Lifestyle
How Charlie Chaplin used his uncanny resemblance to Hitler to fight fascism
It’s been 85 years since The Great Dictator dazzled audiences in 1940. It was a big risk for one of the world’s most popular performers to take a stand against fascism on film.
Bettmann Archive/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Bettmann Archive/Getty Images
Hollywood studios did not want Charlie Chaplin to make The Great Dictator. When he first started writing the script in 1938, the U.S. had not yet entered World War II. In fact, it still enjoyed friendly diplomatic relations with Nazi Germany, as well as many lucrative business ones.
So Chaplin financed The Great Dictator himself. He took advantage of his uncanny resemblance to Adolf Hitler by playing an obvious parody of the Nazi leader, named Adenoid Hynkel, in the film. But the parallels continued, as noted in the 2002 documentary, The Tramp and Dictator.
“Charlie Chaplin, the Little Tramp, and Adolf Hitler, the leader of Germany, had more in common than just a moustache,” says the narrator. “They were born in the same week of the same month of the same year. A few years before Chaplin became famous as the Tramp, Hitler was a tramp. Both were outsiders who left their homeland to conquer the world. They became the best loved and most hated men of their time.”

In The Great Dictator, Chaplin played another character as well: a likeable Jewish barber who finds himself mistaken for the odious Hynkel and who, at the end of the film, delivers an incredibly moving speech.
“I’m sorry, but I don’t want to be an emperor,” he gently informs an assembly of Hynkel’s army and advisors. “I don’t want to rule or conquer anyone. I should like to help everyone if possible. Jew, gentile, Black man, white. We all want to help one another. Human beings are like that. We want to live by each other’s happiness, not by each other’s misery.”
Never before this film had the biggest star of silent film spoken aloud on screen.
YouTube
“Greed has poisoned men’s souls,” he continues, “has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.”
Later, Charlie Chaplin said he hoped that talking from his heart might even help to end the war.
“Machinery that gives abundance, has left us in want,” he says in the speech. “Our knowledge has made us cynical, our cleverness hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery, we need humanity. More than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost.”
Some critics found the speech overly sentimental. Chaplin’s film also stirred the ire of right-wing politicians and power brokers in Washington including Sen. Joe McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover, who wrongly accused him of being a Communist sympathizer. The FBI would eventually compile a 1,900 page file on him.
The film was indeed subversive, and impressively so, said science fiction legend Ray Bradbury, who was interviewed in the documentary The Tramp and Dictator before his death in 2012.
“Comedy is the greatest way to attack anything like a totalitarian regime. They can’t stand it,” Bradbury said. “At the end of the speech, [Chaplin] dares to remind you that you don’t have to go on killing. You don’t have to be a totalitarian. You can make do with the worst people in the world. Somehow you must.”
Chaplin ended his speech with an appeal to the humanity of everyone facing war. “Let us fight for the world of reason,” he implored. “A world where science and progress will lead to all men’s happiness. Soldiers, in the name of democracy, let us all unite!”
The Great Dictator was released years before the world was aware of the extent of Nazi crimes against humanity. Later, Chaplin said he never would have made a comedy about Hitler had he known. But 85 years after it debuted, his movie stands as a testament to how art can stand up to tyranny, and how hard it can fight.
Demonstrators in Berlin wave flags and hold a poster reading “Peace with Russia and China” as they rally in front of a screen displaying a scene from the movie The Great Dictator during the “Peace – Freedom – Referendum” demonstration in May 2025.
Ralf Hirschberger/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Ralf Hirschberger/AFP via Getty Images
Lifestyle
‘Flesh’ wins 2025 Booker Prize: ‘We had never read anything quite like it’
Flesh is Hungarian-British author David Szalay’s sixth novel.
Yuki Sugiura/Booker Prize Foundation
hide caption
toggle caption
Yuki Sugiura/Booker Prize Foundation
István isn’t one of the most talkative characters in literary fiction. He says “yeah” and “okay” a lot, and is mostly reactive to the world around him. But that quietness covers up a tumultuous life — from Hungary to England, from poverty to being in close contact with the super-rich.
He’s the center of David Szalay’s latest novel, Flesh, which just won this year’s Booker Prize. “We had never read anything quite like it,” said Roddy Doyle, chair of this year’s prize, in a statement announcing the win. “I don’t think I’ve read a novel that uses the white space on the page so well. It’s as if the author, David Szalay, is inviting the reader to fill the space, to observe — almost to create — the character with him.”
The Booker Prize is one of the most prestigious awards in literature. It honors the best English-language novels published in the U.K. Winners of the awards receive £50,000, and usually a decent bump in sales.
Szalay is a Hungarian-British author. Flesh is his sixth novel. In 2016, he was shortlisted for the Booker prize for his book All That Man Is. He told the Booker Prize that he was inspired to write Flesh after his own time living between Hungary and England, and noticing the cultural and economic divides that exist within contemporary Europe. “I also wanted to write about life as a physical experience, about what it’s like to be a living body in the world.”
Flesh beat out five other books for the win — including Susan Choi’s Flashlight, Kiran Desai’s The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny, Katie Kitamura’s Audition, Ben Markovits’ The Rest of Our Lives and The Land in Winter by Andrew Miller.
The other judges for this year were novelist Ayọ̀bámi Adébáyọ̀, critic Chris Power, author Kiley Reid and actor and producer Sarah Jessica Parker.

Lifestyle
The Frayed Edge: Are All Sustainability Certifications Broken?
Lifestyle
‘Predator: Badlands’ makes the monster the good guy : Pop Culture Happy Hour
Elle Fanning and Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi in Predator: Badlands.
20th Century Studios
hide caption
toggle caption
20th Century Studios
Predator: Badlands is the latest film about an alien race that hunts things using all sorts of space-gadgets. It’s told from the Predator’s perspective. He’s an outcast sent to a hostile planet to hunt down a deadly monster to prove his worth to his people – with Elle Fanning joining as an unlikely ally. It’s from the same team that made Prey. And both Predator movies are much better than they had any right to be.
Follow Pop Culture Happy Hour on Letterboxd at letterboxd.com/nprpopculture
To access bonus episodes and sponsor-free listening for Pop Culture Happy Hour, subscribe to Pop Culture Happy Hour+ at plus.npr.org/happy.
-
Austin, TX5 days agoHalf-naked woman was allegedly tortured and chained in Texas backyard for months by five ‘friends’ who didn’t ‘like her anymore’
-
Southwest3 days agoTexas launches effort to install TPUSA in every high school and college
-
Seattle, WA1 week agoESPN scoop adds another intriguing name to Seahawks chatter before NFL trade deadline
-
Hawaii2 days agoMissing Kapolei man found in Waipio, attorney says
-
World6 days agoIsrael’s focus on political drama rather than Palestinian rape victim
-
New Jersey2 days agoPolice investigate car collision, shooting in Orange, New Jersey
-
Seattle, WA2 days agoSoundgarden Enlist Jim Carrey and Seattle All-Stars for Rock Hall 2025 Ceremony
-
Southwest7 days agoArmy veteran-turned-MAGA rising star jumps into fiery GOP Senate primary as polls tighten