Connect with us

Michigan

Census report: Immigration driving growth across Michigan; Metro Detroit rebounded in 2024

Published

on

Census report: Immigration driving growth across Michigan; Metro Detroit rebounded in 2024


Washington — Foreign immigration across the state buoyed Michigan’s best-in-decades population growth last year, according to federal data released Thursday.

In a year when the Michigan population increased by about 57,000 (or 0.6%), all but one of the state’s 83 counties saw increases in their number of foreign-born residents. The only one that did not — Arenac County— had zero net change in that metric.

The state also saw significant growth in Metro Detroit to eclipse losses from the previous year, continued growth in the Grand Rapids area and limited population decline in rural areas. Altogether, the data release presents a mostly positive report card for Michigan as it continues a concerted effort to grow its population by retaining residents, attracting new ones and stemming losses from deaths exceeding births.

“The news is good right now,” said Kurt Metzger, a demographer and director emeritus of Data Driven Detroit. But he urged officials at every level of government across the state to continue working on the issue.

Advertisement

“Yes, the population went up between ’23 and ’24. Wasn’t that wonderful? And we all benefited. But don’t get cocky, because it could go down tomorrow,” he said in a phone interview.

Previous Census data showed that Michigan’s population reached a historic high of 10.1 million in 2024, keeping Michigan as the 10th most populous state. The new county-level data shed light on more specific details of that growth and show that Michigan’s population trends were consistent with national ones.

“Increasingly, population growth in metro areas is being shaped by international migration,” said Kristie Wilder, a demographer in the Census Bureau’s Population Division. “While births continue to contribute to overall growth, rising net international migration is offsetting the ongoing net domestic outmigration we see in many of these areas.”

Metro Detroit’s Oakland, Wayne and Macomb counties — all of which have concentrated pockets of immigrant, largely Arab-American populations — accounted for three of the top four spots in total population growth from July 2023 to July 2024. Combined, those counties grew by more than 30,600 people.

Advertisement

Metzger pointed out that Wayne County, which grew by almost 8,700 people, had its first population gain since the early 1990s.

The new data release also reflects significant revisions to population estimates from past years, mostly due to the Census Bureau expanding how it measures immigration. The revisions were especially significant for Metro Detroit. Original estimates for Wayne County, for example, suggested a population loss of nearly 8,000 people between 2022 and 2023. That loss is now estimated at 640.

After Metro Detroit, Grand Rapids-area Kent and Ottawa counties were the next biggest hub for growth last year with a combined increase of more than 10,500 residents. Three other counties (Washtenaw, Ingham and Kalamazoo) had population jumps of more than 1,000.

Nat Zorach, who teaches at Michigan State University’s School of Planning, Design and Construction, said the growth for Kent, Washtenaw and Ingham counties could be an early sign of success for local zoning changes that encourage more new housing construction and conversion of single-family homes into multi-unit properties.

He noted that local governments in Grand Rapids (Kent), Ann Arbor (Washtenaw) and Lansing (Ingham) have all pursued zoning reforms in recent years.

Advertisement

In total, 55 counties saw population increases, 27 saw declines and one (Iosco) had net zero growth. Notably, no county lost more than 163 people. Zorach suggested that the relative steadiness of populations in more rural counties could be due to post-pandemic lifestyle trends.

“I think that there is an attractiveness to small-town life that is probably substantially driven by the fact that it’s cheap to live there,” he said in a phone interview. Zorach also noted that there has been a years-long trend of county populations centralizing in the area’s largest municipality.

“Tiny towns get smaller, but the county seat might grow in a small amount,” he said.

Metzger, however, warned that population watchers should not take too much from last year’s data. “There is a stabilization, but I would hesitate saying that this is a trend,” he said. “The rural areas have been able to hold on. I just worry about where they go next.”

He recalled speaking to a group of rural hospital administrators in Michigan several years ago about their institutions’ long-term viability. “I asked if they were part of any countywide or multi-county efforts around populations, and they were like deer in the headlights,” the demographer said.

Advertisement

The Growing Michigan Together Council, a group convened by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer that spent five months in 2023 strategizing on how to boost the state’s population, did not include many specific recommendations or plans for rural areas. The word “rural” appears three times in the 86-page report.

That report mostly focused on improving Michigan’s education system, encouraging business innovation and addressing housing and infrastructure deficiencies across the state. It also called immigration a “bright spot hidden in Michigan’s current population trend.”

While international immigration contributed to growth across Michigan last year, domestic population indicators were still negative — albeit less so than in past years.

Census data released in December showed that deaths, while decreasing from the previous year, still exceeded births in Michigan last year by 2,855. In total, 72 of Michigan’s 83 counties saw more births than deaths, according to the Census Bureau, or just shy of 88% of counties.

But there were some pockets of what demographers call natural growth, defined as births exceeding deaths.

Advertisement

Kent County had the strongest natural growth last year, followed by Wayne County. The largest natural decline was in Genesee County, home to Flint.

Across the state, net domestic migration losses fell by more than half from the previous year, dropping from -17,446 to -7,656. Net domestic migration refers to the number of people who left Michigan for another U.S. state minus the number of people who moved to Michigan from another state.

“That just shows the importance that immigration plays in Michigan’s future,” Metzger said.

gschwab@detroitnews.com

@GrantSchwab

Advertisement



Source link

Michigan

Bills to end concealed carry permit requirement introduced in Michigan House

Published

on

Bills to end concealed carry permit requirement introduced in Michigan House


A group of Republicans in the Michigan House say Michiganders’ second amendment rights are being infringed, as they introduce legislation to end requirements for concealed carry permits.

Right now, Michiganders must obtain a permit to carry a concealed gun, with a base fee of $100.

As part of the process, applicants must also receive training.

“The first thing they do is put you in a classroom, make sure you know all proper range and safety procedures, run you over what the law states about when and if you’re allowed to use your firearm,” Jonathan Hold, president of the Michigan chapter of Giffords Gun Owners for Safety and a firearms instructor, said. “It gives a really good grounding.”

Advertisement

Applicants must demonstrate four hours of range time as well.

The group of House Republicans feel this is an undue burden, noting many gun owners are already knowledgeable.

They also believe the current five-year felony for carrying without a permit is too steep.

“For the government of the state of Michigan to tell that that we have to be qualified under the guise of their rules in order to protect ourselves is a far cry from what the constitution provides for us,” Rep. Jay DeBoyer, (R- Clay) said.

The package of bills wouldn’t abolish permits, as they are necessary to take guns outside of the state, but it would institute what’s called “constitutional carry.”

Advertisement

That means Michiganders can carry a gun on them without a permit.

Twenty-nine other states already adopted such policies.

“When we exercise other first amendment rights like our right to speak, we do not have to get a permit or permission from the government to speak,” Rep. Jim DeSana (R- Carleton) said. “When we exercise our right to worship, we do not have to go get a permit or permission to go worship.”

Supporters say concealed guns are important for self-defense, and can also help stop crime.

“It’s going to encourage and increase safety for all,” Rep. Joseph Fox (R- Fremont) said. “It’s about protecting everybody because if there are guns in this situation, and people are worried for their lives, they’re gonna stay back away from evil and making bad choices.”

Advertisement

Gun control advocates like Gold, however, say it’s “ridiculous” not to have guardrails.

“We’re talking about the power of life and death at a distance,” Gold said. “To send an untrained user out into the world with a firearm is a mistake.”

He also takes issue with the constitution argument.

“The constitution says as part of a well regulated militia, if you read the second amendment, and we don’t have well regulated militias in this country,” Gold said. “At the very least, what we should have are trained firearms users.”

A similar effort to end concealed carry permits failed to gain traction last year in the Michigan Senate, and with the landscape unchanged, the bills likely have an uphill battle to become law.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Werewolf, trout ruled in ’24. What will be next ‘I voted’ sticker

Published

on

Werewolf, trout ruled in ’24. What will be next ‘I voted’ sticker


play

The rewarding feeling of wearing an “I Voted” sticker after turning in your ballot is something everyone can relate to.

Michigan voters can take it one step farther and vote on the design for the Election Day tradition.

Advertisement

The Michigan Department of State announced on March 3 the return of the highly competitive “I Voted” sticker contest in preparation for the state’s general election on Tuesday, Nov. 3.

“Our first-ever ‘I Voted’ sticker design contest in 2024 was a massive success,” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said in a March 3 release. “This year we look forward to seeing the creative ways Michiganders of all ages celebrate democracy. Submit your entry to help us continue the tradition and get voters excited to cast their ballot this fall.”

Designs are being accepted online via the Secretary of State’s “I Voted” webpage: Michigan.gov/IVotedSticker. On the page, participants may print or download the official entry form.

Design and entry rules, the sticker template, and tips and suggestions are included on the official entry form.

Advertisement

There are three categories — elementary/middle school (grades K-8), high school (grades 9-12) and Michigan residents of all ages. Designs are due at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 1.

Once submissions are closed, the public may vote for finalists online in June. Winners will be announced and celebrated later in the summer. Winning stickers will be dispersed to local election clerks for the November Election.

In 2024, there were more than 480 submissions, and more than 57,700 voters selected the nine winners, according to the release. Before the contest opened up for a public vote, the Michigan Collegiate Student Advisory Task Force members narrowed the submissions down to 25 semifinalists. 

Advertisement

Here’s the 2024 winners and rules for the 2026 participants:

What did the winning 2024 ‘I Voted’ sticker designs look like?

Want to enter a design? Here are the ‘I Voted’ sticker contest rules

According to the Secretary of State, here’s what to keep in mind for your sticker:

  • Designs must be completed using official entry form.
  • Designs must include the phrase “I voted” AND be nonpartisan in nature.
  • Artwork must be original, non-AI generated, and not contain copyrighted or trademarked designs.
  • Entries can be created using your preferred method (digital, paint, crayon, mixed media, etc.)
  • Provide as high quality of resolution as possible when submitting your design.
  • There are three categories — elementary/middle school (grades K-8), high school (grades 9-12) and Michigan residents of all ages. You may enter one design in one category.
  • Designs are due at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 1.

Contact Sarah Moore @ smoore@lsj.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

2 Smoothie King employees fired for refusing to serve customer in Trump hoodie

Published

on

2 Smoothie King employees fired for refusing to serve customer in Trump hoodie


Two employees who refused to serve a man and his wife because he was wearing a hoodie with President Trump’s name on it were fired after a video of the heated encounter went viral.

Erika Lindemyer and her husband, Jake, were forced out of a Smoothie King franchise location in Ann Arbor, Michigan, following a fiery clash with two young female workers on Sunday.

Jake and Erika Lindemyer were denied service at a Smoothie King location in Michigan on Sunday. Leftism/X

The employees claimed they didn’t “feel comfortable” serving the couple because of Jake’s pro-Trump hoodie, as captured by Erika in a viral video.

Jake and Erika fired back at the pair and insisted that they were being “discriminated” against based on their “political views.”

Advertisement
Both of the employees told them to leave. Leftism/X

“We were just wanting a smoothie and you literally looked at us and I asked you if everything was OK and you said ‘We don’t feel comfortable serving you’ because of my husband’s hoodie. That is discrimination,” Erika spat.

“Okay, well, have a great day,” the first employee said.

“That is illegal,” Erika tried to insist again.

“I said Trump discriminates [against] us,” another employee chimed in.

“Okay, well that has nothing to do with us getting a smoothie!” Erika guffawed.

Advertisement
Erika and Jake claimed they were being discriminated against. Leftism/X

“OK, well that’s who you support though, that’s who you love,” the first employee chided.

“What’s embarrassing is that we’re American citizens and I wanted to get a smoothie,” Erika huffed.

The second employee noted that they “have a right to refuse service” and directed the couple to the exit.

“You asked a question and [the other employee] gave you an answer. Have a great day. Have a great day. The door’s right there,” the second worker said.

The employees said they were “uncomfortable” serving the couple because Jake was wearing a piece of
Trump merchandise. Leftism/X

Erika threatened to call the police while storming out, but it’s unclear if she did.

Advertisement

In a separate video shared Monday, one of the workers joked that she might’ve “accidentally started a race war” and called on the public to help remove Erika’s video.

“I am a minor and she recorded me without my permission. The people in the comments are all white and they’re all being hella racist, guys, please help me get this video taken down,” she implored.

Smoothie King confirmed that the girls involved in the viral confrontation “are no longer with the business” as of Monday.

The girl posted her own video joking she might’ve “accidentally started a race war.” Leftism/X

“As a brand, Smoothie King is committed to ensuring our stores are a place free of discrimination of any kind, where every guest and team member is treated with care and respect,” the company wrote on X.

The owner of the Ann Arbor franchise location will also enforce “mandatory retraining for all employees that outlines our guest experience standards.”

Advertisement

In early December, a woman who worked at a Target in California was berated by a customer for wearing a Charlie Kirk “Freedom” T-shirt.

When the employee insisted she was allowed to wear the red shirt, the irate customer accused her of supporting “a racist.”

The medical center where the agitated customer worked was bombarded with upwards of 6,000 “profanity-laced” phone calls after online sleuths doxxed her personal information.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending