Kansas
Kansas City Chiefs waive 3 receivers with Alabama football roots
The Kansas City Chiefs began Tuesday with three wide receivers from Alabama high schools and colleges. By the end of the day, they didn’t have any.
As NFL teams reduced their rosters from the 90 players of the preseason to the regular-season limit of 53 active players on Tuesday, Kansas City waived Justyn Ross from Central High School in Phenix City, Kadarius Toney from Blount High School in Prichard and Montrell Washington from Samford.
Toney was a first-round draft choice of the New York Giants in 2021, whose career with the Chiefs includes the longest punt-return in Super Bowl history and a touchdown reception in the Super Bowl.
Ross has had an injury-affected career since joining Kansas City as an undrafted rookie in 2022. He played in 10 games last season.
As a fifth-round draft pick of the Denver Broncos in 2022, Washington was one of the NFL’s busiest return men as a rookie, but he played in only six games last season for the Chiefs.
The wide receivers were among the 29 players from Alabama high schools and colleges (excluding Alabama and Auburn) who were waived by NFL teams on Tuesday. Another six were released.
The former state players who were waived on Tuesday included:
· Travis Bell, defensive tackle, Jeff Davis: By the Cincinnati Bengals.
· Carter Bradley, quarterback, South Alabama: By the Las Vegas Raiders.
· Shakel Brown, defensive tackle, Troy: By the San Francisco 49ers.
· Spencer Brown, running back, Mortimer Jordan, UAB: By the Atlanta Falcons.
· DJ Coleman, defensive end, Jacksonville State: By the Jacksonville Jaguars.
· TyKeem Doss, guard, Aliceville: By the Pittsburgh Steelers.
· Grant DuBose, wide receiver, Park Crossing: By the Green Bay Packers.
· Chris Edmonds, defensive back, Samford: By the Cleveland Browns.
· Neil Farrell Jr., defensive tackle, Murphy: By the Kansas City Chiefs.
· Eric Garror, cornerback, McGill-Toolen: By the Tennessee Titans.
· Zyon Gilbert, cornerback, Jeff Davis: By the Pittsburgh Steelers.
· OJ Hiliare, wide receiver, Alabama A&M: By the Atlanta Falcons
· Keenan Isaac, cornerback, Midfield, Alabama State: By the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
· Cephus Johnson III, wide receiver, Davidson, South Alabama: By the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
· Chris Oladokun, quarterback, Samford: By the Kansas City Chiefs.
· Tejhaun Palmer, wide receiver, UAB: By the Arizona Cardinals.
· La’Mical Perine, running back, Theodore: By the Pittsburgh Steelers.
· Monty Rice, linebacker, James Clemens: By the New Orleans Saints.
· Justyn Ross, wide receiver, Central-Phenix City: By the Kansas City Chiefs.
· Lincoln Sefcik, tight end, South Alabama: By the New York Jets.
· Jamie Sheriff, outside linebacker, South Alabama: By the Seattle Seahawks.
· Lachavious Simmons, offensive lineman, Selma: By the Tennessee Titans (with an injury designation).
· Reddy Steward, cornerback, Austin, Troy: By the Chicago Bears.
· Kadarius Toney, wide receiver, Blount: By the Kansas City Chiefs.
· Corliss Waitman, punter, South Alabama: By the Chicago Bears
· Montrell Washington, wide receiver, Samford: By the Kansas City Chiefs
· Austin Watkins, wide receiver, UAB: By the Philadelphia Eagles.
· Jalen Wayne, wide receiver, Spanish Fort, South Alabama: By the Green Bay Packers.
· Darryl Williams, center, Bessemer City: By the Jacksonville Jaguars.
The former state players who were released on Tuesday included:
· Khari Blasingame, fullback, Buckhorn: By the Chicago Bears
· Chris Hubbard, offensive tackle, UAB: By the San Francisco 49ers.
· Jordan Matthews, tight end, Madison Academy: By the Carolina Panthers.
· Bobby McCain, defensive back, Oxford: By the Minnesota Vikings.
· Quez Watkins, wide receiver, Athens: By the Pittsburgh Steelers.
· Nick Williams, defensive lineman, Minor, Samford: By the San Francisco 49ers.
They join five players who were waived over the previous five days – wide receiver Kawaan Baker (South Alabama) and cornerback Mikey Victor (Alabama State), cornerback Allan George (Andalusia) by the Cincinnati Bengals, linebacker Trey Kiser (South Alabama) by the New York Giants and running back DeWayne McBride (UAB) by the Minnesota Vikings.
The players who were waived can by claimed by any other team in the league before 11 a.m. CDT Wednesday. Waiver claims are processed in the same order as the 2024 NFL Draft before any trades were made.
Waived players who go unclaimed become free to sign with any team. Players who were released do not have to pass through the waiver process.
Each NFL team can begin assembling its 16-player practice squad on Wednesday afternoon. Practice-squad members work just as active-roster players do during the week, but they are not eligible to play in the games – with one exception. Each NFL team can elevate two practice-squad players to active status for each game.
Four more players were placed on injured reserve. Detroit Lions Brodric Martin (Northridge, North Alabama) and Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Jeremiah Moon (Hoover) were designated to return from IR, but they still will have to miss at least the first four games of the season.
Carolina Panthers linebacker Tae Davis (Oxford) and Washington Commanders defensive tackle Taylor Stallworth (Murphy) were placed on season-ending IR.
FOR MORE OF AL.COM’S COVERAGE OF THE NFL, GO TO OUR NFL PAGE
Mark Inabinett is a sports reporter for Alabama Media Group. Follow him on Twitter at @AMarkG1.
The Detroit Tigers were beaten by the Kansas City Royals 5-1 on Saturday night.
Michael Wacha pitched seven scoreless innings, Bobby Witt Jr. hit an inside-the-park home run on a grounder and Michael Massey had a three-run homer for the Royals, who will go for the series sweep on Sunday night.
Witt hit the ball down the right-field line in the first inning that bounced off the wall and eluded right fielder Kerry Carpenter. Witt motored around the bases and beat the relay throw to the plate for a two-run homer.
It was the Royals’ first inside-the-park home run since Witt did it in August 2023.
Carpenter left the game later with left shoulder soreness.
Wacha (4-2) gave up two hits, walked two and struck out six. It was his longest scoreless outing since throwing eight scoreless innings against the Chicago White Sox on April 11.
Burch Smith (0-2) took the loss. He retired only one of the four batters he faced, allowing two runs on three hits in one-third of an inning.
Massey’s homer in the fourth inning came with runners on first and third with two outs. He lined the ball over the right-center field fence for his third homer of the season.
Wacha had at least one strikeout in each of his first four innings. The Tigers loaded the bases in the fifth on a double, a walk and a hit batter, but Wacha got Matt Vierling to ground out to end the inning.
The Tigers scored in the eighth on a two-out double by Riley Greene.
Up next
The teams conclude the three-game series Sunday. The Tigers have not announced a starter, though manager AJ Hinch said it will be a bullpen game. Kansas City will send LHP Noah Cameron (2-2, 5.40 ERA) to the mound.
Bullet point summary by AI
- The Chiefs are exploring long-term solutions at tight end beyond Travis Kelce’s expected 2026 retirement.
- One potential move involves targeting a veteran player from a team transitioning to a new starter at the position.
- The deal’s structure hinges on future playoff performance, creating a high-stakes incentive for both franchises.
While the 2026 draft is just in the books, it’s never too early to start thinking about the 2027 season — and if there’s one team that’s already looking that far ahead, it’s the Kansas City Chiefs.
Star tight end Travis Kelce is almost certainly retiring after the 2026 campaign despite an inflated new deal, and looking at the Chiefs’ depth chart, backup Noah Gray is not starting-caliber material. You could argue the team can scout for star talent in next year’s draft, but that would come with significant risk and opportunity cost if a prospect isn’t immediately NFL-ready.
Instead, there’s a potential solution general manager Brett Veach can utilize by acquiring an excess asset from another team.
This Chiefs-Bears trade solves Kansas City’s Travis Kelce problem
The Chicago Bears are clearly moving forward with 2025 first-round pick Colston Loveland as their TE1, in addition to taking blocking specialist Sam Roush out of Stanford in this year’s draft. All of which leaves backup — and previous starter — Cole Kmet on the outside looking in. The 27-year-old still has a lot of high-quality football left to play, and he’d certainly sign off on the opportunity to get starting snaps for a team with a championship window still wide open.
The problem is going to be convincing Chicago to pick up the phone in the first place. Kmet signed a restructured deal in April which disincentivizes the Bears from moving him until next year. A pre-June 1 deal would cost Chicago $4.1 million against the salary cap, while any swap after that date only saves the team $1.4 million.
So, with the present season not really an option, these two teams would need to be negotiating with next year in mind as Kmet is projected to cost the Bears $15.4 million against the cap in 2027. That’s the incentive Chicago needs to move him.
At the moment, Kmet is worth a conditional 2027 fifth-round pick — which may sound cheap, but the devil is in the details. Chicago will certainly dictate that an escalator be attached to the pick: For example, if Kansas City misses the playoffs in 2027, then it remains a fifth-rounder but may be deferred until 2028. If they qualify for the postseason then it could stay in 2027. A championship could push it up a round or two (though that would be a tough sell for the Chiefs).
Kmet has topped 500 receiving yards in three of his six seasons in Chicago, so there’s a good reason for Kansas City to inquire about his availability. The Bears, in turn, used a third-round pick to select Stanford’s Sam Roush – signaling they too are preparing for Kmet’s eventual departure.
Follow
Stormont Vail Healthcare is in a legal battle with the state government, alleging the Medicaid program was wrong to refuse payment for the hospitalization of a pregnant patient with complications.
At issue is a disagreement between the Topeka hospital and the Kansas Department of Health and Environment over whether inpatient health care services were medically necessary for the Medicaid patient’s last two weeks of pregnancy.
The Kansas Court of Appeals did not resolve that dispute, but it did side with Stormont Vail in a May 8 decision. The unanimous three-judge panel reversed a decision by Shawnee County District Court Judge Thomas Luedke and vacated an order from KDHE’s State Appeals Committee. The matter now goes back to the appeals committee for reconsideration.
The appellate panel was comprised of Judges Jacy Hurst, Thomas Malone and Stephen Hill, which heard oral arguments on Aug. 5. Hurst wrote the court’s opinion.
The lawsuit stems from a 2018 case of a pregnant patient, who is not named in appellate court documents. She was 28 years old at the time and had an intellectual disability among other complications, including rapid weight loss caused by hyperemesis gravidarum.
The woman was originally admitted at Newman Regional Health in Emporia before she was transferred to Stormont Vail. Part of the hospitalization during her third trimester was covered.
But the final two weeks were not because Sunflower Health Plan, one of the managed care organizations in the state’s privatized Medicaid program known as KanCare, refused to reimburse for the patient’s continued hospitalization through the day the child was born via cesarean section.
“We are here because the Kansas Medicaid program has wrongfully refused to pay for some of an inpatient hospitalization while a Medicaid beneficiary was at Stormont Vail,” said Amanda Wilwert, an attorney for the hospital, during oral arguments. “Stormont believes the inpatient care was medically necessary as defined by the Kansas Medicaid regulations.”
Court records and oral arguments show the state expected Stormont Vail to look into having a home health agency care for the patient in Emporia instead of continued hospitalization — even though home health generally does not take care of pregnant patients and her doctors believed the expectant mother was not stable enough to discharge.
“The way it’s supposed to work,” said Darren Sharp, an attorney representing KDHE, “is the managed care organization, in this case Sunflower Health, on behalf of KDHE reviews the medical records, asks about the appropriate level of care and whether there’s any other interventions that would be more cost effective or appropriate depending on the level of or depending on the patient’s records and the patient’s status.”
Sharp argued medical records showed the patients was getting better because of total parenteral nutrition, or TPN.
“This is when a tube, a PICC, is inserted and your minerals and your electrolytes and all of your nutrition is then intravenously provided,” Sharp said.
He said the treatment “was eliminating her vomiting, her diarrhea, she had no fever, her glucose levels were stabilized.”
In their ruling, the judges indicated the KDHE appeals committee primarily cared about the cost saving of using home health versus hospitalization while disregarding the treating physician for insufficient reasons and ignoring evidence on potential benefits or harms to the patient.
But the judges declined to resolve the dispute. Rather, unless the decision is appealed to the Kansas Supreme Court, the matter goes back to the KDHE administrative process.
There, the agency’s appeals committee must reconsider the case consistent with the Court of Appeal’s ruling. The published decision sets new precedent interpreting state laws and regulations on the Medicaid program.
“While this court provides no opinion on whether the disputed inpatient healthcare services met the definition of medical necessity,” Hurst wrote, “the record shows that some of the (appeals committee’s) factual findings were not supported by the record as a whole and that the (appeals committee) inaccurately applied the law when it failed to consider (the patient’s) individual characteristics and assess the harms and benefits of the healthcare intervention.
“In making a medical necessity determination, the reviewing agency must make an individualized determination based on the record as a whole.”
Jason Alatidd is a Statehouse reporter for The Topeka Capital-Journal. He can be reached by email at jalatidd@usatodayco.com. Follow him on X @Jason_Alatidd.
-
Health1 minute agoCelebrity chef reveals No. 1 mistake sabotaging your weight loss: ‘Fuzzy math’
-
Sports7 minutes ago2026 NASCAR Odds: Pole-sitter Shane van Gisbergen Favorite for Watkins Glen
-
Technology13 minutes agoWhy last year’s breach is this year’s identity fraud
-
Business19 minutes agoPressure grows on California attorney general to try to block Paramount’s deal for Warner Bros.
-
Entertainment25 minutes agoCulver City’s Wende Museum of the Cold War announces major expansion in Hawthorne
-
Lifestyle31 minutes agoAfter an L.A. windstorm, he used fallen trees to make furniture with a story behind it
-
Politics37 minutes agoBig donors backed Harris in 2024. For 2028, they’re not so sure
-
Sports49 minutes agoAfter years of playing through tears, Angel City players are grateful team supports moms