Iowa
Wisconsin 116, Iowa 85: Badger Blitz
Wisconsin 116, Iowa 85: Badger Blitz
A good start for the Hawkeyes — Iowa led Wisconsin 28-22 almost 12 minutes into the game — fell apart in the face of torrid shooting from the Badgers, resulting in a 116-85 Wisconsin victory. The loss dropped Iowa to 10-4 overall and 1-2 in the Big Ten.
A 19-2 Badger run in the first half flipped the game on its head and put the Hawkeyes in a hole they were never able to escape. Wisconsin shredded the Iowa defense over the final thirty minutes of the game and rolled to an easy win.
Here are three takeaways from the loss.
1. When it Rains 3s, it Pours
Both teams started off shooting the ball well, especially from three-point range. Iowa made its first four three-point shots, while Wisconsin made three of its first four threes. But while Iowa’s three-point shooting slowed down, the Badgers just kept burying triple after triple.
Nine different Badgers made at least one three and six players made two or more, led by John Blackwell with a scorching-hot 6-of-10 effort from deep (part of his game-high 32 points). Kamari McGee was the second-best long-range shooter for the Badgers, draining 4-of-5 attempts from beyond the arc.
This sort of three-point eruption from the Badgers wasn’t expected — Wisconsin entered this game shooting 32.5% from deep this season, 217th in the nation. Blackwell was one of the Badgers not firing from deep before tonight — he entered the game making just 28.9% of his long-range efforts, including 3-of-19 in his last six games.
Iowa’s defense didn’t do enough to close out on several of Wisconsin’s three-point attempts and too many of Wisconsin’s school-record 21 threes were wide open. “They got going from the beginning,” Iowa guard Drew Thelwell said. “I don’t think we made enough adjustments to I guess run them off the line or do something else and they just got comfortable out there.”
“We just gotta fly around, have more energy,” added Thelwell. “[It] felt like we just quit on some possessions, which we can’t have, especially starting off on the Big Ten on the road.”
The entire Wisconsin team was clearly in the zone when it came to shooting from beyond the arc — that’s the only way a team can go 21-of-31 from 3-point range. On some level you have to tip your cap to the Badgers; sometimes the flood hits and just washes away everything in its path.
Still, allowing 50+ points in a half or seeing an opponent get hot from long range are not new problems for Iowa basketball — as Thelwell said, the Hawkeyes needed to make some sort of adjustments and do something to stop the torrent of threes flowing from the Badger shooters.
“Our shot selection wasn’t very good, nor was our defense obviously,” Iowa head coach Fran McCaffery said. “We gotta be better with our ball-screen action, with our transition defense. Our initial defense was good sometimes, but not our closeouts, not our defense after the ball was reversed, so sometimes they were getting open 3s.”
“They’ve got a lot of weapons,” McCaffery noted. “Once they start hitting 3s, they’re hard to guard. That’s why what you do on the offensive end is so critical.”
Don’t miss out on any of our exclusive football, basketball, and recruiting coverage. Sign up with Hawkeye Beacon here.
2. Broken Glass
Iowa didn’t do many things well against Wisconsin on Friday, but they did protect the ball well — Iowa had just nine turnovers in the game, versus 13 for the Badgers. The Hawkeyes were able to turn 13 Badger giveaways into a 21-8 edge in points off turnovers.
That was about the only thing that Iowa did better than Wisconsin in this game.
Aside from 3-point shooting, Wisconsin also hammered Iowa on the glass, out-rebounding Iowa 37-21 for the game. Obviously Iowa didn’t have as many defensive rebound opportunities with the ball going through the net again and again on the Wisconsin end (the Badgers shot 64.5% overall from the floor and missed just 22 shots), but they didn’t capitalize well on the chances they did have.
The offensive rebound stats ended up almost even — 8 for Wisconsin, 7 for Iowa — but that’s mainly a function of some late o-boards for the Hawkeyes after the game outcome was long decided. In the first half, Wisconsin out-rebounded 18-9 overall and 5-1 on the offensive glass. They turned that advantage on the offensive boards into a 10-2 edge in second-chance points.
“As a collective unit, I think we just took our foot off the gas pedal,” Thelwell said of Iowa conceding a 19-2 run to Wisconsin after the Hawkeyes led 28-22 in the first half. “Obviously you can’t do that in the Big Ten. [We] just need more energy, more effort, gotta rebound the ball too.”
There are tactical things that Iowa can do to improve its rebounding — as we’ve discussed over the last few days — but one of the biggest changes Iowa can make is bringing more effort to its rebounding attempts. The Badgers seemed to be the quicker team to every loose ball in this game, which is the sort of effort that can be critical in winning the rebounding battle.
3. Drew Thelwell Shined, but…
One of the only bright spots for Iowa in this drubbing was the play of Morehead State transfer Drew Thelwell. Thelwell had his best game as a Hawkeye (by far), erupting for a team-high 25 points on 9-of-14 shooting (3-of-5 from deep), along with a team-high five assists and two rebounds. Thelwell attacked the Badgers inside and out on offense and did what he could on the defensive end as well.
“He was spectacular at both ends,” said McCaffery after the game. “[He] kept fighting, played at the 1, at the 2, driving the ball, finishing in traffic, getting to the free throw line, making steals. [He] just really tried to will us though those difficult minutes in the middle portion of the game.”
After the game, Thelwell said that he embraced the role of being a sparkplug for the team, especially on the defensive end. “I would say it has to start with somebody,” he said. “If that’s my role to get this team going, I’ll do it the best I can on defense and show them that I’ll always give 100%.”
Aside from Thelwell, Iowa’s top performer was Josh Dix, who made his first four shots of the game and finished with 16 points on 7-of-10 shooting (2-of-3 from 3-point range). Dix was key to Iowa’s fast start and early lead and things went south when he went to the bench for a break in the first half; Wisconsin outscored Iowa 16-2 with Dix out of the game in that stretch.
Not one of Iowa’s top performers? Payton Sandfort, who endured one of his worst games in an Iowa uniform and finished with more personal fouls (3) than points (2). Sandfort could not buy a shot, going 1-of-9 from the floor and 0-of-5 from beyond the arc. He did finish with a team-high 5 rebounds.
“Payton puts a lot of pressure on himself,” said McCaffery. “He’s had some off nights. He was fighting tonight, he was trying, [but he] couldn’t get anything to fall. [He] had a couple clean looks, they didn’t go in. That really frustrated him, because teams are guarding him very closely, and then when he gets a clean look, he wants to make it. He was flying at the glass, he was flying around, [it] just didn’t happen for him tonight.”
Iowa is not going to win many games — especially in Big Ten play — when Payton Sandfort scores just two points.
Owen Freeman, Iowa’s other top scorer this season, finished with 14 points on 6-of-11 shooting, but had a quiet night overall. He had just three rebounds and struggled mightily to slow down Wisconsin’s twin towers in the post — Nolan Winter and Steven Crowl combined for 32 points (on 12-of-15 shooting), 15 rebounds and 3 assists.
NEXT: Iowa returns home to face Nebraska (11-2, 1-1 Big Ten) in Carver-Hawkeye Arena on Tuesday, January 7 (7:00 PM CT, Peacock).
Iowa
Democrats will debate in Iowa US Senate primary shaped by outside money and big-name endorsements
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Two Democrats vying to be Iowa’s next U.S. senator are scheduled to debate Thursday, as each seeks to convince voters he’s better positioned to flip the Republican-held seat in a contest that has seen heavy outside spending and high-profile endorsements.
State lawmakers Zach Wahls and Josh Turek are competing in a June 2 primary. It is one of a few remaining competitive Democratic Senate primaries this year, as the party looks to find the best approach to reclaim the U.S. Senate this fall.
Iowa’s Republican Sen. Joni Ernst opted out of a reelection bid, leaving the seat open for the first time since she replaced retiring Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin in 2014. Republican Senate leaders have backed Ashley Hinson, a congresswoman representing northeast Iowa, committing $29 million for her to help keep their thin majority.
Democrats see an opportunity to flip seats in the once-competitive state, despite President Donald Trump’s double-digit win in the last presidential election and an all-Republican federal delegation. But first they need to settle which federal candidate will be at the top of the ticket. Early voting began Wednesday.
An influx of cash has shaped the final stretch
While Wahls and Turek have raised and spent similar amounts, a Democratic political organization, VoteVets, has spent about $7 million to support Turek in the final stretch of the campaign. That’s more than the two candidates have spent combined.
Turek, who is not a veteran, was born with spina bifida after his father’s exposure to chemicals while serving in the Vietnam War. The group has said Turek is uniquely positioned to advocate for veterans’ services, especially health care and military families.
Wahls has criticized the influx of cash as insiders in Washington trying to exert outsized influence, and it’s likely to come up again Thursday, as it did at an Iowa Press debate last week.
Tensions over the future of the party
Wahls has been vocal about who should — or should not — lead Senate Democrats, saying he would not vote for Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York to be the caucus leader.
“The leadership of Chuck Schumer has failed the Democratic Party, it has failed the state and it has failed this country,” Wahls said during last week’s debate. “Dark money has an agenda, and that agenda is to protect the broken status quo and the failed leadership of Sen. Schumer.”
Schumer has tried to keep the focus on Republicans.
Wahls is endorsed by U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who joined him in Iowa for campaign events over the weekend. The progressive senator told voters the Senate needs Democrats who are willing to “get in there and stand up and fight.” Wahls also often highlights the support he’s seen from unions and local elected officials.
Turek responded to Wahls’ criticism saying he’s not a “DC insider.”
“I don’t know these folks,” he said. Turek explained his criteria for leader candidates but stopped short of saying he wouldn’t support Schumer.
“I will go up and ask whoever is deciding to run for leadership … ‘What are you going to do for Iowa? What are you going to do for Iowans? What are you going to do for the middle class?’” Turek said.
In the last week, Turek unveiled a rare endorsement from Harkin, who represented Iowa in Washington for three decades, as well as former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. Turek also has collected endorsements from sitting U.S. senators, including Illinois’ Tammy Duckworth, New Hampshire’s Maggie Hassan and Nevada’s Catherine Cortez Masto.
Drawing greater contrast on issues
In the first debate last week, Turek and Wahls were aligned on many issues. Both said that they would not support the Republican president’s tariffs or the war in Iran and that they do support raising the minimum wage and restoring health care access with a public insurance option. They criticized corruption in Washington and proposed higher taxes on corporations and wealthy Americans.
But they also started to draw some contrasts. More of that is likely Thursday.
Wahls referenced a law Turek supported in the Iowa legislature that makes it a state crime to be in the U.S. illegally. Turek defended his vote, saying it was Biden-era legislation and stressed the importance of a secure U.S.-Mexico border. Turek said he also supports an easier path to citizenship and reforms to immigration enforcement under the Trump administration.
Turek highlighted his working-class background and contrasted his work for a nonprofit with Wahls’ work for a super PAC focused on electing young Democrats.
___
Follow the AP’s coverage of the 2026 election at https://apnews.com/projects/elections-2026/.
Iowa
Iowa State wrestling adds ex-Hawkeye Dru Ayala from transfer portal
Fort Dodge Donnybrook champion Dru Ayala
Hear why Fort Dodge’s Donnybrook Champion Dru Ayala, brother of Drake Ayala, chose the Hawkeyes and has unfinished business in high school
Iowa State wrestling has added another lightweight through the transfer portal, earning the commitment of former Hawkeye Dru Ayala on Wednesday, May 13.
Ayala has been with the Hawkeyes for two seasons, with an 11-4 record as a true freshman and not competing in 2025-26. The 125-pounder will have at least three years of eligibility remaining.
“Grateful for where I’ve been, excited for where I’m going. Go Cyclones,” Ayala said in an Instagram post.
Before his time in Iowa, Ayala was a four-time state medalist with Fort Dodge. He made the state semifinals all four years and had a 153-16 record. He is the brother of former Hawkeye wrestler Drake Ayala, who recently accepted a position as an assistant coach with the Cyclones.
Iowa State has had multiple major departures with Anthony Echemendia, Christian Castillo, Daniel Herrera and others heading to the transfer portal. As a result, the Cyclones have been busy adding to the roster, with Dru Ayala joining Ayden Smith (Rutgers), Brayden Thompson (Oklahoma State) and Rin Sakamoto (Oklahoma State).
Eli McKown covers high school sports and wrestling for the Des Moines Register. Contact him at Emckown@gannett.com. Follow him on Twitter at @EMcKown23.
Iowa
Candidates for Warren County’s Iowa House District 22 tackle issues
Here are the top 2026 midterm races to follow in Iowa
Des Moines Register Chief Politics Reporter Brianne Pfannenstiel breaks down Iowa’s top races ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Two candidates are running for the Iowa House District 22 seat encompassing Norwalk, Carlisle, Cumming and Martensdale.
First-term Republican Rep. Samantha Fett faces a challenge from Democrat Rory Taylor, who she defeated in 2024 to fill the open seat.
Both candidates are unopposed for their party’s nomination.
To help voters, the Des Moines Register sent questions to all federal, statewide and Des Moines area legislative candidates running for political office this year. Their answers have been lightly edited for length and clarity.
The primary election is scheduled for June 2.
Click below to see learn more about the candidates and where they stand on key issues:
| Bios | Top issue | Education | Taxes | Cancer rates | Eminent domain | Budget deficits |
- Political party: Republican.
- Age: 46.
- Residence: Carlisle.
- Occupation: Marketing and communications director for Inspired Life Inc.
- Education: Bachelor’s degree in journalism, Drake University.
- Political experience: Moms for Liberty – Warren County, Carlisle School Board member 2019-2021, Warren County Central Committee member, Capitol Region Republican Women, Iowa Federation of Republican Women, National Federation of Republican Women.
Who is Rory Taylor?
- Political party: Democrat.
- Age: 65.
- Residence: Norwalk.
- Occupation: Retired.
- Education: Bachelor’s degree in history, minor in political science, Iowa State University.
- Political experience: Bevington City Council.
Fett (R): My top issue is strengthening Iowa’s education system. I believe parents should have a leading voice in their children’s education because families want meaningful options. I support high academic standards, safe learning environments and policies that protect children while ensuring every student has the opportunity to succeed. I will work on policies that continue to focus on all students reaching their potential through measurable, objective achievements and by expanding and enhancing the supply of creative education. Education shapes the next generation, and it remains my highest priority.
Taylor (D): Water quality in our state. We need to increase monitoring the water sources we use for our drinking water. Our nitrate levels are in direct correlation to our cancer rates in the state. We need to work with our farmers to mitigate the problem, not blame them for it!
Taylor (D): We need to restructure the voucher program. Students with financial needs could be accommodated, but not the wealthiest of our population. We need to provide more funding for our AEAs and improvement in teacher pay. Bring back our industrial arts programs.
Fett (R): I support policies that put students and families first. That includes strengthening parental rights, expanding educational options and making sure all education models — public schools, homeschool, private and public charter schools — can succeed. I also support a balanced approach to digital learning, since excessive screen time can affect attention and academic progress. I believe Iowa should set developmentally appropriate limits on digital instruction and prioritize strong foundational skills like reading, writing and real classroom connection so every student has the opportunity to thrive.
Fett (R): I support Iowa’s recent tax changes because the state was collecting far more than it needed. With full reserves, a $2 billion ending balance, and over $4 billion in the Taxpayer Relief Fund, returning money to Iowans is the responsible choice. The 3.8% rate keeps Iowa competitive, and temporary revenue dips were planned for. Looking ahead, I would support additional tax law changes that continue this philosophy: keeping government efficient, ensuring strong reserves and returning excess dollars to taxpayers.
Taylor (D): I do not support all the tax changes. I believe moving Iowa’s tax structure for both corporate and income to be more progressive. This would raise taxes on corporations, higher-income individuals and lower taxes on lower-income individuals.
Taylor (D): Water quality standards: Strengthen, enforce and monitor water quality standards to reduce carcinogens like nitrates and PFAS from agricultural runoff.
Fett (R): I support practical, targeted actions that reduce known risks and strengthen research. Iowa is a major radon hotspot, and radon exposure is a leading cause of lung cancer. House File 2297 is an important step requiring passive radon mitigation. A cost-effective protection helps ensure families aren’t unknowingly exposed to dangerous levels. I support the pediatric cancer research bill, which provides dedicated funding to advance research and improve outcomes for Iowa children. This investment and reducing environmental risks give Iowa a stronger and more effective path to lowering cancer rates. Chemical regulation: Improve monitoring of pesticides and fertilizer application, ensuring public health is central to agricultural policy. Radon mitigation: Fund widespread radon testing. Protect Medicaid expansion, which supports cancer screening and care for over 180,000 Iowans. HPV vaccine access: Protect access to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations to prevent future cancer.
Fett (R): Protecting private property rights is essential. Based on that standard, I do not support using eminent domain for carbon capture pipelines, as these projects do not meet the threshold of traditional public use infrastructure and raise significant concerns for landowners. I have consistently opposed the misuse of eminent domain and will continue standing with Iowa landowners on this issue.
Taylor (D): Public projects, such as infrastructure (highways, bridges) and utilities. And as long as there is fair compensation and due process.
Taylor (D): Voucher program would be a start. And the tax cuts that have been made haven’t stimulated the economy as the Republican Party has suggested they would. I don’t see any other cuts I would suggest. The key is tax revenue, and what we have in place now isn’t working!
Fett (R): Iowa’s recent revenue dip was fully expected when income taxes were reduced. I support a disciplined, responsible approach to budgeting that ensures we fund key priorities like public schools, nursing homes and public safety while still allowing Iowans to keep more of what they earn. The Taxpayer Relief Fund was created specifically to manage temporary revenue decreases during tax reform, providing stability without jeopardizing essential services. My focus is on maintaining disciplined budgeting so Iowa continues meeting its obligations without over taxing families.
Read more about the midterm candidates at: https://www.desmoinesregister.com/news/elections/.
Marissa Payne covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. Reach her by email at mjpayne@registermedia.com. Follow her on X at @marissajpayne.
-
Politics4 minutes agoTrump Was Flattering, Xi Was Resolute. The Difference Spoke Volumes.
-
Business10 minutes agoIn Qatar, Energy Sector Damage Is Severe, and the Way Back Will Be Long
-
Science16 minutes agoLithuania’s Peat Bogs Could Help the Climate and Defend the Border, Too
-
Health22 minutes agoWill Her Daughter Be Safe at Pali High as It Rebuilds From LA Wildfires?
-
Culture34 minutes agoJudith Barnard, of Best-Selling ‘Judith Michael’ Fame, Dies at 94
-
Lifestyle40 minutes agoThe Family Branding of Sean Duffy’s Road Trip Reality Show
-
Education46 minutes agoUniversity of Chicago Makes Tuition Free for Families Making Under $250,000
-
Technology52 minutes agoUse this map to find the data centers in your backyard