Connect with us

Kansas

Kansas’s Self-Inflicted Damage and First-Round March Madness Exit Sinks Program to New Low

Published

on

Kansas’s Self-Inflicted Damage and First-Round March Madness Exit Sinks Program to New Low


PROVIDENCE—The Kansas Jayhawks had rallied from 10 points down to a three-point lead with a 2-3 zone and a barrage of missed Arkansas Razorbacks shots. The Hogs had scored two points in a span of seven-plus minutes. A little over three minutes remained, and a miserable Kansas season was close to getting a smidge brighter.

Then KJ Adams tried to take off downcourt with a defensive rebound and suddenly went down, turning the ball over in the process. It looked bad in the moment, and it is—an Achilles injury that coach Bill Self said postgame could cause Adams “to lose a year.” 

What followed that injury was a complete collapse in a winnable game against a No. 10 seed—echoing a home loss to the Houston Cougars and a blown 20-point lead to the Baylor Bears and a brutal loss to the Utah Utes. Without Adams, Kansas turned the ball over on its next four possessions with a flurry of careless passes. By the time the Jayhawks finally got up another shot (which missed), they had gone from three up to four down. Final score: Arkansas 79, Kansas 72.

“We did a lot of the damage ourselves,” Self said, a statement that was true Thursday night and for the season as a whole.

Advertisement

More. SI March Madness. Men’s and Women’s NCAA Tournament News, Features and Analysis. dark

It began with the No. 1 ranking and ended with a first-round punch-out. The 2024–25 Kansas season was the cautionary tale of a team that got what it paid for in the portal era—the wrong guys. The Jayhawks spent a ton of money for a mismatched, un-clutch, underachieving roster that flailed all season offensively and couldn’t finish games. Their 13 losses were the most for the program since 1982–83.

And truth be told, it continues a regression from elite status for the Jayhawks since winning the 2022 national title. They’re 2–3 in the NCAA tournament since then, and their Big 12 record the past two years is 21–17 in a league they dominated for decades. 

It’s almost like some of the advantages gained from years as Adidas’s favored program have worn off after the federal investigation of corruption in college basketball. Kansas was sanctioned in that scandal, though not as severely as some thought it might be. Turns out the real sanction might have been losing T.J. Gassnola and Jim Gatto as recruiting concierges.

This inglorious end forced Self to acknowledge what became increasingly clear as the season spiraled into the dumpster. “We’ve got to reevaluate how we do things,” he said.

Building the program around 7′ 2″ Michigan Wolverines transfer Hunter Dickinson for two seasons was a failed plan. Dickinson exits college as a stat compiler more than a big-time winner. The teams he played on went to the Elite Eight as a freshman, the Sweet 16 as a sophomore, the NIT as a junior, the NCAA second round as a fourth-year senior and the first round as a fifth-year senior. Declining returns on large investments.

Advertisement
Hunter Dickinson

Hunter Dickinson never led KU past the NCAA second round. / Eric Canha-Imagn Images

The addition of AJ Storr from the Wisconsin Badgers was a season-long fiasco that ended with him belatedly playing his best game against Arkansas, scoring 15 points. South Dakota State Jackrabbits transfer Zeke Mayo was inconsistent at best. Alabama Crimson Tide transfer Rylan Griffen was a non-factor who played much better last season for the Crimson Tide. 

Kansas’s two program mainstays, fifth-year point guard Dajuan Harris Jr. and fourth-year forward Adams, were role players who couldn’t carry a bigger load this season when needed. Yet in the final minutes of the season, the absence of Adams suddenly loomed large.

Add it all together and you have a bust of a team.

“You can’t afford [portal] misses, but I will say this … there’s an element of luck involved,” Self said. “I think now more than ever [it] was even before. You can go after the kids that you get a great bargain on. You get a good deal on it but it doesn’t matter unless they fit in and can help you win.

“We’ve got to do a better job of evaluating the portal but I’m happy with the roster we had. It just didn’t turn out to be the team that we had hoped it was.”

Advertisement

Next year’s team will be built around guard Darryn Peterson, the No. 1 or 2 player in the country depending which recruiting rankings you prefer. But he will be a freshman in a sport that skewed old years ago—Cooper Flaggs don’t come along every year. The Jayhawks will have to mine the portal heavily again this offseason, and they can’t afford to get it wrong.

In addition to the roster, Self probably needs to take a critical look at his staff. It’s not the freshest collection of guys, most of them having been in the program for ages. Staff continuity can be a good thing until it’s suddenly not, and this inflection point might be a time to shake things up on that front.

Self pointed out that, in a way, this Kansas team is a victim of the program’s historic success. Most of the nation would take 21 wins and an NCAA berth—but in Lawrence they’re accustomed to conference titles, high seeds and NCAA runs. The Jayhawks’ consistency has been the envy of the entire nation.

“No matter what you do in life, there’s going to be some ups and downs,” Self said. “And we just haven’t had very many downs, to be honest with you.”

The question now is what Kansas will do about this down year. The Jayhawks have to be smarter (and luckier) in the portal. They have to coach the players they bring in better. But first, they head home after their earliest tournament exit since 2006, and with their most losses in more than 40 years.

Advertisement

More March Madness on Sports Illustrated



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Kansas

Patrick Mahomes in a dome? The Kansas City Chiefs’ terrifyingly good idea

Published

on

Patrick Mahomes in a dome? The Kansas City Chiefs’ terrifyingly good idea


Former Texas Tech quarterback Patrick Mahomes has been an unstoppable force since joining the Kansas City Chiefs. The young gunslinger has already won three Super Bowls (2020, 2023, 2024) and added two NFL MVPs to his resume (2018, 2022). Mahomes and the Chiefs have been perennial Super Bowl contenders since he took over the starting role. Based on his stats and accolades, it doesn’t appear that Mahomes needs any other advantages to continue his dominance of the NFL and his onslaught of the NFL record books. The Kansas City Chiefs organization disagrees.

Mahomes put up video game-like numbers while quarterbacking the Texas Tech Red Raiders. One advantage he had in Lubbock was playing on turf. Turf play speeds the game up and allows receivers to make more crisp and concise cuts, increasing the chances of separation from hapless defensive backs and linebackers. Mahomes used this to his advantage, utilizing his incredible accuracy to put the ball where his receivers would be, and not allowing defenders a chance to interfere with the passing game plan. The Chiefs want to give that advantage back to their star quarterback.

Putting Mahomes in a dome does two things: it removes the weather aspect and puts his speedy wideouts back on turf. Thinking about Kansas City speedster Xavier Worthy on turf with Mahomes throwing to him harkens me back to the St Louis Rams days of old. The Rams were known as “the fastest show on turf.” They destroyed NFL offensive records on their way to a Super Bowl win in 2000 over the Tennessee Titans. If the Chiefs can pull off this dome dream, Mahomes could elevate his game even further than it already is. The Chiefs and Mahomes would revitalize their franchise, giving them a marked advantage over visiting teams.

Mahome

Kansas City’s Patrick Mahomes gets ready to throw a pass to a receiver / Tina MacIntyre-Yee/Democrat and Chronicle / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

– Enjoy more Texas Tech coverage on Texas Tech On SI –





Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

Explore Kansas Outdoors: Insect removal technicians

Published

on

Explore Kansas Outdoors: Insect removal technicians


Female Great Plains Toad from Hamilton County, Kansas. Photo by Travis W. Taggart/FHSU

By STEVE GILLILAND
Explore Kansas Outdoors

As we walked up the sidewalk and across the patio at my grandson’s house the other night we had to watch our footing as the ground practically moved beneath our feet.

Dozens of tiny toads the size of quarters hopped in every direction with each step. An adult toad the size of a peach, probably dad or grandpa, perched at the top of the porch. We usually have multitudes of toads at the Gilliland ranch every summer, tumbling from beneath the tomato plants or leaping from under the lilacs. This year though, oddly enough our place seems to be “toad deficient.” I miss the little blighters as they are nature’s ground crew for insect control.

Toad… the name itself conjures up visions of witches adding eyes of newts and wings of bats to a bubbling caldron of potion, or a derogatory remark about a person’s physical appearance. They’re fat and pudgy, their blotchy skin is covered with lumps and warts, their spring mating call sounds like a poor lost calf calling for its mother and they pee on anyone attempting to pick them up. You gotta’ love ’em!

Advertisement

Their saving grace comes in the form of a voracious appetite for insects.

A few years back during a particularly wet spell like that of late, I spoke with Wildlife Diversity Coordinator for the state of Kansas, Ken Brunson, about the myriad of tiny toads that were literally everywhere that year.

Just when I thought life was as simple as a toad, was a toad, was a toad, Ken informed me that toads have names, too. Ken said that 95% of the toads seen in Kansas are either Woodhouse’s Toads, or Great Plains Toads. Eastern Kansas also has some American toads and Spadefoot toads.

Ken linked that year’s abundance of tiny toads to the abundance of standing water in places where there hadn’t been water for ages, and the flood waters forced many from their homes near the streams and swamps where they hatched, and sent them scrambling for higher ground.

Whatever their clan, all toads begin their life as jelly-covered strands of eggs laid in the shallows of swamps, streams and ponds. In about one week the eggs hatch into tadpoles. Next, hind legs begin to grow, then front legs, then lungs replace the gills, the tail is absorbed into the body, and finally, two to three weeks after hatching, the youngsters hop out onto dry land. Woodhouse and Great Plains toads both grow to be three to five inches long when fully mature.

Advertisement

Although not particularly athletic, toads are efficient predators and do have a ravenous appetite for insects. Research suggests that a toad is capable of eating two-thirds its body weight in insects daily.

Worms of all kinds seem to be favorites as they’re probably easier to catch (and I’m sure more filling!) A study done on Great Plains toads in Oklahoma found that because of their fondness for dining on over-wintering cutworms, these toads were estimated to be worth twenty-five dollars apiece per year to the agriculture industry there.

Their taste for bugs can easily be seen in their droppings. The black cigar shaped droppings found in driveways and on sidewalks this time of year are in fact, toad poo. When they have acres of yards, gardens and fields to potty in, I’ll never understand why they feel the need to go on the sidewalk or in the driveway (the least they could do is cart it away when they leave.) Next time you see some, take a stick and poke it apart; you’ll see it’s comprised entirely of undigested bug parts like legs and wings.

Contrary to the old-wives tale, handling a toad does not cause warts. The warts on their skin and the glands behind their eyes do, however, produce a toxin capable of making you sick if accidentally ingested. You’ve witnessed this toxin at work if you have ever seen your dog frothing and foaming at the mouth after playing with a toad in the yard.

With that in mind, I guess my advice to you concerning toads would be three-fold.

Advertisement

1) If you suddenly find your dog foaming and frothing at the mouth, don’t shoot it, it probably just licked a toad.

2) Don’t lick a toad yourself.

3) ALWAYS hold a toad way out in front of you with both hands or you’re liable to get your shoes wet.

So whenever a fat pudgy toad surprises you in the garden or flower bed, tip your hat to them and thank them for the insect removal service they provide.

Continue to Explore Kansas Outdoors!

Advertisement

Steve can be contacted by email at [email protected].



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

New York Mets vs. Kansas City Royals: Expert prediction, HR projections, and odds this Saturday

Published

on

New York Mets vs. Kansas City Royals: Expert prediction, HR projections, and odds this Saturday


The New York Mets will lock horns with the Kansas City Royals in an interleague MLB matchup at Kauffman Stadium on Saturday, scheduled to start at 4:10 p.m. ET.

With the Mets sending Frankie Montas (1-1, 6.14 ERA) to the mound against the Royals’ Michael Lorenzen (5-8, 4.60 ERA), and both boasting sub-average ERAs, home runs are likely on Saturday.

After Saturday’s Mets-Royals simulation results were finalized, Dimers’ experts released updated predictions and betting guidance, along with a complete set of stat projections for both teams’ batters.

Following Soto’s historic snub from the 2025 All Star Game, he once again trails teammate Pete Alonso as the Mets’ most likely home run hitter. The complete data set is below.

Advertisement

Updated Mets vs. Royals stat projections

Player Team 1+ Hit 2+ Hits To Get RBI To Hit HR
Pete Alonso NYM 59.8% 18.9% 38.6% 19.0%
Juan Soto NYM 61.8% 20.0% 35.7% 17.8%
Mark Vientos NYM 61.1% 19.6% 34.6% 15.9%
Francisco Lindor NYM 63.1% 21.8% 31.0% 15.0%
Salvador Perez KC 65.1% 23.0% 34.6% 14.7%
Bobby Witt KC 69.1% 26.7% 33.0% 14.1%
Vinnie Pasquantino KC 66.3% 23.1% 34.6% 14.0%
Brandon Nimmo NYM 61.8% 21.2% 30.1% 13.0%
Brett Baty NYM N/A N/A N/A 12.5%
Jac Caglianone KC 62.6% 20.3% 29.3% 12.4%
Ronny Mauricio NYM 62.8% 21.5% 30.9% 12.0%
Luis Torrens NYM N/A N/A N/A 9.7%
Freddy Fermin KC 65.7% 23.4% 28.5% 9.3%
Jeff McNeil NYM 66.9% 25.0% 30.4% 9.2%
Nick Loftin KC 62.6% 20.5% 26.6% 7.8%
Kyle Isbel KC 62.4% 21.5% N/A 7.8%
Jonathan India KC 61.9% 19.8% 22.9% 7.5%
Maikel Garcia KC 66.7% 24.2% 28.2% 5.9%

Mets vs. Royals betting preview

In addition to the stat projections above, Dimers’ experts have released newly updated Mets-Royals predictions and betting guidance.

Explore the interactive widget below to view the latest run line, over/under, and moneyline odds and probabilities for the Mets-Royals game at Kauffman Stadium.

Game details

The key information you need before the Mets vs. Royals MLB game.

  • Teams: New York Mets vs. Kansas City Royals
  • Date: Saturday, July 12, 2025
  • Time: 4:10 p.m. ET
  • Location: Kauffman Stadium

Starting pitchers

  • Mets: Frankie Montas (1-1, 6.14 ERA)
  • Royals: Michael Lorenzen (5-8, 4.60 ERA)

Odds

The latest and best odds for the MLB showdown between the Mets and Royals.

  • Run line: Mets -1.5 (+125), Royals +1.5 (-150)
  • Moneyline: Mets -125, Royals +108
  • Total: Over/Under 9.5 (-105/-115)

The odds and lines featured in this article are the best available from selected sports betting sites at the time of publication and are subject to change.

Local Mets fans can use the BetMGM promo code “CUSE150″ to unlock bonus bets for Saturday’s matchup with the Royals, while fans nationwide can unlock Prime Day betting deals with the Bet365 bonus code “SYRACUSE”.

Expert prediction: Mets vs. Royals

Using advanced data analysis and advanced algorithms, the experts at Dimers have performed 10,000 simulations of Saturday’s Mets vs. Royals game.

Advertisement

According to Dimers’ popular predictive analytics model, the Mets are more likely to defeat the Royals at Kauffman Stadium. This prediction is based on the model giving the Mets a 53% chance of winning the game.

Furthermore, Dimers predicts that the Royals (+1.5) have a 59% chance of covering the run line, while the 9.5-run over/under has a 53% chance of staying under.

These predictions and probabilities are correct at the time of publication but are subject to potential changes.

Mets vs. Royals best bet

Our top pick for the Mets vs. Royals game on Saturday is to bet on the Royals +1.5 (-150).

This betting advice is formulated through cutting-edge simulations and valuable betting intelligence, designed to assist you in making smarter investments.

Advertisement

MLB Saturday: Mets vs. Royals

Get ready for Saturday’s matchup between the Mets and Royals inMLB at Kauffman Stadium, which is scheduled to start at 4:10 p.m. ET.

We emphasize that all of the MLB best bets and MLB predictions on this page are derived from 10,000 data-driven simulations of the Mets vs. Royals matchup, and they are accurate at the time of publication. They are intended to assist you make better decisions when placing bets at online sportsbooks.

If you or a loved one has questions or needs to talk to a professional about gambling, call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit 1800gambler.net for more information.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending