Replacing Jim Harbaugh was always going to be a next-to-impossible task for the University of Michigan.
Harbaugh has won at every coaching stop he’s been. He led Stanford to a AP Top 5 finish, the San Francisco 49ers to three straight NFC Championship Games and a Super Bowl appearances, and the Wolverines to an average of 10.5 wins per full season, three straight Big Ten titles and a national championship. Harbaugh is one of the very best coaches at any level of football, and you don’t just replace a guy like that.
Particularly, with a guy who’s never been a head coach before.
Even before Harbaugh ultimately made the decision to return to the NFL, I had serious misgivings over Michigan’s perceived plan to promote then-offensive coordinator Sherrone Moore from within the program to replace its star head coach. Fresh off a national championship, the Michigan job should have been one of the most coveted in the country (even with all the NCAA uncertainty surrounding the program). Was a first-time head coach really the best decision?
Advertisement
Junfu Han / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Some of those concerns were alleviated when I heard different national college football analysts like Joel Klatt proclaim their belief that Moore was the right fit for Michigan to continue what Harbaugh had built in Ann Arbor. Fast forward 10 games into Moore’s tenure as head coach, as the Wolverines’ fall to 5-5 with Saturday’s 20-15 loss to undefeated Indiana, all of those doubts and then some have returned over Michigan’s direction as a football program.
Yes, Michigan lost a ton of outstanding players to the NFL this offseason. Yes, Harbaugh gutted the Wolverines’ coaching staff, and his late decision to depart hamstrung Michigan’s ability to add talent out of the transfer portal, particularly at quarterback. With that understood, Moore and the staff he hired at Michigan have still underachieved with the talent they do have in Schembechler Hall.
Michigan’s defense played inspired in the second half against the No. 8 Hoosiers, shutting down Indiana’s high-powered offense with a dominant run defense, a relentless pass rush and strong coverage on the back end. But, that half has been the exception this season.
Defensive coordinator Wink Martindale may be the “O.G.” of the defensive system Mike Macdonald and Jesse Minter run to great success in Ann Arbor, but the two young bucks clearly surpassed their mentor (Martindale) in their abilities to stifle opposing offenses. More often than not, Martindale has made head-scratching decisions in how he’s used NFL-ready talent like Mason Graham and others. And Martindale has mostly come up short in adjusting to young personnel who aren’t ready to execute an NFL-style system.
Junfu Han / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
On the other side of the ball, offensive coordinator Kirk Campbell has been a dreadful play-caller throughout the year for the Wolverines. The quarterbacks coach has routinely stunted Michigan’s momentum with the Alex Orji packages, and/or has been inconceivably predictable and unwilling to break tendency while calling a game. Sure, not having a Power 4 level quarterback is limiting for any offensive coordinator, but Campbell has done nothing to make things easier for Davis Warren or Orji out there.
Advertisement
There’s one thing Moore and his staff have done very well this season — recruit. Michigan’s 2025 recruiting class ranks No. 11 in the country, and is a Top 10 haul based on average prospect rating. Moore has also found a way to unlock more of Michigan’s NIL potential, with boosters like Barstool Sports’ Dave Portnoy being willing to open their wallets in an attempt to flip five-star quarterback Bryce Underwood, among others.
Here’s the concern though: Even if Michigan flips Underwood from LSU, and/or lands a Top 10-caliber class in this cycle, can this staff be trusted to coach and develop that class to the level needed to compete for championships again?
Nothing Michigan’s staff has done this season suggests so.
Junfu Han / USA TODAY NETWORK
Defensive backs coach LaMar Morgan is a great example of this duality on U-M’s staff. Morgan has landed big win after big win on the recruiting trail since being hired by Moore, but Michigan’s secondary has been inconsistent at best, and totally lost at worst, on the field for much of this season.
Michigan has gone from one of the most sure-tackling teams in the country to one that routinely misses tackles, in some of the biggest moments especially. That falls on the entire defensive coaching staff, whether it be the techniques being taught or the way this staff has practiced it throughout the season.
Advertisement
While the Wolverines played hard, battled and had themselves in position to knock off a Top 10 team against Indiana on Saturday, the same coaching shortcomings reared their ugly heads again, and some new ones have emerged as well.
Campbell’s playcalling was dreadful, particularly in the red zone. Moore made several questionable decisions, like okaying a run on 3rd-and-7, cutting the down and distance in half, but then choosing to take a delay-of-game and punt rather than going for it in Indiana territory.
How about the decision to not give Kalel Mullings — Michigan’s most effective rusher — a carry until the second quarter. Moore told CBS’ Jenny Dell at halftime that the Wolverines were “going with the hot hand” in Donovan Edwards and Benjamin Hall, despite the fact that Hall had only seven carries this season prior to today. Was Moore just giving Dell coach-speak to cover up another reason for Mullings absence? One would certainly hope, because not much else about that decision or the reason given makes a whole lot of sense.
Finally, after Michigan’s tackling issue reared its ugly head again on Indiana’s last possession, Moore looked like a deer in headlights while letting 28 seconds tick off the clock before calling the first of Michigan’s three timeouts. Sure, the Wolverines were likely cooked by that point, facing a 2nd-and-2 and needing a stop for any hope of getting one more possession, but Moore’s indecision cost Michigan nearly a half-minute.
Throughout this entire season, Moore has looked like a young head coach who’s in way over his head leading one of the most prominent programs in college football. In one offseason, this program has regressed back to the spot it was in before Harbaugh led an instant turnaround in Ann Arbor. Moore was hired with the goal of continuity, but this looks far more like Brady Hoke or Rich Rodriguez’s Michigan program than it does Harbaugh’s.
What the Wolverines’ have been able to do on the recruiting trail has brought some excitement and hope for the future under Moore, but the overall downgrade in coaching between the previous regime and this current one undermines much of that optimism.
Look, Michigan isn’t going to fire Sherrone Moore after just one season as head coach. While I understand that reality, I also believe it’s never too soon to correct a mistake, and I’ve never felt more strongly that promoting Moore from within after Harbaugh’s departure was a mistake. In my opinion, a proven head coach who can bring in a fresh, modern offensive identity is needed badly. There’s little indication that a move like that will be made this offseason, but based on what we’ve seen in 2024, it feels like a change in direction will be necessary in two or three years.
Advertisement
– Enjoy more Michigan Wolverines coverage on Michigan Wolverines On SI –
For additional coverage of University of Michigan athletics:
As the Federal Reserve continues to cut interest rates amid a cooling job market, the economy is poised for moderate growth in Michigan and nationally over the next two years, according to University of Michigan economists.
The national economy is projected to grow 2.3% in the fourth quarter of 2024 with the unemployment rate averaging 4.2%, while growth may ease slightly in the near future due to a slowing labor market, the UM economists said in a U.S. Economic Outlook for 2025–2026.
Meanwhile, Michigan’s economy has slowed since spring, with heightened uncertainty due to the recent elections, the economists wrote in a Michigan Economic Outlook for 2025–2026. Both reports were written by Jacob T. Burton, Gabriel M. Ehrlich, Kyle W. Henson, Daniil Manaenkov, Niaoniao You and Yinuo Zhang.
“The U.S. economy has gone through times of great uncertainty before and emerged intact,” the economists wrote. “We are projecting that both Michigan and the nation will follow that path over the next two years.”
Advertisement
Job growth in Michigan is expected to decline in the second half of the year, but grow moderately in 2025 and 2026.
“We believe the election results have amplified the uncertainty surrounding Michigan’s economic outlook,” the economists wrote. “We project a small dip in Michigan’s job count in the back half of 2024 to give way to moderate job gains in 2025 and 2026, but the outlook depends critically on uncertain policy decisions and the subsequent market responses.”
The economists expect job growth in the state to be strongest in health care, leisure and hospitality and government, while sectors including manufacturing and professional services are expected to remain stable.
“We are projecting the state economy to return to growth over the next two years as easier monetary policy and another round of tax cuts boost medium-term growth,” the economists wrote. “Michigan adds 19,000 payroll jobs next year and an additional 26,700 in 2026. The unemployment rate in Michigan is projected to fall from 4.6% in late 2024 to 4.3% by the end of 2026.”
The Detroit, Grand Rapids and Ann Arbor metro areas showed a downward trend in job growth, with Detroit and Grand Rapids seeing 0.1% growth during the past year. Ann Arbor saw relatively stronger job growth of 1.3% as of September, according to the report. Metro-level data for October was not available for the report, officials said.
Advertisement
The report attributes the underlying cause of the slowdown in Michigan’s job market as the Federal Reserve’s policy of monetary tightening to control inflation.
“Although the Fed has recently pivoted toward reducing short-term interest rates, we believe that real interest rates remain at a restrictive level and that the effects of the Fed’s past tight monetary policy continue to impact Michigan’s economy,” the economists wrote. “Indeed, in many ways, the national rebalancing in the labor market is precisely what the Fed hoped to engineer with its policy actions. Unfortunately for Michigan, our relatively rate-sensitive industry mix means that higher interest rates have taken a larger economic toll than nationally.”
The Michigan outlook points to stronger personal income growth, with per capita income increasing to $64,000 in 2024 and reaching around $68,500 by 2026, up 41% from 2019.
Inflation is expected to slow to 3.3% in 2024 and 2.2% in 2025 before increasing to 2.7% in 2026 due to new tariffs that the incoming Trump administration is expected to impose.
The U.S. and Michigan economic outlook reports follow the presidential election, which economists say will result in significant changes in U.S. economic policies. In the reports, the economists shared their thoughts on about the impacts of a second Trump administration.
Advertisement
The recent election of Donald Trump as well as the Republican majorities in the U.S. Senate and House will likely to result in a continuation of tax cuts Trump enacted during his first term, the economists said. Also expected is a sharp rise in tariffs on imports from China to take effect by 2026.
While rising tariffs on Chinese imports and tax cuts for corporations and individuals are expected in upcoming years, revenue increases from tariffs are unlikely to offset revenue losses generated by tax cuts, according to the report. This could result in slower revenue growth and a sharp increase in federal deficits.
“As the stimulative effects of the expected tax cuts dominate the drag from the anticipated new tariffs, we project quarterly GDP growth to accelerate modestly during 2026, reaching a 2.5 percent annualized pace by 2026 Q4,” the economists wrote.
The report notes that the Federal Reserve has started cutting interest rates after keeping them at a 23-year high of 5.25% to 5.5% for 14 months. The rate was reduced by 50 basis points in September and 25 basis points in November, bringing it to 4.5% to 4.75%.
Additional cuts will depend on economic data, with the economists expecting another 25 basis point cut in December.
Advertisement
Looking ahead at next year, the economists say they expect the Fed to make four more 25-basis-point cuts in 2025 and reach a range of 3.25–3.5% by the end of the year.
“In our view, the temporary uptick of inflation related to tariffs will not prompt the Fed to tighten policy in 2026,” economists wrote. “We believe that risk management concerns related to the potential negative growth effects of tariffs, which played a role in the 2019 rate cuts, will balance the upside risks from new tax cuts, prompting the Fed to stand pat.”
KALAMAZOO, Mich. (AP) — Quandre Bullock scored 20 points off of the bench to lead South Dakota past Western Michigan 80-76 on Wednesday night.
Bullock also contributed three steals for the Coyotes (5-1). Paul Bruns scored 18 points, shooting 6 for 13 (3 for 8 from 3-point range) and 3 of 3 from the free-throw line. Cameron Fens had 16 points and shot 7 of 9 from the field and 2 for 4 from the foul line.
Advertisement
The Broncos (2-4) were led by Markhi Strickland, who posted 20 points and six rebounds. Western Michigan also got 13 points and six rebounds from Owen Lobsinger. Javaughn Hannah also recorded 12 points.
Bullock scored 12 points in the first half and South Dakota went into the break trailing 34-33. Bruns’ 18-point second half helped South Dakota close out the four-point victory.
___
The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.
With all the talk about running back carries in recent weeks, Michigan is planning to work another player into the rotation this week.
True freshman Micah Ka’apana could make his season debut for the Wolverines in their game Saturday against Northwestern (3:30 p.m., FS1), head coach Sherrone Moore said this week.
On Monday, Moore raved about Ka’apana’s “dynamic speed” and said Michigan has plans to “put it on display a little bit this week,” signaling plans to get the Hawaii native touches as the season winds down.
Under revised NCAA rules, football players can appear in up to four games without burning a redshirt. Ka’apana has not played this season; instead spending much of it on the scout team.
Advertisement
“He’ll be implemented into the game plan a little bit more this week,” Moore said on the “Inside Michigan Football” radio show. “Very shifty, great contact balance. He’s small but he isn’t little. The dude plays with power — he’s strong — but he’s super fast.”
More: Ben Hall views himself as Michigan’s next RB1, and wants more carries to prove it
The 5-foot-11, 190-pound Ka’apana is a former three-star recruit from Bishop Gorman High School in Las Vegas, where he put up big numbers during his final two seasons. The Hawaii native rushed for 723 yards and nine touchdowns as a senior, and topped 1,000 yards and 15 touchdowns as a junior in 2022, while also catching 11 passes for 192 yards and four touchdowns.
Michigan (5-5, 3-4 Big Ten) has spent the bulk of its disappointing season leaning on two backs, Kalel Mullings and Donovan Edwards. Redshirt freshman Benjamin Hall saw some playing time during the non-conference portion of the schedule, then got four carries in the loss to Indiana on Nov. 9.
Another true freshman, Jordan Marshall, has yet to receive a carry despite appearing in two games as a kick returner on special teams. Marshall will continue in that role this week, Moore said, while the Michigan staff takes a closer look at Ka’apana.
Advertisement
“He had a game in high school where he had five carries and five touchdowns,” Moore said. “So the dude is really, really dynamic. Really excited to see what he does with the ball in his hands.”
BETTING: Check out our guide to the best Michigan sportsbooks, where our team of sports betting experts has reviewed the experience, payout speed, parlay options and quality of odds for multiple sportsbooks.