Finance
State aims to reclaim $850K from campaign finance vendor
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — The state is now looking to recoup around $850,000 from a company they said didn’t meet deadlines to create a campaign finance website.
It’s The Guardian and was supposed to be up and running in October, but that didn’t happen. The Guardian is the name of the state’s online campaign finance reporting system.
“They were unable to deliver a compliant system,” said Ethics Commission Executive Director Leeanne Bruce Boone during their meeting on Friday.
The company at the center of it all is RFD and Associates, based in Austin, Texas. They were hired in December 2024 to begin the project of creating The Guardian 2.0.
The previous company, according to the commission, was with Civix. However, problems arose between the state and that company, so they had to shift and find a new vendor.
The commission appropriated around $2.2 million for the endeavor.
Months went by, and according to the commission’s timeline, deadlines were missed altogether.
Dates in June were missed, and in August, the company received a warning from the Ethics Commission. The Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) had to get involved in October and conduct an independent technical assessment.
The October date was proposed by the company, but it wasn’t met. In November, a formal notice of system failures and vendor non-compliance was noted.
“None of the milestones were met,” said Bruce Boone during the meeting. “Extensive corrective steps over many months. Written warnings were sent.”
At the Friday meeting, the commission voted to cut the contract with the company, and a contract with the previous one was then sent out.
“Terminate the contract and proceed with legal action,” said Bruce Boone.
Bruce Boone said that in total $850,000 was actually spent throughout this process on RFD. The new contract with Civix, she said, is estimated to cost over $230,000 and should last for three years. The effort is needed ahead of the 2026 election.
Now the commission has decided to bring in the Attorney General’s Office to see if they can get the money back.
“I take very seriously my role to ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent fairly and appropriately,” AG Drummond said in a statement. “My office stands ready to take legal action to recover damages, hold those responsible accountable, and work with the Ethics Commission to ensure the public has a reliable means to access campaign finance reports.”
News 4 attempted to get a statement out of the Chief Operating Officer of RFD and Associates, who had been in the meeting but quickly left after the commission voted.
“No comment,” said COO Scott Glover.
What would you say to taxpayers about that?
In response, he said, “I don’t agree with the ethics commission’s decision. That’s all I have to say.”
The Guardian had been delayed by several months, but the commission did respond appropriately and timely manner to requests made for documents.
The Guardian was back online Friday afternoon.
Suggest a Correction
Finance
Iran issues its largest-ever currency denomination as accelerating inflation ravages a financial sector deemed a ‘Ponzi scheme’ even before the war | Fortune
Iran’s economy was already crashing before the U.S. and Israel launched a war against the Islamic republic three weeks ago, and the relentless bombing since then has wreaked even more havoc.
In fact, high inflation triggered mass protests in December and January, prompting the regime to massacre tens of thousands of its own citizens. President Donald Trump warned Tehran against further violence and began a military build-up that led to the current conflict.
Inflation has worsened and apparently is so bad now the government issued its largest-ever currency denomination: the 10 million rial note (equivalent to about $7).
The new currency went into circulation last week, according to the Financial Times, and comes just a month after the prior record holder, the 5 million rial, came out.
As prices continue to spiral higher while the war boosts demand for cash, long lines formed to withdraw the fresh banknotes, and supplies quickly ran out.
Iran’s central bank said electronic payments are still the main methods for transactions, though the 10 million rial bill will “ensure public access to cash,” the FT reported.
But doubts about the viability of electronic payments have grown during the war as the U.S. and Israel target the regime’s levers of control.
In addition to bombing Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Basij paramilitary forces, a data center for Bank Sepah was also hit on March 11. Sepah is the country’s largest bank and is responsible for paying salaries to the military and IRGC.
“Iran is already in the middle of a severe cash liquidity crisis,” Miad Maleki, a senior advisor at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former Treasury Department official, said on X earlier this month. “As of Jan 2026, banks were running out of physical banknotes daily, with informal withdrawal caps of just $18–$30/day. Cash in circulation surged 49% YoY due to panic hoarding. The regime simply cannot pivot to cash payments, there isn’t enough physical currency in the system.”
Meanwhile, a currency collapse that began after last year’s U.S.-Israeli bombardment has fueled crippling inflation. The rial lost 60% of its value in the months after the 12-day war, and food inflation soared to 64% by October. It accelerated further to 105% by February, vaulting overall inflation to 47.5%.
The exchange rate fell as low as 1.66 million rials per $1 last month, though it strengthened to about 1.5 million rials as the U.S. temporarily lifted sanctions on Iranian oil.
Heightened demand for cash further stresses a financial system that was considered dubious even before the current war started three weeks ago.
The failure of Ayandeh Bank late last year forced the regime to fold it into a state-run lender, underscoring how fragile the sector was as bad loans piled up to politically connected cronies.
“This was largely theater. In reality, Iran’s entire banking system is insolvent, its balance sheets sustained by fiction rather than assets,” Siamak Namazi, who was a U.S. hostage in Iran from 2015 to 2023, wrote in a report for the Middle East Institute in January.
During his captivity, he learned from imprisoned former officials and business elites that politically connected borrowers bribed assessors to inflate the value of properties, which were used to obtain massive loans.
Instead of repaying the loans, borrowers just gave their properties to the bank, which sold them to other banks at a paper profit, according to Namazi. Those banks knew the properties were overvalued “garbage,” but played along in the scheme by dumping their own toxic assets in exchange and booking fictitious gains.
“The result is a closed-loop Ponzi scheme, sustained by mutual deception and regulatory complicity,” he added. “This practice has metastasized over the past 15 years and is far more extensive than this simplified description suggests. And this is only the banking system. Much of the rest of Iran’s economy is afflicted by similarly entrenched corruption and mismanagement.”
Finance
Should investors have bought gold or the S&P 500 5 years ago?
Remember 2020/21, when Covid-19 crashed stock markets? At their 2020 lows, the UK FTSE 100 and US S&P 500 indexes had collapsed by 35%. Nevertheless, 2020/21 was a great time to buy shares, because returns have been outstanding since.
But would I done better five years ago buying the S&P 500 or investing in gold, one of the world’s oldest stores of value?
Over the past five years, the S&P 500 has leapt by 70.4%. However, this capital gain excludes cash dividends — regular cash returns paid by some companies to shareholders.
Adding dividends, the S&P 500’s return jumps to 81.8%, turning $10,000 into $10,818. That works out at a compound yearly growth rate of 12.7%.
Then again, as a British investor, I buy US assets using pounds sterling. The US index’s return in GBP terms over five years is 13.6% a year. This equates to a five-year total return of 89.2% — still a handsome result for UK buyers of US shares.
For many, gold is the ideal asset in times of trouble. First, it has several uses: as a store of value (often in bank vaults), for jewellery, and as an excellent conductor of electricity in electronics. Second, it is scarce: all the gold ever mined would fit into a cube with sides of under 23m.
As I write, the gold price stands at £3,484.50. This is up an impressive 178.5% over the past five years. That works out at a compound yearly growth rate of 22.7% a year — thrashing the S&P 500’s returns.
Of course, gold pays no income, but these bumper returns can more than make up for this omission. Then again, with the S&P 500 worth around $60trn, its gains have been enjoyed by a much larger cohort of investors
Thus, over the past five years, investors have made more money owning gold than investing in the S&P 500. And speaking of high-performing investments, here’s another hidden gem from spring 2021…
As an older investor (I turned 58 this month), my family portfolio is packed with boring, old-school FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 shares that pay generous dividends.
For example, my family owns shares in Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY), whose stock has soared since 2021. As I write, Lloyds shares trade at 96.68p, valuing the Black Horse bank at £56.7bn.
Over one year, the shares are up 37.8%, easily beating major market indexes. Over five years, this stock has soared by 135.6% — comfortably beating most UK and US shares over this timescale.
Again, the above returns exclude dividends, which Lloyds stock pays out generously. Right now, its dividend yield is 3.8% a year, beating the wider FTSE 100’s yearly cash yield of 3.1%.
Finance
4 Smart Ways to Use Your Tax Return for Financial Planning
(Image credit: Getty Images)
In my work helping people think through retirement planning decisions, I often see people focus heavily on preparing their tax return but spend very little time reviewing it afterward.
By the time tax season ends, most people treat the document like a receipt: They file it, save a copy somewhere and move on.
But your tax return can actually be one of the most useful financial planning reviews you receive each year.
Article continues below
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
CLICK FOR FREE ISSUE
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.
Inside that document is a snapshot of how your financial decisions played out. Taking a closer look can reveal planning opportunities that may affect future tax bills, retirement strategies and other long-term financial decisions.
Whether you’ve already filed your return or are preparing it now, here are four areas worth reviewing.
1. Did you take the standard deduction or itemize?
One of the first things your tax return will reveal is whether you claimed the standard deduction or itemized deductions.
For the 2025 tax year (returns filed during the 2026 tax season), the standard deduction is:
- Single/married filing separately filers: $15,750
- Married filing jointly: $31,500
- Head of household: $23,625
Taxpayers age 65 and older can also claim an additional deduction:
- Single/Head of household: $2,000
- Married filing jointly/separately: $1,600 per eligible spouse
Looking ahead, the 2026 standard deduction increases slightly for inflation:
- Single/Married filing separately: $16,100Married filing jointly: $32,200
- Head of household: $24,150
The additional age-65 deduction for 2026 also rises to $2,050 for single or head of household filers and $1,650 per eligible spouse for married couples filing jointly or separately.
In 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) also introduced a temporary additional deduction of up to $6,000 per eligible taxpayer age 65 or older, available through 2028. This deduction begins phasing out once modified adjusted gross income exceeds $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for married couples filing jointly.
Another important change involves the state and local tax deduction (SALT). Taxpayers who itemize can now deduct up to $40,000 in state and local taxes under current law, although the benefit phases down at higher income levels.
What to review on your return: Look at whether your return used the standard deduction or itemized deductions. If you itemized, review Schedule A to see which categories contributed most to the deduction, such as:
- State and local taxes
- Mortgage interest
- Charitable contributions
- Medical expenses exceeding 7.5% of adjusted gross income
Why this matters: For several years, many households defaulted to the standard deduction because it was significantly larger than their itemized deductions. But with recent changes to the SALT deduction and the new senior deduction, itemizing may once again be relevant for some taxpayers.
Compare your itemized deductions with the standard deduction. If the numbers were relatively close, you may have opportunities to plan ahead.
For example, some taxpayers choose to bunch charitable contributions into a single year, coordinate the timing of property tax payments or track deductible medical expenses more closely so their deductions exceed the standard deduction threshold.
Your tax return shows which deduction strategy worked best this year and whether modest adjustments could change the outcome in future years.
2. Were any Roth conversions reported correctly?
If you converted funds from a traditional IRA or another pre-tax retirement account into a Roth account during the year, your tax return provides an opportunity to review how that decision affected your taxes.
A Roth conversion moves money from a pre-tax account into a Roth account, where future qualified withdrawals are generally tax free. The amount converted becomes ordinary taxable income in the year of the conversion.
What to review on your return: Start by confirming that the conversion was reported correctly.
You should typically see:
- Form 1099-R issued by the account custodian
- Form 8606, which tracks Roth conversions and after-tax IRA basis
- The converted amount included as income on Form 1040
Why this matters: Because Roth conversions are treated as ordinary income, they can affect several parts of your tax picture.
A larger conversion could:
- Push you into a higher marginal tax bracket
- Increase the portion of Social Security benefits that are taxable
- Affect eligibility for Affordable Care Act health insurance subsidies
- Increase future Medicare premiums through IRMAA (Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount)
Understanding how the conversion impacted your tax return helps determine whether the strategy worked as expected. Many retirees perform Roth conversions during lower-income years, often in the period between retirement and the start of Social Security or required minimum distributions.
Reviewing how this year’s conversion showed up on your taxes can help you decide whether future conversions should be smaller, larger or spread across multiple years.
Note: Medicare IRMAA premiums are based on income from two years earlier. A large Roth conversion today could increase Medicare premiums later if income exceeds certain thresholds.
3. Did a retirement account rollover accidentally create taxes?
Another area worth reviewing involves retirement account rollovers.
Rollovers commonly occur when you change jobs, consolidate retirement accounts or retire. For example, you may have rolled over a 401(k) from a former employer into an IRA.
When handled properly as a direct rollover or trustee-to-trustee transfer, these rollovers generally should not create a taxable event. However, they will still appear on your tax return.
What to review on your return: Typically you will see:
- The total distribution amount reported on Form 1040
- The taxable amount listed as zero
- The word “ROLLOVER” next to the entry
If the taxable amount is greater than zero, it may indicate that the rollover was not completed correctly.
Why this matters: Rollovers can accidentally create taxable income if they are handled incorrectly.
This can occur when a rollover is done indirectly instead of directly. With an indirect rollover:
- The funds are first distributed to you
- You must redeposit them into another retirement account within 60 days
And if the distribution came from an employer retirement plan, the plan must generally withhold 20% for federal taxes when funds are paid directly to you, unless the distribution is sent directly to the receiving retirement account or the check is made payable to the receiving plan.
If the full distribution is not redeposited within the required timeframe, part of the distribution may become taxable.
Reviewing your tax return helps confirm that retirement account transfers were handled correctly and did not accidentally trigger taxable income.
Pro tip: Whenever possible, request a direct rollover or trustee-to-trustee transfer. This avoids mandatory withholding and eliminates the risk of missing the 60-day redeposit deadline.
4. Did you receive a tax refund or owe taxes at filing?
Your tax return also reveals how closely your tax withholding matched your actual tax liability.
As income sources change, especially during the transition to retirement, withholding may no longer align with the taxes you ultimately owe.
What to review on your return: Start by reviewing two outcomes:
- Did you receive a large tax refund?
- Did you owe more tax than expected when filing?
A large tax refund may indicate that too much tax was withheld during the year. While refunds can feel like a bonus, they often represent money that could have been available to save or invest throughout the year.
Meanwhile, owing a significant balance at filing time may indicate that withholding did not account for all sources of income.
Why this matters: The federal withholding system was primarily designed for W-2 wage income. But as people approach retirement, income often shifts toward sources such as:
- Portfolio withdrawals
- Pension income
- Roth conversions
- Social Security benefits
- Consulting or part-time income
These sources may not automatically withhold enough tax.
If your withholding did not match your tax liability, adjustments may help prevent surprises next year.
Possible adjustments include:
- Updating Form W-4 with your employer
- Submitting Form W-4P for pension, annuity or periodic IRA withdrawals
- Requesting withholding from Social Security using Form W-4V
- Making quarterly estimated tax payments
Your tax return acts as a feedback loop that helps refine your withholding strategy for the year ahead.
Keep in mind: The IRS generally avoids underpayment penalties if you paid at least 90% of your current-year tax liability or 100% of the previous year’s tax. For higher-income taxpayers the threshold increases to 110% of the prior year’s tax.
What to do after reviewing your return
Once you have reviewed these areas, consider writing down one or two adjustments that could improve next year’s tax outcome.
That might include planning charitable contributions differently, spacing Roth conversions across multiple years, adjusting withholding or ensuring future retirement account transfers are handled as direct rollovers.
None of these decisions need to be complicated on their own. But over time, small adjustments can make a meaningful difference in how much you pay in taxes and how efficiently your retirement income is structured.
Your tax return already contains the information. Taking time to review it with a planning mindset can help you use that information more effectively in the years ahead.
Related Content
This article was written by and presents the views of our contributing adviser, not the Kiplinger editorial staff. You can check adviser records with the SEC or with FINRA.
-
Detroit, MI5 days agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Oklahoma1 week agoFamily rallies around Oklahoma father after head-on crash
-
Georgia1 week agoHow ICE plans for a detention warehouse pushed a Georgia town to fight back | CNN Politics
-
Science1 week agoFederal EPA moves to roll back recent limits on ethylene oxide, a carcinogen
-
Alaska1 week agoPolice looking for man considered ‘armed and dangerous’
-
Movie Reviews5 days ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India
-
Science1 week agoLong COVID leaves thousands of L.A. county residents sick, broke and ignored
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Turning Point USA Clubs Expand to High Schools Across America