Connect with us

Lifestyle

On ‘House Hunters,’ we looked Pinterest-perfect. In reality, our marriage was falling apart

Published

on

On ‘House Hunters,’ we looked Pinterest-perfect. In reality, our marriage was falling apart

When my wife and I appeared on “House Hunters Renovation,” our onscreen lives looked perfect as our home was rebuilt. But offscreen, our family was falling apart. Although we transformed the kitchen with imported tiles and a French range plucked from our shared Pinterest board, viewers had no idea we were foster parents struggling to keep our marriage intact.

We all know that reality TV isn’t quite real. It thrives on exaggeration and half-truths. Over two months of filming in Atwater Village and Silver Lake, we were portrayed as a carefree, childless couple. In actual reality, we were a family of four, beginning the uncertain process of adopting the young brothers we’d fostered for almost a year. Two moms and two boys — “Even Stevens,” the boys liked to say.

Although social workers assured us our family would be permanent, the boys couldn’t appear on screen due to privacy rules. After saying goodbye to a baby we fostered the year before, we didn’t even mention them, in case things changed.

Onscreen, Mary and I enjoyed wine with friends, working out and walking our dogs — a narrative pieced together from one tightly scheduled day of filming. While we staged home improvement scenes and appeared concerned about appliances, real life was much more dramatic than the show’s usual “Where’s your closet?” moments.

Advertisement

The boys grew increasingly anxious as relatives they hadn’t seen since infancy expressed interest in guardianship. We acted as if we believed the idea was good for them — maybe it was. They had just begun calling us their moms, clinging to us as we facilitated visits with the relatives to ease a possible transition, not for us, but for them.

Our episode didn’t capture scenes of us consoling the oldest when his night terrors returned or taking calls from school on shoot days when the youngest begged to come home. We’d switch off our mic packs while convincing him to return to class, assuring him we’d always be there at the end of the day. I wondered how long we could keep that promise.

Amid fostering and renovations, we managed regular parenting duties too: karate, play dates and meltdowns. Hectic work schedules left us little time to discuss anything aside from home improvement and the boys’ activities. Meanwhile, we tracked every on-camera outfit in case producers needed to “make adjustments” later. We maintained a careful facade for the camera. For ourselves, too. I wanted our life to feel as good as it looked.

On weekends off from filming, I’d bring margaritas in an insulated bottle for family trips to the park, telling myself it was the same as brunch drinks with friends, which our schedule no longer allowed. Mary and I passed the bottle back and forth, our hands grazing, the only hint of intimacy those days.

As the renovation progressed, we began arguing. We clashed over the most minor things: schedules and meals. Our only alone time was spent sipping wine in front of the TV after reading the boys’ bedtime stories.

Advertisement

We started couples counseling toward the end of “House Hunters” filming — one more thing to fit into our week. We walked into our first session holding hands, but the vibe shifted as we settled onto opposite ends of the sofa. I went in optimistic, expecting tips on reconnecting, but Mary said she wanted space; things were too difficult. My heart pounded in my ears as the room blurred around me. I wondered if we were filming a different reality show. Surely, I was being “Punk’d.”

The mounting pressure of work, remodeling, filming and parenting — while facing the gauntlet of the foster care system and the boys’ increasingly likely departure — was taking a toll, for sure. But more distance felt like the opposite of what we needed. The boys had no idea anything was amiss. We presented a front of stability for their sake. As we trudged along, it became clear: We needed to gut-rehab our communication and lay the foundation for meaningful connection.

We began with daily check-ins homework from our actor-turned-therapist to share thoughts and feelings, not just the day’s events. Though awkward at first, these steps built trust and helped us reconnect, not just as co-parents, but as partners. Slowly, our walls came down.

After some delays, our renovation was complete. It should have been a happier time, but we moved in while preparing the boys to go live with their relatives. Though saying goodbye was heartbreaking, we knew it was likely best for all of us. Uncertain what kind of family we could provide if they stayed, we’d always miss them, but I also felt a tinge of relief having our lives back. Maybe now we could refocus and rebuild — a bittersweet transition.

We stopped arguing. We weren’t as stressed. We had meaningful conversations, not just rundowns of logistics. We went on dates, reconnected with friends and revisited shared and separate interests. We had the space again to be whole people who could show up for each other at our best. Our final counseling session was the day after the renovation “reveal,” when we pretended to see the finished house for the first time.

Advertisement

When the episode aired, we watched it over hefty pours of wine from our sofa, where I cringed into a velvet throw pillow each time I heard my recorded voice describe our new home as “Spanish-y.” Friends, family and even strangers asked about our filming experience. No one knew to ask about our secret children. It’s like they never existed.

During the ensuing year, we reflected on our past and wondered if we’d been chasing a checklist: Marriage? Check. House? Check. Kids? We realized we didn’t need a child to complete us — we were stronger than ever. But we saw how much the boys thrived with us, even under challenging circumstances. No, we didn’t need a kid, but maybe a kid needed us.

Today, our 12-year-old daughter, with us for over eight years, is officially adopted after a long, uncertain process. We continue to balance the demands of parenting and recognize our partnership is a never-ending project that can’t be adequately packaged for an hour of TV.

We recently revisited our episode for the first time, watching with our daughter tucked between us on the sofa, laughing at her onscreen moms. My recorded voice still made my palms sweat, but it reminded me not only of the time we renovated a house, but of all the years since, as we’ve rebuilt our lives and our family. We’re no longer interested in projecting perfection — we know it doesn’t exist. We clinked our glasses of sparkling water — our drink of choice these days — and marveled at how far we’ve come. We don’t even live in that house anymore.

The author is a writer and marketer living in Glendale with her wife and daughter. She wrote “A Kids Book About Foster Adoption” and is working on a memoir. She’s on Instagram: @j_murn.

Advertisement

L.A. Affairs chronicles the search for romantic love in all its glorious expressions in the L.A. area, and we want to hear your true story. We pay $400 for a published essay. Email LAAffairs@latimes.com. You can find submission guidelines here. You can find past columns here.

Lifestyle

The 11 most challenged books of 2025, according to the American Library Association

Published

on

The 11 most challenged books of 2025, according to the American Library Association

The American Library Association’s list of the most frequently challenged books of 2025 includes Sold by Patricia McCormick, The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky and Maia Kobabe’s Gender Queer: A Memoir.

American Library Association


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

American Library Association

The American Library Association has released its annual list of the most commonly challenged books at libraries across the United States.

According to the ALA, the 11 most frequently targeted books include several tied titles. They are:

1. Sold by Patricia McCormick
2. The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky
3. Gender Queer: A Memoir by Maia Kobabe
4. Empire of Storms by Sarah J. Maas
5. (tie) Last Night at the Telegraph Club by Malinda Lo
5. (tie) Tricks by Ellen Hopkins
7. A Court of Thorns and Roses by Sarah J. Maas
8. (tie) A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess
8. (tie) Identical by Ellen Hopkins
8. (tie) Looking for Alaska by John Green
8. (tie) Storm and Fury by Jennifer L. Armentrout

Advertisement

Many of these individual titles also appear on a 2024-25 report issued last October by PEN America, a separate group dedicated to free expression, which looked at book challenges and bans specifically within public schools.

The ALA says that it documented 4,235 unique titles being challenged in 2025 – the second-highest year on record for library challenges. (The highest ever was in 2023, with 4,240 challenges documented – only five more than in this most recent year.)

According to the ALA, 40% of the materials challenged in 2025 were representations of LGBTQ+ people and those of people of color.

In all, the ALA documented 713 attempts across the United States in 2025 to censor library materials and services; 487 of those challenges targeted books.

According to the ALA, 92% of all book challenges to libraries came from “pressure groups,” government officials and local decision makers. While 20.8% came from pressure groups such as Moms for Liberty (as the ALA cited in an email to NPR), 70.9% of challenges originated with government officials and other “decision makers,” such as local board officials or administrators.

Advertisement

In a more detailed breakdown, the ALA notes that 31% of challenges came from elected government officials and and 40% from board members or administrators. In its full report, the ALA states that only 2.7% of such challenges originated with parents, and 1.4% with individual library users.

Fifty-one percent of challenges were attempted at public libraries, and 37% involved school libraries. The remaining challenges of 2025 targeted school curriculums and higher education.

The ALA defines a book “ban” as the removal of materials, including books, from a library. A “challenge,” in this organization’s definition, is an attempt to have a library resource removed, or access to it restricted.

The ALA is a non-partisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to American libraries and librarians.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

BoF and Marriott Luxury Group Host the Luxury Leaders Salon

Published

on

BoF and Marriott Luxury Group Host the Luxury Leaders Salon
On the eve of Milan Design Week, 15 of the industry’s most influential founders, executives and creative directors gathered at Lake Como’s newly opened Edition hotel for an intimate, off-the-record conversation about where luxury goes next.
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

We beef with the Pope and admire the Stanley Cup : Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me!

Published

on

We beef with the Pope and admire the Stanley Cup : Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me!

Promo image with Phil Pritchard, Alzo Slade, and Peter Sagal

Bruce Bennett, Arnold Turner, NPR/Getty Images, NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Bruce Bennett, Arnold Turner, NPR/Getty Images, NPR

This week, Phil Pritchard, NHL’s Keeper of the Stanley Cup, joins us to about taking the cup jet-skiing and panelists Alonzo Bodden, Adam Burke, and Dulcé Sloan beef with the Pope and get misdiagnosed. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending