Paying off student loans can seem like an impossible task, especially when high interest rates mean loan amounts keep increasing. But student loan relief can provide a lifeline for borrowers in need.
Learn More: I’m a Retirement Planner: 7 Ways I Am Guiding Clients Now That Trump Won
Discover More: How To Financially Plan for the New Year Under the New Trump Presidency
A 2024 survey by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau revealed that nearly 61% of borrowers who received debt relief reported the relief gave them the opportunity to make a beneficial change in their life sooner than they otherwise could have.
But with President-elect Donald Trump poised to take office in January, existing student loan relief programs are in jeopardy, meaning borrowers could face substantial changes to their monthly payments and their student loan debt.
Advertisement
In August 2022, the Biden-Harris administration launched the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan to help borrowers better manage their student loan payments. This income-driven repayment plan offers several benefits to borrowers:
Loan payments are calculated based on a borrower’s income and family size, rather than basing payments on their loan balance.
Qualifying borrowers’ remaining balances can also be forgiven after a certain number of years.
Many borrowers’ monthly payments are reduced, and some borrowers don’t owe monthly payments at all.
If borrowers keep up with their monthly payments, the Department of Education won’t charge monthly interest that isn’t covered by the payments, so borrowers’ balances will decrease, and they can more easily pay off the loans.
While on the campaign trail, Trump called President Joe Biden’s planned student loan forgiveness “vile,” blaming student loan relief for increasing the federal deficit.
Check Out: How To Financially Plan for the New Year Under the New Trump Presidency
Bill Townsend, founder and CEO of College Rover, predicted that Trump will end the SAVE plan as part of a concerted effort by many conservatives to change the appeal and direction of college education.
“Interestingly enough, there is a contractual law issue that will arise from public servants who were contractually bound to certain jobs in exchange for student loan forgiveness,” Townsend explained. “Assuming SAVE, which included this preexisting loan forgiveness contract, is voided, there will be the potential for a class action lawsuit against the U.S. government.”
Advertisement
However, Townsend predicted that Trump could void the lawsuit with an executive action.
According to Reilly Renwick, chief marketing officer at Pragmatic Mortgage Lending, ending the SAVE plan would disrupt income-driven repayment options that are essential to many borrowers, particularly those with lower incomes and larger student loan debt.
“A move to roll back these provisions could significantly affect [borrowers’] financial planning and repayment strategies,” he explained.
Renwick predicted that if the SAVE plan is terminated, many borrowers’ monthly payments would increase.
Advertisement
“Those enrolled in income-driven repayment programs would feel the brunt of the impact,” he explained. “This is especially prevalent for borrowers with a larger student loan balance but lower incomes who rely on reduced payments, as they soon would have to face quite the financial strain if the plan were dismantled.”
In November, the Biden administration began the process of implementing two student loan repayment options. Recognizing that Trump likely would end the SAVE plan, these new plans offer additional support to borrowers.
Income Based Repayment (IBR), an older program, allows borrowers to make monthly payments based on their incomes, but those rates are often higher than the rates provided by the SAVE plan.
The Pay As You Earn (PAYE) plan can give borrowers reasonable monthly payment amounts and features a 20-year student loan forgiveness term. To qualify, borrowers must have a financial hardship and must meet restrictions on when they took out federal student loans.
According to Renwick, it’s highly unlikely that any large-scale student loan forgiveness initiatives will be planned under the Trump administration.
Advertisement
“Given Trump’s prior opposition to broad forgiveness programs, it’s expected that any relief efforts would be narrower in scope,” he said, “potentially focusing on more targeted groups rather than sweeping cancellation policies.”
Townsend recommended that borrowers start planning for the potential implications of the student loan changes that Trump is likely to implement. He suggested that borrowers stop any frivolous spending, including curtailing vacations and eating out. Doing so can help borrowers to save money and better prepare for the larger loan payments they may face.
He recommended that individuals considering attending college reassess their college options. Local and community colleges may provide more affordable programs than out-of-state public or private schools. Even if you receive a scholarship from a school that’s far away, recognize that you will still be responsible for travel costs, and those can add up.
“Borrow as little as possible and realistically look at career choices and potential salaries to make sure you can afford the education you have chosen,” Townsend advised.
When it comes to taking out student loans, Townsend highlighted the importance of being sure that you fully understand the loan. Take the time to read every contract. If you don’t understand the terms, ask a family member, family friend or high school counselor for help understanding the loan so that you can make a well-informed decision.
Advertisement
More From GOBankingRates
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Financial Experts’ 2025 Predictions for Student Loan Debt Under President Trump
HOLYOKE — Amid a financial crisis in Holyoke, city Auditor Tanya Wdowiak gave her two weeks’ notice to the mayor and City Council president on Thursday.
Holyoke Mayor Joshua Garcia said Thursday that he received Wdowiak’s email resignation but hasn’t had a chance to talk with her.
Garcia said he came into the office to an email that requested he accept her formal resignation, effective Nov. 28.
If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
WASHINGTON — The government shutdown is creating a lot of uncertainty and disruption for Alaska Native communities, and for tribal organizations that administer federal programs.
These include SNAP, for food assistance, and the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which subsidizes energy bills.
Ben Mallott, president of the Alaska Federation of Natives, said the prospect that both of those programs would run out of money, just as winter begins, puts some Alaskans in a life-threatening bind.
“Without LIHEAP, without SNAP, our communities, our tribal citizens will have to decide between fuel and food,” he testified to the Senate Indian Affairs Committee Wednesday.
During the pandemic, the Federal Subsistence Board allowed emergency hunting to improve food security. Now, with the government shutdown, Mallott said the Subsistence Board can’t even meet to consider it.
Advertisement
Since the second Trump administration began, advocates for Native American and Alaska Native people have stressed that programs that help them aren’t D.E.I. initiatives but the result of promises, treaties and laws. Now, between the administration’s cuts to government services and the shutdown, they say the government is dodging its responsibilities.
Hearing witnesses said tribal Head Start programs will run low on money if the shutdown extends into November, and that many agency experts tribes normally turn to have lost their jobs.
Pete Upton testified about the Trump administration’s plan to abolish a fund at the Treasury Department called the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. Upton runs the Native CDFI Network, whose Alaska members include the Cook Inlet Lending Center. He said tribal communities are often in banking deserts.
“Native CDFIs are typically the only financial institutions serving these communities, providing access to capital, credit and financial education where no alternative exists,” he said.
Early in the shutdown, the Treasury Department fired the entire staff of the CDFI Fund. With no one at the federal office to certify the CDFIs, Upton said it’s hard for the community finance organizations to attract private-sector and philanthropic investment.
Advertisement
Certification is “a stamp for investors to say that ‘you are investable,’” Upton said. With it, “we bring in private capital at a rate of eight to one.”
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, chair of the Indian Affairs Committee, said tribes face enormous uncertainty as the stalemate in Congress nears the one-month mark.
“We can’t figure out the path forward right now on our spending bills, although I am a little bit more optimistic on that today,” she said.
She didn’t elaborate but said earlier this week that senators are engaged in productive talks.
Police cruisers parked in the Stamford Police Department parking lot photographed on August 7, 2024.
Arnold Gold/Hearst Connecticut Media
STAMFORD — A member of the Stamford Board of Representatives said he was “disgusted” by the city’s Board of Finance’s decision to delay a potential increase in budgeted officers for the city’s police department.
“I’m angry,” said Sean Boeger, D-15, during the Board of Representatives’ Fiscal Committee meeting Monday.
Article continues below this ad
Boeger is also a sergeant in the Stamford Police Department. The increase, which was on the committee’s agenda, would have created 13 more officer positions in the department. A grant would help pay for six of the 13 new positions.
Advertisement
It would’ve brought the total number of officers in the patrol division from 217 to 230, resulting in a 300-person force when all other ranks are considered. In the early 2000s, the department had 314 budgeted sworn officers, according to Chief of Police Timothy Shaw.
Lou DeRubeis, Stamford’s director of public safety, health and welfare, said the proposed increase was the first “in quite a number of years.”
The Board of Finance, however, during its Oct. 9 meeting, voted to hold the increase and asked the police department to provide more information, such as where the officers would be used and the total cost of hiring them outside of wages, such as health insurance and overtime.
Article continues below this ad
Boeger said during Monday’s fiscal committee meeting that he believed there were four officers assigned to traffic enforcement because “patrol demand is so high.” He said the department should be able to double the number of officers for traffic enforcement, which he said was “the top gripe of our citizenry.”
Advertisement
He also said the department was “lucky if we could cover the high schools when it’s busy.”
“If we want to be responsible and we want to have the nice things that a nice city like Stamford should have…we have to do something about this,” Boeger said.
Boeger said the department had opened up testing for new positions and that the department can’t send people to police academies, whether the city’s own or others, until the new positions are approved.
Article continues below this ad
“We’re gambling with open positions based on academy availability,” Boeger said.
Advertisement
Amiel Goldberg, D-13, said he wanted members of the committee to reach out to the Board of Finance to “let them know how deeply disappointed and frustrated our committee is.”
There had been an attempt to add the 13 police officer positions during the most recent budget process, but the Board of Finance cut the funding for those jobs.
At that time, members of the board said to come back with the request once the department filled out the rest of their 287 budgeted officer positions. The department will reach that goal by December, Bridget Fox, chief of staff of the mayor’s office, said during the Oct. 9 meeting.
Article continues below this ad
Shaw, in an interview before the fiscal committee meeting, said getting more people for the department would mean less people have to work overtime and because of that, less people would burn out and leave the force. Half the budgeted overtime, he said, is for the patrol division.
Advertisement
During the Oct. 9 meeting, the chief said the 13-person increase could result in a $500,000 reduction in overtime costs.
Laura Burwick, a member of the Board of Finance, said during the Oct. 9 meeting the request of $743,941 for the new positions was “a huge additional expense to the budget” and that she wanted to “see a little bit of the analysis that went into this.”
Article continues below this ad
Geoff Alswanger, a member of the finance board, said during that meeting that there have been “many sessions” where the board had “angst at the management” of the city’s pension funds and that the board “can’t ignore that as part of this equation.”
Boeger, however, during Monday’s meeting, said the department “has no power or control over that.”