Connect with us

Fitness

5 more minutes of exercise can help you live longer | CNN

Published

on

5 more minutes of exercise can help you live longer | CNN

Daily step counts and reaching at least 150 minutes a week of exercise — lots of exercise guidance focuses on hitting specific step, mile or time targets. But for many people, especially those who are least active, these goals can feel daunting and out of reach.

Can you commit to walk for five minutes daily? Instead of asking what happens when people meet ideal exercise benchmarks, researchers examined what might change if people made small, realistic shifts in how they move and how much time they spend sitting.

The findings, published recently in The Lancet journal, suggest that even modest changes could have meaningful implications for your health and longevity.

I spoke with CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen about what the study found and how it influences what we think about movement in daily life. Wen is an emergency physician and clinical associate professor at George Washington University. She previously was Baltimore’s health commissioner.

CNN: What’s unusual about this new study of exercise?

Advertisement

Dr. Leana Wen: This study set out to answer a deceptively simple question: What might happen if people moved just a little more each day or sat a little less? Rather than focusing on whether people met established exercise targets, the researchers examined the potential population-wide impact of very small increases in physical activity and small reductions in sedentary time.

To investigate this question, they conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis, which means they combined and reanalyzed data from multiple other studies. The analysis included data from seven groups in the United States, Norway and Sweden, comprising more than 40,000 participants, along with a separate analysis of nearly 95,000 participants from the United Kingdom.

The researchers focused on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, which includes activities that raise the heart rate and make people breathe harder, as well as total sedentary time. They then estimated how many deaths might be prevented if people increased their activity by just five or 10 minutes a day or reduced their sitting time by 30 or 60 minutes a day.

CNN: What did they learn about the potential impact of small changes?

Wen: The key finding was that even very small changes in daily movement could be associated with meaningful reductions in deaths when applied across large populations.

Advertisement

The researchers modeled two different scenarios. One focused on people who were least active — roughly the bottom 20% of participants — and asked what might happen if this high-risk group slightly increased their activity. The second took a broader, population-based approach, looking at what might happen if nearly everyone except the most active 20% of individuals made small changes.

In the high-risk scenario, a five-minute-per-day increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among the least active participants was estimated to prevent about 6% of all deaths. When that same five-minute increase was applied across the broader population — excluding only the most active individuals — the potential reduction rose to about 10% of all deaths. These estimates suggest that modest increases in movement, when adopted widely, could translate into substantial population-level benefits.

The researchers also examined reductions in sedentary time. Cutting daily sitting time by 30 minutes was associated with smaller but still meaningful reductions in deaths. Among the least active participants, a 30-minute reduction in sedentary time was estimated to prevent about 3% of deaths, while applying that same reduction across the broader population could prevent about 7% of deaths.

CNN: Do these results support what we already know about exercise, sitting and longevity?

Wen: These findings are consistent with decades of research showing that physical activity is strongly associated with longer life and lower risk of chronic disease, while prolonged sedentary time is linked to higher risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and premature death.

Advertisement

What this study adds is nuance. Traditional exercise research and guidelines often emphasize thresholds; for example, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends at least 150 minutes a week of moderate-intensity physical activity such as brisk walking, dancing or gardening. These thresholds are based on levels of activity associated with maximal or near-maximal health benefits. While those targets are evidence-based, they could unintentionally reinforce the idea that anything less does not matter.

This analysis reinforces the concept that the relationship between activity and health is not all or nothing. Benefits begin at very low levels of activity, particularly for people who are starting from a sedentary baseline. Even incremental increases below guideline thresholds can contribute to better health outcomes.

The study also aligns with growing recognition that sitting time itself is an independent health risk. Even people who exercise regularly can spend large portions of the day sitting, and reducing sedentary time appears to confer benefits beyond structured exercise alone.

CNN: Does this study change existing exercise guidelines?

Wen: It does not change existing exercise guidelines, and it does not suggest that recommended activity levels should be lowered. The current guidelines remain grounded in extensive evidence and are designed to optimize health outcomes across many dimensions, including cardiovascular fitness, muscle strength and metabolic health.

Advertisement

What this research does change is how people might think about those guidelines. Instead of viewing them as a rigid standard that must be met to see any benefit, people can think of them as an aspirational goal along a continuum. Movement exists on a spectrum, and every step along that spectrum matters.

This framing can be particularly helpful for people who feel discouraged or defeated by traditional exercise advice. Rather than feeling that anything short of a full workout is pointless, people can recognize that small increases in daily movement are worthwhile and meaningful.

CNN: Who may benefit most from focusing on small, incremental changes?

Wen: As seen across numerous studies, the largest potential gains appear to be among people who are least active to begin with. For individuals who spend most of the day sitting and engage in very little moderate or vigorous activity, adding even a few minutes of movement represents a substantial relative increase.

This group includes many older adults, people with chronic medical conditions, individuals with physically demanding caregiving roles, and those whose jobs involve prolonged sitting. It also encompasses people who may feel intimidated by exercise culture or who have limited access to safe spaces for physical activity.

Advertisement

From a public health perspective, helping these groups move just a little more could have an outsize impact. Small, realistic changes are more likely to be adopted and sustained, and when spread across large populations, they can translate into meaningful reductions in disease and premature death.

CNN: For someone who feels overwhelmed by exercise advice, what is a realistic first step they could take today?

Wen: A helpful first step may be to shift the mindset from “exercise” to “movement.” Physical activity does not have to mean a gym membership or an intense, structured workout. It can be as simple as taking a brisk walk, taking the stairs instead of the elevator, and standing up and doing chores like vacuuming during the day.

The goal is not perfection or intensity but consistency. Adding a few minutes of movement to the day, or finding opportunities to sit less, can be a manageable place to start. Over time, those small changes can build confidence and momentum.

The central message of this new study is actually reassuring: Progress does not have to be dramatic to matter a lot. Small, realistic changes, repeated day after day, can add up in ways that benefit both you and your community as a whole.

Advertisement

Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN’s Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Fitness

I’m a strength coach – this exercise ‘looks easy’ but do it right, and you’ll have stronger obliques and better core stability

Published

on

I’m a strength coach – this exercise ‘looks easy’ but do it right, and you’ll have stronger obliques and better core stability

Heel touches are one of those exercises you look at and either think, ‘is that it?’ or ‘that looks nice and easy!’, depending on how much you enjoy core exercises. For those who’d rather avoid planks and crunches, this movement makes for a good alternative – and it can be done lying down.

This exercise targets the obliques, muscles that sit on the sides of our core and help stabilise the spine and support hip strength. Often underworked and underrated, these muscles are essential for everyday movements like bending down and twisting, which in turn may help prevent lower back pain.

Continue Reading

Fitness

Teen attitudes to exercise shape fitness years later

Published

on

Teen attitudes to exercise shape fitness years later

Getty Images

Teenagers who see exercise as fun, social and good for their health are significantly fitter by late adolescence than those driven by competition, pressure or fear of judgement, new research led by Flinders University shows.

Tracking more than 1,000 young people from age 14 to 17, researchers found early attitudes to physical activity strongly predict measurable aerobic fitness three years later.

The national study, using data from the long‑running Raine Study, was led by Flinders University in collaboration with the University of Notre Dame Australia, and has been published in Child: Care, Health and Development journal.

Researchers examined how teenagers’ beliefs about physical activity relate to aerobic fitness in late adolescence, measured using a standard laboratory cycling test at age 17.

Advertisement

The findings show that intrinsic motivations – such as enjoying physical activity, feeling healthy, keeping fit and spending time with friends – consistently matter most between the ages of 14 and 17.

Teenagers who value these factors are significantly fitter at 17 than those motivated primarily by winning, external rewards or pressure from others.

Senior author Associate Professor Mandy Plumb, a clinical exercise physiologist at Flinders University, says the results underline the importance of understanding what genuinely motivates young people.

“When adolescents see physical activity as enjoyable, social and good for their health, they are more likely to develop lasting fitness into later adolescence,” says Associate Professor Plumb, who is based at Flinders’ Rural and Remote Health NT.

Participants reported both how important they believed different outcomes of physical activity were, and how likely they thought those outcomes were to occur, including enjoyment, health benefits and appearance.

Advertisement

While most motivational factors remained relatively stable across adolescence, improving appearance was the only factor that increased in importance for both boys and girls by age 17.

Associate Professor Plumb says this reflects normal adolescent development.

“As teenagers get older, they become more aware of their bodies and how they are perceived by others, which is why appearance becomes more influential in later adolescence,” she says.

The study also identified clear gender differences in how motivation relates to fitness outcomes.

Boys tended to have higher aerobic fitness at 17 when motivated by competition, winning and external rewards.

Advertisement

Girls, by contrast, were fitter when motivated by enjoyment, feeling healthy, weight control and supportive social environments.

Associate Professor Plumb says these findings show youth sport and physical activity programs need to be more targeted.

“One‑size‑fits‑all approaches don’t work, particularly for girls during adolescence,” she says.

The research also highlights the damaging impact of negative social experiences, especially for teenage girls.

Girls who believed others would make fun of them for being physically active were significantly less fit by age 17.

Advertisement

“Fear of judgement can directly reduce participation in physical activity, leading to poorer long‑term fitness outcomes,” says Associate Professor Plumb.

Importantly, the study shows that attitudes formed in early adolescence influence later health outcomes – not just behaviour at the time.

“What teenagers believe about physical activity at 14 continues to shape their fitness several years later,” says Associate Professor Plumb.

The authors say the findings have clear implications for parents, schools, coaches and policymakers.

“Programs that prioritise fun, friendship and feeling healthy may be more effective than those focused on competition or performance alone,” says Associate Professor Plumb.

Advertisement

“Reducing pressure, bullying and overly competitive environments could help more young people stay active throughout adolescence.”

The authors say that schools and community sports organisations are well placed to apply the findings to help reverse declining physical activity levels among teenagers.

The paper, Perceptions of the Likelihood and Importance of Physical Activity Outcomes at 14 Years Affects Physical Fitness at 17 Years by Amanda Timler, Paola Chivers, Helen Parker, Elizabeth Rose, Jocelyn Tan, Beth Hands and Mandy S. Plumb was published in Child: Care, Health and Development journal. DOI: 10.1111/cch.70276

Acknowledgements: The Raine Study Gen2-14 year follow-up received funding from NHMRC (Sly et al., ID 211912), NHMRC Program Grant (Stanley et al.,ID 003209) and The Raine Medical Research Foundation. The Raine Study Gen2-17 year follow-up was funded through a NHMRC Program Grant (Stanley et al., ID 353514).

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Fitness

Monroe Center hosts Health and Fitness Day for Older Americans Month

Published

on

Monroe Center hosts Health and Fitness Day for Older Americans Month

The Monroe Center for Healthy Aging will mark Older Americans Month by hosting a Health and Fitness Day on May 27, according to a community announcement.

The event is designed to promote wellness, physical activity and a positive approach to aging, organizers said. Programming reflects the center’s philosophy that many factors influencing how people age — including nutrition, movement and mindset — are within individual control, according to the announcement.

Exercise classes and health screenings

The day begins with the Movin’ and Groovin’ exercise class at 9 a.m., followed by the EnhanceFitness class offered by the Monroe Family YMCA at 10 a.m.

Cholesterol checks will also be available, though space is limited and advance registration is required by calling 734‑241‑0404. Participants are asked to fast for eight hours before the screening, according to the announcement.

Advertisement

Lunch and educational presentation

A complimentary lunch will be served at 11:30 a.m. Registration is required and can be completed by calling 734‑241‑0404.

Following lunch, Chris Boudrie will present a program titled “The Pay‑Offs of Moving Your Body.” The presentation will examine the health benefits of physical activity and include a head‑to‑toe movement routine, according to the announcement.

Boudrie is a retired biology and health sciences professor at Lourdes University in Sylvania, Ohio, and currently works part‑time with the Monroe County Library System, and has been associated with the Monroe Center for Healthy Aging since 1987, organizers said.

Advertisement

This story was created by Dave DeMille, ddemille@gannett.com, with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at cm.usatoday.com/ethical-conduct.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending