Connect with us

Michigan

Michigan officials take center stage during final night of Democratic National Convention

Published

on

Michigan officials take center stage during final night of Democratic National Convention


Michigan officials took center stage on the final night of the Democratic National Convention.

Among a long list of star-studded speakers included three officials from the battleground state of Michigan.

U.S. Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) introduced herself as the Democratic nominee for Michigan’s open U.S. Senate seat.

“I want to talk tonight about national security because the choice in November is stark,” said Slotkin. “America retreating from the world or leading the world.”

Advertisement

Slotkin highlighted her experience as a former CIA officer and Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense.

“For everyone here and everyone watching, I want you to proudly claim your patriotism,” Slotkin said. “You are here because you love your country. Do not give an inch to pretenders who wrap themselves in the flag but spit in the face of freedoms it represents.”

Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson also took the stage in support of Kamala Harris.

“My job is to protect people, all people,” said Swanson.

Swanson discussed a defining moment in his career surrounding a 2020 demonstration in Flint.

Advertisement

“We were able to turn a protest into a peaceful movement by walking together,” Swanson said. “One city, one community, and one country. America, let’s walk, let’s walk together, and let’s elect Kamala Harris.”

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer also spoke during the final night of the convention.

Whitmer touted Harris as the relatable candidate.

“Kamala Harris, she gets us, she sees us, she is us,” said Whitmer.

Whitmer painted Donald Trump as out of touch.

Advertisement

“You think he understands that when your car breaks down, you can’t get to work? No. His first word was probably chauffer,” Whitmer said.

Copyright 2024 by WDIV ClickOnDetroit – All rights reserved.



Source link

Michigan

Michigan hockey first-round pick traded to Penguins, expected to turn pro

Published

on

Michigan hockey first-round pick traded to Penguins, expected to turn pro


Michigan’s 2024-25 roster took a major hit Thursday.

Forward Rutger McGroarty, who finished ninth in the country with 52 points last season, had his rights traded from the Winnipeg Jets to the Pittsburgh Penguins. According to multiple outlets, first reported by The Athletic, he is expected to sign his entry-level pro contract, foregoing his final two years of NCAA eligibility. The Jets are acquiring forward Brayden Yager, the No. 14 overall pick in 2023, in a swap of two top NHL prospects.

McGroarty, the No. 14 overall pick in 2022, reportedly had requested a trade this offseason after he and Winnipeg disagreed on his future with the organization. Two other Michigan early-round picks – Frank Nazar and Gavin Brindley, signed their entry-level deals with the Chicago Blackhawks, and Columbus Blue Jackets, respectively, after Michigan’s season ended in a national semifinal in April.

Both played in NHL games at the end of the year for teams that didn’t make the playoffs, but the Jets finished second in the Central Division and had one of the deepest forward groups in the league, limiting a potential pathway for McGroarty to enter the lineup.

Advertisement

In April, Michigan announced McGroarty was returning for his junior season, but many NHL experts mentioned the 6-foot-1, 200-pounder as a potential trade candidate.

A trade around the draft in June wouldn’t have been surprising, but a move this late in the offseason is unusual. McGroarty was expected to be a leader for a Wolverines team that lost four of its top six scorers from last year. In two years with the Wolverines, he recorded 32 goals and 57 assists in 75 games, playing a major role in the team reaching the Frozen Four both years.



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan receives nearly $1M in grants for lead testing in schools, childcare centers

Published

on

Michigan receives nearly M in grants for lead testing in schools, childcare centers


LANSING, Mich. (WILX) – Michigan will receive nearly $1 million in grants to reduce lead exposure from children at schools and childcare facilities.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced funding to protect children from lead in drinking water on Wednesday. The grant program requires recipients to use the 3Ts—Training, Testing, and Taking Action—to reduce lead in drinking water. The $26 million grant funding was distributed to 55 states and territories, including the District of Columbia; Michigan will receive $930,000.

The EPA said lead can severely harm mental and physical development in children while also slowing down learning and irreversibly damaging the brain. In adults, lead can cause increased blood pressure, heart disease, decreased kidney function, and cancer.

“The science is clear: There is no safe level of exposure to lead,” said Acting Assistant Administrator for Water Bruno Pigott. “As part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s Investing in America agenda, this $26 million will help protect our children from the harmful impacts of lead. EPA is also investing $15 billion under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to remove lead pipes and is providing technical assistance to communities to help them develop and implement lead pipe replacement projects.”

Advertisement

The funding was authorized by the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act and is provided to states, the District of Columbia, and participating territories as grants for lead testing and remediation in schools and childcare facilities.

Subscribe to our News 10 newsletter and YouTube page to receive the latest local news and weather. Looking to hire people, or grow your business through advertising? Gray Digital Media is your one-stop marketing solution. Learn more.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan’s top Democrats are all in Chicago. Who’s the ‘acting’ governor?

Published

on

Michigan’s top Democrats are all in Chicago. Who’s the ‘acting’ governor?


Chicago — None of the six state officials able to serve as Michigan’s governor or acting governor are physically in the state this week, prompting allegations from some Republicans that the lack of a chief executive within the state’s boundaries is unconstitutional.

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in an interview Wednesday night from the sidelines of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago said she remains the governor and that she would return to Michigan should anything occur that requires her attention.

“I am the governor. I’m always the governor of Michigan. It’s 24/7,” Whitmer said. “Obviously, if there is something official that needs to be done I can get back over the state line in about an hour.”

Advertisement

The Michigan constitution requires that, should a governor be absent from the state, his or her powers and duties be transferred down in order of succession to one of the state’s five highest elected officials: Lieutenant Governor Garlin Gilchrist II, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Attorney General Dana Nessel, Speaker Pro Tempore in the Senate Jeremy Moss and House Speaker Joe Tate.

Gilchrist, Benson and Nessel have signed bills in the past under the title of “acting governor” while Whitmer was out of state.

But each of those five successors and Whitmer have been present at Michigan Democratic delegation breakfasts at the Hilton Chicago, with the delegation at the United Center and at other events throughout the Windy City this week.

Whitmer in 2019 also appointed five individuals to succeed her in the event of an emergency in which no one in the line of elected officials is able to perform the duties of the office. But those individuals are meant to be called on in the event of a disaster. Those individuals are State Treasurer Rachel Eubanks, former Lt. Gov. John D. Cherry, Wayne County Executive Warren Evans, businessman Gary Torgow and U.S. Debbie Stabenow.

Advertisement

Evans and Stabenow also are in Chicago.

Whitmer, when asked if Eubanks was intended to be acting governor during the Democratic National Convention, said she was not.

State Rep. Bryan Posthumus, R-Cannon Township, called the governor and her successors’ absence a “constitutional crisis” and reflective of the Democratic legislative majorities’ infrequent session days this year. The Senate and House — which has struggled to pass legislation with its slim 56-54 majority — have met sparingly throughout 2024 and are not scheduled to come back into session until September.

“There are really critical things at stake now in Michigan,” Posthumus said. “The Supreme Court just put down a ruling that could decimate the entire service industry.”

Posthumus was referring to a recent Michigan Supreme Court decision that overturned a Republican-led effort to curb minimum wage and paid sick leave laws. The decision has left restaurants and businesses in a panic amid the threat of sudden increase to minimum wage, the elimination of the tipped wage and the implementation of mandatory paid sick leave rules.

Advertisement

More: Whitmer supports independent review of police, emergency response to Oxford shooting

More: Michigan’s importance in presidential race in focus at Democratic convention

Attorney Steven Liedel, who served as chief legal counsel for former Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm and the Whitmer transition team, rejected the idea that the situation was unconstitutional. The constitutional language governing the line of succession activates those individuals if or when there is a power or duty that needs to exercised, Liedel said.

“There’s nothing that says someone needs to be vested at all times,” Liedel said.

And, as a practical matter, “she’s in Chicago,” Liedel said. “All she has to do is take a plane, a car, a bus or train and the moment she crosses into Michigan, she can exercise any of the powers of governor.”

Advertisement

Liedel also questioned whether the role of the five individuals named in 2019 was only activated upon a disaster. There’s no precedent on the matter, he said, and it’s never been interpreted by an attorney general or court.

Attorney Mark Brewer, a longtime election lawyer and former chairman for the Michigan Democratic Party, said the concerns from Republicans were “silly” and somewhat ironic. It is likely, Brewer said, that Republicans found themselves in similar situations when they controlled the state’s six highest elected offices.

“That’s just a silly, hypocritical argument by the Republicans,” Brewer said. “They were in the same boat at one time.”

eleblanc@detroitnews.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending