Connect with us

Michigan

Group Seeks to Block Abortion Vote in Michigan, Citing Typography

Published

on

Group Seeks to Block Abortion Vote in Michigan, Citing Typography


Conservative teams in Michigan filed challenges this week to efforts to place two constitutional amendments on the poll in November, one that may assure abortion rights and the opposite that may develop voting entry.

The problem to the abortion modification was primarily based on a scarcity of spacing between phrases, which gave some phrases the looks of operating collectively. They characterised the typographical errors as “gibberish,” and “incomprehensible argle-bargle.”

One group argued that the Michigan Board of State Canvassers ought to reject the petition to place that modification to voters, whereas a second group took difficulty with the voting petition, saying it did not determine each present constitutional provision the modification would override.

Supporters of the petition for the Michigan abortion modification mentioned they’d submitted greater than 730,000 signatures, surpassing the roughly 425,000 required, although the board of canvassers must confirm them.

Advertisement

Darci McConnell, a spokeswoman for Reproductive Freedom for All, the group selling the abortion modification, mentioned that the group was “assured that we’re in compliance with all authorized necessities for poll proposals” and that lots of of 1000’s of voters had “learn, understood and signed the petition in assist of reproductive freedom for all.”

The petition consists of the textual content of the proposed modification, which might guarantee abortion rights broadly till fetal viability and in circumstances the place “the life or bodily or psychological well being of the pregnant particular person” was in peril after viability. On some strains, the textual content is squeezed tightly. In a 152-page problem, Residents to Help MI Girls and Youngsters, a bunch that opposes the modification, argued that the dearth of spacing was unacceptable.

For example, in a piece that reads, “Each particular person has a basic proper to reproductive freedom, which entails the appropriate to make and effectuate choices about all issues regarding being pregnant,” the challengers mentioned the formatting created “nonexistent phrases” similar to “decisionsaboutallmattersrelatingtopregnancy.”

They described this and different examples as “nonsensical groupings of letters which are present in no dictionary and are incapable of getting any that means.”

“As a result of the petition fails to make use of precise phrases within the full textual content in its proposed modification, how can the individuals know what they’re voting for or towards?” it mentioned, including that even when the board of canvassers concluded that these have been merely typos, Michigan regulation didn’t permit supporters of the modification to repair such errors at this level within the course of.

Advertisement

Residents to Help MI Girls and Youngsters directed a request for remark to Genevieve Marnon, the legislative director for Proper to Lifetime of Michigan, an anti-abortion group. Ms. Marnon, who filed an affidavit in assist of the problem, mentioned that petitions have been “routinely disqualified for technical errors,” saying that state officers had rejected signatures on a 2019 anti-abortion proposal “for small tears within the petition and for return tackle stickers’ protecting a number of phrases of the ‘important parts’ of the petition.” (Signatures for that marketing campaign, which prolonged into 2020, have been additionally challenged on substantive grounds, together with claims that some have been duplicates.)

Ms. Marnon connected to her e mail a mocking word-search puzzle whose reply checklist consisted of phrases from the petition — all of them separated within the appropriate locations.

Reproductive Freedom for All will file a proper rebuttal by Tuesday, in accordance with Mark Brewer, a lawyer working with the group, who referred to as the grievance a “frivolous Hail Mary problem.” After that, he mentioned, nonpartisan employees within the Michigan secretary of state’s workplace will make a suggestion to the board of canvassers on whether or not the problem ought to be upheld.

If the board of canvassers — two Democrats and two Republicans — deadlocks at its assembly on Aug. 31, the subsequent step would be the courts. Beneath the Michigan Structure, amendments for the November poll have to be finalized by Sept. 9.

The problem to the voting rights modification was filed on behalf of a bunch referred to as Defend Your Vote. The proposal it objected to would amend the Michigan Structure to, amongst different issues, require 9 days of early in-person voting and develop entry to absentee ballots. It will additionally bar any regulation or conduct that “has the intent or impact of denying, abridging, interfering with or unreasonably burdening the elemental proper to vote.”

Advertisement

Supporters mentioned they’d submitted about 670,000 signatures.

Of their problem, attorneys for Defend Your Vote argued that the modification petition didn’t specify all the present constitutional provisions it could modify.

One provision they mentioned was improperly omitted designates the “first Tuesday after the primary Monday of November” as Election Day. By mandating an early-voting interval, the challengers argued, the modification would render that provision “inoperative.”

Micheal Davis Jr., the manager director of Promote the Vote, the group supporting the voting modification, referred to as the grievance “bogus, baseless and meritless.”

The problem to the voting modification can be adjudicated via the identical course of because the problem to the abortion modification. A spokeswoman for Promote the Vote mentioned the group had not filed its formal rebuttal but.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Michigan

Michigan State’s leading rusher a familiar name for Rutgers football fans

Published

on

Michigan State’s leading rusher a familiar name for Rutgers football fans


play

PISCATAWAY – It’s been a long college football journey for Michigan State’s leading rusher, but it’s one that started five years ago with Rutgers football.

Running back Kay’ron Lynch-Adams spent the 2019 and 2020 seasons with the Scarlet Knights before transferring to UMass, but now he’s with the Spartans and a player Rutgers’ defense will need to limit Saturday (3:30 p.m., FS1) at Spartan Stadium in East Lansing.

Advertisement

The 5-foot-10, 215-pound Ohio native returned to the Power 4 level with the Spartans as a sixth-year graduate transfer, and through 11 games has a team-leading 580 yards rushing on 124 carries (4.7 yards per attempt) with two touchdowns.

Lynch-Adams’ production isn’t surprising to Rutgers coach Greg Schiano, who on Monday said he believed Lynch-Adams had this type of potential.

“I was disappointed when he left. I liked the young man, and I also really liked the football player,” Schiano said. “And I can remember exactly where I was when he called me to tell me he was leaving. I was truly disappointed, and really tried to keep him.”

Lynch-Adams played in nine games for Rutgers in 2019, finishing with 161 rushing yards on 48 carries. Then in 2020, he ran for 159 yards and one touchdown on 35 carries in the pandemic-shortened nine-game season.

Advertisement

The problem for Lynch-Adams was that there was a stellar running back atop the depth chart – now two-time Super Bowl champion Isiah Pacheco of the Kansas City Chiefs.

While Schiano didn’t want Lynch-Adams to leave, he couldn’t blame him either.

“I understood why,” Schiano said. “You know, you had this guy by the name of Pacheco in front of him, and he’s a pretty good player, too.”

Lynch-Adams was productive at UMass – last season he rushed for 1,157 yards on 236 carries with 12 touchdowns.

Advertisement

“It’s not like I have stayed in touch with him but I have a little bit,” Schiano said. “I really respect him. He’s a hard-working kid. He’s a really tough football player and I love the way he played. I loved what he did. He was a team guy. I was disappointed when we lost him, and I’m not surprised that he’s having success.”

Lynch-Adams will be the latest challenge for Rutgers’ run defense, which has been up and down this season. He splits carries with Nate Carter, who’s rushed for 452 yards and four touchdowns this season.

The Scarlet Knights are hoping to pick up a seventh regular-season victory, something they haven’t done since 2014.

Limiting Lynch-Adams will be a key to making that happen.

“He’s someone that we have to stop now for sure,” Schiano said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

What injury? Freshman leads Michigan State past Colorado in Maui Invitational opener

Published

on

What injury? Freshman leads Michigan State past Colorado in Maui Invitational opener


So much for Jase Richardson’s sprained left ankle.

Less than a week after rolling it late in a game and being helped off the court, he led Michigan State on it.

The freshman guard came off the bench to score a career-high 13 points as the Spartans rolled to a 72-56 win against Colorado on Monday in the opening around of the Maui Invitational at the Lahaina Civic Center.

In the first tournament setting of the season, Michigan State overcame another miserable shooting performance beyond the arc (2-for-21) with a deep rotation, explosive transition game and active defense.

Advertisement

The Spartans (5-1) will play their second of three games in three days on Tuesday (6 p.m., ESPN) in a semifinal against Memphis (5-0), which survived a late rally to knock off No. 2 UConn 99-97 in overtime earlier Monday. The other half of the bracket features No. 4 Auburn, No. 5 Iowa State, No. 12 North Carolina and Dayton, who are all playing later Monday night.

Richardson made six of eight field goals and was one of 10 different scorers for the Spartans, whose bench outscored the Buffaloes 40-13. Frankie Fidler scored nine, Jeremy Fears had eight and six assists and Coen Carr had eight points.

Julian Hammond led Colorado with a game-high 15 points while Elijah Malone scored 14.

Any concerns about Richardson’s mobility after suffering a sprained ankle late in last week’s 83-75 win against Samford were quickly erased. He checked in less than four minutes into the game and immediately got in the paint for a basket. Richardson shot 4-for-4 from the floor in the first half and Carr made all three of his shot attempts as the two combined for 14 of Michigan State’s 23 bench points in the opening 20 minutes.

That helped make up for the awful 3-point shooting that has plagued the Spartans so far this season. They entered Monday’s game ranked 352nd out of 355 teams in the nation from beyond the arc at just 22.1 percent and picked up where they left off. Michigan State shot 50 percent (15-for-30) from the floor in the opening half despite missing all nine 3-point attempts.

Advertisement

After the teams traded baskets and slim leads, the Spartans closed the half on a 17-4 run. Colorado went scoreless for more than five minutes and missed 10 straight shots at one point before going into halftime trailing 38-25.

Coming out of the locker room, the Buffaloes put together an 8-2 run with a pair of triples from Hammond but three quick turnovers prevented them from further shrinking the deficit. After Michigan State missed its first 14 triple tries, Richardson knocked one down a little more than six minutes into the second half to reestablish a double-digit advantage. The Spartans cruised down the stretch to secure a spot in the semifinals.



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

New bowl projections have Michigan in play at four different sites

Published

on

New bowl projections have Michigan in play at four different sites


Michigan clinched bowl eligibility by landing its sixth win of the season over the weekend, a 50-6 beat down of lowly Northwestern.

And while all eyes are on the rivalry game against Ohio State this Saturday (Noon, FOX), the postseason is fast approaching. In 13 days, the Wolverines will learn of their bowl draw. It won’t be a high-profile game like years past, but several intriguing sites remain a possibility for Sherrone Moore’s team.

The most popular pick this week is the Music City Bowl in Nashville, set for Dec. 30 at Nissan Stadium. It would mark Michigan’s first-ever appearance in the game and pit the Wolverines against an SEC school.

ESPN’s Mark Schlabach has Michigan playing Ole Miss in the Music City Bowl, CBS Sports’ Jerry Palm predicts a Michigan-Missouri matchup in Nashville, while USA Today’s Erick Smith projects the Wolverines to play Texas A&M. All three SEC schools have been in the playoff picture this year, setting the stage for an intriguing neutral-site game.

Advertisement

Three other national writers have Michigan playing in three different bowl games. ESPN’s Kyle Bonagura predicts a Michigan-Syracuse matchup in the Duke’s Mayo Bowl on Jan. 3 in Charlotte. The Action Network’s Brett McMurphy, whose track-record projecting bowl sites and matchups is among the best, has the Wolverines playing Pittsburgh in the Pinstripe Bowl on Dec. 28 at Yankee Stadium in New York. And in an interesting outlier, The Sporting News’ Bill Bender projects a Michigan-Texas A&M matchup in the Dec. 31 ReliaQuest Bowl in Tampa, Fla.

How the top of the Big Ten fares when it comes to the 12-team playoff matters here. Getting four teams in like some are projecting would help Michigan’s standing in the bowl selection process. But if one of those teams gets left out (looking at you, Indiana), it would almost certainly kill any chance of returning to Florida.

After the playoff bids are doled out, the Citrus Bowl has the first pick of the remaining bowl-eligible Big Ten teams, followed by the ReliaQuest Bowl (former Outback Bowl). An 8 or 9-win Illinois would likely be the next Big Ten team off the board, followed by a 7 or 8-win Iowa. After that, though, is anyone’s guess.

And what if Michigan pulls off the upset in Columbus and gets to seven wins? It could suddenly move the Wolverines up the pecking order and give the ReliaQuest Bowl a reason to pick them, provided that Indiana does make the playoff.

This week will help offer some clarity with the Big Ten standings. There’s also a possibility of college football having too many bowl eligible teams this year. And while that certainly won’t affect Michigan — its brand and following are too large to keep out, even at 6-6 — but could limit the number of secondary bowls available to the Big Ten.

Advertisement
  • BETTING: Check out our guide to the best Michigan sportsbooks, where our team of sports betting experts has reviewed the experience, payout speed, parlay options and quality of odds for multiple sportsbooks.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending