Connect with us

Indiana

Knicks-Pacers: 5 takeaways from Indiana’s staunch Game 6 stand

Published

on

Knicks-Pacers: 5 takeaways from Indiana’s staunch Game 6 stand


In an emphatic Game 6 win, Pascal Siakam showed exactly why Indiana traded for him.

• Download the NBA App

We haven’t had a Game 7 at Madison Square Garden since 1995.

The winner of that game was the Indiana Pacers, with Patrick Ewing missing a game-tying finger roll at the buzzer. And it was the Pacers who forced another Game 7 at MSG with a 116-103 victory over the New York Knicks in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference semifinals on Friday.

Advertisement

Indiana took control with a 17-2 run late in the second quarter, dominated the paint, and rebounded well enough to improve to 6-0 at home in these playoffs. They were the more desperate team and they played like it, continuing to play fast on offense and showing a lot more toughness on defense than they displayed in Game 5.

Here are some notes, quotes, numbers and film as the Pacers improved to 6-0 at home in the playoffs and booked another trip back to New York for Game 7 on Sunday afternoon (3:30 p.m. ET, ABC) …


1. Pacers dominate the paint and the glass

The Pacers had outscored the Knicks by 40 points in the paint over the first four games of this series, but the Game 5 score in the paint was 62-36 in favor of the Knicks, with New York also obtaining an incredible 50% of available offensive rebounds.

The script was flipped in Game 6, when the Pacers were a plus-24 (62-38) in the paint, the Knicks’ worst differential of the season (94 total games). Some of that was the Pacers pushing in transition, moving the ball and consistently looking to attack.

Advertisement

Some of it was their defense. The Knicks’ 18-for-41 (43.9%) shooting in the paint was their fourth-worst mark of the season (94 total games). Indiana blocked eight of those shots, with Isaiah Jackson recording three blocks in less than 12 minutes off the bench.

Of course, defensive possessions, especially when you’re playing the Knicks, aren’t done until a rebound has been secured. The Pacers were much better on the defensive glass, with New York’s offensive rebounding percentage of 32.0% being its third-lowest mark of the postseason. (The Knicks are 6-0 when they’ve grabbed more than 34% of available offensive boards.)

The Pacers, meanwhile, had more offensive rebounds (14) than the Knicks (13). Jackson had just one of those 14, but drew two loose-ball fouls on the offensive glass on a single possession early in the fourth quarter.

“It was just activity,” Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said of his team’s interior success on Friday. “We played harder tonight, which was a must.”


2. Knicks play small, Siakam plays big

Advertisement

The Knicks changed their starting lineup in Game 5, replacing Precious Achiuwa with Miles McBride. It gave New York more spacing around Jalen Brunson.

But it also made the Knicks smaller up front. Pascal Siakam took advantage of that change, playing big and scoring a team-high 25 points, with 17 of those coming in the paint (14) or at the free throw line.

Early in the first quarter, Siakam got a layup after a Knicks bucket on the other end of the floor. Tyrese Haliburton got the ball up the floor quickly and Siakam got behind Josh Hart, who had his eyes on the ball …

Pascal Siakam layup

Later in the first, Siakam established early post position against McBride and drew a foul. A few possessions later, he drew another by taking Donte DiVincenzo under the basket.

In the second quarter, Siakam really went to work against Hart by posting him up …

Advertisement

Pascal Siakam post-up basket vs. Josh Hart

He got two more post-up scores against Hart after that. Then he had another matchup against McBride and, when the Knicks brought two extra defenders, Siakam found Myles Turner for a dunk …

Pascal Siakam assist to Myles Turner

The Knicks didn’t go back to their big lineup for the second half, but they put Isaiah Hartenstein (or Achiuwa) on Siakam, with Hart guarding Turner (or Jackson). But in the fourth quarter, with the Knicks’ bigs focused on rim protection, Siakam was twice able to find space to shoot in-rhythm jumpers after setting a ball screen.


3. Hart gets hurt

Prior to Game 6, Hart had averaged an incredible 43.7 minutes, what would be the highest mark for any player who played at least 10 games in the last 11 postseasons. And he had played all 48 (or all 53) minutes in four of the 11 games.

But on Friday, Hart asked to be subbed out midway through both the first and third quarters. He seemingly suffered an abdominal injury early on and was clearly in discomfort the rest of the night. He still played almost 31 minutes, but shot just 2-for-8 and (as noted above) had a tough time defending Siakam.

Advertisement

The Knicks are already without Julius Randle, Mitchell Robinson, Bojan Bogdanovic and OG Anunoby. And with Hart now dealing with something, they have the shortest of turnarounds between Games 6 and 7. The last time they played in the afternoon less than 48 hours after a night game was Game 4, which they lost by 32.

Knicks coach Tom Thibodeau didn’t have an update on Hart after Game 6. Nor did he have much of an answer when asked about the possibility of Anunoby (hamstring strain) returning from a four-game absence to play in Game 7.

The Knicks are now 14-17 without Anunoby since his acquisition. In this series, they’ve been outscored by 28 points (19 per 100 possessions) in 79 total minutes with their other four starters on the floor without him, allowing the Pacers to score an uber-efficient 131.3 points per 100 possessions.


4. Tale of two halves for Brunson

There was some hope for the Knicks at halftime despite being down 10. First of all, they had trailed in eight of their previous 11 playoff games by double-digits and won five of those eight.

Advertisement

Secondly, they were down only 10 even though Brunson had shot 2-for-13 from the field and 1-for-4 from the free throw line. If he got going in the second half, they certainly had a shot.

And Brunson did get going in the second half, scoring 26 points (on 9-for-13 shooting) in less than 19 minutes. But it wasn’t enough.

Overall, the Pacers defended the Knicks’ star better than they did in Game 5. Aaron Nesmith was the primary defender again and did a good job of navigating screens. Haliburton was stronger with his hedges when his man set those screens. And the Pacers also had a couple of timely double-teams after Brunson burrowed his way into the paint …

Jalen Brunson double-team

But in the second half, Brunson was also able to take advantage of the Pacers’ pressure, both in the backcourt (breaking the press and driving for a layup) and in the frontcourt (cutting back door for another layup). He found a rhythm and then he started cooking.

Ultimately, Brunson’s second-half scoring didn’t mean much. And there hasn’t been much carry-over from game to game in this series. But he has shot much better in the three games at home (54%) than he has in Indiana (39%).

Advertisement

5. The difference is inside the Knicks’ offense

Brunson’s second-half scoring didn’t mean much because the Pacers scored 52 points on 34 second-half possessions (1.53 per) before Thibodeau initiated garbage time (by taking Brunson out) with a little less than four minutes left in the fourth quarter.

Game 5, when they held the postseason’s No. 1 offense under a point per possessions, was the Knicks’ best defensive game of the playoffs. But their defense didn’t travel and Game 6 was one of their worst.

Still, the bigger difference between New York wins and Indiana wins in this series has been on the the Knicks’ end of the floor …

Knicks and Pacers’ efficiency, conf. semis

Advertisement
Games NYK OffRtg IND OffRtg
New York wins 131.0 116.7
Indiana wins 107.6 125.2
Diff. 23.4 -8.5

OffRtg = Points scored per 100 possessions

That’s more about their shooting in the paint (60.3% vs. 46.5%) than their shooting from the outside (effective field goal percentage of 56.9% vs. 50.0%). The Pacers were tougher defensively in Game 6 and may need to be even better at Madison Square Garden on Sunday afternoon.

* * *

John Schuhmann is a senior stats analyst for NBA.com. You can e-mail him here, find his archive here and follow him on X. 

The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA, its clubs or Warner Bros. Discovery.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Police shoots man armed with knife in Gary, Indiana, officials say

Published

on

Police shoots man armed with knife in Gary, Indiana, officials say



A man wielding a knife was shot by a police officer on Sunday in Gary, Indiana.

A spokesperson for the city said officers responded to the 2100 block of Tennessee Street for a call of a suicidal man who was armed with a knife in his hand. The man had already stabbed himself a couple of times before they arrived.

Officers found the man in the east alley of 22nd and Ohio. At this time, he was standing in the alley still with the knife in his hand and refused to drop it as ordered by officers. The man then started to advance toward the officer, who shot the man three times in the arm, the spokesperson said.

Advertisement

The officer notified the department that shots were fired, and the man was down. The condition of the man is unknown as of Sunday night.

Other officers responded to the scene to set up a perimeter around the area. The Gary Fire Department and Lake County Crime Scene Investigation personnel were also contacted.

No further information was immediately available. 


If you or someone you know is in emotional distress, get help from the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988. Trained crisis counselors are available 24 hours a day to talk about anything.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

50+ Indiana counties under travel advisories after snow storm. See map

Published

on

50+ Indiana counties under travel advisories after snow storm. See map


play

At least 50 Indiana counties are under a travel advisory, and 20 counties were issued a travel watch for Dec. 14, following an overnight snow storm.

The Indiana Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) travel advisory map has each county shaded in red for a travel warning, orange for a travel watch, yellow for a travel advisory and gray for a county without an elevated status report on it’s current travel conditions.

Advertisement

Here’s how you can check your county to see where it lands on the map.

Travel advisory

According to DHS, a travel advisory is the lowest level of a related advisory.

“Routine travel or activities may be restricted in areas because of a hazardous situation, and individuals should use caution or avoid those areas,” the department says on its website.

Watch advisory

According to DHS, a watch advisory is issued when conditions are threatening to a county’s safety.

“Only essential travel, such as to and from work or in emergency situations, is recommended, and emergency action plans should be implemented by businesses, schools, government agencies and other organizations,” the department’s website states.

Advertisement

Warning advisory

According to DHS, a warning advisory is the highest level of a related advisory, where people may be told not to travel at all.

“Travel may be restricted to emergency management workers only,” the department’s website states.

Here’s the winter weather info you need

🚨 Indiana Weather Alerts: Warnings, Watches and Advisories.

⚡ Indiana power outage map: How to check your status.

Advertisement

💻 Internet outages: How to track them.

🚫 What you should and shouldn’t do when the power is out.

🐶 Your neighbor left their pet outside. Who you should call.

Indianapolis weather radar

Jade Jackson is a public safety reporter for the Indianapolis Star. You can email her at Jade.Jackson@IndyStar.com and follow her on X, formerly Twitter @IAMJADEJACKSON



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

What Darian DeVries, Tucker DeVries Said After Indiana Basketball’s Loss at Kentucky

Published

on

What Darian DeVries, Tucker DeVries Said After Indiana Basketball’s Loss at Kentucky


LEXINGTON, Ky. — Indiana basketball coach Darian DeVries and senior forward Tucker DeVries met with reporters after the Hoosiers’ 72-60 loss to Kentucky on Saturday night at Rupp Arena in Lexington.

Here’s what the DeVries duo said during their near-seven-minute press conference.


Advertisement

Q: I guess, Darian, it’s sort of another night where it feels like it just kind of gets difficult to really break down an opponent off the dribble, kind of get that inside-out sort of paint touch to three looks you want, just like what, I guess, are you guys, what’s not happening there, what’s just kind of sort of failing at the source offensively when that’s not working? 

DD: Yeah, I thought the first half, you know, we got some pretty good action, pretty good movement, I thought the second half, Kentucky certainly turned up the pressure and was able to get into us and we didn’t respond well enough and we turned the ball over too much and live ball turnovers against them are really hard because now they’re out in transition playing in space, so the turnovers and the offensive rebounding, I mean, that flipped the game around that second half. 

Q: On Kentucky’s long run, what was the problem there?

Yeah, I thought the turnovers, it was a combination of things, I thought, you know, we left our feet a few times, I thought we just, you know, got on our heels a little bit and didn’t play as disciplined as we needed to, you know, as that, you know, the crowd got cranked up and things, that’s the time where you got to really dig in a little bit more, your screen’s got to be better, you got to play off of two feet more, and then the offensive rebounds, you know, they just went and got them and, you know, we didn’t do a good enough job of creating space and getting bodies and going and securing the ball. 

Advertisement

Q: What do you think you need to improve on, the team needs to improve on against ball pressure at the point of attack? 

Advertisement

DD: Yeah, the number one thing when you get at ball pressure is everything from an execution standpoint and a movement standpoint, it’s just got to be done with more force, you can’t continue just to get pushed out and everybody stands, so you have to find ways to give yourself up with a back hook, give yourself up with a screen, set up those screens with more force, you know, and get some movement to, you know, even as, you know, they had gotten ahead and we started to break it off a little bit, once we got movement again, we were able to get those clean looks or better looks, so it’s something we got to get better at, there’s no question.

Q: Tucker, your individual line tonight was really great, I mean, your effort was fantastic, 15 points, 7 rebounds, a lot of the three point shots tonight didn’t go down like they normally do for the Hoosiers, what do you think that is, was it just not seeing the basket as well, was it the defense, was it not in the offense where you were getting clean looks? 

TUCKER DEVRIES: To be honest, making and missing shots, I thought tonight, honestly, wasn’t a problem, I know, certainly, I did not shoot it great, as a team we didn’t shoot that great either from three, but, you know, even with that being said, I think there were certainly areas that we needed to be a lot better at, as a group, and if we were able to, you know, especially in the second half, execute in those areas, I think that would have made up for some of those, you know, shooting habits and miscues, but, you know, making them missing shots sometimes is basketball, but I thought in the other areas, if we could just, you know, execute there a little bit.

Q: On that, if shots maybe weren’t the problem, what kind of was, do you think?

Advertisement

TUCKER: I mean, he hit on it pretty good, the turnovers and obviously the offensive rebounds they had, especially in the second half. I mean, I take full responsibility for both of those areas. Obviously, four turnovers is far too many. As a group, I think when they pick up the pressure, I think we just need to really focus on our execution a little bit more on every possession. But good thing is we get a good week here before we play again to really dial in on some of those areas that we’ve maybe lacked in the beginning.

Advertisement

Q: When Lamar picked up his fourth foul and missed nearly nine minutes, what went wrong offensively?

DD: Yeah, I don’t remember the exact sequences there, but, you know, not having Lamar out there is certainly a big part of our offense, and, you know, his foul trouble tonight certainly limited him with only the 21 minutes because he was, again, he’s, you know, a big focal piece of what we try to run our offense through, so, you know, I believe during that little stretch that he wasn’t out there, that’s when the turnovers started to happen and 

we weren’t able to get into, you know, maybe some of our actions the way we needed to. 

Q: Darian, you mentioned Kentucky’s offensive rebound and kind of flipping that game. Was that just their physicality, their effort out beating you guys or something else that you saw going on? 

Advertisement

DD: Yeah, I thought their effort, their physicality in the second half was, you know, really good. I mean, they certainly cranked it up a notch in that second half and we needed to respond to it, but, you know, I thought their aggressiveness defensively, their aggressiveness in the offensive glass, you know, was ultimately the factor. 

Advertisement

Q: Darian, you mentioned Lamar, but how much did the foul trouble for not just him, but other guys, affect you tonight?

DD:  I mean, foul trouble is foul trouble. You have it every night, so you’ve got to figure out a way to deal with it and, you know, we just didn’t do a good enough job with that.

Q: Just to follow up on that, with this team, and you’ve talked about sort of where you are with the two bigs and things like that, like does foul trouble become sort of a compounding problem when it disrupts rotations? It felt tonight like maybe guys were just not either on the floor long enough to find the rhythm or maybe had to be on the floor too long because other guys were in foul trouble. 

DD: Again, our guys, you know, their numbers are called, they’re ready to go. You know, certainly, you know, a guy like Lamar, you want him out there, but when he’s not out there, I feel very confident that the guys that are coming in are going to do their part and do their job and, you know, we certainly have a lot of faith in them, so, you know, unfortunately it just didn’t work out the way we wanted it to tonight.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending