Connect with us

Finance

To Boost Crypto, Break The Federal Grip On Americans’ Financial Rights

Published

on

To Boost Crypto, Break The Federal Grip On Americans’ Financial Rights

Despite the efforts of a few members of Congress, U.S. cryptocurrency policy remains a mess. For years, the Securities and Exchange Commission, most federal banking agencies, and many members of Congress have been outright hostile toward crypto.

But due to several new proposals, many crypto supporters are hopeful this hostility will fade. Over the last few weeks, Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), former President Donald Trump, and presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., all announced proposals for the U.S. to create a bitcoin reserve.

Given the sad current state of U.S. crypto policy, however, it is doubtful these kinds of proposals would get things on track. Still, they provide a great opportunity to have a more fundamental conversation about how to improve crypto policy. To paraphrase my colleague George Selgin, there’s surely a good policy somewhere between the status quo and these reserve proposals.

Advertisement

And it’s vital that Congress finds it.

Crypto enables new forms of digital payments, where users can bypass traditional third-party intermediaries, such as banks and broker-dealers. In other words, it allows for person-to-person electronic transfers of digital assets, including money.

In theory, allowing people to spend money electronically in ways resembling how they’ve been spending cash shouldn’t be controversial, especially in America. Nonetheless, this feature, along with the potentially disruptive nature of crypto, has proven too much for politicians to overcome.

Some people don’t like that crypto is a competitive threat to companies in the traditional payments industry. Others don’t like that it’s a threat to the existing anti-money laundering regime. (That’s an especially big problem because the federal government has drafted traditional financial institutions to act as an extension of law enforcement.) Other critics see bypassing these systems as a threat to the U.S. dollar itself.

Advertisement

The specter of these threats has made it difficult to develop sound cryptocurrency policy, but there are two basic principles—principles that have been foundational to the United States—that can help Congress address these concerns.

The first one relates to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects Americans against warrantless searches and seizures by the government. Thanks to the Bank Secrecy Act and its many amendments, Fourth Amendment protections have been all but eliminated when it comes to Americans’ financial records. The BSA gives law enforcement warrantless access to Americans’ financial records when they use a bank or any other financial institution.

Rather than adapt to the technology, many policymakers want to force crypto to adapt to a system that was designed to work with financial intermediaries. But crypto often upends the traditional role of intermediaries, thus forcing Congress to deal with how it has used those intermediaries to end-run the Fourth Amendment.

Many members of Congress (and the financial industry) now view the Fourth Amendment as a relic, somewhere between overly burdensome and an afterthought, unapplicable to modern America. But the Fourth Amendment was never supposed to be perfect. It represents, instead, the necessarily imperfect balance between the competing interests of individuals’ financial privacy and the government’s ability to gather evidence of a crime.

Reaffirming Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights, as Congress should do, would not be a license to commit crime. It would simply mean that law enforcement must demonstrate probable cause to a judge before accessing Americans’ financial records, just as they do for other searches.

Advertisement

The second principle—limited government—dictates that people, not government officials, are generally the best judges of which economic transactions are in their own best interest. Yet, the federal government now dictates which methods of payments are acceptable, which special institutions may facilitate those payments, and how those institutions may operate. Some members of Congress even want cryptocurrency banned because it doesn’t fit into this government regime.

The principle of limited government also answers the critics who see crypto as a threat to the U.S. dollar. The federal government is not supposed to be the provider of Americans’ money precisely because governments tend to debase currency. The U.S. government is supposed to refrain from debasing people’s money, and to protect people’s right to use money as they see fit. The government is not supposed to control every aspect of how people use their money or even what they use for money.

Critics of crypto assume that the government’s existing monopoly on money issuance maintains the dollar standard itself, but that’s incorrect. The prevalence of the U.S. dollar grew when gold and silver were recognized as money, and it does not depend on a specific type of paper currency or digital entries. The prevalence of the U.S. dollar derives from the country’s relatively strong legal and economic systems, especially as they pertain to protecting individual property rights.

Many advocates of cryptocurrency are frustrated because the federal government has failed to uphold these limited government principles and debased the currency. Americans now have effectively one choice for money, and even the person-to-person transfer of that currency is now highly regulated and surveilled.

So, it makes sense that so many crypto proponents are cheering on these reserve proposals in the hope that they will gain wider acceptance for Bitcoin. Unfortunately, these proposals do not directly address the underlying problems that have kept U.S. crypto policy such a mess.

Advertisement

Cryptocurrency will remain of limited use until Congress pares back the overly invasive regulatory framework that currently governs U.S. financial markets. To do so, Congress need only reaffirm the importance of the Fourth Amendment and a limited government.

Finance

From Love Island to Precious Metals, Prediction Markets Are Changing Finance | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

From Love Island to Precious Metals, Prediction Markets Are Changing Finance | PYMNTS.com

Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket are betting on growth across new financial products.

The industry’s product menu already stretches from political elections and World Cup matches to weather events. It now includes reality television, with Kalshi’s first markets tied to “Love Island USA” helping to more than double its weekly active female user base during part of June, illustrating how easily an exchange can turn an existing online fandom into a new trading constituency.

Prediction markets aren’t done there. Kalshi is reportedly in advanced discussions with regulators about expanding its perpetual futures business beyond cryptocurrencies into gold, other metals, foreign exchange and energy. Polymarket, meanwhile, has reportedly filed applications that would help it offer margin trading to customers in the United States.

Prediction markets, it would seem, are outgrowing the category that made them famous. They are evolving from event-based content into a new distribution layer for a potential next-generation of retail derivatives.

See also: Robinhood’s Memecoin Boom Shows Crypto’s Retail Market Is No Joke

Advertisement

Prediction Markets Are Becoming a Product Portfolio, Not a Betting Category

The event contract services business is evolving from predicting discrete events to trading continuous exposure to economically important assets. That transition is occurring just as the industry’s regulatory position is becoming more complicated.

A federal judge this week rejected Kalshi’s attempt to prevent New York from applying state gambling laws to its sports contracts. Last month, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) sued the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and its chairman, Michael Selig, challenging a decision to let Kalshi and crypto exchange Coinbase list perpetual futures.

The result is a market in which product demand may be the easy part. The harder question is whether prediction platforms can develop a compliance system broad enough to support everything from television finales to leveraged commodity trades.

The Love Island contracts, for example, expose the prediction market category’s fundamental surveillance problem. Television episodes are produced before they are broadcast, meaning cast members, production staff, editors and others can possess information unavailable to the public. Similar informational asymmetries arise around economic announcements, court decisions, corporate events and government actions. The more subjects a platform makes tradable, the more types of potential insiders it must identify.

Goldman Sachs prohibited employees from participating in financial and political event contracts that could create actual or perceived conflicts involving the bank, its clients or the financial industry, particularly when workers could possess confidential corporate or macroeconomic information.

Advertisement

The Senate unanimously adopted a rule in April prohibiting senators, staff and officers from participating in prediction markets. Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs followed this month with an executive order prohibiting state executive branch employees from using nonpublic government information for prediction market profits.

Read also: Prediction Markets Turn Uncertainty Into a Business Model

A Short History of Prediction Market Products and U.S. Regulation

Despite all the action, prediction markets began as relatively constrained experiments in information aggregation. The CFTC said market operators have sought agency guidance since the early 1990s, and the first prediction market was designated as a federally regulated contract market in 2004. The central idea was that putting money behind a forecast could aggregate dispersed information more effectively than polls, surveys or expert opinion.

The model remained small partly because regulators treated event contracts as exceptional products. Contracts tied to economic indicators, elections or entertainment did not fit comfortably within either traditional futures regulation or state gambling frameworks.

Polymarket demonstrated the potential and limitations of operating outside that system. In 2022, the CFTC ordered the company to pay a $1.4 million penalty and wind down markets that violated federal derivatives laws. Polymarket later returned to the U.S. by acquiring federally licensed exchange and clearing infrastructure, creating a regulated domestic operation that is separate from its crypto-based international platform.

Advertisement

PYMNTS reported in September that when the CFTC issued a no-action letter regarding event contracts in response to a request from two businesses owned by Polymarket, it in essence gave Polymarket a regulatory green light to re-enter the U.S. market.

The industry’s short history, in other words, is not primarily a progression from one betting topic to another. It is a progression from restricted forecasting experiment to full-scale exchange infrastructure. That direction of travel appears to be continuing.

Continue Reading

Finance

How AI Is Evolving in Sage Intacct and What It Means for Finance Teams | CBIZ

Published

on

How AI Is Evolving in Sage Intacct and What It Means for Finance Teams | CBIZ

Organizations are shifting their focus from isolated use cases and standalone tools to connect AI directly to financial data across workflows.

Recent updates to Sage Intacct reflect this trend. The latest capabilities embed AI within everyday processes while also enabling finance teams to extend AI capabilities beyond Sage’s core system in a secure and governed way.

Introducing Finance AI

Sage Intacct has reached a major milestone with the release of Finance AI, now available to all customers at no cost through May 2027.

Finance AI represents the next phase of embedded AI, bringing together purpose-built Sage Copilot and AI agent capabilities for finance teams.

This enables Sage Intacct users to begin applying AI in their workflows immediately, without requiring budget approval or long-term commitment.

Advertisement

With Finance AI extended, teams can:

  • Test AI-driven workflows in a real environment;
  • Identify high-value use cases across finance; and
  • Build internal adoption and confidence before investing further.

For many organizations, this will serve as the starting point for AI adoption, allowing them to test the technology and expand into more advanced use cases over time.

AI Inside and Around Sage Intacct

Sage continues to expand its AI capabilities through Sage Copilot and a growing set of AI agents designed to streamline operations and improve decision-making across finance.

Applications include:

  • Automating invoice processing to reduce manual effort and errors;
  • Enabling natural language queries to move from question to insight faster;
  • Supporting the close process with task tracking and guidance; and
  • Identifying unusual activity in real time.

With AI now available directly within financial workflows, teams no longer need to work outside the system to incorporate AI enhancements.

Sage is also expanding AI integration capabilities by giving organizations the ability to connect external AI tools to their financial data.

Extending AI with the Sage Intacct AI Gateway

The Sage Intacct AI Gateway is a key part of the platform’s evolution.

Advertisement

AI Gateway makes secure, AI-enabled access to the Sage Intacct REST API and MCP Server available to all customers and partners.

This opens the door for organizations to build AI solutions that align with their existing tools, processes, and architecture.

With the AI Gateway, finance teams can:

  • Connect external AI tools directly to Sage Intacct data;
  • Build custom AI-driven workflows and use cases;
  • Maintain existing role-based access and permissions; and
  • Use their preferred AI platforms without requiring a specific model or vendor.

In short, it enables organizations to customize their AI while connecting it securely to their financial system.

The Sage Intacct MCP Server: A Controlled Approach to AI Access

At the center of the AI Gateway is the Sage Intacct MCP Server, a secure orchestration layer that manages AI application interactions with Sage Intacct through a single governed endpoint.

Rather than allowing direct, uncontrolled access to financial data, the MCP Server centralizes how AI tools interact with the system.

Advertisement

Key characteristics include:

  • Real-time, read-only access to core financial areas such as AP, AR, GL, cash management, purchasing, and order entry;
  • Compatibility with MCP-enabled AI clients; and
  • Governance and security aligned with existing user permissions.

The MCP Server does not write data and is not a standalone AI tool. As a read-only model, MCP Server helps ensure data integrity while enabling AI-driven insights and workflows.

Connecting Existing AI Tools with the MCP Connector

To further simplify adoption, Sage has introduced a newly released MCP connector that allows organizations to connect existing AI tools to Sage Intacct.

This removes the need for complex custom integrations and makes it easier to:

  • Bring financial data into broader AI workflows;
  • Extend existing AI investments; and
  • Quickly test and scale new use cases.

Instead of starting from scratch, organizations can build on what they already have while maintaining the governance advantages within the MCP framework.

How These Pieces Work Together

Sage’s AI strategy is built around flexibility and choice. Recent updates enable:

  • Sage Copilot and AI agents bring AI directly into the Sage Intacct experience;
  • AI Gateway and MCP Server enable secure access for external AI tools; and
  • MCP connector links those tools to real financial data.

This layered approach allows organizations to start with embedded capabilities and expand into customized AI solutions as their needs evolve.

Why This Matters

Finance teams are under increasing pressure to deliver faster insights, reduce manual work, and support strategic decision-making.

Advertisement

AI can help address these challenges, but only if it is connected to the data that matters most.

These Sage Intacct updates make it possible to:

  • Access and use financial data within AI tools securely;
  • Extend AI across systems instead of keeping it siloed; and
  • Maintain control, governance, and auditability.

This is a shift from isolated automation to connected, data-driven workflows.

How CBIZ Can Help

As a leading Sage VAR partner, CBIZ works with organizations to evaluate where AI can drive the most impact. If you’re exploring how to connect AI to your financial data or want to better understand where to start your AI journey, our team can help you define the right approach and build a roadmap aligned to your goals.

Connect with a member of our team to explore how Finance AI, Sage Copilot, and the AI Gateway can support your organization.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Treasury Pick Queried on Iran War Fallout to Face Senate Finance

Published

on

Treasury Pick Queried on Iran War Fallout to Face Senate Finance

The Senate Finance Committee is set to hear from a panel of Treasury nominees that includes a pick Democrats said was unaware of economic fallout planning ahead of the Iran war and a former executive at Secretary Scott Bessent’s hedge fund.

The July 16 confirmation includes George McMaster, who was the trading chief at Key Square Group, a macro hedge fund run by Bessent, and Sriprakash Kothari, whose behind-the-scenes answers to the panel during the vetting process raised red flags for ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) announced Thursday the panel will consider McMaster and Kothari …

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending