Midwest
Chicago train fire attack shows why ‘decarceration’ policies are putting lives at risk: expert
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The man accused of randomly setting a woman on fire while on a Chicago transit train this week has been slapped with a federal terrorism charge, marking the latest instance of violence on public transit that continues to plague the country.
Lawrence Reed, 50, was charged with one count of committing a terrorist attack or other violence against a mass transportation system, the Northern District of Illinois U.S. Attorney’s Office said in a statement.
Reed was riding on the city’s Blue Line L train at around 9 p.m. Monday when he approached a 26-year-old woman from behind and doused her with gasoline from a plastic bottle, according to a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives arrest affidavit.
The woman managed to fight Reed off as he attempted to ignite the gas, then ran from one end of the car to the other while Reed continued to chase her, the affidavit said, citing surveillance video from the train. Reed subsequently ignited the bottle, approached the victim and used it to set her on fire, prosecutors said.
CHICAGO WOMAN SET ON FIRE DURING ARGUMENT ON CTA TRAIN, POLICE SAY
Lawrence Reed, 50, was charged with committing a terrorist attack or violence against a mass transportation system, according to officials. (Chicago Police Department)
“Reed then ran to the front of the train car and stood watching [the victim] as her body was engulfed in flames,” the affidavit said.
Additional surveillance video revealed Reed visited a gas station roughly 20 minutes before the attack to fill the bottle with fuel, according to the affidavit. He then allegedly walked to the train station, where he boarded an arriving car and executed his attack.
Immediately after the attack, Reed exited the train at the next stop in downtown Chicago, prosecutors said. The woman also stumbled off of the train and fell to the ground and was transported to a hospital in critical condition after sustaining severe burns to her head and body, according to authorities.
Reed was taken into custody Tuesday morning with burn marks on his hand and wearing the same clothes as the suspect seen in surveillance footage carrying out the attack, the affidavit said.
While in police custody, Reed allegedly made “repeated spontaneous and unprompted utterances,” including yelling, “burn b—-” and “burn alive b—-,” according to the affidavit.
Additionally, investigators recovered a partially melted bottle, clear liquid and lighter from the woman’s train seat.
CHICAGO REPEAT OFFENDER ACCUSED OF PUNCHING WOMEN ARRESTED AGAIN AFTER YEARS OF VIOLENT CRIMES: REPORT
Train footage shows Reed allegedly coming up behind a 26-year-old and pouring the liquid on her head and body. (U.S. District Court)
He was subsequently turned over to federal authorities on Wednesday.
In a news conference Wednesday, prosecutors reviewed Reed’s sprawling criminal history dating back to 2017, including a felony aggravated arson charge from an incident in which Reed was accused of starting a fire at the Thompson Center, where Gov. JB Pritzker was holding a daily COVID-19 briefing.
“If you just locked up the habitual offenders, including those who have mental illness, the conditions in not only Chicago and New York — but other blue cities — would be appreciably better,” retired NYPD inspector Paul Mauro told Fox News Digital. “They just won’t do it because of this decarceration movement, and it doesn’t correlate, even if you accept the idea that crime is going down in certain categories.”
In addition to the previous arson charge, Reed has been arrested at least 13 separate times for charges ranging from criminal damage to government property to assault and battery, according to FOX32.
In February 2020, Reed faced misdemeanor battery charges for allegedly punching women in the face in what appeared to be random attacks, the outlet reported. He was reportedly arrested later in the month for a similar incident in which prosecutors allege he slapped a 42-year-old man in the face at the Halsted CTA Blue Line platform.
He was later released on recognizance bonds in both cases, FOX32 reported.
AMERICA’S COMMUTERS UNDER SIEGE AS VIOLENT TRANSIT CRIMES ENDANGER BLUE CITIES
Footage showed Reed allegedly purchasing the items used in the attack from a nearby gas station. (U.S. District Court)
In August, Reed faced charges of aggravated battery after allegedly assaulting a woman at a psychiatric hospital, according to CWB Chicago.
Although prosecutors requested to keep him in custody, Reed was ultimately released with an ankle monitor.
“The bottom line is there is a recidivist class that is incorrigible and that we just don’t enforce against, and it never ends,” Mauro said.
Reed’s erratic behavior continued as he allegedly spat on federal agents while in custody, according to WGN. He then reportedly continued to be disruptive once he entered the courtroom on Wednesday by repeatedly shouting over U.S. Magistrate Judge Laura McNally.
“I plead guilty, I plead guilty,” Reed reportedly said, according to the outlet.
McNally reportedly attempted to continue the hearing as Reed repeatedly interrupted.
BLUE CITY SUSPECT WITH NUMEROUS PRIOR ARRESTS FEDERALLY CHARGED AFTER ALLEGEDLY SETTING WOMAN ABLAZE ON TRAIN
“I’m going to talk to you,” McNally said, to which Reed replied, “Don’t talk to me.”
When asked if he knew the maximum sentence was life in prison, Reed reportedly responded, “It’s cool, it’s cool, it’s cool.”
The interruptions continued with Reed telling the judge, “I’m guilty,” while also claiming to be a Chinese citizen, according to WGN.
Reed’s behavior could indicate that his defense team would pursue an insanity plea, according to Mauro. However, he added that the burden of proof regarding mental competency falls strictly on the defendant.
“The only way that he’s going to get off on an insanity defense is [by proving] a result of a severe mental disease or defect, the defendant was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his acts,” Mauro told Fox News Digital. “The burden of proof is on him.”
U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros reportedly said he had not been made aware of Reed ever being legally declared as mentally incompetent.
CHICAGO PERSON OF INTEREST IN TRAIN FIRE ATTACK HAS 22 PRIOR ARRESTS, WAS FREED BY JUDGE: REPORT
Lawrence Reed was allegedly wearing the same clothing as the suspect seen on surveillance footage lighting a 26-year-old woman on fire when authorities confronted him one day later, according to federal prosecutors. (U.S. District Court)
Reed was charged with one count of committing a terrorist attack or other violence against a mass transportation system, a sparsely used charge that hinges on a violent act taking place on public transit, according to Mauro.
“The charges are going to hold up,” Mauro said. “You don’t see this charge very often, but it is a terrorism offense. The federal charge is going to hold up. This is not showboating.”
Mauro suggested the Trump administration could bring federal charges in this case to send a message to predominantly Democratic cities with relaxed bail laws.
CHARLOTTE TRAIN STABBING PUTS NORTH CAROLINA COMMUTERS ON EDGE AFTER RANDOM ATTACK
“I think it sends a message that the feds are taking the case because they don’t trust the local prosecutor,” Mauro said. “But I don’t think that that message is received, and the message is, ‘We’re taking this and charging it because you guys had [13] shots at this guy, and you didn’t get it done.”
At a news conference Wednesday, federal agents expressed frustration that Reed was free to roam the streets at the time of the attack, while pointing to his extensive criminal history, according to The Associated Press.
“Lawrence Reed had no business being on the streets given his violent criminal history and his pending criminal cases,” ATF Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Division Christopher Amon said. “Reed had plenty of second chances by the criminal justice system, and, as a result, you have an innocent victim in the hospital fighting for her life.”
SEE IT: VIDEO SHOWS CHARLOTTE TRAIN STABBING SUSPECT BEFORE ATTACK AND MINUTES BEFORE ARREST
On Thursday, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson condemned the violent act, while adding that it appears to be an “isolated incident.”
“This is obviously a tragedy, and it’s the tragedy of one of the worst of its kind, And we’re hoping, of course, that everyone can heal in this moment,” Johnson said. “As awful and as horrific as this tragedy is, this is an isolated incident.”
Reed is facing the possibility of life in prison, with Boutros adding that if the victim were to die from her injuries, the federal case could be eligible for the death penalty.
The Cook County State Attorney’s Office and Chicago Police Department did not respond to Fox News Digital’s questions regarding whether officials would file state charges against Reed.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The case has reignited concerns about public safety on mass transit systems and repeat offenders being released onto the streets, and Mauro insisted the violence will remain as long as criminals continue to be let out of jail.
“It just means that every time you get on the subway or even walk the streets, it’s Russian roulette,” Mauro said. “And if it’s your bad luck that day, you’re going to find out why these policies are so detrimental.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Read the full article from Here
Illinois
Fire sweeps through apartment building, displaces residents in Woodridge, Illinois
People ran out of their homes into the cold overnight Tuesday into Wednesday after a fire broke out in an apartment building in the western Chicago suburb of Woodridge.
The fire broke out in a multi-family building at 7900 Janes Ave., near Forest Drive.
Smoke was seen billowing as firefighters stood on the roof.
One firefighter suffered minor injuries fighting the blaze, according to the Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District.
Fire officials said several units have major damage, and the families who reside in them have been displaced.
The American Red Cross was assisting the displaced residents Wednesday morning.
Indiana
Indiana Senate votes to outlaw abortion pills by enabling citizen lawsuits
Abortion drug under scrutiny by RFK Jr.
USA TODAY wellness reporter Alyssa Goldberg covers why the abortion pill mifepristone is being reviewed by the FDA.
What some are calling a “dangerous” escalation of Indiana’s abortion ban, others are calling a chance to close a gaping loophole.
They’re talking about a bill cracking down on abortion-inducing drugs in Indiana, which passed the state Senate on Jan. 27 by a 35-10 vote and represents the next frontier of the anti-abortion movement.
“In a post-Dobbs era, Indiana has chosen life,” bill author Sen. Tyler Johnson, R-Leo, said on the Senate floor. “This bill reinforces that choice by defining abortion clearly and providing civil tools to enforce our laws.”
Republican lawmakers have been eyeing these drugs in recent years since the felling of Roe v. Wade in 2022 and the abortion ban that immediately followed in Indiana. That law prohibits doctors here from providing abortions except in cases of rape, incest, fatal fetal anomalies or when the pregnant person’s life is at risk, and says all medication abortions must be conducted in-person, not via telehealth.
But federal regulations do allow abortion-inducing drugs to be accessed through telehealth services and mailed to patients ― such as from abortion-allowing states to abortion-restricting states. That’s where the rub is.
“What we’re seeing is an influx, and people breaking the law and mailing these drugs directly to women. God forbid any of you physicians are complicit in that,” Sen. Liz Brown, R-Fort Wayne, another author of Senate Bill 236, scolded a handful of doctors who came before the Senate judiciary committee to speak against the bill.
The bill would outlaw the manufacturing, mailing, prescribing or delivering of abortion-inducing drugs to Hoosiers not by making this a criminal act, but a civil one over which any citizen could wage a wrongful-death or whistleblower lawsuit.
In other words, any Hoosier who believes someone ordered a drug to perform an illegal abortion in Indiana could sue a person responsible for doing the manufacturing, mailing, prescribing or delivering. But exempt from liability are the pregnant mother, Indiana doctors and health facilities, internet service providers, transportation network companies and mail carriers. This means, though, that Hoosiers could sue out-of-state doctors.
“In the very rare instances where it is legal to prescribe the abortion bill, you will follow our laws and be licensed here,” Brown said. “You will not be mailing it.”
Those doing the suing can reap relief of at least $100,000 if they win, plus have their attorney’s fees paid by the defendant.
Indianapolis attorney Kathleen DeLaney likened this to bounty hunting.
“What’s really happening here is creating an army of private litigants standing in the name of the government seeking $100k bounties from others,” she said.
Though LaGrange Republican Sen. Sue Glick authored the original abortion ban in 2022, she sympathized with the bill’s opponents, saying the bill would have a “chilling effect” by forcing doctors to second-guess every little circumstance and then allowing non-experts to wage lawsuits.
“We’re sitting here making a decision to allow non-medical people make medical decisions on these issues and then we throw it to non-lawyers to litigate whether or not these were proper medical decisions,” she said during the judiciary committee hearing, before voting no. She voted in favor on the bill on the floor.
But Brown contended the only chilling effect will be on people providing illegal abortions, including via the mail.
“We’re looking for… bad actors obtaining these pills illegally to kill a baby,” she said on the Senate floor Jan. 26. “So yeah, we’re okay with suing them.”
Bill spurs confusion
Doctors who oppose the bill are not only concerned that the lawsuit-enabling language would add fear and confusion to the atmosphere in which they provide care, but they say so would a few other provisions in the bill.
For one, the bill amends slightly the definition of abortion to specifically exempt procedures done to expel a miscarriage, stillbirth or ectopic pregnancy.
But that leaves out a number of other scenarios that they now feel the need to call into question, such as a molar pregnancy, in which fetal body parts and even a heart beat can develop but won’t become an actual baby. Leaving such a pregnancy untreated can lead to cancer or infertility, said Dr. Erin Lips, a gynecologic oncologist at IU Health.
“In my last few years I’ve seen more new moms on death’s door in Indiana than I would have expected,” she said. “Cases like this will become more common.”
They are further concerned about the part of the bill that would add details required in terminated pregnancy reports ― including the name of the person who provided the abortion care ― and require these reports be filed to the office of the inspector general, in addition to the department of health.
At play in the background is an ongoing lawsuit over the question of whether these reports should be public documents subject to Indiana’s public records law. Attorney General Todd Rokita supports making them public, but a Marion County judge has temporarily declared them private medical records.
State lawmakers want additional oversight over the terminated pregnancy reports to make sure Indiana doctors aren’t performing abortions illegally. The doctors are fearful that added confusion over what counts as an illegal abortion will lead to delays in care, and thus risks to the patients’ health.
Those doctors and patients are also uncomfortable with personal patient data, such as their age, race and county that is listed in these reports, being seen by parties outside the department of health.
Danielle Spry, a Hendricks County mother who said she had a second-trimester abortion in 2019 due to a catastrophic disability she learned about 20 weeks along, said the idea that her private medical decision would be examined by people outside the medical field is “violating.”
“How dare any of you look at me and say you would have done anything different,” she said.
How common are medication abortions in Indiana?
Since the abortion ban actually took effect in late 2023, the state health department has reported about 30 to 40 abortions a quarter, compared to pre-ban figures of about 2,000 a quarter, according to the department’s aggregate abortion reporting.
Of those 42 abortions performed in the third quarter of 2025, about a quarter were done using abortion-inducing drugs Misoprostol and Mifepristone. This data only accounts for abortions performed in medical settings that are reported to the state and may not present a complete picture, however.
Abortions provided through telehealth, most likely from out-of-state providers, have been rising since Indiana’s abortion ban took effect, according to a new report by the Society for Family Planning. Where there were virtually none prior to July 2023, the number reported after that has steadily climed from about 200 a month in 2024 to 400 a month in 2025.
Contact IndyStar Statehouse reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@indystar.com or follow her on X @kayla_dwyer17.
Iowa
Iowa women’s basketball vs. USC prediction, 3 things to watch
15 minutes with Jan Jensen on Taylor McCabe’s injury, California trip
The Hawkeyes’ head coach meets the media with a No. 8 national ranking and a transition ahead without their senior sharpshooter.
IOWA CITY — A long and arduous season delivers several moments where a team must snap and clear from what just happened, good or bad. Iowa women’s basketball finds itself in that exact position.
After a stretch that paired excitement with devastation, the No. 8 Hawkeyes head out west for maybe their trickiest trip of the season. The Los Angeles swing begins with a Jan. 29 showdown at USC (8 p.m. CT, Peacock), followed by a Feb. 1 duel at No. 2 UCLA (3 p.m. CT, FOX).
Though these two schools have only been in the Big Ten a year and change, no conference squad has completed a perfect sweep of a California trip when knocking out the two matchups together. Considering UCLA has national-title aspirations as one of the best teams in the country, there’s even more pressure for the Hawkeyes to start this trip with a victory over the Trojans.
With that, here are three things to watch in Iowa vs. USC.
Can Iowa mentally move on from a whirlwind week that covered both ends of the emotional spectrum?
Wiping the mental slate clean was always going to be an important objective ahead of this trip, even before Taylor McCabe’s season-ending ACL tear happened.
Now, doing so is doubly important.
It was a tough scene at practice the day after Iowa’s 91-70 win over Ohio State, where McCabe informed her teammates through tears that her playing career is over. The sharpshooting senior was one of Iowa’s most respected veteran voices, and her even-keeled demeanor helped keep a young team grounded. McCabe will do all she can from the sidelines moving forward.
There’s reason Iowa needs to move on from positivity as well. Amid an eight-game winning streak that included top-15 wins over Michigan State, Maryland and Ohio State in a week’s span, the Hawkeyes have surged in the rankings and NCAA Tournament projections. Iowa is getting properly recognized as one of the hottest squads in the nation.
None of that matters once the ball tips inside the Galen Center. USC, a preseason top-25 team, desperately needs a jolt to get its campaign back on track. A shocking top-10 home upset could certainly do the trick. That’s exactly what Iowa did last season when JuJu Watkins and the Trojans visited Carver-Hawkeye Arena.
How does Iowa keep USC in its Big Ten funk?
Sitting at 10-3 on Dec. 29 with ranked wins over North Carolina State, Washington and Nebraska, the Trojans looked like they had survived their daunting early slate.
The wheels have somewhat fallen off since. In the new calendar year, USC is 1-6 with its only win coming against lowly Purdue. Losses to Oregon, Minnesota, Maryland, Michigan State and Michigan have all been by seven points or less, with a UCLA blowout tacked on as well.
Although freshman guard Jazzy Davidson and Georgia Tech transfer Kara Dunn have been nice weapons spearheading USC’s offense, the Trojans are averaging just 64 points per game in 2026. That sets up nicely for Iowa, considering how potent its defense has been during this winning streak.
If Kylie Feuerbach can make things difficult on Davidson while Iowa takes advantage of USC’s unreliable size — no Trojans forward averages more than 15 minutes per game — the Hawkeyes should be in position late for a big road win.
Can Addie Deal keep everything under control in what will be her first collegiate start?
For a player with the mental makeup of Deal, this insertion into the starting lineup following McCabe’s injury shouldn’t be as big a deal as many outsiders are making it.
Deal has been trending upward for two weeks now, and a return to her home state of California times out well for her responsibilities to officially increase. This five-star freshman feels ready to grab the reins and go.
That said, Deal shouldn’t feel any more pressure than she did before. Iowa has rounded into a versatile squad capable of winning with numerous players leading the charge. Though consistent 20-point outings, like Deal delivered against Ohio State, would certainly be welcomed, Iowa doesn’t need that every night to survive.
Iowa women’s basketball prediction vs. USC
Iowa will endure a turbulent three quarters where stability is hard to find, only to turn it on late and survive with a gritty road win similar to those at Northwestern and Indiana. The Hawkeyes will lean on its interior advantages for a key California survival effort. Iowa 71, USC 69.
Dargan Southard is a sports trending reporter and covers Iowa athletics for the Des Moines Register and HawkCentral.com. Email him at msouthard@gannett.com or follow him on Twitter at @Dargan_Southard.
-
Illinois6 days agoIllinois school closings tomorrow: How to check if your school is closed due to extreme cold
-
Sports1 week agoMiami’s Carson Beck turns heads with stunning admission about attending classes as college athlete
-
Pittsburg, PA1 week agoSean McDermott Should Be Steelers Next Head Coach
-
Lifestyle1 week agoNick Fuentes & Andrew Tate Party to Kanye’s Banned ‘Heil Hitler’
-
Pennsylvania2 days agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Sports1 week agoMiami star throws punch at Indiana player after national championship loss
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoNortheast Ohio cities dealing with rock salt shortage during peak of winter season
-
Technology6 days agoRing claims it’s not giving ICE access to its cameras