Connect with us

Finance

Finally! The Fed Recognizes Inflation’s Retreat; Financial Markets Celebrate

Published

on

Finally! The Fed Recognizes Inflation’s Retreat; Financial Markets Celebrate

Despite the fact that markets were 90%+ certain that the Fed was done hiking, both the equity and fixed-income markets were surprised that the hawkishness, that had been so prevalent for the past 18 months, had completely disappeared. We were surprised, too! The dovish policy statement and Chair Powell’s demeanor complemented each other. We think that most of the Fed meeting was devoted to what the rate cutting cycle should look like and its cadence. Clearly, the Fed is now reading from the same hymnal as the markets regarding the inflation devil. Officially, then, the inflation war is over and the inflation foe has been vanquished. And, as we predicted in our September 22nd blog, “Higher for Longer” did prove to be “transitory.”

Market reaction was swift in both the equities and fixed-income markets. The S&P 500, already near an all-time high, rose 1.4% on Fed Day (Wednesday, December 13th) and bonds had a monster rally as seen in the chart of the 10-Yr. Treasury whose yield touched 5% just two months ago. On Friday (December 15th) it closed at 3.915% and, we believe, is headed lower.

Last Tuesday (December 12th), the day before the Fed met, the odds of a rate cut at their March meeting was 40%. As of market close on Friday, they were 70%. The Fed’s Survey of Economic Projections (SEP), more widely known as the “dot-plot,” is published every quarter. The one published after the recent meeting showed a median Fed Funds Rate of 4.625% at the end of 2024, down 75 basis points from current levels (i.e., three 25 basis point rate cuts), falling another 100 basis points (four cuts) in 2025 to 3.625%, and then to 2.875% by the end of 2026 (3 more cuts) (see chart). And that is assuming a soft landing for the economy (i.e., no Recession). Of course, rate cuts will be swifter, and likely at the 50-basis point level, when the Recession arrives.

Advertisement

What happened to cause such an unexpected turn of events? We think that the reality of the rapid pace of disinflation finally set in, as we have discussed in our blogs for the last few months. Also, as noted by Rosenberg Research, the Fed’s own Beige Book, a quarterly survey of business conditions in each of the 12 Federal Reserve districts, told them that eight of the 12 districts reported either zero growth or actual declines, a result that was worse than Beige Book reports leading up to either the ’01 or ’08 Recessions.

In the after meeting press conference, Chairman Powell’s demeanor was anything but hawkish. While leaving himself and the FOMC an out in case inflation flared up, he admitted that the Fed’s hiking cycle was likely over, and that the next Fed move would be a cut. Once again, he didn’t commit to when the first rate cut would occur, but, as noted above, market odds show a 70% likelihood that the first cut will be in March. If history is any guide, the average number of months between the first pause and the first rate cut is nine. March is the eighth forward month (close enough for government work!).

Advertisement

Inflation – CPI

Playing a key role in all of this has been the inflation data. Both CPI and PPI reports came out this week, and both were supportive of the view that inflation had been beaten. The CPI, while still elevated in the year over year headline (3.1%), is actually exhibiting some signs of deflation, especially on the goods side. The table shows the annualized inflation rate for various time periods over the past year.

Note that over the past three months, inflation has quickly cooled, a major factor in the Fed’s move toward dovishness and the bond market’s view of when the Fed will first cut rates. To show how prevalent falling prices are, the next table shows price changes for the month of November for selected goods and services, examples of the disinflationary (deflationary) environment that the economy has entered.

Inflation – PPI

The Producer Price Index, a leading indicator of future CPI results, came in at a non-inflationary 0.0% in November. October’s reading was -0.4%. Year over year, the PPI has grown just +0.9%. If one looks at PPI items similar to what is in the CPI, one would find that reading was also 0.0% in November after a -0.6% reading registered in October.

Inflation Overview

The war against inflation appears to have been won! We even see this in the price of oil (left chart), now hovering around the $70/bbl. level (closed at $71.79 on Friday). It is way off its $93/bbl. September-October peak, and this is with disruption in Russian oil delivery to the West and OPEC+ discussing further output reductions.

Part of the reason the price could fall was that the production slack and then some was taken up by U.S. operators (right hand chart above). Note that U.S. production has been rising for some time, including at the peak in oil prices in September-October. Because of these factors, it appears that the bulk of the large fall in the price of oil has been from falling demand.

Even the prices of food and used cars, two poster children for this inflation plague, are on the wane.

Other Observations

The Rents Issue: The CPI has been buoyed higher by the lagging rents issue. But, as we get further and further into 2024, it will be pulled down by those very rents. As noted in prior blogs, shelter costs weigh in at a 1/3rd weight in the CPI, but are lagged 12 months. In other words, the current CPI is using rents from a year ago. On the chart above, the purple line shows the true picture of rents (-1.1% in November) and how rapidly they have declined. The blue line is the rental number used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) in the CPI calculations (7.2% in October), and the red line is the resulting CPI (3.2% in October).

By mid-2024, the CPI shelter component will be approaching negative territory. And, once there, it is likely to stay simply due to the record supply of new apartments that will be coming on line.

According to Rosenberg Research, the faulty shelter methodology used by the BLS added 220 basis points to the headline CPI. That is, the CPI would currently be below 1% if accurate, up to date, rents were used. So, it’s not a wonder why the Fed has turned dovish!

Banks – Lending and Delinquencies: The U.S. economy runs on credit. The left hand side of the chart below shows that banks have stopped lending, i.e., commercial and industrial loan balances are the same as they were a year ago. The right hand side shows that consumers have run out of gas. Note the steep upward slope in delinquencies. No lending; rising delinquencies – a formula for banking headaches and an economy that will come to a screeching halt without its needed flow of credit.

Final Thoughts

The Fed has finally recognized that inflation is dead. The November CPI and PPI reports nailed that. The rate at which rates will come down depends on the health of the economy. The next Fed meeting is in March. That’s when we think the first rate cut will occur. We have held this position for several months; nice to see that the markets have caught up (70% chance per Bloomberg).

Advertisement

There are too many companies announcing layoffs – it seems like every day another major layoff is announce. Challenger, Gray and Christmas data on layoffs and job openings have been downbeat. While Retail Sales for November surprised slightly to the upside, Johnson Redbook same store sales were quite negative, so we expect that November’s Retail Sales numbers will be revised down when December’s sales are announced in mid-January. In addition, Retail hired many fewer seasonal employees than normal, and we think this is a prelude to disappointing holiday sales.

We still see 2024 as a Recession year!

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all our readers!

(Joshua Barone and Eugene Hoover contributed to this blog)

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Asian shares slide and US futures and dollar drop after Wall Street’s winning week

Published

on

Asian shares slide and US futures and dollar drop after Wall Street’s winning week

HONG KONG (AP) — Asian shares fell Monday and U.S. futures and the dollar weakened after Moody’sRatings downgraded the sovereign credit rating for the United States because of its failure to stem a rising tide of debt.

The future for the S&P 500 lost 0.9% while that for the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.6%. The U.S. dollar slipped to 145.14 Japanese yen from 145.65 yen. The euro was unchanged at $1.1183.

Chinese markets fell after the government said retail sales rose 5.1% in April from a year earlier, less than expected. Growth in industrial output slowed to 6.1% year-on-year from 7.7% in March.

That could mean rising inventories if production outpaces demand even more than it already does. But it also may reflect some of the shipping boom before some of U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods took effect.

“After an improvement in March, China’s economy looks to have slowed again last month, with firms and households turning more cautious due to the trade war,” Julian Evans-Pritchard of Capital Economics said in a report.

Advertisement

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng lost 0.7% to 23,184.74 and the Shanghai Composite Index edged 0.2% lower to 3,361.72.

Tokyo’s Nikkei 225 gave up 0.4% to 37,605.85 while the Kospi in Seoul dropped 1% to 2,600.57.

Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 declined 0.1% to 8,333.80.

Taiwan’s Taiex was 0.8% lower.

Wall Street cruised to a strong finish last week as U.S. stocks glided closer to the all-time high they set just a few months earlier, though it may feel like an economic era ago.

Advertisement

The S&P 500 rose 0.7% to 5,958.38 for a fifth straight gain. It has rallied to within 3% of its record set in February after it briefly dropped roughly 20% below it last month.

Gains have been driven by hopes that Trump will lower his tariffs against other countries after reaching trade deals with them.

The Dow industrials added 0.8% to 42,654.74, and the Nasdaq composite climbed 0.5% to 19,211.10.

Trump’s trade war sent financial markets reeling because they could slow the economy and drive it into a recession, while also pushing inflation higher.

This week featured some encouraging news on each of those fronts. The United States and China announced a 90-day stand-down in most of their punishing tariffs against each other, while a couple of reports on inflation in the United States came in better than economists expected.

Advertisement

That uncertainty has been hitting U.S. households and businesses, raising worries that they may freeze their spending and long-term plans. The latest reading in a survey of U.S. consumers by the University of Michigan showed sentiment soured again in May, though the pace of decline wasn’t as bad as in prior months.

Continue Reading

Finance

How to block the financial scammers on social media

Published

on

How to block the financial scammers on social media

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Online scams are big business. In the EU, according to the most recent figures, online scammers defrauded consumers out of €4.3bn in 2022. Increasingly, they use sophisticated adverts, including AI-generated “deepfakes” of figures ranging from Elon Musk to the UK personal finance expert Martin Lewis, to lure individuals into disclosing personal data or investing in fraudulent schemes. The vehicle is often social media platforms, which profit indirectly from carrying the ads. No business, least of all some of the world’s most powerful, should be able to profit from fraud on this scale.

Though mechanisms are improving for reimbursing victims, generally by the banking sector, the harm done by such frauds is huge. It includes not just the immediate losses and stress to victims and their banks, but also the erosion of trust in respectable sources of information and the financial industry.

Getting fraudulent material taken down, however, can be a game of “whack a mole” — as the Financial Times discovered when deepfake ads were found on Meta platforms apparently showing its columnist Martin Wolf promoting fraudulent investments. The FT has established that these fakes were seen by millions of users; many may have lost money as a result. As soon as one ad was removed, others popped up from different accounts, with Meta’s systems seemingly unable to keep up, though they do now seem to have been stopped.

Advertisement

Circulation of fraudulent, indeed criminal, material cannot be justified. Given how hard it is to stamp out advertising after the fact, though, this is a case where prevention is better than cure. Social media should have a legal duty not to provide ad space to fraudsters in the first place. They ought to be expected to “know their customers” and be held liable, with proper enforcement and tough penalties, if they fail to block dissemination of fraudulent ads.

The EU is considering legislation on those lines. Member states are discussing proposals from Brussels to introduce a right to automatic reimbursement from PayPal, Visa, Mastercard and banks for customers defrauded by scammers. But an amendment submitted by the Irish finance ministry, and gaining traction in other EU capitals, would go further — by legally requiring online platforms to check that an advertiser is authorised by a regulator to sell financial services, and block it if not.

Brussels frets that the amendment would conflict with a provision in the EU’s Digital Services Act that online platforms are not required to conduct broad-based monitoring of content. There may be squeamishness over antagonising Donald Trump, who wants to defang EU regulation of US tech firms.

Yet having to verify whether financial advertisers are authorised does not constitute large-scale monitoring, and would only be required of very large online platforms or search engines. Some already do it, or have committed to: Google has a financial services certification programme in 17 countries, while Meta agreed with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority in 2022 to ban financial ads by firms not registered with the regulator. And the EU should prioritise robust consumer protection over the protestations of the US president and his Big tech backers.

A legal obligation to verify financial advertisers would not address the wider problem of celebrity deepfakes being used in scams and promotions linked to products ranging from cookware sets to dental products. But the fact that sellers of financial products must usually be registered with regulators opens a route to blocking a particularly harmful online fraud. The EU, and the UK, should set an example to other jurisdictions and take action now.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Walmart should ‘eat the tariffs,’ Trump says, after retailer warns of looming price hikes

Published

on

Walmart should ‘eat the tariffs,’ Trump says, after retailer warns of looming price hikes

Walmart (WMT) joins rocker Bruce Springsteen and pop music icon Taylor Swift as getting a verbal lashing from president Trump on social media this week.

The president ripped Walmart execs on Saturday for signaling tariff-driven price hikes that are poised to begin later this month.

“Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain. Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected. Between Walmart and China they should, as is said, ‘EAT THE TARIFFS,’ and not charge valued customers ANYTHING. I’ll be watching, and so will your customers!!!,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

“We have always worked to keep our prices as low as possible and we won’t stop. We’ll keep prices as low as we can for as long as we can given the reality of small retail margins,” a Walmart spokesperson told Yahoo Finance.

Walmart CEO Doug McMillon was among the CEOs who met with the president in late April to discuss tariff implications. A person familiar with the discussions told Yahoo Finance Walmart made a case to remove tariffs on China altogether as even lower tariffs would have major implications on prices for general merchandise items such as furniture and toys.

Advertisement

The Trump administration and China agreed to dial back tariffs for 90 days last week. The US tariff rate on China now sits at 30%, down from 145% at the height of the trade tussle between the economic superpowers.

“Low prices is what we stand for, and we’re going to keep prices as low as we can as long as we can,” Walmart CFO John David Rainey said on Yahoo Finance’s Catalysts (video above) this week following the company’s first quarter earnings. “But when you look at the magnitude of some of the cost increases on certain categories of items that are imported, it’s more than what retailers can bear. It’s more than what suppliers can bear.”

“And so we’ll work hard to try to keep prices low. But it’s unavoidable that you’re going to see some prices go up on certain items.”

Rainey said increases will be noticeable later this month.

Rainey added, “Well, if you’ve got a 30% tariff on something, you’re likely going to see double digits [in price increases].”

Advertisement

The most impacted areas for Walmart will include baby strollers, furniture, and toys. Price hikes in these departments could major impacts on suppliers such as Newell Brands (NWL), reports Yahoo Finance’s Brooke DiPalma.

Walmart’s earnings day was mixed as shoppers spent somewhat cautiously given the greater economic uncertainty.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending