Quick thoughts on a 97-71 win against Sam Houston State:

How it happened

Indiana went small for a long stretch in the first half and the Hoosiers got rolling offensively. From the 13:12 mark in the first half to the six-minute mark, the Hoosiers went on a 25-3 run to grab a 34-12 lead. Luke Goode’s hot perimeter shooting was a big part of the run. Goode went 4-for-5 from deep in the opening 20 minutes and his 13 points were a team-high. Turnovers, however, were still an issue. Indiana committed nine in the first half. The Hoosiers also cooled off from the free throw line and shot just 5-for-10. A strong defensive performance limited Sam Houston State to just 25 points on 25.8 percent shooting and the Hoosiers went to the locker room with a comfortable 42-25 lead.

It was a poor start to the second half for Indiana as the Bearkats got within nine at 48-39 on a 3-point play by Cameron Huefner with 16:25 remaining. Fouls, however, began to pile up for Sam Houston State as Indiana reached the bonus by the under 12-media timeout, leading 59-47. Out of the timeout, Goode made a pair of free throws following a technical on Kian Scroggins and Oumar Ballo made another pair from the line to stretch the cushion to 63-47 with 11:56 left. By the 6:44 mark, the rout was on as IU stretched the lead to 81-58 on a Bryson Tucker transition layup, forcing Sam Houston State to take a timeout. The Hoosiers were never challenged the rest of the way as they recorded their sixth win.

Standout performers

Myles Rice led Indiana with 19 points on 9-for-12 shooting. Rice had 15 in the second half. Goode scored a career-high 17 points on 5-for-8 shooting. Malik Reneau also had 18 points to go along with 10 rebounds, five assists and three steals in 30 minutes. Anthony Leal also deserves a mention for his spark off the bench. Leal finished with four points, four rebounds and four assists in 25 minutes.

Statistics that stand out

Indiana scored 25 fast-break points and only allowed five offensive rebounds. The Bearkats didn’t score a second chance point. IU’s bench also outscored Sam Houston State’s bench 36-10.

Final IU individual statistics

Final tempo-free statistics

Assembly Call postgame show

Filed to: Sam Houston State Bearkats

BLOOMINGTON — Indiana football coach Curt Cignetti didn’t spend much time celebrating his team’s historically lopsided win over Purdue. 

He was already looking ahead to a potential College Football Playoff appearance for the No. 10 Hoosiers (11-1; 8-1 Big Ten) during his brief opening statement after a 66-0 win over Purdue.

“They are not done yet,” Cignetti said, emphatically. “You know, they are not — they want more. They are going to get more.”

More is likely to be one of college football’s traditional powers in the opening round of the first ever 12-team playoff. There’s some incredibly exciting potential first-round matchups, here they are ranked from thrilling to least:  

More: Indiana football’s soothsayer Mikail Kamara puts his stamp on the Old Oaken Bucket game

Ranking Indiana football’s most exciting potential first round CFP opponents

Georgia (10-2): Taking down a perennial title contender like Georgia in the heart of SEC country would erase any doubts about IU being the real deal. The Bulldogs have won two national titles in the last three years and have the fourth most wins in CFP history. 

The trip to Athens would be a first for the Hoosiers — the programs have never played each other — and haven’t played an SEC opponent on a non-neutral field since facing Kentucky in 2004. 

Indiana playing between the hedges at Sanford Stadium in the postseason was not a scenario anyone envisioned at the start of the year. 

More: Indiana football needed to beat Purdue to keep its CFP hopes alive. How the Hoosiers won was equally important.

Notre Dame (11-1): Notre Dame and Indiana are in the same state, but the football programs have spent much of their existence on separate continents. The Fighting Irish almost have more national titles than IU has bowl appearances. 

The Hoosiers could break out of that shadow in a big way by eliminating them in the first round of the College Football Playoff. 

Indiana fans would probably take a bit of extra pleasure in getting a CFP win before Notre Dame does. The Fighting Irish have made a pair of appearances in the event (2018 and 2020), but lost those games by a combined score of 61-17. 

The fact that the teams have rarely played in the modern era of college football makes the potential matchup all the more exciting. The teams haven’t played since Notre Dame beat IU, 49-27, in 1991. 

It was the only game between the programs going back to 1958. 

Penn State (11-1): Indiana’s past and present could collide in State College. 

The Hoosiers former head coach Tom Allen landed on his feet as PSU’s defensive coordinator. The Nittany Lions finished the regular season with the fourth ranked defense in the FBS (266.8 yards allowed per game) and sixth in scoring defense (14.0). 

Indiana facing its former coach would create plenty of intrigue between two longtime Big Ten rivals especially since Cignetti’s brash style is so diametrically opposed to Allen’s LEO era. 

There’s an added irony to the teams playing in the first round since IU was excited about finally being free of facing Penn State on an annual basis in the Big Ten East division. The Hoosiers wouldn’t have any objections to continuing the series in the postseason. 

More: Indiana football’s win over Purdue was most dominant victory in team history. Here’s 3 stats that prove it.

Texas (11-1): This would be a fun matchup considering the head coaches from both teams are former Nick Saban pupils. 

It would also be a meeting of great offensive minds. 

Cignetti’s respect for Texas coach Steven Sarkisian actually played a role in Indiana’s success this season. That admiration is what led Cignetti to hiring IU’s current quarterbacks coach Tino Sunseri when he was at JMU. 

“I spent that whole COVID fall studying Alabama when Sarkisian was there with Matt Jones and those receivers,” Cignetti said, back in December. “I really liked what they were doing. I was looking for new ideas in the pass game. Tino was Sark’s right hand man.”

On top of it being a great chess match, this isn’t a matchup that comes around very often. Indiana is winless in three games against Texas and the teams haven’t played since 1966. 

Ohio State (10-2): Indiana players would welcome a rematch against Ohio State. The Hoosiers didn’t feel like they played their best game in Columbus and are frustrated by the narrative that they can’t compete with the Buckeyes. 

Bouncing back with a win over OSU in the first round would be a heck of a way for IU to end a 30-game losing streak in the series, but from a fan’s perspective this lacks the same excitement over a game they didn’t see just weeks earlier in the exact same venue. 

Tennessee (10-2): Indiana would get a chance to avenge a 2020 loss to Tennessee in the Gator Bowl if they headed down to Knoxville, but that would provide little motivation for the guys in IU’s locker room since there isn’t anybody still on the roster that played in that game.

This would give the Hoosiers a chance to Big Ten some bragging rights over the SEC, but there’s just not as much juice to this game compared to the rest of the list. 

Michael Niziolek is the Indiana beat reporter for The Bloomington Herald-Times. You can follow him on X @michaelniziolek and read all his coverage by clicking here.

BLOOMINGTON, Ind. – Indiana men’s basketball entered the season with hope and expectation that a return to the NCAA Tournament was imminent and that the Hoosiers might find their way among the national powers again.

Indiana entered Battle 4 Atlantis with the No. 14 ranking in the polls. A preseason victory at Tennessee seemed to justify those hopes.

However, Battle 4 Atlantis proved to be a humbling experience for the Hoosiers. An 89-61 loss to Louisville in the opening game was a shocker that sent much of the Indiana fanbase into immediate angst. Indiana got a chance to make amends with a quality win over Gonzaga, but the Bulldogs rolled 89-73 in another heavy defeat for the Hoosiers.

Indiana avoided an 0-3 Battle 4 Atlantis performance with an 89-73 win over Providence, but the damage was already done. Indiana did not get the quality wins it needed in the Bahamas and Monday’s NCAA NET rankings put Indiana in 71st – well off the pace needed to be considered a NCAA Tournament team.

Indiana (5-2) can make up for none of this in its nonconference matchup with Sam Houston at 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, but the Hoosiers need to demonstrate – if not to themselves, then to the fans – that they are proceeding down a path that can lead them out of the hole they’ve dug for themselves.

One thing is certain – Indiana has removed any room for slip-ups. Without any quality nonconference wins in the Bahamas, the Hoosiers have to run the table against their mid-major nonconference foes. If they lose even one of those games, even a couple of quality wins in the Big Ten play won’t necessarily make up for it.

Here are three things to watch for from the Hoosiers when they face off against the Bearkats:

1. Can Indiana Win By A Large Margin?

It’s sad, to me at least, that margin of victory has become such an important part of how metrics are used by various rankings systems and how it’s baked into the NCAA’s NET rankings.

The NCAA claims it doesn’t use margin of victory data, but it does use offensive and defensive efficiencies, which are absolutely influenced by margin of victory, which in turn, is influenced by strength of schedule.

“This thing’s become a complete numbers game,” NC State coach Kevin Keatts said in a Richmond (Va.) Times-Dispatch story in February. “Unfortunately, I think it takes away from the sportsmanship. … You’ve got to try and beat the heck out of people just to improve your NET.”

Unfortunately, that’s the way the criteria works in 2024-25 too, so scores shall be run up.

The expected victory margin over Sam Houston is 14 points. The Hoosiers need to exceed that and push the margin as high as they can. Should it be that way? Not in any kind of sporting way it shouldn’t, but the Hoosiers have to play the game, especially given that they lack quality wins elsewhere.

2. Will Indiana Take More 3-Point Shots?

In the 2023-24 season, Indiana endured a lot of criticism for not taking 3-point shots. Indiana ranked 273rd in 3-point shooting percentage in 2024 at 32.4%.

While the construction of the roster could be, and was, criticized for not having enough shooters, once the season started, it didn’t make much sense for Indiana to foist threes it couldn’t consistently make, especially when it had high-percentage producers like Kel’El Ware and Malik Reneau near the rim.

So far in the 2024-25 season, Indiana has been similarly dependent on 2-point shots. Unlike last season, the Hoosiers don’t need to be.

This was mentioned in the How To Watch story, but it bears repeating. Of the 58.9 shots per game Indiana takes, 41.3 of them are from 2-point range. Indiana ranks 305th and 340th nationally in 3-point shots made (6.3) and 3-point shots attempted (17.6).

With last year’s roster? This stood to reason, but not with this one.

The Hoosiers rank 105th nationally in 3-point percentage at 35.8%. That puts the Hoosiers in the top third of Division I in 3-point shooting.

One understands the temptation to throw the ball into the paint to Oumar Ballo and Reneau – both can be very difficult to stop in the paint. However, Indiana needs to take better advantage of what appears to be a good shooting team.

3. Can Indiana Run Sam Houston Off The 3-point Line?

Sam Houston (4-4) will not hesitate to fire away from long range – and for good reason. The Bearkats rank 17th nationally in 3-point percentage at 40.3%. Lamar Wilkerson, Dorian Finister and Cameron Huefner all convert at better than 40% from long range.

Indiana has done a good job in 3-point percentage defense (29.9%, ranked 95th nationally), but a bad job in preventing 3-point attempts to begin with. Indiana opponents have averaged 26.3 attempts per game, which puts the Hoosiers in the bottom quarter of Division I.

Indiana has done a poor job of preventing opponents’ shots of any kind (Indiana is giving up almost 64 field goal attempts per game, a bottom 30 Division I ranking), but against the dead-eye Bearkats? The 3-point defense has to be on-point.