Kansas
Kansas Governor vetoes property tax bill, backs alternative plan
TOPEKA, Kan. (KCTV) – Kansas Governor Laura Kelly vetoed a property tax bill and threw her support behind a three-part relief plan partially introduced by Sen. Ethan Corson (D-Prairie Village).
What Happened
Gov. Kelly said she vetoed Senate Substitute for House Bill 2745 on Wednesday, April 8, rejecting a measure that would have allowed residents to petition against local government budget increases exceeding 3%.
Kelly said the bill fails to deliver real property tax relief and instead strips locally elected officials of the flexibility they need to manage their communities.
“Instead, the truth is that this bill will only restrict the ability of locally elected officials to be nimble enough to adjust to the unique needs of the communities they serve,” she added.
The Bill’s Impact – Before the Veto
Kelly said the damage from the bill’s passage had already begun – even before she signed the veto.
According to the Governor, multiple school districts and local governments were notified that bond deals set to close within days had been terminated by underwriters, citing financial uncertainty created by the legislation.
“This means that projects which have already been approved at the local level have been stopped dead in their tracks, as their funding source has been removed due to the passage of this bill,” she said.
What the Bill Would Have Done
Senate Substitute for HB 2745 set a 3% cap on property tax revenue growth for local governments.
Any budget exceeding that threshold – adjusted for inflation – would trigger a public protest petition process.
If at least 5% of registered voters in a taxing subdivision signed a petition by Sept. 15, the budget increase would be blocked, forcing the governing body to revert to the prior year’s levy.
The bill passed the House 76-45 on Feb. 26 and cleared the Senate 22-18 on March 27 under emergency final action.
Three-Part Relief Proposal
Rather than simply vetoing the bill, Kelly urged the Legislature to take up a three-part property tax relief package introduced by Corson before the 2026 session ends.
1) Immediate Vehicle Tax Credit – SB 378
Senate Bill 378, introduced by Corson in January, would provide a one-time, nonrefundable $250 vehicle tax credit applied at the time of registration for eligible vehicles.
That would include cars, trucks, motorcycles, buses, trailers and RVs.
The credit would be funded through the state’s budget stabilization fund and would take effect in FY 2027.
However, the credit is nonrefundable. If a vehicle owner’s tax liability is less than $250, they will not receive the difference as a refund.
The Senate Committee on Taxation held hearings on Feb. 4 and Feb. 5. No opponents testified against the bill.
However, SB 378 has stalled in the Senate with no movement since the second hearing – making Kelly’s public push a potential lifeline for the legislation.
2) Incentive Fund for Fiscally Responsible Local Governments
Kelly said the plan proposes a new state fund to reward cities and counties that keep annual budget growth at or below 3%.
According to the Governor, the state would deposit $60 million into the fund in the first year, growing by 2% annually.
She noted that distribution would be based on population and total assessed value, giving both rural and urban communities equitable access.
3) Doubling the 20-Mill School Finance Exemption
Lastly, under current Kansas law, the first $75,000 of a home’s appraised value is exempt from the 20-mill levy used to fund public education.
The proposal would double that exemption to $150,000, providing annual relief to more than 700,000 Kansas homeowners, Kelly said.
A demand transfer from the State General Fund would ensure public schools continue to receive full constitutional funding, she added.

“I’m laying out a fiscally responsible property tax relief plan that I invite the Legislature to debate and take action on to finally give Kansans some real relief,” Kelly stated.
Republican Response
Republican leaders pushed back sharply, framing the veto as a political move that leaves Kansas families behind.
“Laura Kelly and the Democrats have proven they are not serious about solving the property-tax crisis that is driving Kansans out of their homes,” said Senate President Ty Masterson (R-Andover). “Enough is enough. When I’m Governor, the runaway appraisals and out-of-control local spending will come to an end.”
House Speaker Dan Hawkins (R-Wichita) said the fight is not over.
“Kansans didn’t send us to Topeka to play political games; they sent us here to deliver results. Kansas families are being crushed by rising property taxes,” Hawkins added. “Across the state, they are being forced into tightening their budgets and making smarter, more fiscally responsible choices. Local government should be doing the same. This conversation is not over and we will continue to fight to put Kansans who are suffering under out-of-control property taxes back in the driver’s seat.”
Majority Leader Chris Croft (R-Overland Park) called the veto a betrayal of Kansas voters.
“The people of Kansas deserve a voice in how their hard-earned dollars are taxed, and this veto ignores their needs and the will of the people,” Croft said.
Local Government Reaction
Local governments and organizations were split on HB 2745, but seemed to mostly oppose the legislation.
Opposed – City of Overland Park
Overland Park City Representative Mike Koss testified against the bill, warning it would threaten the city’s financial stability and its ability to fund public safety.
He noted that $98 million of Overland Park’s budget is dedicated to public safety – more than 90% of which is personnel costs.
Koss argued the 5% protest petition threshold was too low, saying it would allow a small majority to override the will of the majority.
He asked the Legislature to restore the threshold to 10% and reinstate a $60 millin property tax relief fund that was stripped from the bill during House floor debate.
In Favor – Kansas Farm Bureau
Jon Donley, representing the Kansas Farm Bureau and it smore than 30,000 farm and ranch families, testified in support of the bill.
He said the measure would slow the growth of local government spending and reduce long-term pressure on property taxes for all classes of property.
“KFB feels that HB 2745 provides the proper policy directives to encourage local taxing jurisdictions to be fiscally responsible,” Donley added.
What’s Next
The Legislature has until the end of the session to consider an override of Kelly’s veto or to take up the new plan – including stalled SB 378.
Republicans hold a supermajority in both chambers, giving them the votes needed to override without Democratic support.
However, the number of supporters in the initial votes would not be enough to override the veto.
Kelly is urging lawmakers to act before the session closes.
“It is time for Kansans to hear the truth from their elected officials and to have their elected officials deliver realistic results for them,” she concluded.
Copyright 2026 KCTV. All rights reserved.
Kansas
Detroit Tigers bested by Kansas City 5-1; Witt hits inside-the-park homer for Royals
The Detroit Tigers were beaten by the Kansas City Royals 5-1 on Saturday night.
Michael Wacha pitched seven scoreless innings, Bobby Witt Jr. hit an inside-the-park home run on a grounder and Michael Massey had a three-run homer for the Royals, who will go for the series sweep on Sunday night.
Witt hit the ball down the right-field line in the first inning that bounced off the wall and eluded right fielder Kerry Carpenter. Witt motored around the bases and beat the relay throw to the plate for a two-run homer.
It was the Royals’ first inside-the-park home run since Witt did it in August 2023.
Carpenter left the game later with left shoulder soreness.
Wacha (4-2) gave up two hits, walked two and struck out six. It was his longest scoreless outing since throwing eight scoreless innings against the Chicago White Sox on April 11.
Burch Smith (0-2) took the loss. He retired only one of the four batters he faced, allowing two runs on three hits in one-third of an inning.
Massey’s homer in the fourth inning came with runners on first and third with two outs. He lined the ball over the right-center field fence for his third homer of the season.
Wacha had at least one strikeout in each of his first four innings. The Tigers loaded the bases in the fifth on a double, a walk and a hit batter, but Wacha got Matt Vierling to ground out to end the inning.
The Tigers scored in the eighth on a two-out double by Riley Greene.
Up next
The teams conclude the three-game series Sunday. The Tigers have not announced a starter, though manager AJ Hinch said it will be a bullpen game. Kansas City will send LHP Noah Cameron (2-2, 5.40 ERA) to the mound.
Kansas
This Chiefs-Bears trade would land Kansas City it’s long-term Travis Kelce replacement
Bullet point summary by AI
- The Chiefs are exploring long-term solutions at tight end beyond Travis Kelce’s expected 2026 retirement.
- One potential move involves targeting a veteran player from a team transitioning to a new starter at the position.
- The deal’s structure hinges on future playoff performance, creating a high-stakes incentive for both franchises.
While the 2026 draft is just in the books, it’s never too early to start thinking about the 2027 season — and if there’s one team that’s already looking that far ahead, it’s the Kansas City Chiefs.
Star tight end Travis Kelce is almost certainly retiring after the 2026 campaign despite an inflated new deal, and looking at the Chiefs’ depth chart, backup Noah Gray is not starting-caliber material. You could argue the team can scout for star talent in next year’s draft, but that would come with significant risk and opportunity cost if a prospect isn’t immediately NFL-ready.
Instead, there’s a potential solution general manager Brett Veach can utilize by acquiring an excess asset from another team.
This Chiefs-Bears trade solves Kansas City’s Travis Kelce problem
The Chicago Bears are clearly moving forward with 2025 first-round pick Colston Loveland as their TE1, in addition to taking blocking specialist Sam Roush out of Stanford in this year’s draft. All of which leaves backup — and previous starter — Cole Kmet on the outside looking in. The 27-year-old still has a lot of high-quality football left to play, and he’d certainly sign off on the opportunity to get starting snaps for a team with a championship window still wide open.
The problem is going to be convincing Chicago to pick up the phone in the first place. Kmet signed a restructured deal in April which disincentivizes the Bears from moving him until next year. A pre-June 1 deal would cost Chicago $4.1 million against the salary cap, while any swap after that date only saves the team $1.4 million.
So, with the present season not really an option, these two teams would need to be negotiating with next year in mind as Kmet is projected to cost the Bears $15.4 million against the cap in 2027. That’s the incentive Chicago needs to move him.
At the moment, Kmet is worth a conditional 2027 fifth-round pick — which may sound cheap, but the devil is in the details. Chicago will certainly dictate that an escalator be attached to the pick: For example, if Kansas City misses the playoffs in 2027, then it remains a fifth-rounder but may be deferred until 2028. If they qualify for the postseason then it could stay in 2027. A championship could push it up a round or two (though that would be a tough sell for the Chiefs).
Kmet has topped 500 receiving yards in three of his six seasons in Chicago, so there’s a good reason for Kansas City to inquire about his availability. The Bears, in turn, used a third-round pick to select Stanford’s Sam Roush – signaling they too are preparing for Kmet’s eventual departure.
Follow
Kansas
Kansas court sides with Stormont Vail in Medicaid payment dispute
Stormont Vail Healthcare is in a legal battle with the state government, alleging the Medicaid program was wrong to refuse payment for the hospitalization of a pregnant patient with complications.
At issue is a disagreement between the Topeka hospital and the Kansas Department of Health and Environment over whether inpatient health care services were medically necessary for the Medicaid patient’s last two weeks of pregnancy.
The Kansas Court of Appeals did not resolve that dispute, but it did side with Stormont Vail in a May 8 decision. The unanimous three-judge panel reversed a decision by Shawnee County District Court Judge Thomas Luedke and vacated an order from KDHE’s State Appeals Committee. The matter now goes back to the appeals committee for reconsideration.
The appellate panel was comprised of Judges Jacy Hurst, Thomas Malone and Stephen Hill, which heard oral arguments on Aug. 5. Hurst wrote the court’s opinion.
The lawsuit stems from a 2018 case of a pregnant patient, who is not named in appellate court documents. She was 28 years old at the time and had an intellectual disability among other complications, including rapid weight loss caused by hyperemesis gravidarum.
The woman was originally admitted at Newman Regional Health in Emporia before she was transferred to Stormont Vail. Part of the hospitalization during her third trimester was covered.
But the final two weeks were not because Sunflower Health Plan, one of the managed care organizations in the state’s privatized Medicaid program known as KanCare, refused to reimburse for the patient’s continued hospitalization through the day the child was born via cesarean section.
“We are here because the Kansas Medicaid program has wrongfully refused to pay for some of an inpatient hospitalization while a Medicaid beneficiary was at Stormont Vail,” said Amanda Wilwert, an attorney for the hospital, during oral arguments. “Stormont believes the inpatient care was medically necessary as defined by the Kansas Medicaid regulations.”
Court records and oral arguments show the state expected Stormont Vail to look into having a home health agency care for the patient in Emporia instead of continued hospitalization — even though home health generally does not take care of pregnant patients and her doctors believed the expectant mother was not stable enough to discharge.
“The way it’s supposed to work,” said Darren Sharp, an attorney representing KDHE, “is the managed care organization, in this case Sunflower Health, on behalf of KDHE reviews the medical records, asks about the appropriate level of care and whether there’s any other interventions that would be more cost effective or appropriate depending on the level of or depending on the patient’s records and the patient’s status.”
Sharp argued medical records showed the patients was getting better because of total parenteral nutrition, or TPN.
“This is when a tube, a PICC, is inserted and your minerals and your electrolytes and all of your nutrition is then intravenously provided,” Sharp said.
He said the treatment “was eliminating her vomiting, her diarrhea, she had no fever, her glucose levels were stabilized.”
In their ruling, the judges indicated the KDHE appeals committee primarily cared about the cost saving of using home health versus hospitalization while disregarding the treating physician for insufficient reasons and ignoring evidence on potential benefits or harms to the patient.
But the judges declined to resolve the dispute. Rather, unless the decision is appealed to the Kansas Supreme Court, the matter goes back to the KDHE administrative process.
There, the agency’s appeals committee must reconsider the case consistent with the Court of Appeal’s ruling. The published decision sets new precedent interpreting state laws and regulations on the Medicaid program.
“While this court provides no opinion on whether the disputed inpatient healthcare services met the definition of medical necessity,” Hurst wrote, “the record shows that some of the (appeals committee’s) factual findings were not supported by the record as a whole and that the (appeals committee) inaccurately applied the law when it failed to consider (the patient’s) individual characteristics and assess the harms and benefits of the healthcare intervention.
“In making a medical necessity determination, the reviewing agency must make an individualized determination based on the record as a whole.”
Jason Alatidd is a Statehouse reporter for The Topeka Capital-Journal. He can be reached by email at jalatidd@usatodayco.com. Follow him on X @Jason_Alatidd.
-
California5 minutes agoAfter exile, California tribes could help run their ancestral redwoods again
-
Connecticut17 minutes ago
Alicia (Plikaitis) Helen Junghans Obituary
-
Delaware23 minutes agoMiddletown runs away with record, team title at New Castle County meet
-
Florida29 minutes agoPalm Bay, Florida parents of premature twins held NICU wedding
-
Georgia35 minutes ago‘We’re champs’: How Georgia baseball soaked up first SEC title in 18 years
-
Hawaii41 minutes agoHilo tsunami clock memorial to be moved? – Hawaii Tribune-Herald
-
Idaho47 minutes agoIdaho Stop ordinance seen as progress for cyclists, supporters say | Jefferson City News-Tribune
-
Illinois53 minutes ago20-year-old motorcyclist killed in crash in Oswego, Illinois, police say


