Connect with us

Iowa

Iowa sues company accused of dumping disused wind-turbine blades at sites across state

Published

on

Iowa sues company accused of dumping disused wind-turbine blades at sites across state


The state of Iowa is suing a Washington state company and its executives for allegedly dumping tons of old wind-turbine blades around Iowa, in violation of the state’s solid-waste laws.

The lawsuit alleges that over the past seven years, Global Fiberglass Solutions has failed to properly dispose of decommissioned wind-turbine blades and stockpiled them at multiple locations across Iowa.

The lawsuit, filed in Iowa District Court for Jasper County, seeks payment of civil penalties and a court injunction to prevent any additional violations of the state’s solid-waste laws.

Advertisement

More: MidAmerican has removed tornado-collapsed turbines, but repair, replacement work ongoing

Global Fiberglass Solutions and its CEO, Donald Lilly, are named as defendants in the case, as is Ronald Albrecht, one of Global’s corporate officers. The defendants could not be reached for comment.

The lawsuit claims that General Electric, which provides parts and equipment for wind turbines, and MidAmerican Energy, which owns wind turbines in Iowa, each hired Global in 2017 to recycle their decommissioned wind-turbine blades.

MidAmerican and General Electric paid Global “millions of dollars,” the lawsuit alleges, to cut up, transport, and recycle the blades. Typically, such blades are about 170 feet long and weigh roughly 16 tons.

Advertisement

Rather than recycle the blades, the lawsuit claims, Global instead dumped roughly 1,300 of them at four locations around the state: Newton, Atlantic and a site in Ellsworth that was used to store blades that were originally dumped in Fort Dodge.

At one time, the lawsuit alleges, there were about 868 blades stored at the Newton site, which was a parking lot for the former Maytag factory. In Ellsworth, Global allegedly dumped 400 blades in a field, directly on the ground. In Atlantic, 22 blades were dumped in a field, directly on the ground, according to the lawsuit.

State says company never posted bond ensuring blades would be recycled

In 2018, according to the lawsuit, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources began fielding complaints about the Newton site. In 2020, the department sent Global a notice of violation related to the sites in Fort Dodge and Newton, indicating the blades were not being recycled as claimed and had simply been discarded. Later that year, a similar notice was issued regarding the Ellsworth site.

In December 2020, the lawsuit alleges, Global agreed to a consent order obligating the company to “take a number of concrete steps to purchase, install, and commence using recycling equipment” to process a certain percentage of the blades according to a series of deadlines.

The company also was required to post a $2 million surety bond to defray state expenses should the DNR be forced to remove and dispose of the blades because of Global’s lack of compliance with the consent order.

Advertisement

The DNR then agreed to extend the deadline for posting the bond until April 1, 2021.

Global never posted the bond, according to the lawsuit, and so the DNR ordered Global to stop accumulating wind-turbine blades in Iowa and to remove all of the blades scattered at the disposal sites. Global didn’t comply with that order and in July 2021 the matter was referred to the Iowa attorney general’s office for legal action.

The state’s lawsuit against Global was filed thie week of Sept. 22, three years after that referral. It seeks a civil penalty of up to $5,000 for each day the company was out of compliance with Iowa’s solid-waste laws.

State records indicate MidAmerican has removed and properly disposed of the blades once located at the Ellsworth site, while General Electric has removed the blades from Atlantic and Newton — a task that was completed in June this year.

Global and its executives “dumped and abandoned 1,300 decommissioned wind-turbine blades in stockpiles across the state,” Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird said in a news release.  “We are taking action to hold them accountable.”

Advertisement

Find this story at Iowa Capital Dispatch, which is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: kobradovich@iowacapitaldispatch.com.



Source link

Iowa

Center for Intellectual Freedom advisory council passes bylaws after disagreements

Published

on

Center for Intellectual Freedom advisory council passes bylaws after disagreements


DES MOINES, Iowa (Gray Media Iowa Capitol Bureau) – The advisory council for the University of Iowa’s new Center for Intellectual Freedom voted 10-7 Tuesday to approve bylaws, including how to select the permanent director.

Republican legislators established the center to combat what they felt was too much liberal ideology on university campuses. The center aims to create college classes that promote what legislators consider intellectual diversity.

Interim director Luciano de Castro created the advisory council’s bylaws, which included who would decide the next director. The group would have consisted mainly of scholars from high research universities.

But Iowa’s Board of Regents felt that too many of those scholars would come from outside Iowa.

Advertisement

“The hiring of the permanent director is on the top of the list. So having a faculty balance at this point and as we’re moving forward, I think, is really important,” said Christine Hensley of the Iowa Board of Regents.

The center’s council considered those concerns at Tuesday’s meeting, but not without disagreement between members.

“Most of the academic side of you folks being willing to serve on there, which we truly appreciate, are from a different state and just not known by Iowans,” said Robert Cramer of the Iowa Board of Regents.

Thomas Gallanis, a professor at George Mason University, disagreed.

“This center is under Iowa control because it reports to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents is the governing body. The Advisory Council is not a governing body,” Gallanis said.

Advertisement

The council now needs the Board of Regents to sign off on the bylaws before the process can get underway to choose a leader for the center.



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa attorney general pushes federal review as farmers warn refinery exemptions hurt corn market

Published

on

Iowa attorney general pushes federal review as farmers warn refinery exemptions hurt corn market



Johnson County farmers have expressed general disapproval of policy exemptions for facilities that turn crops into fuel across the state. Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird urged an investigation into these facilities across the state. 

Bird sent a letter to federal agencies alleging some of Iowa’s small biofuel refineries may be cutting production to qualify for ethanol exemptions, a tactic that farmers say is contributing to lower prices and lost income on their crops.

The Renewable Fuel Standard, or RFS, is a federal program requiring U.S. fuel suppliers to mix renewable fuels into gasoline and diesel with the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, with the 2025 target calling for renewable fuels to account for about 13 percent of the nation’s gasoline and diesel supply.

Small refineries — those unable to satisfy the 75,000-barrel-per-day threshold — can claim an exemption from this requirement by submitting an application that is then reviewed by the EPA.

Advertisement

According to the letter, which was sent on Oct. 29, these companies are claiming hardship while simultaneously telling investors they’re thriving.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Iowa produces over one-fourth of the nation’s ethanol, making Iowa particularly exposed to these kinds of exemptions. When small refineries bypass mixing requirements, it cuts directly into the demand for fuels.

George Swenka, a farmer and rancher in the Tiffin area, agreed with Bird and said he was unhappy with these exemptions, adding it does not make sense to avoid the 10 percent when it helps “everyone.”

“It gives them [refineries with exemptions] an unfair advantage in the marketplace,” Swenka said.” It’s a renewable resource. It helps the producers. It helps every state that’s involved. At the end of the day I just don’t think it’s achieving the goal that should be a common goal for all of us.”

RELATED: Iowa cattle farmer sentiment falls alongside beef futures following Trump’s beef import comments

Advertisement

Chad Hart, an agriculture and finance economics professor at Iowa State University, said this lack of demand has caused financial hardship for farmers.

“It’s a combination of them having ample supplies right now and not seeing as much demand as they would need to take prices higher again. So, if you have the sort of overwhelming supply combined with demand uncertainty, they’re feeling financially squeezed,” Hart said.

Swenka spoke personally about how the lack of demand has affected his farming and said it is especially difficult as farming prices continue to rise.

“Right now, the prices that we’re receiving are just at breakeven, and without an extra marketplace without another source to market our goods, it really makes it tough,” Swenka said.

He said the issue is a common conversation for farmers, calling it “coffee talk,” but he also worries that refinery issues will not be taken as seriously.

Advertisement

“Farmers make up less than 1 percent of the population, so we really feel sometimes that we’re a minority and we feel that we lack any kind of political clout,” he said. 

However, he hopes those outside of agriculture realize it affects the broader Iowa community.

“There’s such a high percentage of jobs, especially in Iowa, directly or indirectly touched by agriculture. So, when the attorney general does good, we all do good, especially in small rural Iowa,” Swenka said.

Great American Insurance Group’s Iowa’s 2025 Digital Yield Tour projects Iowa’s 2025 corn yield could hit 223.7 bushels per acre, which would be well above recent averages, with the average last year being 205 bushels per acre. Hart cited statistics like these as a potential reason why Bird decided to write to the federal government, as many farmers are looking for “usage of their bountiful harvest.”

Hart said the last time Trump was in office, a large number of exemptions were granted to these smaller refineries, and then later overturned in court cases, with Trump issuing 85 exemptions in his first term according to an EPA report.

Advertisement

“There’s also this idea that we may see a similar wave of that here during President Trump’s second term,” Hart said.

Timothy Hagle, a political science professor at the UI, said if changes aren’t made, people may see farms go out of business. According to a Bloomberg Law report released in April, farm bankruptcies grew 55 percent from 2023 to 2024 and are trending even higher in 2025, with Iowa leading all other states with 12 bankruptcies. 

“You’re going to have some farmers that would not be able to continue because of financial reasons, so they may go out of business. You may have some people that would switch crops to the extent they can do,” Hagle said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Officiating Mistakes Cost Iowa Upset Against USC

Published

on

Officiating Mistakes Cost Iowa Upset Against USC


Iowa Hawkeyes’ 26-21 loss at USC turned on multiple controversial officiating decisions in the third quarter. A series of missed calls set up an interception that flipped momentum and ended the Hawkeyes’ upset bid.

CBS Sports’ Chris Hassel posted video of the most egregious play that sparked outrage across college football. Running back Kamari Moulton carried the ball six yards on second down when a USC defender grabbed and twisted his facemask to bring him down.

No flag came out despite the obvious violation. The call should have given Iowa a 15-yard penalty and automatic first down at USC’s 43-yard line with the Hawkeyes leading 21-19.

The missed facemask wasn’t an isolated incident. Moulton had his helmet turned more than 90 degrees sideways and vertically on multiple occasions throughout the game without drawing flags. Fans also pointed to numerous uncalled holding penalties against USC’s offensive line that extended Trojan drives.

The officiating failures proved costly on the very next play. Instead of having a first down in USC territory, Iowa faced third-and-4 from its own 44. Quarterback Mark Gronowski threw a pass that deflected off receiver Jacob Gill’s knee and into the hands of USC freshman defensive lineman Jahkeem Stewart for an interception.

USC capitalized on the short field, driving 40 yards in six plays for a go-ahead touchdown. Running back Bryan Jackson scored from one yard out to give the Trojans a 26-21 lead early in the fourth quarter.

Iowa head coach Kirk Ferentz addressed the officiating after the game: “I thought I saw a couple of things that maybe could’ve gone the other way. Apparently nobody thought it was flag worthy. You’ve got to play through those things. It doesn’t always work the way you want.”

The missed calls drew immediate backlash on social media. “Honestly – this along with all the obvious holds – there needs to be an investigation into the refs. Isn’t fun when they affect the game so bad – it’s like watching women’s basketball refs,” one fan wrote.

“Simply a game-changing missed facemask call that hurts the Iowa Hawkeyes. This is just inexcusable. You can’t miss this. His head turned. Embarrassing,” another stated.

“Officials miss a hold or hands to the face (take your pick) and then Iowa gets hit for the collision in the end zone. They’re not even looking for USC penalties now,” a third fan observed.

Advertisement

The controversy extended beyond the missed penalties. Iowa committed an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on their sideline with 1:25 remaining that gave USC a crucial first down and allowed the Trojans to run out the clock.

The loss dropped Iowa to 6-4 overall and 4-3 in Big Ten play after blowing a 21-10 halftime lead. The Hawkeyes managed just 108 total yards in the second half and failed to score after intermission.

Despite the officiating controversies, Iowa still had one final chance to pull off the upset. On fourth-and-6 with under two minutes remaining, Gronowski launched a deep pass to receiver Kaden Wetjen, who made a spectacular catch near the USC 10-yard line. However, replay showed his toe landed just out of bounds by mere inches, ending Iowa’s comeback attempt.

Advertisement

Iowa’s College Football Playoff hopes had already died in an 18-16 loss to Oregon on November 8. The USC defeat marked another painful near-miss in a season defined by close losses to ranked opponents.

The Hawkeyes have now lost four games this season by a combined 15 points, with three of those opponents potentially making the College Football Playoff. The defeat extended Iowa’s losing streak against ranked teams to 13 consecutive games.

Iowa has bowl eligibility secured with two regular season games remaining against Michigan State and Nebraska. The combination of questionable officiating and self-inflicted mistakes at USC captures the essence of Iowa’s frustrating 2025 campaign.

Don’t forget to bookmark Iowa Hawkeyes on SI for the latest news. exclusive interviews, recruiting coverage and more!





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending