Connect with us

Illinois

Illinois university sued after professor alleges he was fired for objecting to race-based hiring policies

Published

on

Illinois university sued after professor alleges he was fired for objecting to race-based hiring policies


The University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) is facing a lawsuit over its racial hiring quotas after a former professor claimed he was illegally “retaliated” against for objecting to its allegedly discriminatory practices.

Professor Stephen Kleinschmit was a clinical associate professor at UIC’s Department of Public Policy, Management and Analytics (PPMA) until his contract was terminated in August 2023.  

According to a legal complaint filed in federal court Monday by legal firm Liberty Justice Center, Kleinschmit was fired after criticizing the allegedly discriminatory and unlawful nature of a new university recruitment program that focused on candidates’ race, gender and sexual orientation in its criteria for hiring.

The lawsuit claims that in late 2019, the professor became uncomfortable during meetings about the candidate search for UIC’s new “Bridge to Faculty” (B2F) program. B2F is a recruitment program under the university’s diversity office, which aims to diversify faculty and “attract underrepresented postdoctoral scholars with the goal of a direct transition to a tenure-track junior faculty position after two years,” UIC says.

Advertisement

RECORDS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER SHOW COLLEGE PURSUED RACE-BASED HIRING

Professor Kleinschmit filed a legal complaint against the University of Illinois Chicago, after he claims he was retaliated against for criticizing the school’s unlawful DEI hiring and promotion practices. (Getty Images/Liberty Justice Center)

During these meetings, fellow faculty members “spent an extended period of time discussing the racial characteristics of the candidates and routinely lamented the race and gender makeup of the applicant pool,” the complaint states. 

Kleinschmit came to believe that B2F, and other diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs at the public university, were illegal under federal nondiscrimination law. 

He initially hesitated to speak out for fear of “being ostracized and retaliated against” as a non-tenure faculty member. Eventually, he shared his concerns with other members of his department and college administrators, worrying that he could be implicated in participating in what he believed to be illegal activities by the university.

Advertisement

Kleinschmit’s conversations objecting to the university’s racial hiring practices and political activism over that nearly 4-year period before he was terminated, “were not well received,” the complaint adds. 

The complaint names four other race-based hiring programs at UIC to argue there is “pervasive racial discrimination in employment practices” at the school that has “undermined” its academic integrity.

MASSACHUSETTS UNIVERSITY PROMOTES DEI AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION DESPITE TRUMP ADMIN EXECUTIVE ORDERS

The Liberty Justice Center’s lawsuit claims Professor Kleinschmit suffered substantial professional damage after being fired from the University of Illinois Chicago. (iStock)

UIC allegedly said Kleinschmit’s contract was not renewed due to budget cuts. 

Advertisement

The complaint says that five months after his termination, UIC advertised it was hiring for a non-tenure track faculty position with job duties that “significantly overlapped” with Kleinschmit’s prior responsibilities. The job posting encouraged “members of a recognized underrepresented group” to apply. 

Liberty Justice Center says Kleinschmit was an “exemplary” employee who was promoted early and received positive performance evaluations, merit-driven bonuses and salary increases every year of his 6-year employment at the university.

The professor says he was not notified of his impending layoff until June 2023, leaving him little time for a successful appeal. The late notice also hurt his ability to find another job before the commencement of the academic school year, leaving him unemployed for an entire year, according to the complaint.

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST MEDIA AND CULTURE NEWS

Liberty Justice Center is accusing UIC of racial discrimination and retaliation against Kleinschmit. It asks the court to order the university to halt its racially discriminatory hiring and retention practices and seeks financial damages for the earnings and benefits Kleinschmit lost because of the university’s “illegal” actions.

Advertisement

“The University of Illinois Chicago repeatedly engaged in blatant acts of racial discrimination, then added illegal retaliation to the mix to avoid accountability for its unlawful behavior,” Reilly Stephens, Senior Counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, said. “These actions are unacceptable violations of the right to equal protection under the law, and we urge the court to put a stop to it immediately.”

Kleinschmit, who is now an instructor at Northwestern University’s School of Public Policy, said, “I was fired for speaking out against illegal behavior by the university. I’m grateful to the Liberty Justice Center for taking a stand against institutional corruption and fighting for my constitutional and statutory rights.”

The University of Illinois Chicago said it does not comment on pending litigation.

CHICAGO CASINO PROJECT ACCUSED IN LAWSUIT OF NOT ALLOWING WHITE MEN TO INVEST: ‘BLATANTLY DISCRIMINATORY’

President Donald Trump, shown here on Friday, Feb. 7, has instituted sweeping policies to eradicate DEI across the federal government since taking office.  (AP/Alex Brandon)

Advertisement

The lawsuit is the latest example of a public university facing scrutiny for its race-based hiring practices after the University of Colorado Boulder also came under fire in recent weeks.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In his first slew of executive orders, President Donald Trump launched a federal review of DEI teachings and practices in educational institutions receiving federal funding.

On January 21, Trump issued an order, “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” that accuses DEI policies of violating civil rights protections. 

The order requires that the attorney general and secretary of education identify potential civil compliance investigations among institutions of higher education with endowments over $1 billion and, accordingly, develop action plans to “deter DEI programs or principles that constitute illegal discrimination or preferences.”

Advertisement

Universities across the nation shuttered their DEI offices last year as Republican lawmakers targeted these policies. Missouri State University and West Virginia University are the latest schools to shut down their DEI programs this year.

Fox News’ Aubrie Spady contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement

Illinois

Illinois lawmakers consider tightening DUI law to 0.05 BAC

Published

on

Illinois lawmakers consider tightening DUI law to 0.05 BAC


COLLINSVILLE, Ill. (First Alert 4) – Right now, in Illinois, Missouri and most of the country, drivers must be at or over 0.08 to get a DUI. A proposal in the Illinois Statehouse would lower that threshold.

“Make it as safe as you possibly can out there,” said John Sapolis.

Collinsville resident John Sapolis said while lowering Illinois’ DUI threshold would not affect him, as he rarely drinks, he likes the idea of getting drinkers off the road.

“It’s bad enough out there driving around with people who are not drinking,” said Sapolis.

Advertisement

If a bill passes in the Illinois House of Representatives, the blood alcohol limit would be lowered, meaning fewer drinks could put somebody over the line for a DUI.

Two Chicago-area lawmakers propose lowering the threshold from 0.08 to 0.05.

“Your body still is not in a proper state to really be behind the wheel,” said Erin Doherty, Regional Executive Director for Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

Doherty said even at 0.05, drivers are less coordinated and cannot track moving objects as well as when they are sober.

Utah is the only state in the country to have the 0.05 limit, and Doherty said one in five drivers there changed their behavior.

Advertisement

“There are so many other options before getting behind the wheel,” said Doherty.

Sara Floyd used to live in Utah and now calls Collinsville home.

“The Midwest people like to have a few beers while they watch their Little League games

“In Utah, you can barely get alcohol at a gas station,” said Floyd.

She said the culture in Utah is very different and thinks there should be some wiggle room for drivers.

Advertisement

“If one person had a beer within an hour period and then drove, they shouldn’t get a DUI for one drink,” said Floyd.

Doherty said they do not recommend driving even after a single drink.

“You really should not get behind the wheel when you’re any kind of impaired, one drink, five drinks, whatever that looks like, just don’t drive,” said Doherty.

While each body processes alcohol differently, according to the National Library of Medicine, in a two-hour period it takes a 170-pound man three to four drinks to reach 0.05, and it takes a 137-pound woman two to three drinks to reach the same state.

April Sage said she does not think this law would work, saying instead it would help more if the state added more public transit.

Advertisement

“I could have three beers and get a ride home safely,” said Sage.

First Alert 4 reached out to a spokesman for the Illinois Department of Transportation to see if they had any comments on this bill. The spokesperson said they are not going to comment because it is pending legislation.

According to the Illinois Department of Public Health, fatal crashes involving one driver who had been drinking increased 4% from 2019 to 2022, despite multiple studies showing fewer Americans are drinking.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Voters had no choice in nearly 9-in-10 primary elections

Published

on

Voters had no choice in nearly 9-in-10 primary elections



Illinois voting data shows voters had no choice of candidate in nearly 9-in-10 Democratic and Republican primaries for state and federal office in 2024.

Voters had no choice of candidate in nearly nine out of every 10 Republican and Democratic primary elections for state and federal office in 2024.

Analysis of Illinois voting data shows Democrats ran one or no candidate in 135 of the 155 primary elections for the U.S. House, Illinois Senate and Illinois House. That left voters with a choice between candidates in just 20 races.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Republicans only ran one or no candidate in 137 of the 155 primary elections last year for non-judicial state and federal positions, giving voters of a choice in just 18 races.

In total, there were 155 primaries for the U.S. House of Representatives, Illinois Senate and Illinois House in 2024. Democrats did not run a candidate in 28 of these races while Republicans failed to run a candidate in 50.

And in the 107 Democratic primaries and 87 Republican primaries were only one candidate ran for the position, those candidates secured their spot on the general election ballot with a single primary vote.

To get on the primary ballot for Illinois Senate, the Illinois General Assembly mandates established party candidates to get 1,000 petition signatures from district party members. Illinois House candidates need 500 signatures. For U.S. House, either party’s candidates need signatures from 0.5% of all primary voters from their party in the district.

Advertisement

This lack of choice between candidates for Democratic and Republican party primaries also left general election voters with fewer choices on the ballot.

In the 2024 election cycle, 65 of the 155 non-judicial state and federal general elections had only one candidate on the ballot. That means in 65 districts, it only took one vote for a candidate to win a seat representing the entire district.

Illinoisans already suffer from a lack of choice in candidates. Research shows an average of 4.7 million Illinois voters had no choice in their state representative between the 2012 and 2020 election cycles.

Research shows more choice drives voter participation and makes legislators less susceptible to the influence of lobbyists and special interests. Lightly contested elections also tend to skew policies in favor of powerful special interests.

Illinois should consider reforms that will give voters more choices at the ballot box, such as making it easier for independents to enter the general election like they do in Iowa, Wisconsin and Tennessee.

Advertisement

Until that happens, Illinoisans will continue to see elections with too few choices and too much influence handed to those already in power.





Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

2 men shot, 1 fatally, outside bar in Morris, police say

Published

on

2 men shot, 1 fatally, outside bar in Morris, police say


MORRIS, Ill. (WLS) — A man was killed and another was injured in a shooting outside of a bar in Grundy County.

The shooting happened early Saturday outside of Clayton’s Tap in the 100 block of West Washington Street in Morris, Illinois, officials said.

ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

The Grundy County Sheriff’s Office responded to the scene, where they found two men with gunshot wounds. One was pronounced dead at the scene and the other was taken to a hospital in critical condition.

The victim who died was identified by the Grundy County Coroner’s Office as 35-year-old Julian Rosario of Channahon.

Advertisement

A suspect in the shooting, 22-year-old Marshall Szpara of Seneca, was arrested and “initially charged with two counts of aggravated battery with a firearm, pending further review from the Grundy County States Attorney’s office,” Morris police said.

No further information was available.

Copyright © 2026 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending