Connect with us

Iowa

Iowa passes Medicaid work requirement

Published

on

Iowa passes Medicaid work requirement


Iowa lawmakers have approved a bill mandating that certain Medicaid recipients work to retain benefits, a move expected to affect tens of thousands of constituents who use the health program.

The new legislation makes Iowa one of the latest states to pursue such requirements. Georgia remains the only state with work requirements already in place, but may others have similar legislation pending approval or at various stages of implementation.

Newsweek has contacted Iowa lawmakers and the state’s Department of Health and Human Services for comment via email outside regular working hours.

Why It Matters

Iowa’s new Medicaid work requirement is expected to affect low-income adults who receive health care through the state’s Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Advertisement

A number of states have recently pushed for Medicaid work requirements. On the federal level, House Republicans have proposed similar requirements as part of its budget.

Generally, critics of work requirements warn they will substantially weaken the Medicaid system, the largest public health insurance program in the country, by forcing millions off the service. Supporters argue that work requirements will foster employment, reduce fraudulent claims and improve personal responsibility.

What To Know

The bill seeks to include work requirements as a condition of eligibility for those on the Iowa Health and Wellness Plan, meaning they use Medicaid under the ACA expansion.

The legislation said, “The goal of including work requirements is to reduce the dependence of low-income Iowans on public assistance programs through efforts that advance economic stability and mobility.”

To be eligible for the program, Iowans 19 to 64 years old would have to work 80 hours a month, although some recipients would be exempt from the ruling.

Advertisement

Those who are “determined to be disabled by the United States social security administration” are exempt. Exemptions also include those identified as “medically frail,” caregivers of a child under the age of 6 and people with “high risk” pregnancies.

As the bill has been deemed of “immediate importance,” the new rules would come into effect upon its enactment.

According to the bill, if federal law or regulations affecting work requirements for the Iowa Health and Wellness Plan are “modified to exclude work requirements as a basis for maintaining eligibility,” the department will discontinue the plan entirely, if it gets approval to do so.

A fiscal note on the bill said that as of April, 183,000 Iowans were enrolled on the state’s Medicaid expansion program. Of those enrollees, the report expected 32,000 individuals to lose coverage beginning in 2026 because of the requirements.

The report also anticipated that the new requirements would decrease the state’s total Medicaid expenditures by about $2.5 million in the financial year 2026 and by about $14.4 million in the financial year 2027.

Advertisement
A stock photo of the Iowa Capitol in Des Moines.

Charlie Neibergall/AP

What People Are Saying

The Iowa State Democrats account on X, formerly Twitter, wrote on Tuesday: “Many Iowans rely on state funding to help cover their healthcare needs. The scale of our maternal healthcare crisis is growing. The Medicaid waiver waitlist for Iowans with disabilities is growing. This Republican budget proposal fails to bring relief to those Iowans in need.”

The Iowa Democrats X account wrote on Tuesday: “Countless Iowans rely on Medicaid to access healthcare coverage. Iowa Republicans in D.C. plan to ignore the concerns of their constituents and rip away their coverage to pay for a $4.5 trillion tax cut for the wealthy.”

Democratic state Senator Sarah Trone Garriott said: “Taking away people’s health care does not help them work. It often keeps people out of the workforce, because then they can’t pay for their medications, they can’t get the care they need. They end up getting sicker. They end up missing more work.”

Republican state Senator Mike Klimesh said: “So at the end of demonstration year five, we will see a savings in the state of Iowa as a result of this program of $50 million. $50 million in savings that we can really reallocate or reappropriate to other areas, perhaps work with our programs. We may be able to develop with further communication between ourselves in the House.”

What Happens Next

The Iowa Senate approved the bill in a 33-13 vote, the Des Moines Register reported. It went back to the House, which passed it in a 56-30 vote on Wednesday.

Advertisement

The legislation now heads to Governor Kim Reynolds, who is expected to sign it.



Source link

Iowa

Iowa State football running back Carson Hansen to leave Cyclones

Published

on

Iowa State football running back Carson Hansen to leave Cyclones


play

Iowa State football running back Carson Hansen announced on Dec. 23 that he “will be pursuing new opportunities with my last year of eligibility.”

Advertisement

Hansen is the latest Cyclones star to indicate that he will transfer to another school in the wake of coach Matt Campbell’s departure to Penn State. Quarterback Rocco Becht and cornerbacks Jeremiah Cooper and Jontez Williams are among the other Iowa State standouts leaving Ames.

Hansen, a native of Lakeville, Minn., rushed for 952 yards on 188 carries during his junior season with the Cyclones. In three years with Iowa State, he compiled 1,771 yards and 19 touchdowns on the ground.

Hansen was the Cyclones’ leading rusher in 2024 and 2025.

“My three years here at Iowa State have been a life changing experience because of the people who make up Ames …” Hansen wrote on Twitter/X. “Thank you to the fans that shook Jack Trice every Saturday and for your belief in this football team.”

Campbell announced on Dec. 5 that he was leaving Iowa State after 10 years as the Cyclones’ head coach. He was quickly succeeded by Washington State’s Jimmy Rogers, who has a big job in front of him to replace the exodus of talent transferring out of Ames.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa Supreme Court overturns doctor’s child sex abuse conviction

Published

on

Iowa Supreme Court overturns doctor’s child sex abuse conviction


play

  • The Iowa Supreme Court overturned the sexual abuse conviction of a West Des Moines doctor.
  • The court ruled that allowing the child victim to testify via one-way video violated the Iowa Constitution.
  • This decision is one of several that has set Iowa apart from other states on the issue of remote testimony.

The Iowa Supreme Court has overturned the conviction of a West Des Moines doctor found guilty of sexually abusing a child, ruling that allowing the victim to testify via one-way video violated the Iowa Constitution.

The court on Tuesday, Dec. 23, reversed the conviction of Lynn Melvin Lindaman, a longtime central Iowa surgeon who practiced at the Lindaman Orthopaedics clinic in West Des Moines before he was charged in 2023 with second-degree sexual abuse. The case was remanded for a new trial.

Advertisement

The decision is the latest in a string of rulings that have set Iowa apart as the only state in the country whose highest court has barred one-way video testimony in criminal trials, even in cases involving child victims. 

Those decisions already have begun reshaping prosecutions across the state and have prompted lawmakers to launch the process of amending the Iowa Constitution. The change would ultimately require voter approval.

Lindaman, now 75, was convicted after a jury trial in Polk County. Prosecutors alleged that on June 26, 2023, he committed a sex act in Ankeny against a child under the age of 10. A second count of sexual abuse was dismissed prior to trial. He was sentenced to 50 years in prison, with a mandatory minimum of 42½ years because of a prior sexual predatory offense in 1976. He also faced a separate and now-dismissed civil lawsuit from an Iowa woman who claimed he sexually assaulted her in 1975.

The Iowa Offender Search still lists Lindaman as in custody of the Iowa Medical & Classification Center.

Advertisement

On appeal, Lindaman argued that his constitutional rights were violated when the district court allowed the child to testify from another room via one-way closed-circuit television, rather than from the witness stand in the courtroom.

“Today’s decision from the Iowa Supreme Court is an important win for Lynn Lindaman and a major step toward a fair result,” said Lucas Taylor, the attorney representing Lindaman. “Although the court did not rule in our favor on every issue, this ruling recognizes serious errors in the prior proceedings and gives Mr. Lindaman the chance to present his defense to a new jury.”

In a 4-3 ruling issued earlier this year in State v. White, the Iowa Supreme Court agreed with that argument, holding that one-way video testimony violates the confrontation clause of the Iowa Constitution. Writing for the majority in that case, Justice David May said that “when the accused and the witness are prevented from seeing each other, there is no face-to-face confrontation, and the Iowa Constitution is not satisfied.”

The ruling came despite U.S. Supreme Court precedent allowing such testimony and laws in many other states permitting it. Under the Iowa statute the court overturned, judges had been allowed to authorize remote testimony by minors, or witnesses with mental illnesses or disabilities, if a judge found that “trauma caused by testifying in the physical presence of the defendant … would impair the minor’s ability to communicate.”

The White decision arose from an Osceola County case, but its effects have since spread and courts across Iowa have begun hearing challenges from defendants convicted in cases where one-way video testimony was used.

Advertisement

Following the ruling, Lynn Hicks, a spokesman for the Polk County Attorney’s Office, said at least five Polk County defendants convicted under similar circumstances could be entitled to new trials.

One of those defendants, Michael Dunbar, already has received a new trial. Dunbar was resentenced after the victim testified in person from the witness stand, and the court again imposed a life sentence.

Dissent fuels push to amend Iowa Constitution

The State v. White ruling has drawn sharp criticism from prosecutors and state leaders, including Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird, who has argued the decision unnecessarily traumatizes child victims. 

Bird has proposed a constitutional amendment to allow children to testify remotely in certain cases. The measure has passed both chambers of the Legislature once and must pass again before going to voters in a statewide referendum.

“Children shouldn’t be forced to testify at arm’s length from their abusers, and many kids can’t. This opinion shows how important it is to restore protections for a child victim to testify remotely,” Bird said in a Tuesday statement to the Des Moines Register. “Our office will continue to fight for a constitutional amendment to ensure kids are protected and abusers are brought to justice. We are grateful our effort has received overwhelming bipartisan support in the Iowa Legislature.”

Advertisement

Justice Thomas D. Waterman, writing in a dissent in the opinion issued Tuesday, rejected the majority’s historical interpretation of the confrontation clause.

“Thunder comes during rainstorms; it does not follow that thunder requires rain. That video testimony was not used in 1871 tells us more about technology than it does about constitutional interpretation,” Waterman wrote.

He also said there is “no historical evidence that the framers of the Iowa Constitution intended a different meaning for confrontation rights than the Sixth Amendment,” and warned that the majority was reading requirements into Iowa’s Constitution that do not exist in its text.

Nick El Hajj is a reporter at the Register. He can be reached at nelhajj@gannett.com. Follow him on X at @nick_el_hajj.

This story was updated to add new information and to correct an inaccuracy.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

States including Iowa, Nebraska reach $150M settlement with Mercedes-Benz

Published

on

States including Iowa, Nebraska reach 0M settlement with Mercedes-Benz


LINCOLN, Neb. (WOWT) – A coalition of states including both Iowa and Nebraska reached a nearly $150 million settlement with Mercedes-Benz.

The states allege over 200,000 diesel vehicles were illegally equipped with devices designed to cheat on emissions tests between 2008 and 2016.

Mercedes allegedly hid the existence of these devices from regulators and people purchasing the vehicles.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending