that needs to exercised, Liedel said.
“There’s nothing that says someone needs to be vested at all times,” Liedel said.
And, as a practical matter, “she’s in Chicago,” Liedel said. “All she has to do is take a plane, a car, a bus or train and the moment she crosses into Michigan, she can exercise any of the powers of governor.”
Liedel also questioned whether the role of the five individuals named in 2019 was only activated upon a disaster. There’s no precedent on the matter, he said, and it’s never been interpreted by an attorney general or court.
Attorney Mark Brewer, a longtime election lawyer and former chairman for the Michigan Democratic Party, said the concerns from Republicans were “silly” and somewhat ironic. It is likely, Brewer said, that Republicans found themselves in similar situations when they controlled the state’s six highest elected offices.
“That’s just a silly, hypocritical argument by the Republicans,” Brewer said. “They were in the same boat at one time.”
eleblanc@detroitnews.com
Michigan
Man uses racial slur while testifying against Michigan Capitol gun ban
Lansing — A man disrupted an already tense Michigan Senate committee hearing Thursday on whether guns should be permanently banned from the state Capitol building by using a racial slur to refer to people in Detroit while testifying.
The individual identified himself as Avi Rachlin and said he was representing “Groypers for America,” referring to a far-right extremist movement, according to the testimony card he submitted to the Michigan Senate Civil Rights, Judiciary and Public Safety Committee.
Rachlin opened his remarks by contending that Democrats’ efforts to push the gun prohibition for the state Capitol and House and Senate office buildings went against the “will of the people,” who had voted on Nov. 5 to elect Republican Donald Trump as president and give back control of the state House to the GOP.
“This is legislation that targets White people,” Rachlin said. “It is racial because the people who carry in the Capitol are primarily White people …, and this is retaliation for the only demographic that overwhelmingly voted to support Donald Trump.”
Rachlin then said lawmakers should focus on people who shoot others in places like Detroit. He noted that the committee’s chairwoman, Sen. Stephanie Chang, D-Detroit, represents a portion of the city. Rachlin then said the individuals are “overwhelmingly 13 to 34 year old Sub-Saharan African n——.”
In response, Chang hit her gavel and said the committee was going to move on.
“Are you going to have armed guards remove me?” Rachlin asked. “Armed men with guns?”
Sen. Jim Runestad, R-White Lake, interjected, asking “Did I just hear you call a group of people by some epithet?”
“Yes,” Rachlin replied.
Sen. Ruth Johnson, R-Holly, told Rachlin, “The term that you used is inappropriate, and it will not get you anywhere in this Legislature.”
Moments later, the committee voted 4-2 to send the bills to the full Senate, with Runestad and Johnson in opposition.
The measures would generally prohibit guns inside the Michigan Capitol, the Anderson House Office Building and the Binsfeld Senate Office Building in Lansing. However, a lawmaker with a concealed pistol license would still be able to carry a weapon in the buildings.
Currently, under a policy of the Michigan State Capitol Commission, guns are banned inside the Capitol. That standard doesn’t apply to the House and Senate office buildings.
Sen. Dayna Polehanki, D-Livonia, one of the sponsors of the bills, has argued that lawmakers need to put the prohibition into law so a future commission can’t change it on its own. Polehanki said it is “very important” to her to get the bills through the Legislature by the end of the year, before Republicans take back control of the state House.
“As you can see, my Republican colleagues, who voted no, I guess don’t believe in protecting … Michigan citizens in the Capitol from the real threat of gun violence,” Polehanki said.
The Livonia lawmaker said there are enough votes in the Senate to pass the bills.
Polehanki and Sen. Sarah Anthony, D-Lansing, both testified on Thursday about protests during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 — before the gun ban was in place — that brought individuals with guns into the gallery of the Senate.
“It was just a few years ago that many of us were in this building absolutely terrified as firearms were pointed at us while we were trying to do our jobs,” Anthony said.
Runestad asked Anthony if she reported the guns being pointed at her to Capitol security. Anthony said she had made a formal complaint to the Michigan State Police and House sergeants. Runestad interrupted Anthony. Then, she said, “I raised a lot of nieces and nephews, and I’m not shy when it comes to addressing temper tantrums.”
A representative from the National Rifle Association and Tom Lambert, legislative director of the group Michigan Open Carry, testified against the bills.
Lambert said Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, a Democrat, would have prosecuted individuals if they pointed guns at lawmakers during protests in 2020. Michigan already has a law against brandishing a firearm, which would include pointing a gun in a threatening manner, Lambert noted.
“The bills are a solution in search of a problem,” Lambert argued.
cmauger@detroitnews.com
Michigan
Former Michigan State Star Deserves More From NBA Team
Former Michigan State Spartans star Max Christie probably should have stayed in school an extra year. We get it. The kid is very raw, but the tools are obviously there.
And he deserves more from the Los Angeles Lakers.
Now in his third NBA season, Christie is just 21 years old, so there is ample time for the youngster to grow into his frame and develop a reliable all-around game.
However, Christie won’t be able to get there if the Lakers don’t give him playing time.
Heading into Wednesday night’s action, Christie had played in all 10 games for Los Angeles, but he was averaging just 13.1 minutes per game. Not only that, but his minutes have been sporadic.
Christie was given double-digit minutes over his first six contests, topping out at 27 minutes in his fifth game. But since then, he has only achieved double figures twice. As a matter of fact, in the Lakers’ previous two games before Wednesday, he had played a total of three minutes.
That doesn’t seem right, especially considering that he just landed a four-year contract extension over the summer.
It’s understandable that Los Angeles is trying to make the playoffs in what could be LeBron James’ final season, but the Lakers aren’t even giving Christie a legitimate chance.
Los Angeles’ bench isn’t exactly deep. It is giving significant minutes to Cam Reddish and Gabe Vincent, for crying out loud. You’re saying JJ Redick can’t find a way to get Christie more involved?
Christie has the potential to be a terrific two-way player on the NBA level. Heck, if he had spent another year at Michigan State, he may have been a lottery pick, and a high one, at that.
Instead, the Lakers took the 6-foot-6 wing in the second round of the 2022 draft, which absolutely looked like a steal at the time.
But it’s not going to be much of a steal if Los Angeles doesn’t play him.
The Lakers are starving for defensive help, and Christie could be the answer on the perimeter. If they actually give him a consistent opportunity, it may pay dividends.
And if they’re not going to play him? Just trade him and give him a chance to shine elsewhere.
Don’t forget to follow the official Spartan Nation Page on Facebook Spartan Nation WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE, and be a part of our vibrant community group Go Green Go White as well WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE.
Michigan
Elderly couple rescued from condominium fire in Plymouth Township, Michigan
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
-
Health1 week ago
Lose Weight Without the Gym? Try These Easy Lifestyle Hacks
-
Culture6 days ago
The NFL is heading to Germany – and the country has fallen for American football
-
Business5 days ago
Ref needs glasses? Not anymore. Lasik company offers free procedures for referees
-
Sports6 days ago
All-Free-Agent Team: Closers and corner outfielders aplenty, harder to fill up the middle
-
News3 days ago
Herbert Smith Freehills to merge with US-based law firm Kramer Levin
-
Technology4 days ago
The next Nintendo Direct is all about Super Nintendo World’s Donkey Kong Country
-
Business1 day ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 day ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case