In the days leading up to yesterday’s Democratic primary in Michigan, President Joe Biden’s White House and reelection campaign were reportedly “freaking out” about the grassroots push to protest his handling of the Israel-Gaza conflict by getting voters to check “uncommitted” on the ballot. With the votes now cast and tallied up, it’s easy to see why.
“Uncommitted” came second in the Michigan primary with 13 percent of the vote, making up just shy of 101,000 individual votes, in a stunning rebuke of an incumbent president by the voters meant to be his most committed supporters. The three-week-old campaign cleared its own, self-set benchmark of ten thousand votes in a matter of hours.
Critics, not unfairly, charged the target had been set artificially low to exceed expectations. Yet by the end of the night, the final total was not just ten times this number. It was both a higher percentage and roughly five times the raw total that “uncommitted” drew against Barack Obama in the state’s 2012 primary. That was a year in which Obama’s reelection chances were considered perilous, owing to the then president’s sagging approval rating — one that was nonetheless still seven points higher than Biden’s current, historically low approval.
Last night’s “uncommitted” vote was also far higher than that of the Michigan Republican primary four years ago, when Biden’s likely opponent Donald Trump was the unpopular incumbent fighting for reelection, but saw only 4.2 percent (or 28,485) of his own party’s voters in the state rebuke him in the same way.
Advertisement
The result is both a breathtaking organizing achievement and a testament to Democratic voters’ near-unprecedented discontent with their own president.
The Listen to Michigan campaign, organized by a broad collection of activists comprising, among others, young voters, Arab and Muslim Americans, local Democrats, and left-wing organizations like Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), managed this after only three weeks of work and little funding. The most high-profile support it got was from congresswoman and DSA member Rashida Tlaib, who has been roundly attacked in the media for backing the effort, and former congressman Beto O’Rourke. This all comes amid a Democratic primary contest that has been specially shaped to smother opposition to Biden and smooth his way into the general election, from nonsensically rearranging the primary schedule to favor the president, to canceling debates and depriving his few challengers of both airtime and ballot access.
More ominous for Biden is what this result signals for his chances to win the key battleground state in November. Biden’s winning margin there four years ago was roughly 155,000 votes, not much more than the number of “uncommitted” Michiganders this year — and that came under historically favorable conditions, when Biden was viewed vastly more favorably, and as a result of a determined organizing campaign by many of the same groups and individuals now involved in whipping “uncommitted” votes.
Maybe more significant was Trump’s winning margin of eleven thousand votes in 2016, when Democratic turnout was depressed by a lack of enthusiasm, as well as the figure that the Listen to Michigan campaign pointedly took up as its goal. As Dearborn mayor Abdullah Hammoud put it, “We’re not sizable enough to make a candidate win. But we’re sizable enough to make a candidate lose.”
Sure enough, “uncommitted” trounced the president by sixteen points last night in heavily Arab and Muslim Dearborn, which Biden had won in 2020 with 74 percent of the vote. Similarly, Washtenaw County, home to state colleges including the University of Michigan, saw “uncommitted” take home 17 percent of the vote, a sign of young voters’ well-documented disapproval of Biden’s unconditional support for the war. Both groups were key parts of Biden’s winning coalition over Trump in 2020, not just in Michigan but nationwide.
Advertisement
All of this amounts to a resoundingly clear message to Biden on Gaza from the Democratic base, one that the president is showing some signs of comprehending. On the eve of the vote, Biden told reporters in a rare televised appearance that his “hope” was to have a cease-fire in place by next Monday. California representative Ro Khanna — who has visited Michigan and urged Biden behind the scenes to change course on Gaza out of concern it could cost him the election — has said the timing of Biden’s announcement wasn’t a coincidence. Former defense secretary Mark Esper told CNN that Israeli officials he spoke to had been “surprised” by Biden’s admission, adding that “a cynic might say that President Biden said that because we’re on the eve last night of the Michigan primary, where words like that would resonate well with Arab Americans and Muslim Americans.”
What’s not clear is whether Biden is really intending to follow through. In the same interview, Esper disclosed that Israeli officials were confused by Biden’s words, since what they wanted was a “pause” or “temporary cease-fire.” The most recent news is that the administration has given Israel until the middle of March to put in writing that it will let humanitarian aid into Gaza and won’t violate international law while taking US weapons, which the State Department will then certify by the end of the month. That suggests that if a cease-fire doesn’t come by Monday, Biden will allow Israel at least another month to wage its war before considering cutting off the flow of arms, if that even happens.
Even if a cease-fire does come, it’s unclear if it will take the permanent form that Listen to Michigan organizers are demanding, or if it will hew closer to what Israeli officials are envisioning. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to press forward with an Israeli assault on Rafah — where 1.4 million Gazans were corralled into on the false pretense that it would be a “safe area” — after a pause that lasts at most two months, which would make the cease-fire functionally meaningless.
Though some disaffected voters, like organizers of the smaller “Abandon Biden” campaign, view their goal as convincing voters to sit out the presidential election and inflict a political defeat on Biden, supporters of Listen to Michigan explicitly framed their effort as a way to shake the White House awake and give Biden a path to winning back their votes. It remains to be seen if he’ll listen: according to Politico this morning, “presidential aides continue to believe that today’s ‘uncommitted’ voters will be November’s Biden voters once they have a stark choice in front of them.”
This is a big gamble, especially for the president himself. Biden has staked much of his legacy on his defeat of Trump in 2020 and came into office with ambitions of being a historic, consequential leader. Long resentful at team Obama’s tendency to look down their noses at him, Biden reportedly loved the growing narrative at the start of his presidency that he was a bolder leader than his former boss.
Advertisement
By ignoring the demands of pro-cease-fire voters — now the overwhelming majority of not just his own party but virtually every demographic in the United States — Biden risks being remembered as a disastrous one-term president who split his own party and brought a far more virulent, radical Trump presidency to power, all thanks to a stubborn and increasingly inexplicable determination to back a foreign government’s unpopular, heinous war.
The president’s aides have reportedly been “keeping him in a bubble” regarding voters’ unhappiness with his Israel-Gaza policy. If this Michigan result isn’t what bursts it, then they need to step in and do it themselves.
A 58-year-old woman is accused of driving a vehicle at the bottom of a ski hill near skiers and snowboarders in White Lake Township, Michigan, the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office said Saturday.
Advertisement
Prosecutors allege the Bingham Farms, Michigan, woman drove near guests of Alpine Valley Ski Area, including children, on Tuesday.
According to the prosecutor’s office, witnesses said they saw the woman smoking what appeared to be marijuana before the incident and wearing ski boots while driving. Officers attempting to perform sobriety tests reported that she “exhibited poor balance, slurred speech, and open hostility.”
Online court records show the woman is charged with operating while impaired for the third time. If convicted, she faces up to five years in prison, a maximum fine of $5,000 and “mandatory vehicle immobilization” for one to three years, the prosecutor’s office said.
“This defendant endangered children with her irresponsible actions,” Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald said in a written statement. “There is no excuse to drive impaired, even once. If you’ve had too much to drink or are under the influence of marijuana or other drugs, call a friend, call an Uber, just don’t drive.”
The woman is scheduled to appear at a probable cause conference on March 12.
A long-lost silent film that’s believed to be the first depiction of a robot in motion pictures was rediscovered in Michigan. And it’s a great reminder for film history fans that you shouldn’t give up hope just because a film has been deemed lost.
The film, titled “Gugusse and the Automaton,” is just 45 seconds long and was created in 1897 by French film pioneer Georges Méliès. It shows a magician named Gugusse turning a large crank to control Pierrot Automate, a child-sized robot. The robot grows bigger and bigger until it’s an adult.
Once full size, the robot does a little dance before hitting Gugusse over the head with a stick. Gugusse brings the robot down from his pedestal and then shows him what’s what.
Gugusse hits the robot over the head with a gigantic mallet, each swing making the mechanical man a little smaller until he’s back to his child-like size. Another swing makes the robot a small doll and then it’s just one more mallet slap before the robot disappears completely.
Advertisement
With that, the film is over.
It’s a short film with a goofy, slapstick premise. But it’s also an artifact that can be interpreted similarly to so much robot-focused media that would come later in the 20th century. The robot harms a human, the human needs to destroy the robot.
We see anti-robot stories pop up especially during difficult economic times, like the 1930s and 1970s, something I’ve written about before at length. And if you’re wondering whether there were hard economic times in France during the 1890s, there certainly were—in the form of a double dip recession, no less.
But putting aside the potential message of the film (and the risk of taking it too seriously as a sign of broader social frustrations), the story of how this film was rediscovered is fascinating.
Bill McFarland of Grand Rapids, Michigan, drove a box of films that belonged to his great-grandfather to the Library of Congress’s National Audio-Visual Conservation Center in Culpeper, Virginia so that experts could take a look at what he had.
Advertisement
McFarland’s great-grandfather was a man named William Delisle Frisbee who had worked jobs as a school teacher and a potato farmer in Pennsylvania, according to a blog post from the Library of Congress. But he also worked nights as a “traveling showman,” according to the Library.
“He drove his horse and buggy from town to town to dazzle the locals with a projector and some of the world’s first moving pictures,” the Library explains. “He set up shop in a local schoolroom, church, lodge or civic auditorium and showed magic lantern slides and short films with music from a newfangled phonograph. It was shocking.”
Frisbee died in 1937 and two trunks of his possessions were passed on through generations until they made their way to McFarland, who was unable to screen the movies from himself because of their condition.
The Library posted a video to Instagram talking about their acquisition of the film and how remarkable it is that such an old film was found. It’s estimated that as much as 90% of films made before 1930 are lost to history.
Other films in the trunks included another Méliès film from 1900 titled “The Fat and Lean Wrestling Match,” fragments of a Thomas Edison movie called “The Burning Stable.” Library technicians scanned the films in 4K to preserve them for future generations.
Advertisement
The word “robot” wasn’t coined until 1920 for the Czech play R.U.R. by Karel Capek. But visions of artificial men date back centuries. And it’s incredible to see a robot from the 1890s depicted on film for the first time. Even if it’s just 45 seconds long.
Don’t give up hope if you’re longing to watch some movie that’s believed to be completely lost. You never know what someone may have in a dusty old trunk in Michigan.
Kylan Boswell (4) scored 15 points for the Illini but Yaxel Lendeborg (23) scored 16 in Michigan’s win. Geoff Stellfox / Getty Images
Michigan has left no doubt about Big Ten superiority — the No. 3 Wolverines’ 84-70 romp Friday at No. 10 Illinois gives them an outright conference championship with two regular-season games remaining.
The win gives Michigan its first outright title since 2021, and it’s another top-shelf win that gives Michigan (27-2, 17-1 Big Ten) a boost in its pursuit of the NCAA Tournament’s No. 1 seed. This matters for the Wolverines because they would be lined up for a potential Final Four matchup with the No. 4 seed rather than either of the two teams that are also in contention for No. 1 — Duke, which beat Michigan last week to gain the inside track, and Arizona.
Advertisement
Friday’s lone meeting of the regular season between two purported national contenders left Michigan looking much the part, and Illinois looking a tier lower. This was domination, a comfortable second half for a Michigan team that led by as many as 21.
Michigan sophomore big man Morez Johnson Jr., who transferred from Illinois in the offseason, heard a lot of jeers from fans at State Farm Center and responded with 19 points and 11 rebounds. Big man Aday Mara also scored 19. Yaxel Lendeborg, the star of Michigan’s jumbo frontcourt, had 16 points and seven rebounds.
That interior helped the Wolverines to a 42-32 edge in points in the paint and 22 second-chance points. Keaton Wagler had 23 points to lead Illinois (22-7, 13-5), which projected as a No. 2 seed in Tuesday’s Bracket Watch but has lost two straight games and four of six. The Illini are trending in the wrong direction and potentially heading to the three-line.
The No. 1 seed also gets to choose its tournament path, and Michigan has requested Philadelphia as its first-weekend site. Otherwise, the Wolverines will likely be placed in Buffalo, which is closer to Ann Arbor.