Connect with us

Illinois

Nebraska vs. Illinois football FREE STREAM: How to watch today

Published

on

Nebraska vs. Illinois football FREE STREAM: How to watch today


LINCOLN, Nebraska – Rising programs in the Big Ten collide as the No. 22 Nebraska Cornhuskers host the No. 24 Illinois Fighting Illini today – Friday, Sept. 20 – at Memorial Stadium in Lincoln, Nebraska. This NCAA football game is available on multiple streaming services for free.

The matchup will broadcast live on FOX at 8 p.m. Eastern. (7 p.m. Central). Fans without cable can catch the game at no cost via FuboTV or DirecTV Stream, which both offer free trials. FuboTV is offering a special $30 discount off your first month too.

Another option is SlingTV, which has promotional offers for new customers.

Guided by head coach Matt Rhule, the Cornhuskers (3-0) continue to roll through the season with a beaming confidence that this year is different.

Advertisement

The revival is spearheaded by five-star freshman quarterback Dylan Raiola, who continues to grow into his own. Raiola has notched 670 yards and five touchdowns while giving up one interception. He has a 73.8% completion percentage.

Sophomore running back and Oregon transfer Dante Dowdell has tallied 31 carries for 184 yards and three touchdowns. Sophomore Emmett Johnson, senior Rahmir Johnson and junior Gabe Ervin have combined for 244 yards and three touchdowns.

Allowing just 20 points all season, the defense has been a consistent strength. After terrorizing Colorado two weeks ago, the Cornhuskers smothered Northern Iowa 34-3. That’s even when the Panthers had a 38:07-21:53 time of possession advantage.

The Cornhuskers secondary will be tested in this one. They have relinquished two touchdowns thus far this season. The defense is allowing just 6.7 points per game while garnering nine sacks and five turnovers.

Nebraska finished their nonconference schedule without a loss for the first time since 2016.

Advertisement

It’s the first game between two ranked opponents at Memorial Stadium in over a decade. Nebraska has lost their last 12 matchups against ranked opponents. The historic venue will be celebrating its 400th consecutive sellout.

Watch Nebraska vs. Illinois on FuboTV for free

The Fighting Illini (3-0) are off to a strong campaign in Bret Bielema’s fourth year at the helm. It’s their first 3-0 start since 2011 and the first time in 16 years they get to be part of a ranked vs. ranked matchup. They have a key road win against No. 19 Kansas under their belt and are coming off a victory over Central Michigan last week.

Like Nebraska, Illinois is dreaming big, especially with the playoff doors widening. But a meaty Big Ten schedule will provide a dose of reality.

It all comes as somewhat of a surprise after the Fighting Illinois lost a boatload of talent, including three of its four leading receivers and Nagurski-Woodson Big Ten Defensive Player of the Year Jer’Zhan Newton.

Advertisement

The Fighting Illinois are led by junior quarterback Luke Altmyer, who has amassed 648 yards and six touchdowns with a 68% completion rate. He averages 8.1 yards per pass and can fly out of the pocket when needed.

His favorite target, senior Pat Bryant, has hauled in 235 yards and four touchdowns while averaging 15.7 yards per reception. Ole Miss senior transfer Zakhari Franklin has 16 receptions for 193 yards.

The ground game is guided by sophomore Kaden Feagin, who has taken over the reins with 42 carries for 173 yards and three touchdowns. The offensive line is bolstered by three returning starters, including senior Zy Crisler and junior Josh Gesky.

In total, the offense is averaging 32.7 points per game.

Defensively, the Fighting Illini have only allowed two touchdowns in three games. They have also forced nine turnovers in that span, which is the second-most in the Big Ten. They allow a stingy 8.7 points per game.

Advertisement

Junior linebacker Dylan Rosiek, last year’s leading tackler, has 14 tackles and a forced fumble. Senior defensive lineman and Florida State transfer Dennis Briggs Jr. has tallied 13 tackles and three tackles for loss.

Junior defensive backs Miles Scott and Xavier Scott have snatched a combined five interceptions in three games.

It’s the second consecutive year these two teams will play each other on Friday night. The Cornhuskers snapped a three-game losing streak to the Fighting Illini last year. Nebraska has been no stranger to the solo spotlight, tallying five Friday night conference games since 2017.

Nebraska leads the all-time series 14-6-1.

Watch Nebraska vs. Illinois for free on DirecTV Stream

Advertisement

Who is announcing Nebraska vs. Illinois?

Tim Brando (play-by-play) and Devin Gardner (analyst) will be the announcers while Josh Sims reports from the sidelines.

What are the latest odds for Nebraska vs. Illinois?

Spread: NEB: (-8), Ill: (+8)

Moneyline: NEB: (-325), Ill: (+260)

Point total: 43

Odds from DraftKings

Advertisement

Here’s more information on how to watch this game on TV and streaming services.

What: College football: Nebraska vs. Illinois

When: Friday, Sept. 20, 2024

Time: 8 p.m. Eastern (7 p.m. Central)

Where: Memorial Stadium | Lincoln, Nebraska

Advertisement

Channel: FOX

Best streaming options: FuboTV (free trial and $30 off first month), DirecTV Stream (free trial) and Sling TV ($10 off first month)

Cable Channel Finder: AT&T U-Verse, Comcast Xfinity, Spectrum/Charter, Optimum/Altice, Cox, DIRECTV, Dish, Verizon Fios



Source link

Advertisement

Illinois

SCOTUS blocks deployment of National Guards to Illinois

Published

on

SCOTUS blocks deployment of National Guards to Illinois


  • Investigation reveals timeline in Melodee Buzzard’s death

    01:14

  • At least two killed in Pa. nursing home explosion

    01:26

  • Now Playing

    SCOTUS blocks deployment of National Guards to Illinois

    01:16

  • UP NEXT

    DOJ releases Epstein files that mention Trump

    01:36

  • Skater Tony Hawk makes ‘Nutcracker’ ballet debut

    00:18

  • Russell Brand charged with rape and sexual assault

    00:32

  • Mother of missing girl found dead taken into custody

    00:10

  • Melodee Buzzard’s body has been found

    00:32

  • Jim Beam to halt whiskey production for one year

    00:21

  • Third batch of Epstein files mentions Trump

    00:28

  • Chipotle to offer GLP-1 menu options for customers

    00:26

  • How to protect yourself from the flu as cases surge

    00:37

  • Maduro seen dancing with humanoid AI-robot

    00:20

  • Jackie Chan carries the Olympic Torch through Pompeii

    00:19

  • Rescuers search Mexican Navy plane after crash in Texas

    00:31

  • Greta Thunberg arrested for supporting hunger strikers

    00:36

  • Eruption at Yellowstone geyser caught on camera

    00:18

  • Ohio kids lead police on a high speed stolen car chase

    01:21

  • U.S. launches new deadly strike on alleged narco-boat

    00:18

  • Trap captures wrong bear in California

    00:17

 SCOTUS blocks deployment of National Guards to Illinois



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois

Published

on

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuffed the Trump administration over its plan to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois over the strenuous objections of local officials.

The court in an unsigned order turned away an emergency request made by the administration, which said the troops are needed to protect federal agents involved in immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.

Although the decision is a preliminary one involving only Chicago, it will likely bolster similar challenges made to National Guard deployments in other cities, with the opinion setting significant new limits on the president’s ability to do so.

The decision marked a rare defeat for President Donald Trump at the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, after the administration secured a series of high-profile wins this year.

Advertisement

In doing so, the court at least provisionally rejected the Trump administration’s view that the situation on the ground is so chaotic that it justifies invoking a federal law that allows the president to call National Guard troops into federal service in extreme situations.

Those circumstances can include when “there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” or “the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The court ruled against the administration on a threshold question, finding that the law’s reference to the “regular forces” only allows for the National Guard to be called up if regular military forces are unable to restore order.

The court order said that Trump could only call up the military where they could “legally execute the laws” and that power is limited under another law called the Posse Comitatus Act.

“At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois,” the court said.

Advertisement

As a result, the Trump administration has failed to show that the National Guard law “permits the President to federalize the Guard in the exercise of inherent authority to protect federal personnel and property in Illinois,” the court added.

The decision saw the court’s six conservative justices split, with three in the majority and three in dissent. The court’s three liberals were in the majority.

The dissenters were Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.

“I have serious doubts about the correctness of the court’s views. And I strongly disagree with the manner in which the court has disposed of this application,” Alito wrote in a dissenting opinion.

“There is no basis for rejecting the President’s determination that he was unable to execute the federal immigration laws using the civilian law enforcement resources at his command,” he added.

Advertisement

Trump’s unusual move to deploy the National Guard, characteristic of his aggressive and unprecedented use of executive power, was based on his administration’s stated assessment that the Chicago area was descending into lawless chaos.

That view of protests against surging immigration enforcement actions in Chicago is rejected by local officials as well as judges who have ruled against the administration.

The deployment was challenged in court by the Democratic-led state of Illinois and the city of Chicago, with their lawyers saying Trump had an ulterior motive for the deployment: to punish his political opponents.

They argued in court papers that Trump’s invocation of the federal law was not justified and that his actions also violated the Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which places limits on federal power, as well as the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally bars the military from conducting law enforcement duties.

U.S. District Judge April Perry said she “found no credible evidence that there is a danger of rebellion” and issued a temporary restraining order in favor of the state.

Advertisement

The Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals largely reached the same conclusion, saying “the facts do not justify the president’s actions.”

The court did narrow Perry’s order, saying that Trump could federalize the troops, but could not deploy them.

The Supreme Court has frequently ruled in Trump’s favor in recent months as the administration has rushed to the justices when policies are blocked by lower courts.

Trump’s efforts to impose federal control over cities led by Democrats who vociferously oppose his presidency are not just limited to Chicago. He has also sought to deploy the National Guard in the District of Columbia, Los Angeles and Portland, Oregon.

Most recently, hundreds of National Guard troops deployed in Illinois and Oregon were set to return to their home states.

Advertisement

The deployment in the District of Columbia, which is a federal enclave with less local control, has been challenged in court, but there has been no ruling yet.

A federal appeals court allowed the Los Angeles deployment, and a different panel of judges on Oct. 20 ruled similarly in relation to Portland.



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Gates Explains How Injuries are Holding Mizzou Back After Loss to Illinois

Published

on

Gates Explains How Injuries are Holding Mizzou Back After Loss to Illinois


Advertisement

ST. LOUIS — Dennis Gates’ eyebrows raised when he heard the word choice of “struggles” in a question regarding a recent drop off in perimeter offense for Missouri that was evident in a loss to Illinois.

“You said ‘struggles’?” Gates asked.

Advertisement

“You know, I can’t wait to get healthy as a team,” Gates said to answer the question.

With three of its players injured, Missouri suffered a 91-48 loss to No. 20 Illinois on Monday. It’s the lowest-scoring performance in any game in the Gates era. It’s the lowest-scoring output for Missouri in the series since a matchup in the 1943-44 season.

Advertisement

There’s no way to sugarcoat how poor of a performance it was for the Tigers. The cracks in the foundation that have been popping since the season opener at Howard are continuing to break through even more.

But Gates believes returning those thee players will begin to patch up those cracks and get Missouri closer to its full potential.

“It’s like pieces of puzzles,” Gates said. “Our entire team has been put together a certain way. … So we have guys playing playing well, but playing out of position due to our injuries, and ultimately, I’m excited about getting healthy. You cannot ask our players to do more than what they’ve done. I take it on my shoulders, as the leader, as the head coach, it’s on me. This game is on me.”

Advertisement

The most impactful of the absences has been guard Jayden Stone, who has now missed each of the last seven games with a hand injury. He provided a scoring spark off the bench, including from the perimeter, when he was healthy. His initial timeline for return set him to return to the court for SEC play at the latest.

Meanwhile, forward Trent Pierce has missed the entirety of his junior season so far with an undisclosed injury. No specific timeline has been given for his return.

Additionally, Missouri faced another surprising hit against the Fighting Illini with forward Jevon Porter missing the game with a leg injury.

Between Stone and Porter, Missouri is missing a combined average of 19.2 points and 8.5 rebounds per game. Plus the length of Pierce, who started in 19 games last season.

Gates believes Missouri is hurting not only from the absence of those three players alone, but also from the domino effect it is having on the lineups. Specifically with the offensive spacing that Stone brings that creates opportunities for other players on the offense.

“When you lose a guy (Pierce) that has not played this season and he’s a starter in the SEC, that’s a (missing) advantage with length, shooting ability,” Gates said. “Jayden Stone, the same way, look at his percentage. You have to have both Stone and (Jacob) Crews in the game to open up things.”

Advertisement

Dec22, 2025; St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Missouri Tigers forward Jacob Crews (35) high fives guard T.O. Barrett (35) during the first half of a game against the Illinois Fighting Illini at the Enterprise Center. | Sam Simon/MissouriOnSi

The injuries have forced other players into roles not originally expected, stretching the roster thin.

“But in the meantime, in the process of getting healthy, we got to have guys fill in the blanks and be utility guys and do something that we may not have planned for you to do,” Gates said. “Some may take the opportunity as a way to get on the court, some may not.”

Gates specifically highlighted wanting the guys who were being asked to do more to do a better job of defending the 3-point line, where Illinois shot 45% from. He also highlighted wanting center Luke Northweather to be more agressive offensively in Porter’s absence.

Advertisement

Monday night’s absence for Porter meant more opportunities for true freshman forward Nicholas Randall, who appeared in 13 minutes. He grabbed two rebounds in that time.

But Porter and Pierce’s absence was still painfully obvious on the glass. Missouri was out-rebounded 43-24 and gave up 29 second-chance points while only scoring five of their own, a key disparity in the loss. The dominance on the glass for Illinois was crucial to the Fighting Illini going on a 14-5 run to end the first half. Gates attributed the second-chance points to Illinois being able to execute consistently on the opportunities and Missouri getting out of rotation too often.

Advertisement

“The second-chance points that we gave up, they executed on every single one of them, and that’s what hurt us,” Gates said. “That’s what ignited their run. And I just thought our guys at that point, hit a wall.”

Advertisement

Gates isn’t letting the injuries, nor Monday’s blowout loss affect his perception of what the team is capable of. With optimism that at least Stone and Porter could return at the start of SEC play, he’s hoping his team will look closer to the original picture he had in mind.

“I think our team is a good team, man,” Gates said. “We can win games as we have, without certain guys, and we’ll continue to piece it together.”

That piecing together will need to come quick. In non-conference play, Missouri did not earn any sort of notch for a possible bid in the NCAA Tournament. Though the Tigers finish the slate 10-3, Missouri went 1-3 against high-major opponents in that. The loss to Illinois was one that draws even more questions on what the Tigers are truly capable of this season.

Read more Missouri Tigers news:



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending