Connect with us

Michigan

Michigan man mourns

Published

on

Michigan man mourns


(CBS DETROIT) – “Surreal.”

That’s how Kenneth Vrana describes the last few days awaiting word about the fate of his friend Paul-Henri Nargeolet aboard the Titan submersible.

The Benton Harbor native, who now lives in the Upper Peninsula, where he runs Maritime Consulting, had gotten word early that the Titan had likely imploded on its voyage to explore the wreck of the Titanic. But not knowing for certain was tough. 

“The worst thing I wanted to imagine was being adrift,” Vrana said. 

Advertisement

That would mean the inhabitants would know they were running out of air.

“The first thing that came to mind was a potential hull breach simply because I knew that it was an experimental design,” Vrana said. “That’s always in the back of your mind, and I’m sure it was in the back of PH’s.”

Vrana has made a career out of underwater exploration and tourism, co-directing the Titanic Mapping Project in 2015. He met the man he calls “PH” over two decades ago when they worked together on an exploration of the Titanic in 2000. 

Vrana said that he and Nargeolet had initial concerns about the Titan

When OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush proposed the design and development of his new generation of submersibles, “there were obvious questions and concerns that both PH and I shared on the design and materials being used. From my understanding, this is the first time carbon fiber has been incorporated into a pressure chamber to be used in deep water exploration.”

Advertisement

Still, Vrana said, when he spoke to Nargeolet two weeks before the Titan set off, he did not express any further concerns. 

“There’s going to be lots of debate by all kinds of experts, especially marine engineers, naval architects and explorers about why this experimental design was even allowed.”

And that’s not the only debate. 

“Were the passengers victims?  That’s a critical question,” said Vrana. “Or were they aware of the risks and in a position and willing to take the chance and be one of the few people that actually saw the Titanic?”

Vrana said the passengers were aware of the risks.

Advertisement

“I probably would have taken the trip if I was there,” he said. 

And yet, Vrana said, he has never taken the trip to see the Titanic. He was the scientist, Vrana said, and Nargeolet was the explorer. 

“There are certain personalities that love exploration of the unknown, and PH loved that,” he said. That was his passion.”

Vrana said that the accident will be a wake-up call that we need to place more attention on ocean exploration and research.  

“The oceans cover almost 75% of the world’s surface area, and we have not surveyed most of it to the levels we have surveyed the moon,” he said. 

Advertisement

Vrana said that despite the Titan implosion, he believes the tragedy will spur another generation to explore.  

“There are still incredible mysteries to still be unlocked … there have been an incredible number of vessels lost through time and in the Great Lakes, Native American also,” he said. 

But Vrana said that will also mean more tragedies.  

“We can be sure that there will be more incidents like this as technology increases, especially robotics and AI,” he said. 

As for the man Vrana called a “dear friend” and colleague, he said, “I’m still frankly processing everything that has happened here and what it means – the dreams of future projects that PH and others like myself had continued to believe in.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Michigan

Ohio State’s Ryan Day: Losing to Michigan ‘one of the worst things that’s happened to me’

Published

on

Ohio State’s Ryan Day: Losing to Michigan ‘one of the worst things that’s happened to me’


Ryan Day has felt a large sting in each of Ohio State’s losses to Michigan in the past three seasons. He’s hoping to change that when the two hated rivals play on Saturday (noon ET on FOX and the FOX Sports app).

The Ohio State head coach admitted that his team’s three straight losses to Michigan were one of the toughest moments of his life and only topped by the loss of a loved one. 

Advertisement

“We felt what it’s like to not win this game, and it’s bad. It’s one of the worst things that’s happened to me in my life, quite honestly,” Day said in an interview on WBNS’ “Game Time with Ryan Day.” “Other than losing my father and a few other things, like it’s quite honestly, for my family, the worst thing that’s happened. So we can never have that happen again, ever. And that’s been the approach all season.”

While Day has been one of college football’s winningest coaches since he was promoted by Ohio State in 2019 (66-9), his inability to win in the majority of the Buckeyes’ biggest games has led to scrutiny. Day is 1-3 against Michigan, with his only win coming in 2019 (the two teams did not play in the COVID-shortened 2020 season).

Entering Saturday’s game, Ohio State holds a clear edge over Michigan. The Buckeyes are 10-1 and Day has notched two top-five victories in November, improving his record against top-five opponents to 4-6. The Wolverines, meanwhile, have struggled offensively in their first season under Sherrone Moore, causing them to enter The Game with a 6-5 record.

Even though Ohio State seems to be on a playoff track regardless of what happens Saturday, it still seems imperative for Day to beat Michigan. Ohio State hasn’t lost four straight games to Michigan since its 0-5-1 stretch from 1988-93. 

When you consider that Day’s predecessor, Urban Meyer, won all seven of his matchups against Michigan, he understands the pressure the rivalry brings, saying it’s “not just a game — it’s our life.”

Advertisement

“We know what this game means and certainly I know what this game means. And there’s a lot of people counting on this game,” Day said. “This is our identity. It’s who we are. We don’t have anything else. So it’s a big responsibility. And the last couple of years, when it doesn’t get done, it just eats at your core. And so it just motivates you every single day to come back, to get this done, to stand on the field and sing the (alma mater) Carmen Ohio after winning this game.”

Ohio State takes care of business & Is Indiana a playoff team?

Ohio State’s shortcomings against Michigan in each of the last three seasons could have arguably been the difference between it winning and losing a national championship. The Buckeyes were left out of the College Football Playoff in the 2021 and 2023 seasons due to their loss to the Wolverines. Ohio State was included in the four-team field in 2022, but as the No. 4 seed had to face defending champion Georgia in the semifinal rather than the title game. The Buckeyes lost that playoff game when they missed a potential game-winning field goal as time expired.

Ohio State came close to beating Michigan last season but fell 30-24 in Ann Arbor to the eventual national champs. After the 2023 loss, the vast majority of its draft-eligible players returned for another season, including wide receiver Emeka Egbuka and defensive linemen Jack Sawyer and JT Tuimoloau. Day is hoping that Saturday will mark the day that this senior class will get over the hump and get its first win over Michigan.

“It’s not about me … it’s about these seniors who decided to come back,” Day said. “They’re the ones that are on the field. They’re the true warriors that go put it on the line every game. And they came back for a reason: It’s to win this game. And they’ve made that very clear. So, you know, while we’re all involved in it and I appreciate what they said, this is about these players.”

[Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily.]

Advertisement


Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more




Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan steps back from developing 1,400-acre rural megasite

Published

on

Michigan steps back from developing 1,400-acre rural megasite


Michigan is no longer pursuing a plan to turn farmland into an industrial site after facing community pushback on developing the controversial megasite.

The Michigan Economic Development Corp. and the Lansing Area Economic Partnership, LEAP, put together a 1,400-acre megasite in Eagle Township to attract a largescale, job-creating investment.

But after the state disbursed nearly $6 million to the project, it’s been halted.

“We continue to believe the site could have great potential given its proximity to infrastructure, workforce and other adjacent industrial uses,” said Otie McKinley, a spokesperson for the Michigan Economic Development Corp. “We also recognize that this is not the right time to pursue additional development on the site.”

Advertisement

‘At what cost?’ Michigan communities fight mega sites despite promise of jobs

The Eagle Township megasite, also known as the Michigan Manufacturing Innovation Campus, was one of four megasites the state started assembling two years ago as a part of its strategy to land major billion-dollar investments.

Named for their size, each “build-ready” megasite is at least 1,000 acres.

Others are located in Mundy Township near Flint, Shiawassee County and Marshall, where Ford Motor Co. is building a $2.5 billion electric vehicle battery plant.

The Michigan Strategic Fund earmarked $75 million two years ago to make these megasites “build ready” with infrastructure upgrades and real estate acquisition.

Advertisement

For the Eagle Township property, the state distributed $5.95 million to LEAP for site prep. LEAP did not respond to questions about how the funding was spent.

A former map of the Michigan Manufacturing Innovation Campus, a 1,400-acre megasite located in Eagle Township. (Photo provided by the Lansing Area Economic Partnership)

LEAP says there was a “sense of urgency” because of Michigan’s need for “sites of that magnitude to pursue important semiconductor and EV-related industry investment projects to reshore US manufacturing and technology jobs.”

It took six months of “confidential real estate assembly” to put together the Eagle Township megasite, according to LEAP. This included farmland donated to Michigan State University by late farmer David Morris and private properties under a three-year option agreement.

LEAP has since allowed the real estate options to expire after “the local municipality leaders and neighbor sentiment turned from initial unanimous support into significant opposition.”

Advertisement

“We took the further step of offering early termination to all affected property owners in recent weeks,” LEAP said in a statement.

Michigan assembling 1,000-acre ‘mega sites’ to attract big investments

This decision comes after the project faced significant backlash from community members who objected to the large swath of rural land becoming a major industrial site.

Opposition gained momentum over the past two years through a 3,200-member Facebook group called “Stop the Mega Site, Eagle MI.” Red signs proclaiming “No Eagle Megasite” have also dotted the rural community located about 15 miles west of Lansing.

Eagle Township Supervisor and local farmer Troy Stroud, 54, says he’s cautiously optimistic about the news.

Advertisement

“We’re not all farmers in Eagle, but it’s a very strong part of how we identify and what we enjoy about where we live,” he said. “It’s what matters to us, and you have to fight for what matters to you.”

Eagle Township

Michigan is no longer marketing a 1,400 megasite in Eagle Township for future industrial development. (Photo by Rose White | MLive)Rose White | MLive

A key sticking point for opponents was that Morris, a former Eagle Township supervisor and longtime farmer, donated his centennial family farm to Michigan State University with the stipulation it must remain farmland until 2031. MSU previously said the agreement would extend to any future owner, but the university was sued last year for allegedly redacting too much information about the deal.

Stroud says a “lack of transparency” was another major issue after former township supervisor Patti Schafer signed non-disclosure agreements about the project.

“We just wanted some transparency around what it was,” he said. “It just became this quest of wanting to know the knowledge, the details, what was really happening.”

State approves $250M grant for new Genesee County megasite

Advertisement

This led to Schafer, Township Treasurer Kathy Oberg and Trustee Richard Jones facing recall efforts over the NDAs. Schafer lost her seat to Stroud while Oberg and Jones both resigned last November.

Secrecy around economic development has also been contentious in Lansing where lawmakers have signed confidentiality agreements tied to big deals.

It remains unclear what the future holds for the Eagle Township megasite.

Both LEAP and the Michigan Economic Development Corp. said it is not currently being marketed for development. A website for the Michigan Manufacturing Innovation Campus is now password protected. And the “primary economic opportunity” LEAP was trying to land chose another location outside the region.

Additionally, Eagle Township adopted a 220-page master plan in September that reflects residents’ will “to maintain the cherished natural and rural charm of the community.” It also updated its zoning rules around industrial sites.

Advertisement

“The future of a site in Eagle Township remains in the hands of the community,” McKinley said. “We are always open to any future engagement should their vision or plans for development on that site change from what they are today.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan State’s leading rusher a familiar name for Rutgers football fans

Published

on

Michigan State’s leading rusher a familiar name for Rutgers football fans


play

PISCATAWAY – It’s been a long college football journey for Michigan State’s leading rusher, but it’s one that started five years ago with Rutgers football.

Running back Kay’ron Lynch-Adams spent the 2019 and 2020 seasons with the Scarlet Knights before transferring to UMass, but now he’s with the Spartans and a player Rutgers’ defense will need to limit Saturday (3:30 p.m., FS1) at Spartan Stadium in East Lansing.

Advertisement

The 5-foot-10, 215-pound Ohio native returned to the Power 4 level with the Spartans as a sixth-year graduate transfer, and through 11 games has a team-leading 580 yards rushing on 124 carries (4.7 yards per attempt) with two touchdowns.

Lynch-Adams’ production isn’t surprising to Rutgers coach Greg Schiano, who on Monday said he believed Lynch-Adams had this type of potential.

“I was disappointed when he left. I liked the young man, and I also really liked the football player,” Schiano said. “And I can remember exactly where I was when he called me to tell me he was leaving. I was truly disappointed, and really tried to keep him.”

Lynch-Adams played in nine games for Rutgers in 2019, finishing with 161 rushing yards on 48 carries. Then in 2020, he ran for 159 yards and one touchdown on 35 carries in the pandemic-shortened nine-game season.

Advertisement

The problem for Lynch-Adams was that there was a stellar running back atop the depth chart – now two-time Super Bowl champion Isiah Pacheco of the Kansas City Chiefs.

While Schiano didn’t want Lynch-Adams to leave, he couldn’t blame him either.

“I understood why,” Schiano said. “You know, you had this guy by the name of Pacheco in front of him, and he’s a pretty good player, too.”

Lynch-Adams was productive at UMass – last season he rushed for 1,157 yards on 236 carries with 12 touchdowns.

Advertisement

“It’s not like I have stayed in touch with him but I have a little bit,” Schiano said. “I really respect him. He’s a hard-working kid. He’s a really tough football player and I love the way he played. I loved what he did. He was a team guy. I was disappointed when we lost him, and I’m not surprised that he’s having success.”

Lynch-Adams will be the latest challenge for Rutgers’ run defense, which has been up and down this season. He splits carries with Nate Carter, who’s rushed for 452 yards and four touchdowns this season.

The Scarlet Knights are hoping to pick up a seventh regular-season victory, something they haven’t done since 2014.

Limiting Lynch-Adams will be a key to making that happen.

“He’s someone that we have to stop now for sure,” Schiano said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending