Connect with us

Michigan

Indiana football quarterback Kurtis Rourke on thumb injury: ‘I feel back to 100%’

Published

on

Indiana football quarterback Kurtis Rourke on thumb injury: ‘I feel back to 100%’


BLOOMINGTON — The only evidence of Indiana football quarterback Kurtis Rourke’s thumb injury was a bit of tape. 

He ditched the splint and glove he wore against Michigan State in IU’s 20-15 win over Michigan on Saturday at Memorial Stadium.

Rourke underwent surgery on his throwing hand two weeks ago after breaking a bone in his right thumb. He made a quick recovery for the No. 8 Hoosiers (10-0; 7-0 Big Ten), but protected the thumb in his return to the lineup against MSU. 

Advertisement

He didn’t wear anything on his throwing hand while preparing for the Wolverines. He felt some mild discomfort at the end of a full week of practice, but the rest he got during an off day on Friday had him feeling “100 percent.”

“I had no issues going into today,” Rourke said, after the game.

Indiana QB Kurtis Rourke and offense ‘near perfect’ in first half 

Indiana looked like it was going to cruise to another double-digit victory on Saturday when it jumped out to a 17-3 lead with Rourke going 14 of 18 for 190 yards with two touchdowns. 

Advertisement

“We were going against a really good defense, that first half we had to be near perfect,” Rourke said. “Made some good reads, big catches and big runs.”

With Michigan starter corner Will Johnson sidelined with an injury, Indiana leaned on the deep ball starting with Rourke’s 26-yard gain in the first quarter to Ke’Shawn Williams along the sideline to get into the red zone.

The Ohio transfer had the tiniest of windows to deliver the ball and Williams made a great individual effort by getting his feet down inbounds after making the leaping two-handed grab.

Rourke throwing a back-shoulder throw to Omar Cooper Jr. for a touchdown two plays later to give Indiana a 7-3 lead.

Advertisement

He extended that advantage with a 36-yard touchdown pass to Elijah Sarratt with 12:10 to go in the second quarter. Rourke didn’t flinch with Michigan’s All-American defensive tackle Mason Graham bearing down on him in the pocket and delivered one of his prettiest throws of the season to Sarratt on a pass that traveled more than 45 yards in the air. 

Rourke closed out the half 3 of 4 on passes of 20-yards or more. 

Indiana’s offense shows ‘good resolve’ despite struggles 

The consensus after the game was that IU’s offense was just out of sync in the second half. 

Advertisement

Michigan didn’t make any wholesale changes at halftime and didn’t do anything the Hoosiers hadn’t seen on film, but nothing seemed to work.

“For a while there, we had a hard time gaining three yards on offense.” Cignetti said.

On IU’s first offensive snap of the second half, Rourke threw the ball right into the hands of Michigan defensive back Zeke Berry at his own 7-yard line. It was only his fourth interception of the season, but the turnover acted as a wake up call for the Wolverines. 

They forced three straight punts after that. 

“The interception was a bad way to start, and then we had some protection issues, and then we had some opportunities, plays that we normally make, maybe a one-on-one go ball or back-shoulder throw, we fake the bubble and Sarratt down the sideline just can’t quite connect,” Cignetti said. “We had a number of those. And then the sacks. We couldn’t get anything going in the run game. It just wasn’t happening.”

Advertisement

Indiana finished with 10 total yards of offense in the second half and were held to less than 250 yards for the first time since visiting Ann Arbor last year, but no one panicked. 

“I thought we did a really good job,” Cignetti said. “The offense is used to clicking and scoring a lot of points. I thought everybody had good resolve. We stepped up as a team and found a different way to win.”

The offense managed some critical first downs with the game on the line. 

Rourke connected with Williams again late in the second half to put IU in field goal range — Nicolas Radicic hit a 41-yarder with 2:34 to go — and he ran the ball for a first down in the final minutes to prevent Michigan from getting the ball back. 

“These are games that really test you as a team,” Rourke said. “We knew eventually we’d come to a game that it would be close and we’d have to see what we are made of. Really proud of how we handled it.”

Advertisement

Michael Niziolek is the Indiana beat reporter for The Bloomington Herald-Times. You can follow him on X @michaelniziolek and read all his coverage by clicking here.





Source link

Michigan

Bills to end concealed carry permit requirement introduced in Michigan House

Published

on

Bills to end concealed carry permit requirement introduced in Michigan House


A group of Republicans in the Michigan House say Michiganders’ second amendment rights are being infringed, as they introduce legislation to end requirements for concealed carry permits.

Right now, Michiganders must obtain a permit to carry a concealed gun, with a base fee of $100.

As part of the process, applicants must also receive training.

“The first thing they do is put you in a classroom, make sure you know all proper range and safety procedures, run you over what the law states about when and if you’re allowed to use your firearm,” Jonathan Hold, president of the Michigan chapter of Giffords Gun Owners for Safety and a firearms instructor, said. “It gives a really good grounding.”

Advertisement

Applicants must demonstrate four hours of range time as well.

The group of House Republicans feel this is an undue burden, noting many gun owners are already knowledgeable.

They also believe the current five-year felony for carrying without a permit is too steep.

“For the government of the state of Michigan to tell that that we have to be qualified under the guise of their rules in order to protect ourselves is a far cry from what the constitution provides for us,” Rep. Jay DeBoyer, (R- Clay) said.

The package of bills wouldn’t abolish permits, as they are necessary to take guns outside of the state, but it would institute what’s called “constitutional carry.”

Advertisement

That means Michiganders can carry a gun on them without a permit.

Twenty-nine other states already adopted such policies.

“When we exercise other first amendment rights like our right to speak, we do not have to get a permit or permission from the government to speak,” Rep. Jim DeSana (R- Carleton) said. “When we exercise our right to worship, we do not have to go get a permit or permission to go worship.”

Supporters say concealed guns are important for self-defense, and can also help stop crime.

“It’s going to encourage and increase safety for all,” Rep. Joseph Fox (R- Fremont) said. “It’s about protecting everybody because if there are guns in this situation, and people are worried for their lives, they’re gonna stay back away from evil and making bad choices.”

Advertisement

Gun control advocates like Gold, however, say it’s “ridiculous” not to have guardrails.

“We’re talking about the power of life and death at a distance,” Gold said. “To send an untrained user out into the world with a firearm is a mistake.”

He also takes issue with the constitution argument.

“The constitution says as part of a well regulated militia, if you read the second amendment, and we don’t have well regulated militias in this country,” Gold said. “At the very least, what we should have are trained firearms users.”

A similar effort to end concealed carry permits failed to gain traction last year in the Michigan Senate, and with the landscape unchanged, the bills likely have an uphill battle to become law.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Werewolf, trout ruled in ’24. What will be next ‘I voted’ sticker

Published

on

Werewolf, trout ruled in ’24. What will be next ‘I voted’ sticker


play

The rewarding feeling of wearing an “I Voted” sticker after turning in your ballot is something everyone can relate to.

Michigan voters can take it one step farther and vote on the design for the Election Day tradition.

Advertisement

The Michigan Department of State announced on March 3 the return of the highly competitive “I Voted” sticker contest in preparation for the state’s general election on Tuesday, Nov. 3.

“Our first-ever ‘I Voted’ sticker design contest in 2024 was a massive success,” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said in a March 3 release. “This year we look forward to seeing the creative ways Michiganders of all ages celebrate democracy. Submit your entry to help us continue the tradition and get voters excited to cast their ballot this fall.”

Designs are being accepted online via the Secretary of State’s “I Voted” webpage: Michigan.gov/IVotedSticker. On the page, participants may print or download the official entry form.

Design and entry rules, the sticker template, and tips and suggestions are included on the official entry form.

Advertisement

There are three categories — elementary/middle school (grades K-8), high school (grades 9-12) and Michigan residents of all ages. Designs are due at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 1.

Once submissions are closed, the public may vote for finalists online in June. Winners will be announced and celebrated later in the summer. Winning stickers will be dispersed to local election clerks for the November Election.

In 2024, there were more than 480 submissions, and more than 57,700 voters selected the nine winners, according to the release. Before the contest opened up for a public vote, the Michigan Collegiate Student Advisory Task Force members narrowed the submissions down to 25 semifinalists. 

Advertisement

Here’s the 2024 winners and rules for the 2026 participants:

What did the winning 2024 ‘I Voted’ sticker designs look like?

Want to enter a design? Here are the ‘I Voted’ sticker contest rules

According to the Secretary of State, here’s what to keep in mind for your sticker:

  • Designs must be completed using official entry form.
  • Designs must include the phrase “I voted” AND be nonpartisan in nature.
  • Artwork must be original, non-AI generated, and not contain copyrighted or trademarked designs.
  • Entries can be created using your preferred method (digital, paint, crayon, mixed media, etc.)
  • Provide as high quality of resolution as possible when submitting your design.
  • There are three categories — elementary/middle school (grades K-8), high school (grades 9-12) and Michigan residents of all ages. You may enter one design in one category.
  • Designs are due at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 1.

Contact Sarah Moore @ smoore@lsj.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

2 Smoothie King employees fired for refusing to serve customer in Trump hoodie

Published

on

2 Smoothie King employees fired for refusing to serve customer in Trump hoodie


Two employees who refused to serve a man and his wife because he was wearing a hoodie with President Trump’s name on it were fired after a video of the heated encounter went viral.

Erika Lindemyer and her husband, Jake, were forced out of a Smoothie King franchise location in Ann Arbor, Michigan, following a fiery clash with two young female workers on Sunday.

Jake and Erika Lindemyer were denied service at a Smoothie King location in Michigan on Sunday. Leftism/X

The employees claimed they didn’t “feel comfortable” serving the couple because of Jake’s pro-Trump hoodie, as captured by Erika in a viral video.

Jake and Erika fired back at the pair and insisted that they were being “discriminated” against based on their “political views.”

Advertisement
Both of the employees told them to leave. Leftism/X

“We were just wanting a smoothie and you literally looked at us and I asked you if everything was OK and you said ‘We don’t feel comfortable serving you’ because of my husband’s hoodie. That is discrimination,” Erika spat.

“Okay, well, have a great day,” the first employee said.

“That is illegal,” Erika tried to insist again.

“I said Trump discriminates [against] us,” another employee chimed in.

“Okay, well that has nothing to do with us getting a smoothie!” Erika guffawed.

Advertisement
Erika and Jake claimed they were being discriminated against. Leftism/X

“OK, well that’s who you support though, that’s who you love,” the first employee chided.

“What’s embarrassing is that we’re American citizens and I wanted to get a smoothie,” Erika huffed.

The second employee noted that they “have a right to refuse service” and directed the couple to the exit.

“You asked a question and [the other employee] gave you an answer. Have a great day. Have a great day. The door’s right there,” the second worker said.

The employees said they were “uncomfortable” serving the couple because Jake was wearing a piece of
Trump merchandise. Leftism/X

Erika threatened to call the police while storming out, but it’s unclear if she did.

Advertisement

In a separate video shared Monday, one of the workers joked that she might’ve “accidentally started a race war” and called on the public to help remove Erika’s video.

“I am a minor and she recorded me without my permission. The people in the comments are all white and they’re all being hella racist, guys, please help me get this video taken down,” she implored.

Smoothie King confirmed that the girls involved in the viral confrontation “are no longer with the business” as of Monday.

The girl posted her own video joking she might’ve “accidentally started a race war.” Leftism/X

“As a brand, Smoothie King is committed to ensuring our stores are a place free of discrimination of any kind, where every guest and team member is treated with care and respect,” the company wrote on X.

The owner of the Ann Arbor franchise location will also enforce “mandatory retraining for all employees that outlines our guest experience standards.”

Advertisement

In early December, a woman who worked at a Target in California was berated by a customer for wearing a Charlie Kirk “Freedom” T-shirt.

When the employee insisted she was allowed to wear the red shirt, the irate customer accused her of supporting “a racist.”

The medical center where the agitated customer worked was bombarded with upwards of 6,000 “profanity-laced” phone calls after online sleuths doxxed her personal information.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending